Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future

Key Points The severe shortage of human organ donors limits the practice of clinical transplantation, the only effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. Xenotransplantation using pig organs might provide the most immediate solution to the scarcity of human organ donors. Immunological rejection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature Reviews: Immunology 2007-07, Vol.7 (1), p.519-531
Hauptverfasser: Sykes, Megan, Yang, Yong-Guang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 531
container_issue 1
container_start_page 519
container_title Nature Reviews: Immunology
container_volume 7
creator Sykes, Megan
Yang, Yong-Guang
description Key Points The severe shortage of human organ donors limits the practice of clinical transplantation, the only effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. Xenotransplantation using pig organs might provide the most immediate solution to the scarcity of human organ donors. Immunological rejection of xenografts presents the most formidable obstacle to clinical xenotransplantation. Both innate and adaptive immune systems contribute to xenograft rejection. The availability of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs and pigs transgenic for human complement regulatory proteins have made it possible to overcome hyperacute rejection. However, with these pigs it has not been possible to completely prevent acute humoral xenograft rejection unless a tolerance-inducing protocol is used. Innate immune cells mediate much stronger responses to xenografts than to allografts. Genetic modifications of pigs to remove xenoantigens that interact with the activating receptors of human natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, and to provide the ligands that interact with the inhibitory receptors of these cells may confer protection against cytotoxicity by NK cells and macrophages. Nonspecific immunosuppression has been insufficient to prevent porcine xenograft rejection in non-human primates without severe toxicity. Tolerance induction is probably required to overcome the delayed form of humoral rejection and T-cell xenoresponses. The observation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) infecting human cells in vitro has raised concerns regarding the safety of xenotransplantation. However, studies so far have provided no evidence of xenotransplantation-associated PERV transmission to humans in vivo . The risk for xenotransplantation-mediated zoonosis will never be completely eliminated, and constant vigilance will be required as clinical xenotransplantation proceeds. Worldwide harmonization of regulatory guidelines for oversight is needed to address the infectious risks associated with clinical xenotransplantation. In contrast to allotransplantation, both the patients and the public must be included when considering the benefit versus risk of xenotransplantation. Could xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source solve the severe shortage of human organ donors? This Review describes the recent advances that are helping to bring this approach closer to the clinic and the obstacles that still need to be overcome. Xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nri2099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20130138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A186101603</galeid><sourcerecordid>A186101603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1a0bbd3a3fc6c8671dd20e044ee0159ee04ba5b17da2ea1363ef770ed7521a1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkm1rFDEQx4Motj3FT6AsCq2-uJrZ7G7ufFeOVgsFwQfwXchmZ--27CXbTCL125tlr62nkpCEmd8Mk_8MYy-AnwIXi_fWdzlfLh-xQyhkMQdZwOP7txAH7IjomnOokucpOwBZSuAyP2SrH2hd8NrS0GsbdOic_ZCZ6D3akFEyRMq0bTKdDehpQBO6n5g5m4UNZm0M0eMz9qTVPeHz3T1j3y_Ov60-za8-f7xcnV3NTbnkYQ6a13UjtGhNZRaVhKbJOfKiQORQLtNZ1LqsQTY6Rw2iEthKybGRZQ4aWjFjx1PewbubiBTUtiODfSocXSSVcxBpLxL4-i_w2kVvU20qzwsoqyJpMmNvJmite1SdbUcZzJhRncGigiQWH6nT_1BpNbjtjLPYdsm-F_BuLyAxAW_DWkcidfn1yz57_Ae7Qd2HDbk-jk2gffBkAo13RB5bNfhuq_0vBVyNA6B2A5DIV7uvx3qLzQO363gC3k4AJZddo3_Q5t9cLyfU6rHN97nu_L8BEj2_gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224156473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sykes, Megan ; Yang, Yong-Guang</creator><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Megan ; Yang, Yong-Guang</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points The severe shortage of human organ donors limits the practice of clinical transplantation, the only effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. Xenotransplantation using pig organs might provide the most immediate solution to the scarcity of human organ donors. Immunological rejection of xenografts presents the most formidable obstacle to clinical xenotransplantation. Both innate and adaptive immune systems contribute to xenograft rejection. The availability of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs and pigs transgenic for human complement regulatory proteins have made it possible to overcome hyperacute rejection. However, with these pigs it has not been possible to completely prevent acute humoral xenograft rejection unless a tolerance-inducing protocol is used. Innate immune cells mediate much stronger responses to xenografts than to allografts. Genetic modifications of pigs to remove xenoantigens that interact with the activating receptors of human natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, and to provide the ligands that interact with the inhibitory receptors of these cells may confer protection against cytotoxicity by NK cells and macrophages. Nonspecific immunosuppression has been insufficient to prevent porcine xenograft rejection in non-human primates without severe toxicity. Tolerance induction is probably required to overcome the delayed form of humoral rejection and T-cell xenoresponses. The observation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) infecting human cells in vitro has raised concerns regarding the safety of xenotransplantation. However, studies so far have provided no evidence of xenotransplantation-associated PERV transmission to humans in vivo . The risk for xenotransplantation-mediated zoonosis will never be completely eliminated, and constant vigilance will be required as clinical xenotransplantation proceeds. Worldwide harmonization of regulatory guidelines for oversight is needed to address the infectious risks associated with clinical xenotransplantation. In contrast to allotransplantation, both the patients and the public must be included when considering the benefit versus risk of xenotransplantation. Could xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source solve the severe shortage of human organ donors? This Review describes the recent advances that are helping to bring this approach closer to the clinic and the obstacles that still need to be overcome. Xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source has the potential to resolve the severe shortage of human organ donors. Although the development of relatively non-toxic immunosuppressive or tolerance-inducing regimens will be required to justify clinical trials using pig organs, recent advances in our understanding of the biology of xenograft rejection and zoonotic infections, and the generation of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs have moved this approach closer to clinical application. This Review highlights the major obstacles impeding the translation of xenotransplantation into clinical therapies and the potential solutions, providing a perspective on the future of clinical xenotransplantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-1733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-1741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nri2099</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17571072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Animal models in research ; Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibody Formation - immunology ; Antigens ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Edema ; Endothelium ; Graft rejection ; Graft Rejection - genetics ; Graft Rejection - immunology ; Hemorrhage ; Hogs ; Humans ; Immune Tolerance - immunology ; Immunology ; Medical research ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Primates ; review-article ; Swine ; T cells ; T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Thrombosis ; Transplantation, Heterologous - immunology ; Transplantation, Heterologous - trends ; Xenotransplantation ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Nature Reviews: Immunology, 2007-07, Vol.7 (1), p.519-531</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2007</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1a0bbd3a3fc6c8671dd20e044ee0159ee04ba5b17da2ea1363ef770ed7521a1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1a0bbd3a3fc6c8671dd20e044ee0159ee04ba5b17da2ea1363ef770ed7521a1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nri2099$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nri2099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17571072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yong-Guang</creatorcontrib><title>Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future</title><title>Nature Reviews: Immunology</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Immunol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Immunol</addtitle><description>Key Points The severe shortage of human organ donors limits the practice of clinical transplantation, the only effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. Xenotransplantation using pig organs might provide the most immediate solution to the scarcity of human organ donors. Immunological rejection of xenografts presents the most formidable obstacle to clinical xenotransplantation. Both innate and adaptive immune systems contribute to xenograft rejection. The availability of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs and pigs transgenic for human complement regulatory proteins have made it possible to overcome hyperacute rejection. However, with these pigs it has not been possible to completely prevent acute humoral xenograft rejection unless a tolerance-inducing protocol is used. Innate immune cells mediate much stronger responses to xenografts than to allografts. Genetic modifications of pigs to remove xenoantigens that interact with the activating receptors of human natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, and to provide the ligands that interact with the inhibitory receptors of these cells may confer protection against cytotoxicity by NK cells and macrophages. Nonspecific immunosuppression has been insufficient to prevent porcine xenograft rejection in non-human primates without severe toxicity. Tolerance induction is probably required to overcome the delayed form of humoral rejection and T-cell xenoresponses. The observation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) infecting human cells in vitro has raised concerns regarding the safety of xenotransplantation. However, studies so far have provided no evidence of xenotransplantation-associated PERV transmission to humans in vivo . The risk for xenotransplantation-mediated zoonosis will never be completely eliminated, and constant vigilance will be required as clinical xenotransplantation proceeds. Worldwide harmonization of regulatory guidelines for oversight is needed to address the infectious risks associated with clinical xenotransplantation. In contrast to allotransplantation, both the patients and the public must be included when considering the benefit versus risk of xenotransplantation. Could xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source solve the severe shortage of human organ donors? This Review describes the recent advances that are helping to bring this approach closer to the clinic and the obstacles that still need to be overcome. Xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source has the potential to resolve the severe shortage of human organ donors. Although the development of relatively non-toxic immunosuppressive or tolerance-inducing regimens will be required to justify clinical trials using pig organs, recent advances in our understanding of the biology of xenograft rejection and zoonotic infections, and the generation of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs have moved this approach closer to clinical application. This Review highlights the major obstacles impeding the translation of xenotransplantation into clinical therapies and the potential solutions, providing a perspective on the future of clinical xenotransplantation.</description><subject>Animal models in research</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibody Formation - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Endothelium</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - genetics</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - immunology</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune Tolerance - immunology</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>T cells</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - immunology</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - trends</subject><subject>Xenotransplantation</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1474-1733</issn><issn>1474-1741</issn><issn>1365-2567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkm1rFDEQx4Motj3FT6AsCq2-uJrZ7G7ufFeOVgsFwQfwXchmZ--27CXbTCL125tlr62nkpCEmd8Mk_8MYy-AnwIXi_fWdzlfLh-xQyhkMQdZwOP7txAH7IjomnOokucpOwBZSuAyP2SrH2hd8NrS0GsbdOic_ZCZ6D3akFEyRMq0bTKdDehpQBO6n5g5m4UNZm0M0eMz9qTVPeHz3T1j3y_Ov60-za8-f7xcnV3NTbnkYQ6a13UjtGhNZRaVhKbJOfKiQORQLtNZ1LqsQTY6Rw2iEthKybGRZQ4aWjFjx1PewbubiBTUtiODfSocXSSVcxBpLxL4-i_w2kVvU20qzwsoqyJpMmNvJmite1SdbUcZzJhRncGigiQWH6nT_1BpNbjtjLPYdsm-F_BuLyAxAW_DWkcidfn1yz57_Ae7Qd2HDbk-jk2gffBkAo13RB5bNfhuq_0vBVyNA6B2A5DIV7uvx3qLzQO363gC3k4AJZddo3_Q5t9cLyfU6rHN97nu_L8BEj2_gA</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Sykes, Megan</creator><creator>Yang, Yong-Guang</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future</title><author>Sykes, Megan ; Yang, Yong-Guang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1a0bbd3a3fc6c8671dd20e044ee0159ee04ba5b17da2ea1363ef770ed7521a1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal models in research</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibody Formation - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Endothelium</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - genetics</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - immunology</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune Tolerance - immunology</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>T cells</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - immunology</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - trends</topic><topic>Xenotransplantation</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yong-Guang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature Reviews: Immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sykes, Megan</au><au>Yang, Yong-Guang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future</atitle><jtitle>Nature Reviews: Immunology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Immunol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Immunol</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>519-531</pages><issn>1474-1733</issn><eissn>1474-1741</eissn><eissn>1365-2567</eissn><abstract>Key Points The severe shortage of human organ donors limits the practice of clinical transplantation, the only effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. Xenotransplantation using pig organs might provide the most immediate solution to the scarcity of human organ donors. Immunological rejection of xenografts presents the most formidable obstacle to clinical xenotransplantation. Both innate and adaptive immune systems contribute to xenograft rejection. The availability of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs and pigs transgenic for human complement regulatory proteins have made it possible to overcome hyperacute rejection. However, with these pigs it has not been possible to completely prevent acute humoral xenograft rejection unless a tolerance-inducing protocol is used. Innate immune cells mediate much stronger responses to xenografts than to allografts. Genetic modifications of pigs to remove xenoantigens that interact with the activating receptors of human natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, and to provide the ligands that interact with the inhibitory receptors of these cells may confer protection against cytotoxicity by NK cells and macrophages. Nonspecific immunosuppression has been insufficient to prevent porcine xenograft rejection in non-human primates without severe toxicity. Tolerance induction is probably required to overcome the delayed form of humoral rejection and T-cell xenoresponses. The observation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) infecting human cells in vitro has raised concerns regarding the safety of xenotransplantation. However, studies so far have provided no evidence of xenotransplantation-associated PERV transmission to humans in vivo . The risk for xenotransplantation-mediated zoonosis will never be completely eliminated, and constant vigilance will be required as clinical xenotransplantation proceeds. Worldwide harmonization of regulatory guidelines for oversight is needed to address the infectious risks associated with clinical xenotransplantation. In contrast to allotransplantation, both the patients and the public must be included when considering the benefit versus risk of xenotransplantation. Could xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source solve the severe shortage of human organ donors? This Review describes the recent advances that are helping to bring this approach closer to the clinic and the obstacles that still need to be overcome. Xenotransplantation using pigs as the transplant source has the potential to resolve the severe shortage of human organ donors. Although the development of relatively non-toxic immunosuppressive or tolerance-inducing regimens will be required to justify clinical trials using pig organs, recent advances in our understanding of the biology of xenograft rejection and zoonotic infections, and the generation of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs have moved this approach closer to clinical application. This Review highlights the major obstacles impeding the translation of xenotransplantation into clinical therapies and the potential solutions, providing a perspective on the future of clinical xenotransplantation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>17571072</pmid><doi>10.1038/nri2099</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-1733
ispartof Nature Reviews: Immunology, 2007-07, Vol.7 (1), p.519-531
issn 1474-1733
1474-1741
1365-2567
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20130138
source MEDLINE; Nature; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal models in research
Animals
Antibodies
Antibody Formation - immunology
Antigens
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Edema
Endothelium
Graft rejection
Graft Rejection - genetics
Graft Rejection - immunology
Hemorrhage
Hogs
Humans
Immune Tolerance - immunology
Immunology
Medical research
Monkeys & apes
Patient outcomes
Physiological aspects
Primates
review-article
Swine
T cells
T-Lymphocytes - immunology
Thrombosis
Transplantation, Heterologous - immunology
Transplantation, Heterologous - trends
Xenotransplantation
Zoonoses
title Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A15%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Xenotransplantation:%20current%20status%20and%20a%20perspective%20on%20the%20future&rft.jtitle=Nature%20Reviews:%20Immunology&rft.au=Sykes,%20Megan&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=519-531&rft.issn=1474-1733&rft.eissn=1474-1741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nri2099&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA186101603%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224156473&rft_id=info:pmid/17571072&rft_galeid=A186101603&rfr_iscdi=true