A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion
Extension block pinning is a simple and reliable technique for mallet fractures, but poor results are sometimes obtained. The predictors of postoperative range of motion after extension block pinning of mallet fingers were investigated. The outcomes for postoperative active motion of the distal inte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-06, Vol.71 (6), p.876-882 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 882 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 876 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Usami, Satoshi Kawahara, Sanshiro Kuno, Hayato Takamure, Hiroshi Inami, Kohei |
description | Extension block pinning is a simple and reliable technique for mallet fractures, but poor results are sometimes obtained. The predictors of postoperative range of motion after extension block pinning of mallet fingers were investigated.
The outcomes for postoperative active motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, such as flexion angle, extension loss, and total range of motion, were examined. Predictors such as age, gender, finger, fragment size, joint subluxation, the time from injury to operation, procedure, fixation angle, the time from operation to wire removal, and joint step-off were evaluated statistically.
With a mean 12.2-month follow-up, according to Crawford's criteria, 49 of 116 fingers (42%) had an excellent result, 37 (32%) had a good result, 29 (25%) had a fair result, and 1 (1%) had a poor result. The mean flexion angle was 62.9 ± 13.2°, extension loss was −6.6 ± 7.3°, and total range of motion was 55.8 ± 17.0° in the DIP joint. Pin tract infections were confirmed in 7 fingers with poor results. There were no complaints about nail deformity or skin abnormality. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of poor postoperative motion were increased age chronic case, remained joint step-off, excess flexed fixation angle, and long-term wire placement.
Extremely flexed fixation and chronic case easily causes extension loss in the DIP joint. In closed extension block pinning, joint fixation with an extreme flexion angle should be avoided and the pinning wire should be removed as soon as possible after confirming bony union. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010838631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681518300627</els_id><sourcerecordid>2010838631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3fc7cfe0d321c0ce42e89ef2cc338be482450dbbd653c8c732050b2dcb9827a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0Eohd4ARbISzYJviXxIDajqqVIlbqBteUcn1QekjjYTsU8QN8bhyksWfmi__-O_JmQd5zVnPH246HuD0uqBeO6Zrxmir8g51x3umKN3L0s-07pqtW8OSMXKR0YU5Kr5jU5E7uGSd625-RpTyPmGNKCkP0j0pRXd6RhoDCGhI7ir4xz8mGm_RjgB138PPv5gQ4h0smOI2Y6RAt5jZg-0f1sx2PyaQMsEZ2HHOLpFFIOC0b7Z0q08wNu11PIhf2GvBrsmPDt83pJvt9cf7u6re7uv3y92t9VoBTLlRyggwGZk4IDA1QC9Q4HASCl7lFpoRrm-t61jQQNnRSsYb1w0O-06KyQl-TDibvE8HPFlM3kE-A42hnDmkxRybTUreQlKk5RKHJSxMEs0U82Hg1nZtNvDmbTv3W0YdwU_aX0_pm_9hO6f5W_vkvg8ymA5ZWPHqNJ4HGGYiqWDzAu-P_xfwOsWJnp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010838631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Usami, Satoshi ; Kawahara, Sanshiro ; Kuno, Hayato ; Takamure, Hiroshi ; Inami, Kohei</creator><creatorcontrib>Usami, Satoshi ; Kawahara, Sanshiro ; Kuno, Hayato ; Takamure, Hiroshi ; Inami, Kohei</creatorcontrib><description>Extension block pinning is a simple and reliable technique for mallet fractures, but poor results are sometimes obtained. The predictors of postoperative range of motion after extension block pinning of mallet fingers were investigated.
The outcomes for postoperative active motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, such as flexion angle, extension loss, and total range of motion, were examined. Predictors such as age, gender, finger, fragment size, joint subluxation, the time from injury to operation, procedure, fixation angle, the time from operation to wire removal, and joint step-off were evaluated statistically.
With a mean 12.2-month follow-up, according to Crawford's criteria, 49 of 116 fingers (42%) had an excellent result, 37 (32%) had a good result, 29 (25%) had a fair result, and 1 (1%) had a poor result. The mean flexion angle was 62.9 ± 13.2°, extension loss was −6.6 ± 7.3°, and total range of motion was 55.8 ± 17.0° in the DIP joint. Pin tract infections were confirmed in 7 fingers with poor results. There were no complaints about nail deformity or skin abnormality. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of poor postoperative motion were increased age chronic case, remained joint step-off, excess flexed fixation angle, and long-term wire placement.
Extremely flexed fixation and chronic case easily causes extension loss in the DIP joint. In closed extension block pinning, joint fixation with an extreme flexion angle should be avoided and the pinning wire should be removed as soon as possible after confirming bony union.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29503166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Bone Wires ; Child ; Extension block pinning ; Extension loss ; Female ; Finger Joint - physiopathology ; Finger Phalanges - injuries ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Mallet fracture ; Middle Aged ; Predictors ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Retrospective study ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-06, Vol.71 (6), p.876-882</ispartof><rights>2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3fc7cfe0d321c0ce42e89ef2cc338be482450dbbd653c8c732050b2dcb9827a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3fc7cfe0d321c0ce42e89ef2cc338be482450dbbd653c8c732050b2dcb9827a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Usami, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Sanshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuno, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamure, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inami, Kohei</creatorcontrib><title>A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Extension block pinning is a simple and reliable technique for mallet fractures, but poor results are sometimes obtained. The predictors of postoperative range of motion after extension block pinning of mallet fingers were investigated.
The outcomes for postoperative active motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, such as flexion angle, extension loss, and total range of motion, were examined. Predictors such as age, gender, finger, fragment size, joint subluxation, the time from injury to operation, procedure, fixation angle, the time from operation to wire removal, and joint step-off were evaluated statistically.
With a mean 12.2-month follow-up, according to Crawford's criteria, 49 of 116 fingers (42%) had an excellent result, 37 (32%) had a good result, 29 (25%) had a fair result, and 1 (1%) had a poor result. The mean flexion angle was 62.9 ± 13.2°, extension loss was −6.6 ± 7.3°, and total range of motion was 55.8 ± 17.0° in the DIP joint. Pin tract infections were confirmed in 7 fingers with poor results. There were no complaints about nail deformity or skin abnormality. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of poor postoperative motion were increased age chronic case, remained joint step-off, excess flexed fixation angle, and long-term wire placement.
Extremely flexed fixation and chronic case easily causes extension loss in the DIP joint. In closed extension block pinning, joint fixation with an extreme flexion angle should be avoided and the pinning wire should be removed as soon as possible after confirming bony union.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Wires</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Extension block pinning</subject><subject>Extension loss</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Finger Phalanges - injuries</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mallet fracture</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective study</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0Eohd4ARbISzYJviXxIDajqqVIlbqBteUcn1QekjjYTsU8QN8bhyksWfmi__-O_JmQd5zVnPH246HuD0uqBeO6Zrxmir8g51x3umKN3L0s-07pqtW8OSMXKR0YU5Kr5jU5E7uGSd625-RpTyPmGNKCkP0j0pRXd6RhoDCGhI7ir4xz8mGm_RjgB138PPv5gQ4h0smOI2Y6RAt5jZg-0f1sx2PyaQMsEZ2HHOLpFFIOC0b7Z0q08wNu11PIhf2GvBrsmPDt83pJvt9cf7u6re7uv3y92t9VoBTLlRyggwGZk4IDA1QC9Q4HASCl7lFpoRrm-t61jQQNnRSsYb1w0O-06KyQl-TDibvE8HPFlM3kE-A42hnDmkxRybTUreQlKk5RKHJSxMEs0U82Hg1nZtNvDmbTv3W0YdwU_aX0_pm_9hO6f5W_vkvg8ymA5ZWPHqNJ4HGGYiqWDzAu-P_xfwOsWJnp</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Usami, Satoshi</creator><creator>Kawahara, Sanshiro</creator><creator>Kuno, Hayato</creator><creator>Takamure, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Inami, Kohei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion</title><author>Usami, Satoshi ; Kawahara, Sanshiro ; Kuno, Hayato ; Takamure, Hiroshi ; Inami, Kohei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3fc7cfe0d321c0ce42e89ef2cc338be482450dbbd653c8c732050b2dcb9827a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Wires</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Extension block pinning</topic><topic>Extension loss</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Finger Phalanges - injuries</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mallet fracture</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective study</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Usami, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Sanshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuno, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamure, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inami, Kohei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Usami, Satoshi</au><au>Kawahara, Sanshiro</au><au>Kuno, Hayato</au><au>Takamure, Hiroshi</au><au>Inami, Kohei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>876</spage><epage>882</epage><pages>876-882</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Extension block pinning is a simple and reliable technique for mallet fractures, but poor results are sometimes obtained. The predictors of postoperative range of motion after extension block pinning of mallet fingers were investigated.
The outcomes for postoperative active motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, such as flexion angle, extension loss, and total range of motion, were examined. Predictors such as age, gender, finger, fragment size, joint subluxation, the time from injury to operation, procedure, fixation angle, the time from operation to wire removal, and joint step-off were evaluated statistically.
With a mean 12.2-month follow-up, according to Crawford's criteria, 49 of 116 fingers (42%) had an excellent result, 37 (32%) had a good result, 29 (25%) had a fair result, and 1 (1%) had a poor result. The mean flexion angle was 62.9 ± 13.2°, extension loss was −6.6 ± 7.3°, and total range of motion was 55.8 ± 17.0° in the DIP joint. Pin tract infections were confirmed in 7 fingers with poor results. There were no complaints about nail deformity or skin abnormality. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of poor postoperative motion were increased age chronic case, remained joint step-off, excess flexed fixation angle, and long-term wire placement.
Extremely flexed fixation and chronic case easily causes extension loss in the DIP joint. In closed extension block pinning, joint fixation with an extreme flexion angle should be avoided and the pinning wire should be removed as soon as possible after confirming bony union.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29503166</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-06, Vol.71 (6), p.876-882 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010838631 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Bone Wires Child Extension block pinning Extension loss Female Finger Joint - physiopathology Finger Phalanges - injuries Follow-Up Studies Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fractures, Bone - surgery Humans Male Mallet fracture Middle Aged Predictors Range of Motion, Articular Retrospective Studies Retrospective study Time Factors Young Adult |
title | A retrospective study of closed extension block pinning for mallet fractures: Analysis of predictors of postoperative range of motion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A40%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20retrospective%20study%20of%20closed%20extension%20block%20pinning%20for%20mallet%20fractures:%20Analysis%20of%20predictors%20of%20postoperative%20range%20of%20motion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Usami,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=876&rft.epage=882&rft.pages=876-882&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2010838631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010838631&rft_id=info:pmid/29503166&rft_els_id=S1748681518300627&rfr_iscdi=true |