Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns
Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia pa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Comprehensive psychiatry 2018-05, Vol.83, p.12-18 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 18 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | Comprehensive psychiatry |
| container_volume | 83 |
| creator | Sahan, Halide E. Yildirim, Ejder A. Soylu, Aliye Tabakci, Abdulkadir S. Cakmak, Serdal Erkoc, Sahap N. |
| description | Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients have not been studied yet. In our study, we aimed to compare attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients with organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers.
43 patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, 38 patients with organic dyspepsia and 42 healthy volunteers matched in terms of age, sex and education were included in the study. All participants were evaluated using a socio-demographic and clinical data questionnaire, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Adult Attachment Scale.
There was no difference in sociodemographic features among the three groups. Functional dyspepsia group exhibited significantly higher Trait Anxiety scores compared to organic dyspepsia and control groups. Control group showed significantly higher secure attachment styles compared to functional dyspepsia and organic dyspepsia groups, there was no difference between groups in non-secure attachment styles according to triple attachment model. Dimensionally, functional dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than organic dyspepsia groups and organic dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than control group.
According to our findings, Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious than organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients while avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.
•Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients.•Avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.•Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.02.007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010837758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010440X18300336</els_id><sourcerecordid>2029490556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe3ff8d96c076c6e6cd8275fa85fa6db666870df9589dae2b70c12ea4b5721113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2KFDEUhYMoTjv6Clrgxk2VN6mq_CyHZvyBATcKugrp1I2dpispk5TSb2-aHgdx4yLccPnOCfkIeUWho0D520Nn47ws-WT3HQMqO2AdgHhENnTsWSt7OTwmGwAK7TDA1yvyLOcDAEgph6fkiqkRqOJ0Q75ta49JPsfQRNe4NdjiYzDHZjrlBZfsTfPLl30T03cTvP1r7UNTMM35nDOlGLufMZRmqXdMIT8nT5w5ZnxxP6_Jl3e3n7cf2rtP7z9ub-5a2ytVWoe9c3JS3ILgliO3k2RidEbWw6cd51wKmJwapZoMsp0ASxmaYTcKRintr8mbS--S4o8Vc9GzzxaPRxMwrllXPSB7IUZZ0df_oIe4pvrZM8XUoGAceaXEhbIp5pzQ6SX52aSTpqDP9vVBP9g_10sNTFf7Nfnyvn_dzTg95P7orsDNBcAq5KfHpLP1GCxOPqEteor-v4_8BtAIm9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2029490556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Sahan, Halide E. ; Yildirim, Ejder A. ; Soylu, Aliye ; Tabakci, Abdulkadir S. ; Cakmak, Serdal ; Erkoc, Sahap N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahan, Halide E. ; Yildirim, Ejder A. ; Soylu, Aliye ; Tabakci, Abdulkadir S. ; Cakmak, Serdal ; Erkoc, Sahap N.</creatorcontrib><description>Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients have not been studied yet. In our study, we aimed to compare attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients with organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers.
43 patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, 38 patients with organic dyspepsia and 42 healthy volunteers matched in terms of age, sex and education were included in the study. All participants were evaluated using a socio-demographic and clinical data questionnaire, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Adult Attachment Scale.
There was no difference in sociodemographic features among the three groups. Functional dyspepsia group exhibited significantly higher Trait Anxiety scores compared to organic dyspepsia and control groups. Control group showed significantly higher secure attachment styles compared to functional dyspepsia and organic dyspepsia groups, there was no difference between groups in non-secure attachment styles according to triple attachment model. Dimensionally, functional dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than organic dyspepsia groups and organic dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than control group.
According to our findings, Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious than organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients while avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.
•Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients.•Avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.•Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-440X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.02.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29501961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Anxiety - epidemiology ; Anxiety - psychology ; Attachment ; Behavior disorders ; Disease ; Dyspepsia - diagnosis ; Dyspepsia - epidemiology ; Dyspepsia - psychology ; Family medical history ; Fear & phobias ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system ; Object Attachment ; Pain ; Psychopathology ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnostic imaging ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology ; Stress ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Comprehensive psychiatry, 2018-05, Vol.83, p.12-18</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe3ff8d96c076c6e6cd8275fa85fa6db666870df9589dae2b70c12ea4b5721113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe3ff8d96c076c6e6cd8275fa85fa6db666870df9589dae2b70c12ea4b5721113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2029490556?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29501961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahan, Halide E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Ejder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soylu, Aliye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabakci, Abdulkadir S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Serdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoc, Sahap N.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns</title><title>Comprehensive psychiatry</title><addtitle>Compr Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients have not been studied yet. In our study, we aimed to compare attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients with organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers.
43 patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, 38 patients with organic dyspepsia and 42 healthy volunteers matched in terms of age, sex and education were included in the study. All participants were evaluated using a socio-demographic and clinical data questionnaire, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Adult Attachment Scale.
There was no difference in sociodemographic features among the three groups. Functional dyspepsia group exhibited significantly higher Trait Anxiety scores compared to organic dyspepsia and control groups. Control group showed significantly higher secure attachment styles compared to functional dyspepsia and organic dyspepsia groups, there was no difference between groups in non-secure attachment styles according to triple attachment model. Dimensionally, functional dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than organic dyspepsia groups and organic dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than control group.
According to our findings, Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious than organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients while avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.
•Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients.•Avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.•Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anxiety - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dyspepsia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dyspepsia - psychology</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0010-440X</issn><issn>1532-8384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM2KFDEUhYMoTjv6Clrgxk2VN6mq_CyHZvyBATcKugrp1I2dpispk5TSb2-aHgdx4yLccPnOCfkIeUWho0D520Nn47ws-WT3HQMqO2AdgHhENnTsWSt7OTwmGwAK7TDA1yvyLOcDAEgph6fkiqkRqOJ0Q75ta49JPsfQRNe4NdjiYzDHZjrlBZfsTfPLl30T03cTvP1r7UNTMM35nDOlGLufMZRmqXdMIT8nT5w5ZnxxP6_Jl3e3n7cf2rtP7z9ub-5a2ytVWoe9c3JS3ILgliO3k2RidEbWw6cd51wKmJwapZoMsp0ASxmaYTcKRintr8mbS--S4o8Vc9GzzxaPRxMwrllXPSB7IUZZ0df_oIe4pvrZM8XUoGAceaXEhbIp5pzQ6SX52aSTpqDP9vVBP9g_10sNTFf7Nfnyvn_dzTg95P7orsDNBcAq5KfHpLP1GCxOPqEteor-v4_8BtAIm9Y</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Sahan, Halide E.</creator><creator>Yildirim, Ejder A.</creator><creator>Soylu, Aliye</creator><creator>Tabakci, Abdulkadir S.</creator><creator>Cakmak, Serdal</creator><creator>Erkoc, Sahap N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns</title><author>Sahan, Halide E. ; Yildirim, Ejder A. ; Soylu, Aliye ; Tabakci, Abdulkadir S. ; Cakmak, Serdal ; Erkoc, Sahap N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe3ff8d96c076c6e6cd8275fa85fa6db666870df9589dae2b70c12ea4b5721113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anxiety - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dyspepsia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dyspepsia - psychology</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahan, Halide E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Ejder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soylu, Aliye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabakci, Abdulkadir S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Serdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoc, Sahap N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Comprehensive psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahan, Halide E.</au><au>Yildirim, Ejder A.</au><au>Soylu, Aliye</au><au>Tabakci, Abdulkadir S.</au><au>Cakmak, Serdal</au><au>Erkoc, Sahap N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns</atitle><jtitle>Comprehensive psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Compr Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>83</volume><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>0010-440X</issn><eissn>1532-8384</eissn><abstract>Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients have not been studied yet. In our study, we aimed to compare attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients with organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers.
43 patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, 38 patients with organic dyspepsia and 42 healthy volunteers matched in terms of age, sex and education were included in the study. All participants were evaluated using a socio-demographic and clinical data questionnaire, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Adult Attachment Scale.
There was no difference in sociodemographic features among the three groups. Functional dyspepsia group exhibited significantly higher Trait Anxiety scores compared to organic dyspepsia and control groups. Control group showed significantly higher secure attachment styles compared to functional dyspepsia and organic dyspepsia groups, there was no difference between groups in non-secure attachment styles according to triple attachment model. Dimensionally, functional dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than organic dyspepsia groups and organic dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than control group.
According to our findings, Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious than organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients while avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.
•Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients.•Avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.•Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29501961</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.02.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0010-440X |
| ispartof | Comprehensive psychiatry, 2018-05, Vol.83, p.12-18 |
| issn | 0010-440X 1532-8384 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010837758 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Adult Anxiety Anxiety - diagnosis Anxiety - epidemiology Anxiety - psychology Attachment Behavior disorders Disease Dyspepsia - diagnosis Dyspepsia - epidemiology Dyspepsia - psychology Family medical history Fear & phobias Female Humans Hypotheses Male Middle Aged Nervous system Object Attachment Pain Psychopathology Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnostic imaging Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology Stress Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
| title | Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A58%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20functional%20dyspepsia%20with%20organic%20dyspepsia%20in%20terms%20of%20attachment%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Comprehensive%20psychiatry&rft.au=Sahan,%20Halide%20E.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=83&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=0010-440X&rft.eissn=1532-8384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2029490556%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2029490556&rft_id=info:pmid/29501961&rft_els_id=S0010440X18300336&rfr_iscdi=true |