Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND:To assess the safety and efficacy of the Instinct clip in the acute endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is the first large series reporting this clip in achieving hemostasis. A retrospective descriptive chart review was performed on p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2018-04, Vol.52 (4), p.307-312
Hauptverfasser: Wander, Praneet, Castaneda, Daniel, D’Souza, Lionel, Singh, Simi, Serouya, Sam, Velazquez, Ana I, Mamun, Rifat, Voaklander, Rebecca, Benias, Petros, Carr-Locke, David L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 4
container_start_page 307
container_title Journal of clinical gastroenterology
container_volume 52
creator Wander, Praneet
Castaneda, Daniel
D’Souza, Lionel
Singh, Simi
Serouya, Sam
Velazquez, Ana I
Mamun, Rifat
Voaklander, Rebecca
Benias, Petros
Carr-Locke, David L
description BACKGROUND:To assess the safety and efficacy of the Instinct clip in the acute endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is the first large series reporting this clip in achieving hemostasis. A retrospective descriptive chart review was performed on patients presenting with recent overt GI bleeding treated with endoclip therapy at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center between May 2013 and January 2016. Results are expressed in absolute numbers, percentages, and trends. RESULTS:In total, 178 consecutive patients with UGIB were included. Source of bleeding was identified as duodenal ulcer (29.2%), gastric ulcer (22.5%), gastro-esophageal junction tear (8.4%), anastomosis (5.6%), erosive gastropathy (5.6%), Dieulafoy (5.1%), gastric polyp (4.5%), postendoscopic procedure (3.9%), angioectasia (3.4%), esophageal ulcer (2.8%), benign duodenal mass (2.8%), peg tube site (2.3%), gastric neoplasm (1.7%), esophagitis (1.1%), and small bowel ulcer (1.1%). Lesions demonstrated active bleeding in 47.5% (11.3% spurting and 36.2% oozing) and nonbleeding lesions in 52.5% (25.0% visible vessel, 11.9% hematin in ulcer base, 10.0% adherent clot, 5.6% flat spot). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 96.6%. Additional methods were used in 24.1% (argon plasma coagulation and epinephrine injection in 21.3%, surgery in 0.6%, and interventional radiology in 2.2%). There were no adverse events. In-hospital rebleeding was 7.3% and 3.9% presented with rebleeding within 30 days. Average procedure duration was 22.9 minutes and average length of hospital stay was 11.3 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Instinct clip, when used for UGIB, seems to be safe and effective with similar rebleeding rates compared with other modalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000785
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012916138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012916138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4b32bbc2f786da886d872e0507f29655b8624ed5cec249247382b179aa5711f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtuGyEYhVHUKnEub1BVLLuZhMswwLIduU6lXBaJ1yOG-SehxTAFu07ePkR2qyiLsgAJfef88CH0iZJzSrS8uG4X5-TtkkocoBkVXFeMcPoBzQjVrCJSkyN0nPNPQqjknB6iI6YFlVrVM-TuXHjwgFsIa0h4_jRBchAs4Dhig29gi-dhiNnGyVncejdhF_C1CeahBPFNDH9MchaMx8upZPHC5HWKrrTltQvl-psHGAp7ij6Oxmc4258naPl9ft9eVle3ix_t16vKctGIqu4563vLRqmawaiyKcmACCJHphshetWwGgZhwbJas1pyxfryGWOEpHSs-Qn6suudUvy9Ka_oVi5b8N4EiJvcMUKZpg3lqqD1DrUp5pxg7KbkViY9d5R0r5K7Irl7L7nEPu8nbPoVDP9Cf60WQO2AbfTFav7lN1tI3WOxtH78f_cLtzWH1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012916138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Wander, Praneet ; Castaneda, Daniel ; D’Souza, Lionel ; Singh, Simi ; Serouya, Sam ; Velazquez, Ana I ; Mamun, Rifat ; Voaklander, Rebecca ; Benias, Petros ; Carr-Locke, David L</creator><creatorcontrib>Wander, Praneet ; Castaneda, Daniel ; D’Souza, Lionel ; Singh, Simi ; Serouya, Sam ; Velazquez, Ana I ; Mamun, Rifat ; Voaklander, Rebecca ; Benias, Petros ; Carr-Locke, David L</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:To assess the safety and efficacy of the Instinct clip in the acute endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is the first large series reporting this clip in achieving hemostasis. A retrospective descriptive chart review was performed on patients presenting with recent overt GI bleeding treated with endoclip therapy at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center between May 2013 and January 2016. Results are expressed in absolute numbers, percentages, and trends. RESULTS:In total, 178 consecutive patients with UGIB were included. Source of bleeding was identified as duodenal ulcer (29.2%), gastric ulcer (22.5%), gastro-esophageal junction tear (8.4%), anastomosis (5.6%), erosive gastropathy (5.6%), Dieulafoy (5.1%), gastric polyp (4.5%), postendoscopic procedure (3.9%), angioectasia (3.4%), esophageal ulcer (2.8%), benign duodenal mass (2.8%), peg tube site (2.3%), gastric neoplasm (1.7%), esophagitis (1.1%), and small bowel ulcer (1.1%). Lesions demonstrated active bleeding in 47.5% (11.3% spurting and 36.2% oozing) and nonbleeding lesions in 52.5% (25.0% visible vessel, 11.9% hematin in ulcer base, 10.0% adherent clot, 5.6% flat spot). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 96.6%. Additional methods were used in 24.1% (argon plasma coagulation and epinephrine injection in 21.3%, surgery in 0.6%, and interventional radiology in 2.2%). There were no adverse events. In-hospital rebleeding was 7.3% and 3.9% presented with rebleeding within 30 days. Average procedure duration was 22.9 minutes and average length of hospital stay was 11.3 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Instinct clip, when used for UGIB, seems to be safe and effective with similar rebleeding rates compared with other modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-0790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29517984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Duodenal Ulcer - surgery ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic - instrumentation ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Male ; New York City ; Patient Safety ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Ulcer - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2018-04, Vol.52 (4), p.307-312</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4b32bbc2f786da886d872e0507f29655b8624ed5cec249247382b179aa5711f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4b32bbc2f786da886d872e0507f29655b8624ed5cec249247382b179aa5711f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wander, Praneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaneda, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Souza, Lionel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Simi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serouya, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velazquez, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamun, Rifat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voaklander, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benias, Petros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr-Locke, David L</creatorcontrib><title>Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding</title><title>Journal of clinical gastroenterology</title><addtitle>J Clin Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:To assess the safety and efficacy of the Instinct clip in the acute endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is the first large series reporting this clip in achieving hemostasis. A retrospective descriptive chart review was performed on patients presenting with recent overt GI bleeding treated with endoclip therapy at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center between May 2013 and January 2016. Results are expressed in absolute numbers, percentages, and trends. RESULTS:In total, 178 consecutive patients with UGIB were included. Source of bleeding was identified as duodenal ulcer (29.2%), gastric ulcer (22.5%), gastro-esophageal junction tear (8.4%), anastomosis (5.6%), erosive gastropathy (5.6%), Dieulafoy (5.1%), gastric polyp (4.5%), postendoscopic procedure (3.9%), angioectasia (3.4%), esophageal ulcer (2.8%), benign duodenal mass (2.8%), peg tube site (2.3%), gastric neoplasm (1.7%), esophagitis (1.1%), and small bowel ulcer (1.1%). Lesions demonstrated active bleeding in 47.5% (11.3% spurting and 36.2% oozing) and nonbleeding lesions in 52.5% (25.0% visible vessel, 11.9% hematin in ulcer base, 10.0% adherent clot, 5.6% flat spot). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 96.6%. Additional methods were used in 24.1% (argon plasma coagulation and epinephrine injection in 21.3%, surgery in 0.6%, and interventional radiology in 2.2%). There were no adverse events. In-hospital rebleeding was 7.3% and 3.9% presented with rebleeding within 30 days. Average procedure duration was 22.9 minutes and average length of hospital stay was 11.3 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Instinct clip, when used for UGIB, seems to be safe and effective with similar rebleeding rates compared with other modalities.</description><subject>Duodenal Ulcer - surgery</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Endoscopic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach Ulcer - surgery</subject><issn>0192-0790</issn><issn>1539-2031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtuGyEYhVHUKnEub1BVLLuZhMswwLIduU6lXBaJ1yOG-SehxTAFu07ePkR2qyiLsgAJfef88CH0iZJzSrS8uG4X5-TtkkocoBkVXFeMcPoBzQjVrCJSkyN0nPNPQqjknB6iI6YFlVrVM-TuXHjwgFsIa0h4_jRBchAs4Dhig29gi-dhiNnGyVncejdhF_C1CeahBPFNDH9MchaMx8upZPHC5HWKrrTltQvl-psHGAp7ij6Oxmc4258naPl9ft9eVle3ix_t16vKctGIqu4563vLRqmawaiyKcmACCJHphshetWwGgZhwbJas1pyxfryGWOEpHSs-Qn6suudUvy9Ka_oVi5b8N4EiJvcMUKZpg3lqqD1DrUp5pxg7KbkViY9d5R0r5K7Irl7L7nEPu8nbPoVDP9Cf60WQO2AbfTFav7lN1tI3WOxtH78f_cLtzWH1w</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Wander, Praneet</creator><creator>Castaneda, Daniel</creator><creator>D’Souza, Lionel</creator><creator>Singh, Simi</creator><creator>Serouya, Sam</creator><creator>Velazquez, Ana I</creator><creator>Mamun, Rifat</creator><creator>Voaklander, Rebecca</creator><creator>Benias, Petros</creator><creator>Carr-Locke, David L</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding</title><author>Wander, Praneet ; Castaneda, Daniel ; D’Souza, Lionel ; Singh, Simi ; Serouya, Sam ; Velazquez, Ana I ; Mamun, Rifat ; Voaklander, Rebecca ; Benias, Petros ; Carr-Locke, David L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4b32bbc2f786da886d872e0507f29655b8624ed5cec249247382b179aa5711f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Duodenal Ulcer - surgery</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Endoscopic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach Ulcer - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wander, Praneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaneda, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Souza, Lionel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Simi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serouya, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velazquez, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamun, Rifat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voaklander, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benias, Petros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr-Locke, David L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wander, Praneet</au><au>Castaneda, Daniel</au><au>D’Souza, Lionel</au><au>Singh, Simi</au><au>Serouya, Sam</au><au>Velazquez, Ana I</au><au>Mamun, Rifat</au><au>Voaklander, Rebecca</au><au>Benias, Petros</au><au>Carr-Locke, David L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>307-312</pages><issn>0192-0790</issn><eissn>1539-2031</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:To assess the safety and efficacy of the Instinct clip in the acute endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is the first large series reporting this clip in achieving hemostasis. A retrospective descriptive chart review was performed on patients presenting with recent overt GI bleeding treated with endoclip therapy at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center between May 2013 and January 2016. Results are expressed in absolute numbers, percentages, and trends. RESULTS:In total, 178 consecutive patients with UGIB were included. Source of bleeding was identified as duodenal ulcer (29.2%), gastric ulcer (22.5%), gastro-esophageal junction tear (8.4%), anastomosis (5.6%), erosive gastropathy (5.6%), Dieulafoy (5.1%), gastric polyp (4.5%), postendoscopic procedure (3.9%), angioectasia (3.4%), esophageal ulcer (2.8%), benign duodenal mass (2.8%), peg tube site (2.3%), gastric neoplasm (1.7%), esophagitis (1.1%), and small bowel ulcer (1.1%). Lesions demonstrated active bleeding in 47.5% (11.3% spurting and 36.2% oozing) and nonbleeding lesions in 52.5% (25.0% visible vessel, 11.9% hematin in ulcer base, 10.0% adherent clot, 5.6% flat spot). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 96.6%. Additional methods were used in 24.1% (argon plasma coagulation and epinephrine injection in 21.3%, surgery in 0.6%, and interventional radiology in 2.2%). There were no adverse events. In-hospital rebleeding was 7.3% and 3.9% presented with rebleeding within 30 days. Average procedure duration was 22.9 minutes and average length of hospital stay was 11.3 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Instinct clip, when used for UGIB, seems to be safe and effective with similar rebleeding rates compared with other modalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>29517984</pmid><doi>10.1097/MCG.0000000000000785</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-0790
ispartof Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2018-04, Vol.52 (4), p.307-312
issn 0192-0790
1539-2031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012916138
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Duodenal Ulcer - surgery
Equipment Design
Female
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery
Hemostasis, Endoscopic - instrumentation
Hospitals, University
Humans
Male
New York City
Patient Safety
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - surgery
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Ulcer - surgery
title Single Center Experience of a New Endoscopic Clip in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20Center%20Experience%20of%20a%20New%20Endoscopic%20Clip%20in%20Managing%20Nonvariceal%20Upper%20Gastrointestinal%20Bleeding&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Wander,%20Praneet&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=307-312&rft.issn=0192-0790&rft.eissn=1539-2031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012916138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012916138&rft_id=info:pmid/29517984&rfr_iscdi=true