TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp)
Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Förstner on his 65th birthday Sediments in harbours and nearby shipyards demonstrate widespread contamination with tributyltin (TBT). Therefore, reuse and relocation of dredged material from these locations are prohibited. Even if the International Marine Organization (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of soils and sediments 2005, Vol.5 (1), p.21-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Journal of soils and sediments |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Stichnothe, Heinz Calmano, Wolfgang Arevalo, Eduardo Keller, Arne Thöming, Jorg |
description | Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Förstner on his 65th birthday Sediments in harbours and nearby shipyards demonstrate widespread contamination with tributyltin (TBT). Therefore, reuse and relocation of dredged material from these locations are prohibited. Even if the International Marine Organization (IMO) convention concerning TBT-based paints is ratified (Champ, 2003) the TBT problem in sediments will continue to remain for many years due to the persistence of TBT. An electrochemical process has been developed to treat polluted sediments. Dredged materials with high and low TBT-contents were studied on a technical and a pilot scale. The treatment process was assessed by chemical analysis and a biotest battery. Additionally, an economic analysis was performed to check the economic feasibility of the process to treat dredged material from two different locations at different operating conditions. Furthermore an up-scaling estimation was performed to evaluate treatment costs at a larger scale, i.e. for a plant having a capacity of 720 000 t/a. Butyltin species and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were decomposed due to electrochemically-induced oxidation, while the treatment did not alter heavy metal and PCB concentrations. The bacteria luminescence test indicated a reduced toxicity after the electrochemical treatment, while the algae growth inhibition test and bacteria contact test did not confirm these results. Based on a small consumer price of 0.12/kWh, treating the high-contaminated sediment in the pilot plant would cost 21/m^sup 3^ and 31/m^sup 3^ for the low contaminated sediment, respectively. Assuming an industrial consumer price of 0.06/kWh for electricity in an up-scaled process with a capacity of 720 000t/a, the total treatment costs for the low contaminated sediment would be 13/m^sup 3^. The results of treating dredged material from Bremerhaven and the fine-grained fraction from the METHA plant show that the effectiveness of the process performance is more related to the binding form and sediment composition than to the initial concentration of TBT. The electrochemically treated material complies with chemical criteria for relocation of dredged material, but post-treatment, e.g. washing and/or reduction of remaining oxidants with Fe-II-salts, is needed to fulfil ecotoxicological criteria for relocation. Economic investigations have shown that the electrochemical treatment might be a technical option to treat TBT contaminated, dredged materia |
doi_str_mv | 10.1065/jss2005.01.128 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20154377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20154377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-b6c1cc026ecbfde651837604a182a30a00127779c63c54a30dbe98940f7b3df93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFavnhcPoofEmexmPwQPtfgFBYXG87LZbCAlX2bTg_-9qe3Ji6d5zPx4w3uEXCLECCK924SQAKQxYIyJOiIzFMgjyRUcT5ozHQGCOiVnIWwAmJzOM_KQPWaR69rRNlVrR1_QtS-qxrdjuKfZ4O2407RqqaUfVd2NdO1s7emNpn1_e05OSlsHf3GYc_L5_JQtX6PV-8vbcrGKLJNyjHLh0DlIhHd5WXiRomJSALeoEsvAAmAipdROMJfyaVPkXivNoZQ5K0rN5uR679sP3dfWh9E0VXC-rm3ru20wCWDKp1f_gsgl01qwCbz6A2667dBOIYwQiqmE_7rFe8gNXQiDL00_VI0dvg2C2XVuDp0bQDN1zn4Aeh5xjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>668382477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp)</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stichnothe, Heinz ; Calmano, Wolfgang ; Arevalo, Eduardo ; Keller, Arne ; Thöming, Jorg</creator><creatorcontrib>Stichnothe, Heinz ; Calmano, Wolfgang ; Arevalo, Eduardo ; Keller, Arne ; Thöming, Jorg</creatorcontrib><description>Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Förstner on his 65th birthday Sediments in harbours and nearby shipyards demonstrate widespread contamination with tributyltin (TBT). Therefore, reuse and relocation of dredged material from these locations are prohibited. Even if the International Marine Organization (IMO) convention concerning TBT-based paints is ratified (Champ, 2003) the TBT problem in sediments will continue to remain for many years due to the persistence of TBT. An electrochemical process has been developed to treat polluted sediments. Dredged materials with high and low TBT-contents were studied on a technical and a pilot scale. The treatment process was assessed by chemical analysis and a biotest battery. Additionally, an economic analysis was performed to check the economic feasibility of the process to treat dredged material from two different locations at different operating conditions. Furthermore an up-scaling estimation was performed to evaluate treatment costs at a larger scale, i.e. for a plant having a capacity of 720 000 t/a. Butyltin species and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were decomposed due to electrochemically-induced oxidation, while the treatment did not alter heavy metal and PCB concentrations. The bacteria luminescence test indicated a reduced toxicity after the electrochemical treatment, while the algae growth inhibition test and bacteria contact test did not confirm these results. Based on a small consumer price of 0.12/kWh, treating the high-contaminated sediment in the pilot plant would cost 21/m^sup 3^ and 31/m^sup 3^ for the low contaminated sediment, respectively. Assuming an industrial consumer price of 0.06/kWh for electricity in an up-scaled process with a capacity of 720 000t/a, the total treatment costs for the low contaminated sediment would be 13/m^sup 3^. The results of treating dredged material from Bremerhaven and the fine-grained fraction from the METHA plant show that the effectiveness of the process performance is more related to the binding form and sediment composition than to the initial concentration of TBT. The electrochemically treated material complies with chemical criteria for relocation of dredged material, but post-treatment, e.g. washing and/or reduction of remaining oxidants with Fe-II-salts, is needed to fulfil ecotoxicological criteria for relocation. Economic investigations have shown that the electrochemical treatment might be a technical option to treat TBT contaminated, dredged material. However, the technique is not fully developed and cannot remove all chemicals of concern, e.g. heavy metals. The decision as to whether this technique can be applied is site-specific and should be taken based on the case-by-case approach. Since biotests integrate the effects of all contaminants present in a sample, process-accompanying evaluation procedures need additional assessment methods such as TIE (toxicity identification evaluation) as a second tier following ecotoxicological tests, in which the reasons for the effects are identified. For reasons of sustainability, a much more effect-oriented and long-term cost effective approach should be applied in future to avoid the release of harmful substances into the environment. Life cycle assessment should be carried out to identify and quantify impacts of sediment treatment processes in order to take into account both the distant effects of local actions and local effects of distant actions.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1065/jss2005.01.128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Antifouling substances ; Chemical analysis ; Chemical treatment ; Contaminants ; Contaminated sediments ; Dredging ; Economic analysis ; Economics ; Electrochemistry ; Harbors ; Heavy metals ; Industrial pollution ; Life cycle analysis ; Metal concentrations ; Oxidizing agents ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Relocation ; Sediment composition ; Sediment pollution ; Tributyltin</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2005, Vol.5 (1), p.21-29</ispartof><rights>Ecomed 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-b6c1cc026ecbfde651837604a182a30a00127779c63c54a30dbe98940f7b3df93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stichnothe, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calmano, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arevalo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thöming, Jorg</creatorcontrib><title>TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp)</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><description>Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Förstner on his 65th birthday Sediments in harbours and nearby shipyards demonstrate widespread contamination with tributyltin (TBT). Therefore, reuse and relocation of dredged material from these locations are prohibited. Even if the International Marine Organization (IMO) convention concerning TBT-based paints is ratified (Champ, 2003) the TBT problem in sediments will continue to remain for many years due to the persistence of TBT. An electrochemical process has been developed to treat polluted sediments. Dredged materials with high and low TBT-contents were studied on a technical and a pilot scale. The treatment process was assessed by chemical analysis and a biotest battery. Additionally, an economic analysis was performed to check the economic feasibility of the process to treat dredged material from two different locations at different operating conditions. Furthermore an up-scaling estimation was performed to evaluate treatment costs at a larger scale, i.e. for a plant having a capacity of 720 000 t/a. Butyltin species and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were decomposed due to electrochemically-induced oxidation, while the treatment did not alter heavy metal and PCB concentrations. The bacteria luminescence test indicated a reduced toxicity after the electrochemical treatment, while the algae growth inhibition test and bacteria contact test did not confirm these results. Based on a small consumer price of 0.12/kWh, treating the high-contaminated sediment in the pilot plant would cost 21/m^sup 3^ and 31/m^sup 3^ for the low contaminated sediment, respectively. Assuming an industrial consumer price of 0.06/kWh for electricity in an up-scaled process with a capacity of 720 000t/a, the total treatment costs for the low contaminated sediment would be 13/m^sup 3^. The results of treating dredged material from Bremerhaven and the fine-grained fraction from the METHA plant show that the effectiveness of the process performance is more related to the binding form and sediment composition than to the initial concentration of TBT. The electrochemically treated material complies with chemical criteria for relocation of dredged material, but post-treatment, e.g. washing and/or reduction of remaining oxidants with Fe-II-salts, is needed to fulfil ecotoxicological criteria for relocation. Economic investigations have shown that the electrochemical treatment might be a technical option to treat TBT contaminated, dredged material. However, the technique is not fully developed and cannot remove all chemicals of concern, e.g. heavy metals. The decision as to whether this technique can be applied is site-specific and should be taken based on the case-by-case approach. Since biotests integrate the effects of all contaminants present in a sample, process-accompanying evaluation procedures need additional assessment methods such as TIE (toxicity identification evaluation) as a second tier following ecotoxicological tests, in which the reasons for the effects are identified. For reasons of sustainability, a much more effect-oriented and long-term cost effective approach should be applied in future to avoid the release of harmful substances into the environment. Life cycle assessment should be carried out to identify and quantify impacts of sediment treatment processes in order to take into account both the distant effects of local actions and local effects of distant actions.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Antifouling substances</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Industrial pollution</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Oxidizing agents</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Sediment composition</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Tributyltin</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFavnhcPoofEmexmPwQPtfgFBYXG87LZbCAlX2bTg_-9qe3Ji6d5zPx4w3uEXCLECCK924SQAKQxYIyJOiIzFMgjyRUcT5ozHQGCOiVnIWwAmJzOM_KQPWaR69rRNlVrR1_QtS-qxrdjuKfZ4O2407RqqaUfVd2NdO1s7emNpn1_e05OSlsHf3GYc_L5_JQtX6PV-8vbcrGKLJNyjHLh0DlIhHd5WXiRomJSALeoEsvAAmAipdROMJfyaVPkXivNoZQ5K0rN5uR679sP3dfWh9E0VXC-rm3ru20wCWDKp1f_gsgl01qwCbz6A2667dBOIYwQiqmE_7rFe8gNXQiDL00_VI0dvg2C2XVuDp0bQDN1zn4Aeh5xjA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Stichnothe, Heinz</creator><creator>Calmano, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Arevalo, Eduardo</creator><creator>Keller, Arne</creator><creator>Thöming, Jorg</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp)</title><author>Stichnothe, Heinz ; Calmano, Wolfgang ; Arevalo, Eduardo ; Keller, Arne ; Thöming, Jorg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-b6c1cc026ecbfde651837604a182a30a00127779c63c54a30dbe98940f7b3df93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Antifouling substances</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Industrial pollution</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Oxidizing agents</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Sediment composition</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Tributyltin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stichnothe, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calmano, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arevalo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thöming, Jorg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stichnothe, Heinz</au><au>Calmano, Wolfgang</au><au>Arevalo, Eduardo</au><au>Keller, Arne</au><au>Thöming, Jorg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>21-29</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Förstner on his 65th birthday Sediments in harbours and nearby shipyards demonstrate widespread contamination with tributyltin (TBT). Therefore, reuse and relocation of dredged material from these locations are prohibited. Even if the International Marine Organization (IMO) convention concerning TBT-based paints is ratified (Champ, 2003) the TBT problem in sediments will continue to remain for many years due to the persistence of TBT. An electrochemical process has been developed to treat polluted sediments. Dredged materials with high and low TBT-contents were studied on a technical and a pilot scale. The treatment process was assessed by chemical analysis and a biotest battery. Additionally, an economic analysis was performed to check the economic feasibility of the process to treat dredged material from two different locations at different operating conditions. Furthermore an up-scaling estimation was performed to evaluate treatment costs at a larger scale, i.e. for a plant having a capacity of 720 000 t/a. Butyltin species and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were decomposed due to electrochemically-induced oxidation, while the treatment did not alter heavy metal and PCB concentrations. The bacteria luminescence test indicated a reduced toxicity after the electrochemical treatment, while the algae growth inhibition test and bacteria contact test did not confirm these results. Based on a small consumer price of 0.12/kWh, treating the high-contaminated sediment in the pilot plant would cost 21/m^sup 3^ and 31/m^sup 3^ for the low contaminated sediment, respectively. Assuming an industrial consumer price of 0.06/kWh for electricity in an up-scaled process with a capacity of 720 000t/a, the total treatment costs for the low contaminated sediment would be 13/m^sup 3^. The results of treating dredged material from Bremerhaven and the fine-grained fraction from the METHA plant show that the effectiveness of the process performance is more related to the binding form and sediment composition than to the initial concentration of TBT. The electrochemically treated material complies with chemical criteria for relocation of dredged material, but post-treatment, e.g. washing and/or reduction of remaining oxidants with Fe-II-salts, is needed to fulfil ecotoxicological criteria for relocation. Economic investigations have shown that the electrochemical treatment might be a technical option to treat TBT contaminated, dredged material. However, the technique is not fully developed and cannot remove all chemicals of concern, e.g. heavy metals. The decision as to whether this technique can be applied is site-specific and should be taken based on the case-by-case approach. Since biotests integrate the effects of all contaminants present in a sample, process-accompanying evaluation procedures need additional assessment methods such as TIE (toxicity identification evaluation) as a second tier following ecotoxicological tests, in which the reasons for the effects are identified. For reasons of sustainability, a much more effect-oriented and long-term cost effective approach should be applied in future to avoid the release of harmful substances into the environment. Life cycle assessment should be carried out to identify and quantify impacts of sediment treatment processes in order to take into account both the distant effects of local actions and local effects of distant actions.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1065/jss2005.01.128</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-0108 |
ispartof | Journal of soils and sediments, 2005, Vol.5 (1), p.21-29 |
issn | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20154377 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algae Antifouling substances Chemical analysis Chemical treatment Contaminants Contaminated sediments Dredging Economic analysis Economics Electrochemistry Harbors Heavy metals Industrial pollution Life cycle analysis Metal concentrations Oxidizing agents Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Relocation Sediment composition Sediment pollution Tributyltin |
title | TBT-contaminated Sediments: Treatment in a Pilot Scale (9 pp) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TBT-contaminated%20Sediments:%20Treatment%20in%20a%20Pilot%20Scale%20(9%20pp)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Stichnothe,%20Heinz&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=21-29&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1065/jss2005.01.128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20154377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=668382477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |