Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool
Patient falls are a significant issue in hospitalized patients and financially costly to hospitals. The Joint Commission requires that patients be assessed for fall risk and interventions in place to mitigate the risk of falls. It is imperative to have a patient population/setting specific fall risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of emergency nursing 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.483-490 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 490 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Journal of emergency nursing |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Scott, Robin A. Oman, Kathleen S. Flarity, Kathleen Comer, Jennifer L. |
description | Patient falls are a significant issue in hospitalized patients and financially costly to hospitals. The Joint Commission requires that patients be assessed for fall risk and interventions in place to mitigate the risk of falls. It is imperative to have a patient population/setting specific fall risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk for falling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 2013 Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment tool (MEDFRAT) specifically designed for the ED population.
A two-phase prospective design was used for this study. Phase one determined the interrater reliability of the MEDFRAT. Phase two assessed the validity of the MEDFRAT in an emergency department (ED) within a 600-bed academic/teaching institution; Level II Trauma Center with >100,000 annual patient visits.
The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool was validated in this ED setting. The tool demonstrated positive interrater reliability (k=0.701) and when implemented with a falls prevention strategy and staff education demonstrated a 48% decrease in ED fall rate (0.57 falls/1000 patient visits) post implementation during the study period.
The MEDFRAT, an evidenced based ED-specific fall risk tool was implemented on the basis of the risk factors consistently identified in the literature: prior fall history, impaired mobility, altered mental status, altered elimination, and the use of sedative medication. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool demonstrated to be a valid tool for this hospital system.Unlabelled Box |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jen.2018.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012910803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099176717301022</els_id><sourcerecordid>2131663433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-8e8a2e25ed329e59fefcce25d44917138345babe5ad48b6f276f832923ea11c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggS2xYNMHXzo9NV0OZ0kqFSjB7y0luikMSD3YyaHa8A2_YJ6mnU1iwYGXZ_s7RvecQ8hJYCgyKt13a4ZhyBjJlkDJWPiILyHmZcFUUj8mCMaUSKIvyiDwLoWOM5SWop-SIq5wLkeULMi0rt8UT-h53bmxOqBkber1FT6dvSL_aBqk3tg_v6Gpr-tlMdry5__qMP-knHJy3pqerAf0NjvWOfsCN8dOA40TPTd_f_vr9xYbvyTIEDOH-ee1c_5w8aU0f8MXDeUzW56v12UVydf3x8mx5ldRCwpRIlIYjz7ERXGGuWmzrOt6bLFNQgpBxg8pUmJsmk1XR8rJoZUS5QANQi2Py5mC78e7HjGHSgw019r0Z0c1Bx-C4AiaZiOjrf9DOzX6Mw2kOAopCZGJPwYGqvQvBY6s33g7G7zQwvW9Edzo2sjeWmoGOjUTNqwfnuRqw-av4U0EETg8AxiS2Fr0OtY1hYmM91pNunP2P_R06lZvt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131663433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Scott, Robin A. ; Oman, Kathleen S. ; Flarity, Kathleen ; Comer, Jennifer L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, Robin A. ; Oman, Kathleen S. ; Flarity, Kathleen ; Comer, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient falls are a significant issue in hospitalized patients and financially costly to hospitals. The Joint Commission requires that patients be assessed for fall risk and interventions in place to mitigate the risk of falls. It is imperative to have a patient population/setting specific fall risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk for falling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 2013 Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment tool (MEDFRAT) specifically designed for the ED population.
A two-phase prospective design was used for this study. Phase one determined the interrater reliability of the MEDFRAT. Phase two assessed the validity of the MEDFRAT in an emergency department (ED) within a 600-bed academic/teaching institution; Level II Trauma Center with >100,000 annual patient visits.
The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool was validated in this ED setting. The tool demonstrated positive interrater reliability (k=0.701) and when implemented with a falls prevention strategy and staff education demonstrated a 48% decrease in ED fall rate (0.57 falls/1000 patient visits) post implementation during the study period.
The MEDFRAT, an evidenced based ED-specific fall risk tool was implemented on the basis of the risk factors consistently identified in the literature: prior fall history, impaired mobility, altered mental status, altered elimination, and the use of sedative medication. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool demonstrated to be a valid tool for this hospital system.Unlabelled Box</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29523345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accident prevention ; Accidental Falls - prevention & control ; Alcohol ; Assessment Score ; Clinical assessment ; Colorado ; Drugs ; Education ; Elimination ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Emergency services ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Falls ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Humans ; Interrater reliability ; Mobility ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Patient Safety ; Physical restraints ; Professional practice ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of emergency nursing, 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.483-490</ispartof><rights>2018 Emergency Nurses Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-8e8a2e25ed329e59fefcce25d44917138345babe5ad48b6f276f832923ea11c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-8e8a2e25ed329e59fefcce25d44917138345babe5ad48b6f276f832923ea11c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2131663433?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,12827,27905,27906,30980,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Kathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flarity, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comer, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><title>Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool</title><title>Journal of emergency nursing</title><addtitle>J Emerg Nurs</addtitle><description>Patient falls are a significant issue in hospitalized patients and financially costly to hospitals. The Joint Commission requires that patients be assessed for fall risk and interventions in place to mitigate the risk of falls. It is imperative to have a patient population/setting specific fall risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk for falling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 2013 Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment tool (MEDFRAT) specifically designed for the ED population.
A two-phase prospective design was used for this study. Phase one determined the interrater reliability of the MEDFRAT. Phase two assessed the validity of the MEDFRAT in an emergency department (ED) within a 600-bed academic/teaching institution; Level II Trauma Center with >100,000 annual patient visits.
The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool was validated in this ED setting. The tool demonstrated positive interrater reliability (k=0.701) and when implemented with a falls prevention strategy and staff education demonstrated a 48% decrease in ED fall rate (0.57 falls/1000 patient visits) post implementation during the study period.
The MEDFRAT, an evidenced based ED-specific fall risk tool was implemented on the basis of the risk factors consistently identified in the literature: prior fall history, impaired mobility, altered mental status, altered elimination, and the use of sedative medication. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool demonstrated to be a valid tool for this hospital system.Unlabelled Box</description><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Assessment Score</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elimination</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interrater reliability</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Physical restraints</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0099-1767</issn><issn>1527-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggS2xYNMHXzo9NV0OZ0kqFSjB7y0luikMSD3YyaHa8A2_YJ6mnU1iwYGXZ_s7RvecQ8hJYCgyKt13a4ZhyBjJlkDJWPiILyHmZcFUUj8mCMaUSKIvyiDwLoWOM5SWop-SIq5wLkeULMi0rt8UT-h53bmxOqBkber1FT6dvSL_aBqk3tg_v6Gpr-tlMdry5__qMP-knHJy3pqerAf0NjvWOfsCN8dOA40TPTd_f_vr9xYbvyTIEDOH-ee1c_5w8aU0f8MXDeUzW56v12UVydf3x8mx5ldRCwpRIlIYjz7ERXGGuWmzrOt6bLFNQgpBxg8pUmJsmk1XR8rJoZUS5QANQi2Py5mC78e7HjGHSgw019r0Z0c1Bx-C4AiaZiOjrf9DOzX6Mw2kOAopCZGJPwYGqvQvBY6s33g7G7zQwvW9Edzo2sjeWmoGOjUTNqwfnuRqw-av4U0EETg8AxiS2Fr0OtY1hYmM91pNunP2P_R06lZvt</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Scott, Robin A.</creator><creator>Oman, Kathleen S.</creator><creator>Flarity, Kathleen</creator><creator>Comer, Jennifer L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool</title><author>Scott, Robin A. ; Oman, Kathleen S. ; Flarity, Kathleen ; Comer, Jennifer L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-8e8a2e25ed329e59fefcce25d44917138345babe5ad48b6f276f832923ea11c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Assessment Score</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elimination</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interrater reliability</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Physical restraints</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Kathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flarity, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comer, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of emergency nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, Robin A.</au><au>Oman, Kathleen S.</au><au>Flarity, Kathleen</au><au>Comer, Jennifer L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool</atitle><jtitle>Journal of emergency nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Nurs</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>483-490</pages><issn>0099-1767</issn><eissn>1527-2966</eissn><abstract>Patient falls are a significant issue in hospitalized patients and financially costly to hospitals. The Joint Commission requires that patients be assessed for fall risk and interventions in place to mitigate the risk of falls. It is imperative to have a patient population/setting specific fall risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk for falling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 2013 Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment tool (MEDFRAT) specifically designed for the ED population.
A two-phase prospective design was used for this study. Phase one determined the interrater reliability of the MEDFRAT. Phase two assessed the validity of the MEDFRAT in an emergency department (ED) within a 600-bed academic/teaching institution; Level II Trauma Center with >100,000 annual patient visits.
The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool was validated in this ED setting. The tool demonstrated positive interrater reliability (k=0.701) and when implemented with a falls prevention strategy and staff education demonstrated a 48% decrease in ED fall rate (0.57 falls/1000 patient visits) post implementation during the study period.
The MEDFRAT, an evidenced based ED-specific fall risk tool was implemented on the basis of the risk factors consistently identified in the literature: prior fall history, impaired mobility, altered mental status, altered elimination, and the use of sedative medication. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool demonstrated to be a valid tool for this hospital system.Unlabelled Box</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29523345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jen.2018.01.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-1767 |
ispartof | Journal of emergency nursing, 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.483-490 |
issn | 0099-1767 1527-2966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2012910803 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Accident prevention Accidental Falls - prevention & control Alcohol Assessment Score Clinical assessment Colorado Drugs Education Elimination Emergency medical care Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Emergency services Evidence-Based Practice Falls Health risk assessment Health risks Humans Interrater reliability Mobility Nurses Nursing Patient Safety Physical restraints Professional practice Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Validity |
title | Above, Beyond, and Over the Side rails: Evaluating the New Memorial Emergency Department Fall–Risk-Assessment Tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Above,%20Beyond,%20and%20Over%20the%20Side%20rails:%20Evaluating%20the%20New%20Memorial%20Emergency%20Department%20Fall%E2%80%93Risk-Assessment%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20emergency%20nursing&rft.au=Scott,%20Robin%20A.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=483-490&rft.issn=0099-1767&rft.eissn=1527-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jen.2018.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131663433%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131663433&rft_id=info:pmid/29523345&rft_els_id=S0099176717301022&rfr_iscdi=true |