“What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data

Public reporting of hospital performance data is a developing area that is gaining increased attention. This is the first study to explore a range of stakeholder opinions on how such public reporting could be strengthened in Australia. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with a pur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2018-04, Vol.202, p.143-150
Hauptverfasser: Canaway, Rachel, Bismark, Marie, Dunt, David, Prang, Khic-Houy, Kelaher, Margaret
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue
container_start_page 143
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 202
creator Canaway, Rachel
Bismark, Marie
Dunt, David
Prang, Khic-Houy
Kelaher, Margaret
description Public reporting of hospital performance data is a developing area that is gaining increased attention. This is the first study to explore a range of stakeholder opinions on how such public reporting could be strengthened in Australia. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of expert healthcare consumer, provider and purchaser informants who worked in a variety of senior roles and had knowledge of or involvement in public reporting of hospital data within the public or private healthcare sectors. Informants from all Australian states, territory and national jurisdictions participated. Thematic analysis was used to gain an overview of experts' opinions to inform policy and systems-development for strengthening foundational frameworks for public reporting of health services performance. Themes arising were synthesised to generate explanatory figures to highlight key areas for strengthening public reporting. Our findings suggest that in Australia there is a lack of agreement on what the objectives and who the audience are for public reporting of hospital performance data. Without this shared understanding it is difficult to strengthen frameworks and impacts of public reporting. When developing frameworks for public reporting of hospital data in Australia, more explicit definition of what or who are the ‘public’ is needed along with identification of barriers, desired impacts, data needs, and data collection/reporting/feedback mechanisms. All relevant stakeholders should be involved in design of public reporting frameworks. Offering multiple systems of public reporting, each tailored to particular audiences, might enable greater impact of reporting towards improved hospital quality and safety, and consumer knowledge to inform treatment decisions. This study provides an overview of perspectives, but further research is warranted to develop PR frameworks that can generate greatest impacts for the needs of various audiences. •Public reporting of hospital performance data (PR) in Australia is little researched.•Australian stakeholders lack common understanding of the scope and purpose of PR.•Stakeholders' variable conceptions of ‘public’ contributes to confusion about PR.•This is the first study to explore expert informants' opinions of PR in Australia.•Reshaping the national PR system for different audiences should increase PR impact.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012922710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953618300753</els_id><sourcerecordid>2103118354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a19be594b40307b88e30059ec01727309017b14a30da8b95904ba30989fca3403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc1u1DAQthCIbguvAJa4cEkY20ljc0FVRQGpEgdAHC3HmXS9JHGwnaKKSx8EXq5PgqPdcuDCaTTz_dj6PkKeMygZsNNXuzJ6G60bsSs5MFkCL4GpB2TDZCOKWlTNQ7IB3jSFqsXpETmOcQcADKR4TI64qnklG9iQn3e3v75uTaIu0hHNlGh7Q-elHZx9c3f7-zX9lMw33Pqhw0CvHf6I1E80poDTVdri5KYr6sbZ2JSB_qCkAWcf0orl29bH2SUz0BlD78NoJou0M8k8IY96M0R8epgn5MvF28_n74vLj-8-nJ9dFlYolQrDVIu1qtoKBDStlCgAaoUWWMMbASrPllVGQGdkq2oFVZsXJVVvjciiE_Jy7zsH_33BmPToosVhMBP6JeocIFecN2ylvviHuvNLmPLvNM8wY1LUVWY1e5YNPsaAvZ6DG0240Qz02o_e6b_9rPZSA9e5n6x8dvBf2hW7190XkglnewLmQHLeQWcXzIl1LqBNuvPuv4_8AQwgp3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2103118354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Canaway, Rachel ; Bismark, Marie ; Dunt, David ; Prang, Khic-Houy ; Kelaher, Margaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Canaway, Rachel ; Bismark, Marie ; Dunt, David ; Prang, Khic-Houy ; Kelaher, Margaret</creatorcontrib><description>Public reporting of hospital performance data is a developing area that is gaining increased attention. This is the first study to explore a range of stakeholder opinions on how such public reporting could be strengthened in Australia. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of expert healthcare consumer, provider and purchaser informants who worked in a variety of senior roles and had knowledge of or involvement in public reporting of hospital data within the public or private healthcare sectors. Informants from all Australian states, territory and national jurisdictions participated. Thematic analysis was used to gain an overview of experts' opinions to inform policy and systems-development for strengthening foundational frameworks for public reporting of health services performance. Themes arising were synthesised to generate explanatory figures to highlight key areas for strengthening public reporting. Our findings suggest that in Australia there is a lack of agreement on what the objectives and who the audience are for public reporting of hospital performance data. Without this shared understanding it is difficult to strengthen frameworks and impacts of public reporting. When developing frameworks for public reporting of hospital data in Australia, more explicit definition of what or who are the ‘public’ is needed along with identification of barriers, desired impacts, data needs, and data collection/reporting/feedback mechanisms. All relevant stakeholders should be involved in design of public reporting frameworks. Offering multiple systems of public reporting, each tailored to particular audiences, might enable greater impact of reporting towards improved hospital quality and safety, and consumer knowledge to inform treatment decisions. This study provides an overview of perspectives, but further research is warranted to develop PR frameworks that can generate greatest impacts for the needs of various audiences. •Public reporting of hospital performance data (PR) in Australia is little researched.•Australian stakeholders lack common understanding of the scope and purpose of PR.•Stakeholders' variable conceptions of ‘public’ contributes to confusion about PR.•This is the first study to explore expert informants' opinions of PR in Australia.•Reshaping the national PR system for different audiences should increase PR impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29524870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Audiences ; Australia ; Consumer decision-making ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Development policy ; Expert opinion ; Experts ; Health care policy ; Health services ; Hospital quality improvement ; Hospitals ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Interest groups ; Medical decision making ; Medical treatment ; Patient safety ; Public health ; Public performance reporting ; Public relations ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Respondents ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2018-04, Vol.202, p.143-150</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a19be594b40307b88e30059ec01727309017b14a30da8b95904ba30989fca3403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a19be594b40307b88e30059ec01727309017b14a30da8b95904ba30989fca3403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0937-575X ; 0000-0002-9899-858X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618300753$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,33751,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Canaway, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bismark, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prang, Khic-Houy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelaher, Margaret</creatorcontrib><title>“What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Public reporting of hospital performance data is a developing area that is gaining increased attention. This is the first study to explore a range of stakeholder opinions on how such public reporting could be strengthened in Australia. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of expert healthcare consumer, provider and purchaser informants who worked in a variety of senior roles and had knowledge of or involvement in public reporting of hospital data within the public or private healthcare sectors. Informants from all Australian states, territory and national jurisdictions participated. Thematic analysis was used to gain an overview of experts' opinions to inform policy and systems-development for strengthening foundational frameworks for public reporting of health services performance. Themes arising were synthesised to generate explanatory figures to highlight key areas for strengthening public reporting. Our findings suggest that in Australia there is a lack of agreement on what the objectives and who the audience are for public reporting of hospital performance data. Without this shared understanding it is difficult to strengthen frameworks and impacts of public reporting. When developing frameworks for public reporting of hospital data in Australia, more explicit definition of what or who are the ‘public’ is needed along with identification of barriers, desired impacts, data needs, and data collection/reporting/feedback mechanisms. All relevant stakeholders should be involved in design of public reporting frameworks. Offering multiple systems of public reporting, each tailored to particular audiences, might enable greater impact of reporting towards improved hospital quality and safety, and consumer knowledge to inform treatment decisions. This study provides an overview of perspectives, but further research is warranted to develop PR frameworks that can generate greatest impacts for the needs of various audiences. •Public reporting of hospital performance data (PR) in Australia is little researched.•Australian stakeholders lack common understanding of the scope and purpose of PR.•Stakeholders' variable conceptions of ‘public’ contributes to confusion about PR.•This is the first study to explore expert informants' opinions of PR in Australia.•Reshaping the national PR system for different audiences should increase PR impact.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Consumer decision-making</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Expert opinion</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospital quality improvement</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Medical decision making</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public performance reporting</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUc1u1DAQthCIbguvAJa4cEkY20ljc0FVRQGpEgdAHC3HmXS9JHGwnaKKSx8EXq5PgqPdcuDCaTTz_dj6PkKeMygZsNNXuzJ6G60bsSs5MFkCL4GpB2TDZCOKWlTNQ7IB3jSFqsXpETmOcQcADKR4TI64qnklG9iQn3e3v75uTaIu0hHNlGh7Q-elHZx9c3f7-zX9lMw33Pqhw0CvHf6I1E80poDTVdri5KYr6sbZ2JSB_qCkAWcf0orl29bH2SUz0BlD78NoJou0M8k8IY96M0R8epgn5MvF28_n74vLj-8-nJ9dFlYolQrDVIu1qtoKBDStlCgAaoUWWMMbASrPllVGQGdkq2oFVZsXJVVvjciiE_Jy7zsH_33BmPToosVhMBP6JeocIFecN2ylvviHuvNLmPLvNM8wY1LUVWY1e5YNPsaAvZ6DG0240Qz02o_e6b_9rPZSA9e5n6x8dvBf2hW7190XkglnewLmQHLeQWcXzIl1LqBNuvPuv4_8AQwgp3U</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Canaway, Rachel</creator><creator>Bismark, Marie</creator><creator>Dunt, David</creator><creator>Prang, Khic-Houy</creator><creator>Kelaher, Margaret</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9899-858X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>“What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data</title><author>Canaway, Rachel ; Bismark, Marie ; Dunt, David ; Prang, Khic-Houy ; Kelaher, Margaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a19be594b40307b88e30059ec01727309017b14a30da8b95904ba30989fca3403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Consumer decision-making</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Expert opinion</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospital quality improvement</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Medical decision making</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public performance reporting</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Canaway, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bismark, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prang, Khic-Houy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelaher, Margaret</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Canaway, Rachel</au><au>Bismark, Marie</au><au>Dunt, David</au><au>Prang, Khic-Houy</au><au>Kelaher, Margaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>202</volume><spage>143</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>143-150</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Public reporting of hospital performance data is a developing area that is gaining increased attention. This is the first study to explore a range of stakeholder opinions on how such public reporting could be strengthened in Australia. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of expert healthcare consumer, provider and purchaser informants who worked in a variety of senior roles and had knowledge of or involvement in public reporting of hospital data within the public or private healthcare sectors. Informants from all Australian states, territory and national jurisdictions participated. Thematic analysis was used to gain an overview of experts' opinions to inform policy and systems-development for strengthening foundational frameworks for public reporting of health services performance. Themes arising were synthesised to generate explanatory figures to highlight key areas for strengthening public reporting. Our findings suggest that in Australia there is a lack of agreement on what the objectives and who the audience are for public reporting of hospital performance data. Without this shared understanding it is difficult to strengthen frameworks and impacts of public reporting. When developing frameworks for public reporting of hospital data in Australia, more explicit definition of what or who are the ‘public’ is needed along with identification of barriers, desired impacts, data needs, and data collection/reporting/feedback mechanisms. All relevant stakeholders should be involved in design of public reporting frameworks. Offering multiple systems of public reporting, each tailored to particular audiences, might enable greater impact of reporting towards improved hospital quality and safety, and consumer knowledge to inform treatment decisions. This study provides an overview of perspectives, but further research is warranted to develop PR frameworks that can generate greatest impacts for the needs of various audiences. •Public reporting of hospital performance data (PR) in Australia is little researched.•Australian stakeholders lack common understanding of the scope and purpose of PR.•Stakeholders' variable conceptions of ‘public’ contributes to confusion about PR.•This is the first study to explore expert informants' opinions of PR in Australia.•Reshaping the national PR system for different audiences should increase PR impact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29524870</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9899-858X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2018-04, Vol.202, p.143-150
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012922710
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Accountability
Audiences
Australia
Consumer decision-making
Data collection
Decision making
Development policy
Expert opinion
Experts
Health care policy
Health services
Hospital quality improvement
Hospitals
Hospitals - standards
Humans
Information Dissemination
Interest groups
Medical decision making
Medical treatment
Patient safety
Public health
Public performance reporting
Public relations
Quality of care
Quality of Health Care - standards
Respondents
Stakeholder Participation
Stakeholders
Transparency
title “What is meant by public?”: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A37%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWhat%20is%20meant%20by%20public?%E2%80%9D:%20Stakeholder%20views%20on%20strengthening%20impacts%20of%20public%20reporting%20of%20hospital%20performance%20data&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Canaway,%20Rachel&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=202&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=143-150&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2103118354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2103118354&rft_id=info:pmid/29524870&rft_els_id=S0277953618300753&rfr_iscdi=true