What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature

Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2018-03, Vol.22 (3), p.151-160
Hauptverfasser: Gaitanidis, A., Simopoulos, C., Pitiakoudis, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 3
container_start_page 151
container_title Techniques in coloproctology
container_volume 22
creator Gaitanidis, A.
Simopoulos, C.
Pitiakoudis, M.
description Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2011613422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2011613422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2e7a29474631afe4ead1c818e98d7f3633c66e1928fc5735167091b91ce3a8d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1LxDAQBuAgit8_wIsEvHipZpK2ab3J4hcIXhS9hWw63Y10mzVJlf33xt1VQfCUQJ6ZJPMScgTsDBiT5wEYFJAxqDKQJcsWG2QXgFcZy4uXzeVeZKUQcofshfDKGEhZwDbZ4XUBPKFdYp-nOtLoqHF9sA16-jHFnjYY7KS3_YRq2um59i4YN7cmsc55NFF3NHptl8QM3lszdMPsInGP7xY_qGtpnCLtbESv4-DxgGy1ugt4uF73ydP11ePoNrt_uLkbXd5nRkgeM45S8zqXeSlAt5ijbsBUUGFdNbIV6TemLBFqXrWmkKKAUrIaxjUYFLpqKrFPTld95969DRiimtlgsOt0j24IijOAEkTOeaInf-irG3yfXrdUQjJW1knBSpk0heCxVXNvZ9ovFDD1lYNa5aBSDuorB7VINcfrzsN4hs1PxffgE-ArENJRP0H_e_X_XT8B5bCTiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011370069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gaitanidis, A. ; Simopoulos, C. ; Pitiakoudis, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaitanidis, A. ; Simopoulos, C. ; Pitiakoudis, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29512045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Colorectal Surgery ; Curricula ; Gastroenterology ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Proctology ; Review ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2018-03, Vol.22 (3), p.151-160</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Techniques in Coloproctology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2e7a29474631afe4ead1c818e98d7f3633c66e1928fc5735167091b91ce3a8d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2e7a29474631afe4ead1c818e98d7f3633c66e1928fc5735167091b91ce3a8d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29512045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaitanidis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simopoulos, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitiakoudis, M.</creatorcontrib><title>What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1LxDAQBuAgit8_wIsEvHipZpK2ab3J4hcIXhS9hWw63Y10mzVJlf33xt1VQfCUQJ6ZJPMScgTsDBiT5wEYFJAxqDKQJcsWG2QXgFcZy4uXzeVeZKUQcofshfDKGEhZwDbZ4XUBPKFdYp-nOtLoqHF9sA16-jHFnjYY7KS3_YRq2um59i4YN7cmsc55NFF3NHptl8QM3lszdMPsInGP7xY_qGtpnCLtbESv4-DxgGy1ugt4uF73ydP11ePoNrt_uLkbXd5nRkgeM45S8zqXeSlAt5ijbsBUUGFdNbIV6TemLBFqXrWmkKKAUrIaxjUYFLpqKrFPTld95969DRiimtlgsOt0j24IijOAEkTOeaInf-irG3yfXrdUQjJW1knBSpk0heCxVXNvZ9ovFDD1lYNa5aBSDuorB7VINcfrzsN4hs1PxffgE-ArENJRP0H_e_X_XT8B5bCTiw</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Gaitanidis, A.</creator><creator>Simopoulos, C.</creator><creator>Pitiakoudis, M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature</title><author>Gaitanidis, A. ; Simopoulos, C. ; Pitiakoudis, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2e7a29474631afe4ead1c818e98d7f3633c66e1928fc5735167091b91ce3a8d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaitanidis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simopoulos, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitiakoudis, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaitanidis, A.</au><au>Simopoulos, C.</au><au>Pitiakoudis, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>151-160</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><abstract>Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29512045</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1123-6337
ispartof Techniques in coloproctology, 2018-03, Vol.22 (3), p.151-160
issn 1123-6337
1128-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2011613422
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Colorectal Surgery
Curricula
Gastroenterology
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Proctology
Review
Surgery
title What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20to%20consider%20when%20designing%20a%20laparoscopic%20colorectal%20training%20curriculum:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Gaitanidis,%20A.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=151-160&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011613422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011370069&rft_id=info:pmid/29512045&rfr_iscdi=true