Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach

Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach

To compare outcomes of radical hysterectomy (RH) across age groups based on surgical approach: minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs laparotomy (LP). Cross-sectional retrospective review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The Univer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2018-11, Vol.25 (7), p.1224-1230
Hauptverfasser: dos Reis, Ricardo, Andrade, Carlos E.M.C., Frumovitz, Michael, Munsell, Mark, Ramirez, Pedro T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Age Factors
Cervical cancer
Cross-Sectional Studies
Elderly patients
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy - methods
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy - methods
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Radical hysterectomy
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare outcomes of radical hysterectomy (RH) across age groups based on surgical approach: minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs laparotomy (LP). Cross-sectional retrospective review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent RH at a tertiary cancer center between 1990 and 2013. Patients were stratified by age group (
ISSN:1553-4650
1553-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.002