Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users

Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users

The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2018-02, Vol.143 (2), p.1214-1222
Hauptverfasser: Brochier, Tim, McKay, Colette, McDermott, Hugh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1222
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1214
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 143
creator Brochier, Tim
McKay, Colette
McDermott, Hugh
description The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40% of the dynamic range) and modulation frequencies (10 and 100 Hz). Rate modulation detection thresholds (RMDTs) and amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured and compared to assess whether there was a perceptual advantage to either modulation method. Both RMDTs and AMDTs improved with increasing presentation level and decreasing modulation frequency. RMDTs and AMDTs were correlated, indicating that a common processing mechanism may underlie the perception of rate modulation and amplitude modulation, or that some subject-dependent factors affect both types of modulation detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.5025048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010377160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2010377160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-7d62b6ae155637085d1744bf3459ffe0f2a93c5aca2265dbb5e4c6e6295244bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ijyp0TdIkbU8ii1-wIIieQ5pM2Eq7qUkq-O-t23U9CJ5mBh7emXkQOiV4TgglV2TOMeWYFXtoSjjFacEp20dTjDFJWSnEBB2F8DaMvMjKQzShJSu5KOgUXT-rCEnrTN-oWLt1YiCC3nRx5SGsXGNCYp1PtNOrBpRP6rZr1DomfQAfjtGBVU2Ak22dode725fFQ7p8un9c3CxTnXEe09wIWgkFhHOR5bjghuSMVTZjvLQWsKWqzDRXWlEquKkqDkwLELQcPmFVlc3Q-ZjbeffeQ4iyrYOGZrgEXB8kxQRneU4EHtCLEdXeheDBys7XrfKfkmD57UsSufU1sGfb2L5qwezIH0EDcDkCQddxY2jHfDj_myQ7Y_-D_67-Av62gKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010377160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Brochier, Tim ; McKay, Colette ; McDermott, Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Brochier, Tim ; McKay, Colette ; McDermott, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40% of the dynamic range) and modulation frequencies (10 and 100 Hz). Rate modulation detection thresholds (RMDTs) and amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured and compared to assess whether there was a perceptual advantage to either modulation method. Both RMDTs and AMDTs improved with increasing presentation level and decreasing modulation frequency. RMDTs and AMDTs were correlated, indicating that a common processing mechanism may underlie the perception of rate modulation and amplitude modulation, or that some subject-dependent factors affect both types of modulation detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5025048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29495682</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018-02, Vol.143 (2), p.1214-1222</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-7d62b6ae155637085d1744bf3459ffe0f2a93c5aca2265dbb5e4c6e6295244bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-7d62b6ae155637085d1744bf3459ffe0f2a93c5aca2265dbb5e4c6e6295244bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.5025048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,778,782,792,1562,4500,27911,27912,76139</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brochier, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Colette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40% of the dynamic range) and modulation frequencies (10 and 100 Hz). Rate modulation detection thresholds (RMDTs) and amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured and compared to assess whether there was a perceptual advantage to either modulation method. Both RMDTs and AMDTs improved with increasing presentation level and decreasing modulation frequency. RMDTs and AMDTs were correlated, indicating that a common processing mechanism may underlie the perception of rate modulation and amplitude modulation, or that some subject-dependent factors affect both types of modulation detection.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ijyp0TdIkbU8ii1-wIIieQ5pM2Eq7qUkq-O-t23U9CJ5mBh7emXkQOiV4TgglV2TOMeWYFXtoSjjFacEp20dTjDFJWSnEBB2F8DaMvMjKQzShJSu5KOgUXT-rCEnrTN-oWLt1YiCC3nRx5SGsXGNCYp1PtNOrBpRP6rZr1DomfQAfjtGBVU2Ak22dode725fFQ7p8un9c3CxTnXEe09wIWgkFhHOR5bjghuSMVTZjvLQWsKWqzDRXWlEquKkqDkwLELQcPmFVlc3Q-ZjbeffeQ4iyrYOGZrgEXB8kxQRneU4EHtCLEdXeheDBys7XrfKfkmD57UsSufU1sGfb2L5qwezIH0EDcDkCQddxY2jHfDj_myQ7Y_-D_67-Av62gKg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Brochier, Tim</creator><creator>McKay, Colette</creator><creator>McDermott, Hugh</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users</title><author>Brochier, Tim ; McKay, Colette ; McDermott, Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-7d62b6ae155637085d1744bf3459ffe0f2a93c5aca2265dbb5e4c6e6295244bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brochier, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Colette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brochier, Tim</au><au>McKay, Colette</au><au>McDermott, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1214</spage><epage>1222</epage><pages>1214-1222</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40% of the dynamic range) and modulation frequencies (10 and 100 Hz). Rate modulation detection thresholds (RMDTs) and amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured and compared to assess whether there was a perceptual advantage to either modulation method. Both RMDTs and AMDTs improved with increasing presentation level and decreasing modulation frequency. RMDTs and AMDTs were correlated, indicating that a common processing mechanism may underlie the perception of rate modulation and amplitude modulation, or that some subject-dependent factors affect both types of modulation detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29495682</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.5025048</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018-02, Vol.143 (2), p.1214-1222
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010377160
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A25%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate%20modulation%20detection%20thresholds%20for%20cochlear%20implant%20users&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Brochier,%20Tim&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1214&rft.epage=1222&rft.pages=1214-1222&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5025048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2010377160%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010377160&rft_id=info:pmid/29495682&rfr_iscdi=true