Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility
Gunsalus, Marcus, and Oransky discuss the need for institutional research misconduct reports to have more credibility. They highlight the central role of institutions to protect the integrity of their research and to investigate the allegations of research misconduct and then report the outcomes to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2018-04, Vol.319 (13), p.1315-1316 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1316 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 1315 |
| container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
| container_volume | 319 |
| creator | Gunsalus, C. K Marcus, Adam R Oransky, Ivan |
| description | Gunsalus, Marcus, and Oransky discuss the need for institutional research misconduct reports to have more credibility. They highlight the central role of institutions to protect the integrity of their research and to investigate the allegations of research misconduct and then report the outcomes to federal oversight agencies and other entities, including journals. They explore steps on how institutions improve their credibility including the development of a proposed checklist for research integrity investigation and the formation of consortia to provide external peer review of internal investigative reports. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.2018.0358 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2013517322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2675025</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2013517322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-dbfa170ec654a0724d6bc5960467b8e8d5a4035dd1f39849ac52386a7d0f79d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkLtPwzAQhy0EoqWwMjCgSCwsCX4_JoQqHpVakBDMkRM7IlVSF9sZ-t_jqNABLyf5vvvp7gPgEsECQYju1rrXBYZIFpAweQSmiBGZE6bkMZhCqGQuqKQTcBbCGqaHiDgFE6wYwZCrKbhfbEJs4xBbt9Fd9m6D1b7-ylZtqN3GDHVMf1vnY8herTXZynmbzb01bdV2bdydg5NGd8Fe_NYZ-Hx6_Ji_5Mu358X8YZlrgknMTdVoJKCtOaMaCkwNr2qmOKRcVNJKwzRNBxiDGqIkVbpmmEiuhYGNUEaSGbjd5269-x5siGWfNrRdpzfWDaFMCghDgmCc0Jt_6NoNPl03UlxBgimhiSr2VO1dCN425da3vfa7EsFyVFuOasdcWY5q08D1b-xQ9dYc8D-XCbjaA-PcocsFg5iRH6Oee5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2069032434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Gunsalus, C. K ; Marcus, Adam R ; Oransky, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunsalus, C. K ; Marcus, Adam R ; Oransky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>Gunsalus, Marcus, and Oransky discuss the need for institutional research misconduct reports to have more credibility. They highlight the central role of institutions to protect the integrity of their research and to investigate the allegations of research misconduct and then report the outcomes to federal oversight agencies and other entities, including journals. They explore steps on how institutions improve their credibility including the development of a proposed checklist for research integrity investigation and the formation of consortia to provide external peer review of internal investigative reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29532069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Academies and Institutes ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Biomedical Research - standards ; Consortia ; Credibility ; Integrity ; Investigations ; Professional misconduct ; Research centers ; Research Personnel - ethics ; Scholarly publishing ; Scientific Misconduct ; United States ; Universities</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2018-04, Vol.319 (13), p.1315-1316</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Apr 3, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-dbfa170ec654a0724d6bc5960467b8e8d5a4035dd1f39849ac52386a7d0f79d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2018.0358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.0358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3338,27922,27923,76259,76262</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunsalus, C. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Adam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oransky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>Gunsalus, Marcus, and Oransky discuss the need for institutional research misconduct reports to have more credibility. They highlight the central role of institutions to protect the integrity of their research and to investigate the allegations of research misconduct and then report the outcomes to federal oversight agencies and other entities, including journals. They explore steps on how institutions improve their credibility including the development of a proposed checklist for research integrity investigation and the formation of consortia to provide external peer review of internal investigative reports.</description><subject>Academies and Institutes</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - standards</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Research Personnel - ethics</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Scientific Misconduct</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkLtPwzAQhy0EoqWwMjCgSCwsCX4_JoQqHpVakBDMkRM7IlVSF9sZ-t_jqNABLyf5vvvp7gPgEsECQYju1rrXBYZIFpAweQSmiBGZE6bkMZhCqGQuqKQTcBbCGqaHiDgFE6wYwZCrKbhfbEJs4xBbt9Fd9m6D1b7-ylZtqN3GDHVMf1vnY8herTXZynmbzb01bdV2bdydg5NGd8Fe_NYZ-Hx6_Ji_5Mu358X8YZlrgknMTdVoJKCtOaMaCkwNr2qmOKRcVNJKwzRNBxiDGqIkVbpmmEiuhYGNUEaSGbjd5269-x5siGWfNrRdpzfWDaFMCghDgmCc0Jt_6NoNPl03UlxBgimhiSr2VO1dCN425da3vfa7EsFyVFuOasdcWY5q08D1b-xQ9dYc8D-XCbjaA-PcocsFg5iRH6Oee5A</recordid><startdate>20180403</startdate><enddate>20180403</enddate><creator>Gunsalus, C. K</creator><creator>Marcus, Adam R</creator><creator>Oransky, Ivan</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180403</creationdate><title>Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility</title><author>Gunsalus, C. K ; Marcus, Adam R ; Oransky, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-dbfa170ec654a0724d6bc5960467b8e8d5a4035dd1f39849ac52386a7d0f79d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academies and Institutes</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - standards</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Research Personnel - ethics</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Scientific Misconduct</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunsalus, C. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Adam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oransky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunsalus, C. K</au><au>Marcus, Adam R</au><au>Oransky, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2018-04-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>319</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1315</spage><epage>1316</epage><pages>1315-1316</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><abstract>Gunsalus, Marcus, and Oransky discuss the need for institutional research misconduct reports to have more credibility. They highlight the central role of institutions to protect the integrity of their research and to investigate the allegations of research misconduct and then report the outcomes to federal oversight agencies and other entities, including journals. They explore steps on how institutions improve their credibility including the development of a proposed checklist for research integrity investigation and the formation of consortia to provide external peer review of internal investigative reports.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>29532069</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2018.0358</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
| ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2018-04, Vol.319 (13), p.1315-1316 |
| issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2013517322 |
| source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
| subjects | Academies and Institutes Biomedical Research - ethics Biomedical Research - standards Consortia Credibility Integrity Investigations Professional misconduct Research centers Research Personnel - ethics Scholarly publishing Scientific Misconduct United States Universities |
| title | Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Research%20Misconduct%20Reports%20Need%20More%20Credibility&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Gunsalus,%20C.%20K&rft.date=2018-04-03&rft.volume=319&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1315&rft.epage=1316&rft.pages=1315-1316&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2018.0358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2013517322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2069032434&rft_id=info:pmid/29532069&rft_ama_id=2675025&rfr_iscdi=true |