Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs

To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) based on color fundus photographs. A deep learning system for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON on color fundus photographs. We retrospectively...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2018-08, Vol.125 (8), p.1199-1206
Hauptverfasser: Li, Zhixi, He, Yifan, Keel, Stuart, Meng, Wei, Chang, Robert T., He, Mingguang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1206
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1199
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 125
creator Li, Zhixi
He, Yifan
Keel, Stuart
Meng, Wei
Chang, Robert T.
He, Mingguang
description To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) based on color fundus photographs. A deep learning system for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON on color fundus photographs. We retrospectively included 48 116 fundus photographs for the development and validation of a deep learning algorithm. This study recruited 21 trained ophthalmologists to classify the photographs. Referable GON was defined as vertical cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 or more and other typical changes of GON. The reference standard was made until 3 graders achieved agreement. A separate validation dataset of 8000 fully gradable fundus photographs was used to assess the performance of this algorithm. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity and specificity was applied to evaluate the efficacy of the deep learning algorithm detecting referable GON. In the validation dataset, this deep learning system achieved an AUC of 0.986 with sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 92.0%. The most common reasons for false-negative grading (n = 87) were GON with coexisting eye conditions (n = 44 [50.6%]), including pathologic or high myopia (n = 37 [42.6%]), diabetic retinopathy (n = 4 [4.6%]), and age-related macular degeneration (n = 3 [3.4%]). The leading reason for false-positive results (n = 480) was having other eye conditions (n = 458 [95.4%]), mainly including physiologic cupping (n = 267 [55.6%]). Misclassification as false-positive results amidst a normal-appearing fundus occurred in only 22 eyes (4.6%). A deep learning system can detect referable GON with high sensitivity and specificity. Coexistence of high or pathologic myopia is the most common cause resulting in false-negative results. Physiologic cupping and pathologic myopia were the most common reasons for false-positive results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2011276657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642017335650</els_id><sourcerecordid>2011276657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c43df0b5b76fd6849589b72d331b00b9079d1c22aa0e358ebf33c2bea66861043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF2L1DAUhoMo7rj6D0Ry6U3rSdKm7Y2g4-4qDK6gXoc0PdlmaJuapML8ezPM6qVXgZPnPR8PIa8ZlAyYfHcs_TqmUZccWFsCK4GLJ2TH6qorqoaJp2SXMVbIisMVeRHjEQCkFNVzcsW7GmQrxY6sN9Y6o82Jeks1_YS40gPqsLjlgX4_xYQztT7kj4QmnYt3k96Mn3XyW6T3a3KGfsUt-FWn8UQ_6ogD9Qvd-ynHbrdlyNi30Sf_EPQ6xpfkmdVTxFeP7zX5eXvzY_-5ONzffdl_OBSm5nUqTCUGC33dN9IOsq26uu36hg9CsB6g76DpBmY41xpQ1C32VgjDe9Qy38WgEtfk7aXvGvyvDWNSs4sGp0kvmDdX2RrjjZR1k9HqgprgYwxo1RrcrMNJMVBn1-qoLq7PqVYBU9l1jr15nLD1Mw7_Qn_lZuD9BcB852-HQUXjcDE4uJBlqsG7_0_4A2_akkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011276657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Li, Zhixi ; He, Yifan ; Keel, Stuart ; Meng, Wei ; Chang, Robert T. ; He, Mingguang</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhixi ; He, Yifan ; Keel, Stuart ; Meng, Wei ; Chang, Robert T. ; He, Mingguang</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) based on color fundus photographs. A deep learning system for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON on color fundus photographs. We retrospectively included 48 116 fundus photographs for the development and validation of a deep learning algorithm. This study recruited 21 trained ophthalmologists to classify the photographs. Referable GON was defined as vertical cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 or more and other typical changes of GON. The reference standard was made until 3 graders achieved agreement. A separate validation dataset of 8000 fully gradable fundus photographs was used to assess the performance of this algorithm. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity and specificity was applied to evaluate the efficacy of the deep learning algorithm detecting referable GON. In the validation dataset, this deep learning system achieved an AUC of 0.986 with sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 92.0%. The most common reasons for false-negative grading (n = 87) were GON with coexisting eye conditions (n = 44 [50.6%]), including pathologic or high myopia (n = 37 [42.6%]), diabetic retinopathy (n = 4 [4.6%]), and age-related macular degeneration (n = 3 [3.4%]). The leading reason for false-positive results (n = 480) was having other eye conditions (n = 458 [95.4%]), mainly including physiologic cupping (n = 267 [55.6%]). Misclassification as false-positive results amidst a normal-appearing fundus occurred in only 22 eyes (4.6%). A deep learning system can detect referable GON with high sensitivity and specificity. Coexistence of high or pathologic myopia is the most common cause resulting in false-negative results. Physiologic cupping and pathologic myopia were the most common reasons for false-positive results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29506863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Deep Learning ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - instrumentation ; Fundus Oculi ; Glaucoma - complications ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Optic Disk - diagnostic imaging ; Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis ; Optic Nerve Diseases - etiology ; Photography - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2018-08, Vol.125 (8), p.1199-1206</ispartof><rights>2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c43df0b5b76fd6849589b72d331b00b9079d1c22aa0e358ebf33c2bea66861043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c43df0b5b76fd6849589b72d331b00b9079d1c22aa0e358ebf33c2bea66861043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6912-2810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keel, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Mingguang</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) based on color fundus photographs. A deep learning system for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON on color fundus photographs. We retrospectively included 48 116 fundus photographs for the development and validation of a deep learning algorithm. This study recruited 21 trained ophthalmologists to classify the photographs. Referable GON was defined as vertical cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 or more and other typical changes of GON. The reference standard was made until 3 graders achieved agreement. A separate validation dataset of 8000 fully gradable fundus photographs was used to assess the performance of this algorithm. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity and specificity was applied to evaluate the efficacy of the deep learning algorithm detecting referable GON. In the validation dataset, this deep learning system achieved an AUC of 0.986 with sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 92.0%. The most common reasons for false-negative grading (n = 87) were GON with coexisting eye conditions (n = 44 [50.6%]), including pathologic or high myopia (n = 37 [42.6%]), diabetic retinopathy (n = 4 [4.6%]), and age-related macular degeneration (n = 3 [3.4%]). The leading reason for false-positive results (n = 480) was having other eye conditions (n = 458 [95.4%]), mainly including physiologic cupping (n = 267 [55.6%]). Misclassification as false-positive results amidst a normal-appearing fundus occurred in only 22 eyes (4.6%). A deep learning system can detect referable GON with high sensitivity and specificity. Coexistence of high or pathologic myopia is the most common cause resulting in false-negative results. Physiologic cupping and pathologic myopia were the most common reasons for false-positive results.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fundus Oculi</subject><subject>Glaucoma - complications</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Optic Disk - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Optic Nerve Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF2L1DAUhoMo7rj6D0Ry6U3rSdKm7Y2g4-4qDK6gXoc0PdlmaJuapML8ezPM6qVXgZPnPR8PIa8ZlAyYfHcs_TqmUZccWFsCK4GLJ2TH6qorqoaJp2SXMVbIisMVeRHjEQCkFNVzcsW7GmQrxY6sN9Y6o82Jeks1_YS40gPqsLjlgX4_xYQztT7kj4QmnYt3k96Mn3XyW6T3a3KGfsUt-FWn8UQ_6ogD9Qvd-ynHbrdlyNi30Sf_EPQ6xpfkmdVTxFeP7zX5eXvzY_-5ONzffdl_OBSm5nUqTCUGC33dN9IOsq26uu36hg9CsB6g76DpBmY41xpQ1C32VgjDe9Qy38WgEtfk7aXvGvyvDWNSs4sGp0kvmDdX2RrjjZR1k9HqgprgYwxo1RrcrMNJMVBn1-qoLq7PqVYBU9l1jr15nLD1Mw7_Qn_lZuD9BcB852-HQUXjcDE4uJBlqsG7_0_4A2_akkM</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Li, Zhixi</creator><creator>He, Yifan</creator><creator>Keel, Stuart</creator><creator>Meng, Wei</creator><creator>Chang, Robert T.</creator><creator>He, Mingguang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-2810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs</title><author>Li, Zhixi ; He, Yifan ; Keel, Stuart ; Meng, Wei ; Chang, Robert T. ; He, Mingguang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c43df0b5b76fd6849589b72d331b00b9079d1c22aa0e358ebf33c2bea66861043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fundus Oculi</topic><topic>Glaucoma - complications</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Optic Disk - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Optic Nerve Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keel, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Mingguang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zhixi</au><au>He, Yifan</au><au>Keel, Stuart</au><au>Meng, Wei</au><au>Chang, Robert T.</au><au>He, Mingguang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1199</spage><epage>1206</epage><pages>1199-1206</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) based on color fundus photographs. A deep learning system for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON on color fundus photographs. We retrospectively included 48 116 fundus photographs for the development and validation of a deep learning algorithm. This study recruited 21 trained ophthalmologists to classify the photographs. Referable GON was defined as vertical cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 or more and other typical changes of GON. The reference standard was made until 3 graders achieved agreement. A separate validation dataset of 8000 fully gradable fundus photographs was used to assess the performance of this algorithm. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity and specificity was applied to evaluate the efficacy of the deep learning algorithm detecting referable GON. In the validation dataset, this deep learning system achieved an AUC of 0.986 with sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 92.0%. The most common reasons for false-negative grading (n = 87) were GON with coexisting eye conditions (n = 44 [50.6%]), including pathologic or high myopia (n = 37 [42.6%]), diabetic retinopathy (n = 4 [4.6%]), and age-related macular degeneration (n = 3 [3.4%]). The leading reason for false-positive results (n = 480) was having other eye conditions (n = 458 [95.4%]), mainly including physiologic cupping (n = 267 [55.6%]). Misclassification as false-positive results amidst a normal-appearing fundus occurred in only 22 eyes (4.6%). A deep learning system can detect referable GON with high sensitivity and specificity. Coexistence of high or pathologic myopia is the most common cause resulting in false-negative results. Physiologic cupping and pathologic myopia were the most common reasons for false-positive results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29506863</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-2810</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2018-08, Vol.125 (8), p.1199-1206
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2011276657
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Algorithms
Deep Learning
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - instrumentation
Fundus Oculi
Glaucoma - complications
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Humans
Optic Disk - diagnostic imaging
Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis
Optic Nerve Diseases - etiology
Photography - methods
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
title Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20Deep%20Learning%20System%20for%20Detecting%20Glaucomatous%20Optic%20Neuropathy%20Based%20on%20Color%20Fundus%20Photographs&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Li,%20Zhixi&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1199&rft.epage=1206&rft.pages=1199-1206&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011276657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011276657&rft_id=info:pmid/29506863&rft_els_id=S0161642017335650&rfr_iscdi=true