Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis
Volatiles emitted from unpollinated in situ flowers were collected from two male cultivars, ‘M33’, ‘M91’, and one female cultivar ‘Zesy002’ (Gold3) of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis ). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straigh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical ecology 2018-04, Vol.44 (4), p.406-415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 415 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 406 |
container_title | Journal of chemical ecology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Twidle, A. M. Barker, D. Seal, A. G. Fedrizzi, B. Suckling, D. M. |
description | Volatiles emitted from unpollinated
in situ
flowers were collected from two male cultivars, ‘M33’, ‘M91’, and one female cultivar ‘Zesy002’ (Gold3) of kiwifruit (
Actinidia chinensis
var.
chinensis
). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straight chain alkenes dominating the headspace. Electrophysiological responses of honey bees (
Apis mellifera
) and bumble bees (
Bombus terrestris
) to the headspace of the kiwifruit flowers were recorded. Honey bees consistently responded to 11 floral volatiles from Gold3 pistillate flowers while bumble bees consistently responded to only five compounds from the pistillate flowers. Nonanal, 2-phenylethanol, 4-oxoisophorone and (3
E
,6
E
)-
α
-farnesene from pistillate flowers elicited responses from both bee species. Overall, honey bees were more sensitive to the straight chain hydrocarbons of the kiwifruit flowers than the bumble bees, which represented one of the main differences between the responses of the two bee species. The floral volatiles from staminate flowers of the male cultivars ‘M33’ and ‘M91’ varied greatly from those of the pistillate flowers of the female cultivar Gold3, with most of the bee active compounds significantly different from those in the Gold3 flower headspace. The total floral emissions of ‘M33’ flowers were significantly less than those of the Gold3 flowers, while the total floral emissions of the ‘M91’ flowers were significantly greater than those of the Gold3 flowers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2009212542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2009212542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-51f31298c20da56e1c4abb47c47049833207c7c17a70dc9261f61dac326f8c293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFPHCEYholpo1vrD_DSkPTSQ0e_D2aAOZqNtqYmGmO9EpZhWgwLW5ix6b-XzVpNmvRE4H2-F8JDyDHCCQLI04KglGgAVQM9Fw3bIwvsJG-wE_iGLAD6mnCOB-RdKQ8AwITq9skB61ulgPcL8ng5uDj50Vsz-RRpGulFSNkEep9CPQquUBMHepNC8NFMKdNbVzYplhr4SL_5337Ms5_ocg6TfzS5fKZndvLRD95Q-9NHF4svtCYnr9v35O1oQnFHz-sh-X5xfrf82lxdf7lcnl01lks2NR2OHFmvLIPBdMKhbc1q1UrbSmh7xTkDaaVFaSQMtmcCR4GDsZyJsQ71_JB82vVucvo1uzLptS_WhWCiS3PRrH4RQ9a1rKIf_0Ef0pxjfd2WUhJ4K7BSuKNsTqVkN-pN9muT_2gEvZWid1J0laK3UvS2-cNz87xau-Fl4q-FCrAdUGoUf7j8evX_W58A6VaXeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008703461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Twidle, A. M. ; Barker, D. ; Seal, A. G. ; Fedrizzi, B. ; Suckling, D. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Twidle, A. M. ; Barker, D. ; Seal, A. G. ; Fedrizzi, B. ; Suckling, D. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Volatiles emitted from unpollinated
in situ
flowers were collected from two male cultivars, ‘M33’, ‘M91’, and one female cultivar ‘Zesy002’ (Gold3) of kiwifruit (
Actinidia chinensis
var.
chinensis
). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straight chain alkenes dominating the headspace. Electrophysiological responses of honey bees (
Apis mellifera
) and bumble bees (
Bombus terrestris
) to the headspace of the kiwifruit flowers were recorded. Honey bees consistently responded to 11 floral volatiles from Gold3 pistillate flowers while bumble bees consistently responded to only five compounds from the pistillate flowers. Nonanal, 2-phenylethanol, 4-oxoisophorone and (3
E
,6
E
)-
α
-farnesene from pistillate flowers elicited responses from both bee species. Overall, honey bees were more sensitive to the straight chain hydrocarbons of the kiwifruit flowers than the bumble bees, which represented one of the main differences between the responses of the two bee species. The floral volatiles from staminate flowers of the male cultivars ‘M33’ and ‘M91’ varied greatly from those of the pistillate flowers of the female cultivar Gold3, with most of the bee active compounds significantly different from those in the Gold3 flower headspace. The total floral emissions of ‘M33’ flowers were significantly less than those of the Gold3 flowers, while the total floral emissions of the ‘M91’ flowers were significantly greater than those of the Gold3 flowers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-0331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29488039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Actinidia chinensis ; Agriculture ; Alkenes ; Animal behavior ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Biochemistry ; Biological Microscopy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chains ; Chemical ecology ; Cultivars ; Ecology ; Emissions ; Entomology ; Farnesene ; Flowers ; Headspace ; Honey ; Hydrocarbons ; Kiwifruit ; Life Sciences ; Plant reproduction ; Pollinators ; Terpenes ; Volatile compounds ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical ecology, 2018-04, Vol.44 (4), p.406-415</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Chemical Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-51f31298c20da56e1c4abb47c47049833207c7c17a70dc9261f61dac326f8c293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-51f31298c20da56e1c4abb47c47049833207c7c17a70dc9261f61dac326f8c293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29488039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Twidle, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedrizzi, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suckling, D. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis</title><title>Journal of chemical ecology</title><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><description>Volatiles emitted from unpollinated
in situ
flowers were collected from two male cultivars, ‘M33’, ‘M91’, and one female cultivar ‘Zesy002’ (Gold3) of kiwifruit (
Actinidia chinensis
var.
chinensis
). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straight chain alkenes dominating the headspace. Electrophysiological responses of honey bees (
Apis mellifera
) and bumble bees (
Bombus terrestris
) to the headspace of the kiwifruit flowers were recorded. Honey bees consistently responded to 11 floral volatiles from Gold3 pistillate flowers while bumble bees consistently responded to only five compounds from the pistillate flowers. Nonanal, 2-phenylethanol, 4-oxoisophorone and (3
E
,6
E
)-
α
-farnesene from pistillate flowers elicited responses from both bee species. Overall, honey bees were more sensitive to the straight chain hydrocarbons of the kiwifruit flowers than the bumble bees, which represented one of the main differences between the responses of the two bee species. The floral volatiles from staminate flowers of the male cultivars ‘M33’ and ‘M91’ varied greatly from those of the pistillate flowers of the female cultivar Gold3, with most of the bee active compounds significantly different from those in the Gold3 flower headspace. The total floral emissions of ‘M33’ flowers were significantly less than those of the Gold3 flowers, while the total floral emissions of the ‘M91’ flowers were significantly greater than those of the Gold3 flowers.</description><subject>Actinidia chinensis</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alkenes</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological Microscopy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Chemical ecology</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Farnesene</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Headspace</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Kiwifruit</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0098-0331</issn><issn>1573-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFPHCEYholpo1vrD_DSkPTSQ0e_D2aAOZqNtqYmGmO9EpZhWgwLW5ix6b-XzVpNmvRE4H2-F8JDyDHCCQLI04KglGgAVQM9Fw3bIwvsJG-wE_iGLAD6mnCOB-RdKQ8AwITq9skB61ulgPcL8ng5uDj50Vsz-RRpGulFSNkEep9CPQquUBMHepNC8NFMKdNbVzYplhr4SL_5337Ms5_ocg6TfzS5fKZndvLRD95Q-9NHF4svtCYnr9v35O1oQnFHz-sh-X5xfrf82lxdf7lcnl01lks2NR2OHFmvLIPBdMKhbc1q1UrbSmh7xTkDaaVFaSQMtmcCR4GDsZyJsQ71_JB82vVucvo1uzLptS_WhWCiS3PRrH4RQ9a1rKIf_0Ef0pxjfd2WUhJ4K7BSuKNsTqVkN-pN9muT_2gEvZWid1J0laK3UvS2-cNz87xau-Fl4q-FCrAdUGoUf7j8evX_W58A6VaXeQ</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Twidle, A. M.</creator><creator>Barker, D.</creator><creator>Seal, A. G.</creator><creator>Fedrizzi, B.</creator><creator>Suckling, D. M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis</title><author>Twidle, A. M. ; Barker, D. ; Seal, A. G. ; Fedrizzi, B. ; Suckling, D. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-51f31298c20da56e1c4abb47c47049833207c7c17a70dc9261f61dac326f8c293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Actinidia chinensis</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alkenes</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological Microscopy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Chemical ecology</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Farnesene</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Headspace</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Kiwifruit</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Twidle, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedrizzi, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suckling, D. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Twidle, A. M.</au><au>Barker, D.</au><au>Seal, A. G.</au><au>Fedrizzi, B.</au><au>Suckling, D. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle><stitle>J Chem Ecol</stitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>406-415</pages><issn>0098-0331</issn><eissn>1573-1561</eissn><abstract>Volatiles emitted from unpollinated
in situ
flowers were collected from two male cultivars, ‘M33’, ‘M91’, and one female cultivar ‘Zesy002’ (Gold3) of kiwifruit (
Actinidia chinensis
var.
chinensis
). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straight chain alkenes dominating the headspace. Electrophysiological responses of honey bees (
Apis mellifera
) and bumble bees (
Bombus terrestris
) to the headspace of the kiwifruit flowers were recorded. Honey bees consistently responded to 11 floral volatiles from Gold3 pistillate flowers while bumble bees consistently responded to only five compounds from the pistillate flowers. Nonanal, 2-phenylethanol, 4-oxoisophorone and (3
E
,6
E
)-
α
-farnesene from pistillate flowers elicited responses from both bee species. Overall, honey bees were more sensitive to the straight chain hydrocarbons of the kiwifruit flowers than the bumble bees, which represented one of the main differences between the responses of the two bee species. The floral volatiles from staminate flowers of the male cultivars ‘M33’ and ‘M91’ varied greatly from those of the pistillate flowers of the female cultivar Gold3, with most of the bee active compounds significantly different from those in the Gold3 flower headspace. The total floral emissions of ‘M33’ flowers were significantly less than those of the Gold3 flowers, while the total floral emissions of the ‘M91’ flowers were significantly greater than those of the Gold3 flowers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29488039</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-0331 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical ecology, 2018-04, Vol.44 (4), p.406-415 |
issn | 0098-0331 1573-1561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2009212542 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Actinidia chinensis Agriculture Alkenes Animal behavior Apis mellifera Bees Biochemistry Biological Microscopy Biomedical and Life Sciences Chains Chemical ecology Cultivars Ecology Emissions Entomology Farnesene Flowers Headspace Honey Hydrocarbons Kiwifruit Life Sciences Plant reproduction Pollinators Terpenes Volatile compounds Volatiles |
title | Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20Floral%20Volatiles%20and%20Pollinator%20Responses%20in%20Kiwifruit%20Cultivars,%20Actinidia%20chinensis%20var.%20chinensis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20ecology&rft.au=Twidle,%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=406-415&rft.issn=0098-0331&rft.eissn=1573-1561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10886-018-0936-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2009212542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008703461&rft_id=info:pmid/29488039&rfr_iscdi=true |