Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients
Objectives To describe the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the evaluation of patients with anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS). Background ACAOS of the right and left coronary are rare, but may lead to sympto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2018-07, Vol.92 (1), p.68-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Driesen, Bart W. Warmerdam, Evangeline G. Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T. Schoof, Paul H. Meijboom, Folkert J. Haas, Felix Stella, Pieter R. Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O. Evens, Fabiola C. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M. Krings, Gregor J. van Dijk, Arie P. J. Voskuil, Michiel |
description | Objectives
To describe the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the evaluation of patients with anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS).
Background
ACAOS of the right and left coronary are rare, but may lead to symptoms and impose a risk for sudden cardiac death, depending on several anatomical features. Assessment and risk estimation is challenging in (nonathlete) adults, especially if they present without symptoms or with atypical complaints.
Methods
The team retrospectively studied 30 consecutive patients with ACAOS with interarterial course, who received IVUS‐ and FFR‐guided treatment at our institution between October 2010 and September 2017.
Results
FFR was abnormal in only seven patients. IVUS showed the typical slit‐like anatomy of the orifice in 23 patients. Based on FFR and/or IVUS results, in conjunction with the clinical presentation, clinical decision was made. A decision for intervention was made if at least two out of three entities were abnormal. Intervention implied unroofing of the coronary artery (n = 10) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1). In all other patients a conservative strategy was followed. No adverse events occurred in the total population after a median of 37 (0–62) months of follow‐up.
Conclusions
Conservative treatment may be justifiable in adult patients with ACAOS in the presence of normal FFR and nonsuspicious symptoms, despite the presence of an interarterial course and/or slitlike orifice on IVUS. We recommend the use of FFR and IVUS in the standard work‐up for adult patients with ACAOS and propose the use of a flowchart to aid in decision‐making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.27578 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012913373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2081926142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-8451180d2dfea85aae7f89b1ea61901ee5b51a8133ce0a71a639dc83fd5bd5d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQxyNERUvhwAsgS1xaiW1tZ504x1X4qlSpBz7ELZq1J4srxw52slVvPAKP0mfqkzBlFw5InMb2_OY_nvkXxQvBzwTn8twYeyZrVetHxZFQUi5qWX19vD-LZlkdFk9zvuacN5VsnhSHslFSLGtxVNytQhzAxzkzE1MMkG4ZpAkpxOQ2LsDkwob1KQ5s-oYsjmPMbkKWXaCa2LMv4DP4LbCTVbu6-nj6mmAwkyMtz3ofb1jCjGmL9z9-MgiWuTAl2EI2s4fEZk-3HOdgKb-ZnUXLBgiwwQHDRDADSwwb6SP0kJ8VBz11xOf7eFx8fvf2U_thcXn1_qJdXS5MqUq90EslhOZW2h5BKwCse92sBUIlGi4Q1VoJ0KIsDXKoBVRlY40ue6vWVlldHhcnO90xxe8z5qkbXDboPQSkbXWSC9lQeV0S-uof9DrOicZ_oLRoZCWWkqjTHWVSzDlh343JDbTvTvDuwcaObOx-20jsy73ivB7Q_iX_-EbA-Q64cR5v_6_Ute2bneQvVDesZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2081926142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Driesen, Bart W. ; Warmerdam, Evangeline G. ; Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T. ; Schoof, Paul H. ; Meijboom, Folkert J. ; Haas, Felix ; Stella, Pieter R. ; Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O. ; Evens, Fabiola C. M. ; Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M. ; Krings, Gregor J. ; van Dijk, Arie P. J. ; Voskuil, Michiel</creator><creatorcontrib>Driesen, Bart W. ; Warmerdam, Evangeline G. ; Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T. ; Schoof, Paul H. ; Meijboom, Folkert J. ; Haas, Felix ; Stella, Pieter R. ; Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O. ; Evens, Fabiola C. M. ; Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M. ; Krings, Gregor J. ; van Dijk, Arie P. J. ; Voskuil, Michiel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To describe the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the evaluation of patients with anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS).
Background
ACAOS of the right and left coronary are rare, but may lead to symptoms and impose a risk for sudden cardiac death, depending on several anatomical features. Assessment and risk estimation is challenging in (nonathlete) adults, especially if they present without symptoms or with atypical complaints.
Methods
The team retrospectively studied 30 consecutive patients with ACAOS with interarterial course, who received IVUS‐ and FFR‐guided treatment at our institution between October 2010 and September 2017.
Results
FFR was abnormal in only seven patients. IVUS showed the typical slit‐like anatomy of the orifice in 23 patients. Based on FFR and/or IVUS results, in conjunction with the clinical presentation, clinical decision was made. A decision for intervention was made if at least two out of three entities were abnormal. Intervention implied unroofing of the coronary artery (n = 10) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1). In all other patients a conservative strategy was followed. No adverse events occurred in the total population after a median of 37 (0–62) months of follow‐up.
Conclusions
Conservative treatment may be justifiable in adult patients with ACAOS in the presence of normal FFR and nonsuspicious symptoms, despite the presence of an interarterial course and/or slitlike orifice on IVUS. We recommend the use of FFR and IVUS in the standard work‐up for adult patients with ACAOS and propose the use of a flowchart to aid in decision‐making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27578</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29521471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>anomalous coronary artery origin ; congenital heart defects ; Coronary artery ; Coronary vessels ; Decision making ; fractional flow reserve ; Heart surgery ; intravascular ultrasound ; Orifices ; Patients ; Stents ; surgical repair ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2018-07, Vol.92 (1), p.68-75</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-8451180d2dfea85aae7f89b1ea61901ee5b51a8133ce0a71a639dc83fd5bd5d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-8451180d2dfea85aae7f89b1ea61901ee5b51a8133ce0a71a639dc83fd5bd5d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1984-3986</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.27578$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.27578$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29521471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Driesen, Bart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmerdam, Evangeline G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoof, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijboom, Folkert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stella, Pieter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evens, Fabiola C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krings, Gregor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Arie P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskuil, Michiel</creatorcontrib><title>Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Objectives
To describe the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the evaluation of patients with anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS).
Background
ACAOS of the right and left coronary are rare, but may lead to symptoms and impose a risk for sudden cardiac death, depending on several anatomical features. Assessment and risk estimation is challenging in (nonathlete) adults, especially if they present without symptoms or with atypical complaints.
Methods
The team retrospectively studied 30 consecutive patients with ACAOS with interarterial course, who received IVUS‐ and FFR‐guided treatment at our institution between October 2010 and September 2017.
Results
FFR was abnormal in only seven patients. IVUS showed the typical slit‐like anatomy of the orifice in 23 patients. Based on FFR and/or IVUS results, in conjunction with the clinical presentation, clinical decision was made. A decision for intervention was made if at least two out of three entities were abnormal. Intervention implied unroofing of the coronary artery (n = 10) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1). In all other patients a conservative strategy was followed. No adverse events occurred in the total population after a median of 37 (0–62) months of follow‐up.
Conclusions
Conservative treatment may be justifiable in adult patients with ACAOS in the presence of normal FFR and nonsuspicious symptoms, despite the presence of an interarterial course and/or slitlike orifice on IVUS. We recommend the use of FFR and IVUS in the standard work‐up for adult patients with ACAOS and propose the use of a flowchart to aid in decision‐making.</description><subject>anomalous coronary artery origin</subject><subject>congenital heart defects</subject><subject>Coronary artery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>fractional flow reserve</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>intravascular ultrasound</subject><subject>Orifices</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>surgical repair</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQxyNERUvhwAsgS1xaiW1tZ504x1X4qlSpBz7ELZq1J4srxw52slVvPAKP0mfqkzBlFw5InMb2_OY_nvkXxQvBzwTn8twYeyZrVetHxZFQUi5qWX19vD-LZlkdFk9zvuacN5VsnhSHslFSLGtxVNytQhzAxzkzE1MMkG4ZpAkpxOQ2LsDkwob1KQ5s-oYsjmPMbkKWXaCa2LMv4DP4LbCTVbu6-nj6mmAwkyMtz3ofb1jCjGmL9z9-MgiWuTAl2EI2s4fEZk-3HOdgKb-ZnUXLBgiwwQHDRDADSwwb6SP0kJ8VBz11xOf7eFx8fvf2U_thcXn1_qJdXS5MqUq90EslhOZW2h5BKwCse92sBUIlGi4Q1VoJ0KIsDXKoBVRlY40ue6vWVlldHhcnO90xxe8z5qkbXDboPQSkbXWSC9lQeV0S-uof9DrOicZ_oLRoZCWWkqjTHWVSzDlh343JDbTvTvDuwcaObOx-20jsy73ivB7Q_iX_-EbA-Q64cR5v_6_Ute2bneQvVDesZA</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Driesen, Bart W.</creator><creator>Warmerdam, Evangeline G.</creator><creator>Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T.</creator><creator>Schoof, Paul H.</creator><creator>Meijboom, Folkert J.</creator><creator>Haas, Felix</creator><creator>Stella, Pieter R.</creator><creator>Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.</creator><creator>Evens, Fabiola C. M.</creator><creator>Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M.</creator><creator>Krings, Gregor J.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Arie P. J.</creator><creator>Voskuil, Michiel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-3986</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients</title><author>Driesen, Bart W. ; Warmerdam, Evangeline G. ; Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T. ; Schoof, Paul H. ; Meijboom, Folkert J. ; Haas, Felix ; Stella, Pieter R. ; Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O. ; Evens, Fabiola C. M. ; Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M. ; Krings, Gregor J. ; van Dijk, Arie P. J. ; Voskuil, Michiel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-8451180d2dfea85aae7f89b1ea61901ee5b51a8133ce0a71a639dc83fd5bd5d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>anomalous coronary artery origin</topic><topic>congenital heart defects</topic><topic>Coronary artery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>fractional flow reserve</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>intravascular ultrasound</topic><topic>Orifices</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>surgical repair</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Driesen, Bart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmerdam, Evangeline G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoof, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijboom, Folkert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stella, Pieter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evens, Fabiola C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krings, Gregor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Arie P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskuil, Michiel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Driesen, Bart W.</au><au>Warmerdam, Evangeline G.</au><au>Sieswerda, Gert‐Jan T.</au><au>Schoof, Paul H.</au><au>Meijboom, Folkert J.</au><au>Haas, Felix</au><au>Stella, Pieter R.</au><au>Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.</au><au>Evens, Fabiola C. M.</au><au>Doevendans, Pieter A. F. M.</au><au>Krings, Gregor J.</au><au>van Dijk, Arie P. J.</au><au>Voskuil, Michiel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>68-75</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To describe the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the evaluation of patients with anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS).
Background
ACAOS of the right and left coronary are rare, but may lead to symptoms and impose a risk for sudden cardiac death, depending on several anatomical features. Assessment and risk estimation is challenging in (nonathlete) adults, especially if they present without symptoms or with atypical complaints.
Methods
The team retrospectively studied 30 consecutive patients with ACAOS with interarterial course, who received IVUS‐ and FFR‐guided treatment at our institution between October 2010 and September 2017.
Results
FFR was abnormal in only seven patients. IVUS showed the typical slit‐like anatomy of the orifice in 23 patients. Based on FFR and/or IVUS results, in conjunction with the clinical presentation, clinical decision was made. A decision for intervention was made if at least two out of three entities were abnormal. Intervention implied unroofing of the coronary artery (n = 10) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1). In all other patients a conservative strategy was followed. No adverse events occurred in the total population after a median of 37 (0–62) months of follow‐up.
Conclusions
Conservative treatment may be justifiable in adult patients with ACAOS in the presence of normal FFR and nonsuspicious symptoms, despite the presence of an interarterial course and/or slitlike orifice on IVUS. We recommend the use of FFR and IVUS in the standard work‐up for adult patients with ACAOS and propose the use of a flowchart to aid in decision‐making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29521471</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.27578</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-3986</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2018-07, Vol.92 (1), p.68-75 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012913373 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | anomalous coronary artery origin congenital heart defects Coronary artery Coronary vessels Decision making fractional flow reserve Heart surgery intravascular ultrasound Orifices Patients Stents surgical repair Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound |
title | Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve‐ and intravascular ultrasound‐guided management in adult patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A55%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anomalous%20coronary%20artery%20originating%20from%20the%20opposite%20sinus%20of%20Valsalva%20(ACAOS),%20fractional%20flow%20reserve%E2%80%90%20and%20intravascular%20ultrasound%E2%80%90guided%20management%20in%20adult%20patients&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Driesen,%20Bart%20W.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=68-75&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.27578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2081926142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2081926142&rft_id=info:pmid/29521471&rfr_iscdi=true |