At last, some movement on food labelling

Many schemes are voluntary and they often tend to infer animal welfare benefits from the method involved in the production process rather than the actual measurable welfare of the animals themselves. The consumer is left uncertain about how the specific 'inputs', such as housing, space, fe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record 2018-03, Vol.182 (10), p.298-298
1. Verfasser: Ravetz, Gudrun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many schemes are voluntary and they often tend to infer animal welfare benefits from the method involved in the production process rather than the actual measurable welfare of the animals themselves. The consumer is left uncertain about how the specific 'inputs', such as housing, space, feed and management practices lead to improved outcomes in terms of the health, physical condition and behaviour of the animals. Last week at Westminster, we discussed ideas with other major stakeholders in a forum on method of production and slaughter labelling hosted by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare (APGAW), chaired by Lord Trees.
ISSN:0042-4900
2042-7670
DOI:10.1136/vr.k1123