Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative

Overseas energy investment as an effective way of securing energy supply is being favored by the world’s leading energy consuming countries. However, energy investment has the potential high risk on multiple forms, including political and regulatory risk, currency, liquidity and refinancing risk as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2018-01, Vol.170, p.535-547
Hauptverfasser: Duan, Fei, Ji, Qiang, Liu, Bing-Yue, Fan, Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 547
container_issue
container_start_page 535
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 170
creator Duan, Fei
Ji, Qiang
Liu, Bing-Yue
Fan, Ying
description Overseas energy investment as an effective way of securing energy supply is being favored by the world’s leading energy consuming countries. However, energy investment has the potential high risk on multiple forms, including political and regulatory risk, currency, liquidity and refinancing risk as well as resource risk and so on. To effectively evaluate overseas energy investment risk, this study proposed a new indicator system from six dimensions. Furthermore, a fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight was constructed to rate the energy investment risk for 50 nations along China’s “Belt & Road initiative”. The findings indicate that resource potential and Chinese factors have become the main determinant of energy investment risk, while environmental constraints and political risk should also be considered for investing decisions. In conclusion, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the most ideal choices for China’s energy investment balancing resource potential and investment environment. •Energy investment risk assessment along the “Belt & Road Initiative” is evaluated.•A new indicator system including 36 indicators from six dimensions is proposed.•A fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight is constructed.•The overall energy investment risk along the “Belt & Road Initiative” is relatively high.•Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the ideal investment choices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.152
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010227709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652617321509</els_id><sourcerecordid>2010227709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-fef643acf56edd970355b3c6377a4d3fb8e449fd997b714eccef620aa1b3bdab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIOQkXnZNNrub5iRaqhYKgtRzyCaTmrrN1mRb6M3X8PV8EqPt3dMw8H0_Mz9Cl5TklND6ZpkvdQvr0OUFoTwnIqdVcYQGdMRFRvmoPkYDIiqR1VVRn6KzGJckgYSXAzSfeAiLHXZ-C7Ffge9xcPEdqxghxr_ddgF71bvOR6zazi_w-M159f35FfE9tD2-wi-dMnjqXe8St4VzdGJVG-HiMIfo9WEyHz9ls-fH6fhulmkmSJ9ZsHXJlLZVDcYITlhVNUzXjHNVGmabEZSlsEYI3nBagtZJKIhStGGNUQ0bout9bvr9Y5PulysXNbSt8tBtokx1kKLgnIiEVntUhy7GAFaug1upsJOUyN8W5VIeWvzVuCRCphaTd7v3IP2xdRBk1A68BuMC6F6azv2T8AOvVYCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010227709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt &amp; Road Initiative</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duan, Fei ; Ji, Qiang ; Liu, Bing-Yue ; Fan, Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Duan, Fei ; Ji, Qiang ; Liu, Bing-Yue ; Fan, Ying</creatorcontrib><description>Overseas energy investment as an effective way of securing energy supply is being favored by the world’s leading energy consuming countries. However, energy investment has the potential high risk on multiple forms, including political and regulatory risk, currency, liquidity and refinancing risk as well as resource risk and so on. To effectively evaluate overseas energy investment risk, this study proposed a new indicator system from six dimensions. Furthermore, a fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight was constructed to rate the energy investment risk for 50 nations along China’s “Belt &amp; Road initiative”. The findings indicate that resource potential and Chinese factors have become the main determinant of energy investment risk, while environmental constraints and political risk should also be considered for investing decisions. In conclusion, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the most ideal choices for China’s energy investment balancing resource potential and investment environment. •Energy investment risk assessment along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is evaluated.•A new indicator system including 36 indicators from six dimensions is proposed.•A fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight is constructed.•The overall energy investment risk along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is relatively high.•Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the ideal investment choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Belt &amp; Road Initiative ; China ; energy ; Energy investment assessment ; entropy ; Entropy weight ; Kazakhstan ; Pakistan ; politics ; risk ; risk assessment ; Russia ; Saudi Arabia ; United Arab Emirates</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2018-01, Vol.170, p.535-547</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-fef643acf56edd970355b3c6377a4d3fb8e449fd997b714eccef620aa1b3bdab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-fef643acf56edd970355b3c6377a4d3fb8e449fd997b714eccef620aa1b3bdab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617321509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duan, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bing-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Ying</creatorcontrib><title>Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt &amp; Road Initiative</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>Overseas energy investment as an effective way of securing energy supply is being favored by the world’s leading energy consuming countries. However, energy investment has the potential high risk on multiple forms, including political and regulatory risk, currency, liquidity and refinancing risk as well as resource risk and so on. To effectively evaluate overseas energy investment risk, this study proposed a new indicator system from six dimensions. Furthermore, a fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight was constructed to rate the energy investment risk for 50 nations along China’s “Belt &amp; Road initiative”. The findings indicate that resource potential and Chinese factors have become the main determinant of energy investment risk, while environmental constraints and political risk should also be considered for investing decisions. In conclusion, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the most ideal choices for China’s energy investment balancing resource potential and investment environment. •Energy investment risk assessment along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is evaluated.•A new indicator system including 36 indicators from six dimensions is proposed.•A fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight is constructed.•The overall energy investment risk along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is relatively high.•Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the ideal investment choices.</description><subject>Belt &amp; Road Initiative</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy investment assessment</subject><subject>entropy</subject><subject>Entropy weight</subject><subject>Kazakhstan</subject><subject>Pakistan</subject><subject>politics</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Saudi Arabia</subject><subject>United Arab Emirates</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIOQkXnZNNrub5iRaqhYKgtRzyCaTmrrN1mRb6M3X8PV8EqPt3dMw8H0_Mz9Cl5TklND6ZpkvdQvr0OUFoTwnIqdVcYQGdMRFRvmoPkYDIiqR1VVRn6KzGJckgYSXAzSfeAiLHXZ-C7Ffge9xcPEdqxghxr_ddgF71bvOR6zazi_w-M159f35FfE9tD2-wi-dMnjqXe8St4VzdGJVG-HiMIfo9WEyHz9ls-fH6fhulmkmSJ9ZsHXJlLZVDcYITlhVNUzXjHNVGmabEZSlsEYI3nBagtZJKIhStGGNUQ0bout9bvr9Y5PulysXNbSt8tBtokx1kKLgnIiEVntUhy7GAFaug1upsJOUyN8W5VIeWvzVuCRCphaTd7v3IP2xdRBk1A68BuMC6F6azv2T8AOvVYCM</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Duan, Fei</creator><creator>Ji, Qiang</creator><creator>Liu, Bing-Yue</creator><creator>Fan, Ying</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt &amp; Road Initiative</title><author>Duan, Fei ; Ji, Qiang ; Liu, Bing-Yue ; Fan, Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-fef643acf56edd970355b3c6377a4d3fb8e449fd997b714eccef620aa1b3bdab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Belt &amp; Road Initiative</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy investment assessment</topic><topic>entropy</topic><topic>Entropy weight</topic><topic>Kazakhstan</topic><topic>Pakistan</topic><topic>politics</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Saudi Arabia</topic><topic>United Arab Emirates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duan, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bing-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Ying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duan, Fei</au><au>Ji, Qiang</au><au>Liu, Bing-Yue</au><au>Fan, Ying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt &amp; Road Initiative</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>535</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>535-547</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>Overseas energy investment as an effective way of securing energy supply is being favored by the world’s leading energy consuming countries. However, energy investment has the potential high risk on multiple forms, including political and regulatory risk, currency, liquidity and refinancing risk as well as resource risk and so on. To effectively evaluate overseas energy investment risk, this study proposed a new indicator system from six dimensions. Furthermore, a fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight was constructed to rate the energy investment risk for 50 nations along China’s “Belt &amp; Road initiative”. The findings indicate that resource potential and Chinese factors have become the main determinant of energy investment risk, while environmental constraints and political risk should also be considered for investing decisions. In conclusion, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the most ideal choices for China’s energy investment balancing resource potential and investment environment. •Energy investment risk assessment along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is evaluated.•A new indicator system including 36 indicators from six dimensions is proposed.•A fuzzy integrated evaluation model based on the entropy weight is constructed.•The overall energy investment risk along the “Belt &amp; Road Initiative” is relatively high.•Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kazakhstan, and Russia are the ideal investment choices.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.152</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2018-01, Vol.170, p.535-547
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010227709
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Belt & Road Initiative
China
energy
Energy investment assessment
entropy
Entropy weight
Kazakhstan
Pakistan
politics
risk
risk assessment
Russia
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
title Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20investment%20risk%20assessment%20for%20nations%20along%20China%E2%80%99s%20Belt%20&%20Road%20Initiative&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Duan,%20Fei&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=535-547&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2010227709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010227709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959652617321509&rfr_iscdi=true