Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
The authors' study represents the first level I evidence to assess whether intraoperative nerve blocks improve the quality of recovery from immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in whic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2018-03, Vol.141 (3), p.590-597 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 597 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 590 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Lanier, Steven T. Lewis, Kevin C. Kendall, Mark C. Vieira, Brittany L. De Oliveira, Gildasio Nader, Anthony Kim, John Y. S. Alghoul, Mohammed |
description | The authors' study represents the first level I evidence to assess whether intraoperative nerve blocks improve the quality of recovery from immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in which patients undergoing immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction were randomized to either (1) intraoperative intercostal and pectoral nerve blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4 mg of dexamethasone or (2) sham nerve blocks with normal saline. The 40-item Quality of Recovery score, pain score, and opioid use in the postoperative period were compared statistically between groups. Power analysis ensured 80 percent power to detect a 10-point (clinically significant) difference in the 40-item Quality of Recovery score.
Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Age, body mass index, laterality, mastectomy type, and lymph node dissection were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in quality of recovery, pain burden as measured by visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, antiemetic use, or length of hospital stay between groups at 24 hours after surgery. Mean global 40-item Quality of Recovery scores were 169 (range, 155 to 182) for the treatment arm and 165 (range, 143 to 179) for the placebo arm (p = 0.36), indicating a high quality of recovery in both groups.
Although intraoperative nerve blocks can be a safe adjunct to a comprehensive postsurgical recovery regimen, the authors' results indicate no effect on overall quality of recovery from tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Therapeutic, I. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008889400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008889400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-a0ba7229f079addad88f3486b4c2815bb4f145bed28e73ab36f4b6468f95eb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUV1v0zAUtRCIlcI_QMiPPCzDX0kc3tayQaUJSinPke3caGZOXGyHUf4Z_w63Gx_CD7bv0T3n2ucg9JySM0qa-tV68-mM_LMEJeIBmtGSNYVggj1EM0I4Kygp2Ql6EuMXQmjNq_IxOmGNkJQ3dIZ-rsYUlN9BUMl-A_weQt4XzpubiC-VdTh5vBp2wWf446ScTXvse7wBk5Gwx6pPEPDWxjgBvvi-U2OX60UAFdOxa4wpTCZZP77G53gdfNyBOcw6xW_8pB0UC2czqTvFm0z2g_1xuK-dMqB9sfT5gd456PAy91mjHN4Gq9xT9KhXLsKz-3OOPl9ebJfviqsPb1fL86vC8JJVhSJa1Yw1Pakb1XWqk7LnQlZaGCZpqbXoqSg1dExCzZXmVS90JSrZNyVoUfE5enmnmz34OkFM7WCjAefUCH6KLSNEStmIbPYcibtWk38ZA_TtLthBhX1LSXsIrc2htf-Hlmkv7idMeoDuD-l3Sn91b73LbscbN91CaK9BuXR91KtKLgpGqCQ8V8UR4r8A2iulFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008889400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lanier, Steven T. ; Lewis, Kevin C. ; Kendall, Mark C. ; Vieira, Brittany L. ; De Oliveira, Gildasio ; Nader, Anthony ; Kim, John Y. S. ; Alghoul, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Steven T. ; Lewis, Kevin C. ; Kendall, Mark C. ; Vieira, Brittany L. ; De Oliveira, Gildasio ; Nader, Anthony ; Kim, John Y. S. ; Alghoul, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>The authors' study represents the first level I evidence to assess whether intraoperative nerve blocks improve the quality of recovery from immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in which patients undergoing immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction were randomized to either (1) intraoperative intercostal and pectoral nerve blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4 mg of dexamethasone or (2) sham nerve blocks with normal saline. The 40-item Quality of Recovery score, pain score, and opioid use in the postoperative period were compared statistically between groups. Power analysis ensured 80 percent power to detect a 10-point (clinically significant) difference in the 40-item Quality of Recovery score.
Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Age, body mass index, laterality, mastectomy type, and lymph node dissection were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in quality of recovery, pain burden as measured by visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, antiemetic use, or length of hospital stay between groups at 24 hours after surgery. Mean global 40-item Quality of Recovery scores were 169 (range, 155 to 182) for the treatment arm and 165 (range, 143 to 179) for the placebo arm (p = 0.36), indicating a high quality of recovery in both groups.
Although intraoperative nerve blocks can be a safe adjunct to a comprehensive postsurgical recovery regimen, the authors' results indicate no effect on overall quality of recovery from tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Therapeutic, I.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29481391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Bupivacaine - administration & dosage ; Dexamethasone - administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Epinephrine - administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Mastectomy - methods ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Tissue Expansion - instrumentation ; Tissue Expansion - methods ; Tissue Expansion Devices ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2018-03, Vol.141 (3), p.590-597</ispartof><rights>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-a0ba7229f079addad88f3486b4c2815bb4f145bed28e73ab36f4b6468f95eb463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-a0ba7229f079addad88f3486b4c2815bb4f145bed28e73ab36f4b6468f95eb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29481391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Gildasio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, John Y. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alghoul, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>The authors' study represents the first level I evidence to assess whether intraoperative nerve blocks improve the quality of recovery from immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in which patients undergoing immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction were randomized to either (1) intraoperative intercostal and pectoral nerve blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4 mg of dexamethasone or (2) sham nerve blocks with normal saline. The 40-item Quality of Recovery score, pain score, and opioid use in the postoperative period were compared statistically between groups. Power analysis ensured 80 percent power to detect a 10-point (clinically significant) difference in the 40-item Quality of Recovery score.
Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Age, body mass index, laterality, mastectomy type, and lymph node dissection were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in quality of recovery, pain burden as measured by visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, antiemetic use, or length of hospital stay between groups at 24 hours after surgery. Mean global 40-item Quality of Recovery scores were 169 (range, 155 to 182) for the treatment arm and 165 (range, 143 to 179) for the placebo arm (p = 0.36), indicating a high quality of recovery in both groups.
Although intraoperative nerve blocks can be a safe adjunct to a comprehensive postsurgical recovery regimen, the authors' results indicate no effect on overall quality of recovery from tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Therapeutic, I.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dexamethasone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Epinephrine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion Devices</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUV1v0zAUtRCIlcI_QMiPPCzDX0kc3tayQaUJSinPke3caGZOXGyHUf4Z_w63Gx_CD7bv0T3n2ucg9JySM0qa-tV68-mM_LMEJeIBmtGSNYVggj1EM0I4Kygp2Ql6EuMXQmjNq_IxOmGNkJQ3dIZ-rsYUlN9BUMl-A_weQt4XzpubiC-VdTh5vBp2wWf446ScTXvse7wBk5Gwx6pPEPDWxjgBvvi-U2OX60UAFdOxa4wpTCZZP77G53gdfNyBOcw6xW_8pB0UC2czqTvFm0z2g_1xuK-dMqB9sfT5gd456PAy91mjHN4Gq9xT9KhXLsKz-3OOPl9ebJfviqsPb1fL86vC8JJVhSJa1Yw1Pakb1XWqk7LnQlZaGCZpqbXoqSg1dExCzZXmVS90JSrZNyVoUfE5enmnmz34OkFM7WCjAefUCH6KLSNEStmIbPYcibtWk38ZA_TtLthBhX1LSXsIrc2htf-Hlmkv7idMeoDuD-l3Sn91b73LbscbN91CaK9BuXR91KtKLgpGqCQ8V8UR4r8A2iulFA</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Lanier, Steven T.</creator><creator>Lewis, Kevin C.</creator><creator>Kendall, Mark C.</creator><creator>Vieira, Brittany L.</creator><creator>De Oliveira, Gildasio</creator><creator>Nader, Anthony</creator><creator>Kim, John Y. S.</creator><creator>Alghoul, Mohammed</creator><general>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author>Lanier, Steven T. ; Lewis, Kevin C. ; Kendall, Mark C. ; Vieira, Brittany L. ; De Oliveira, Gildasio ; Nader, Anthony ; Kim, John Y. S. ; Alghoul, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-a0ba7229f079addad88f3486b4c2815bb4f145bed28e73ab36f4b6468f95eb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dexamethasone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Epinephrine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion Devices</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Gildasio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, John Y. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alghoul, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanier, Steven T.</au><au>Lewis, Kevin C.</au><au>Kendall, Mark C.</au><au>Vieira, Brittany L.</au><au>De Oliveira, Gildasio</au><au>Nader, Anthony</au><au>Kim, John Y. S.</au><au>Alghoul, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>597</epage><pages>590-597</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>The authors' study represents the first level I evidence to assess whether intraoperative nerve blocks improve the quality of recovery from immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in which patients undergoing immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction were randomized to either (1) intraoperative intercostal and pectoral nerve blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4 mg of dexamethasone or (2) sham nerve blocks with normal saline. The 40-item Quality of Recovery score, pain score, and opioid use in the postoperative period were compared statistically between groups. Power analysis ensured 80 percent power to detect a 10-point (clinically significant) difference in the 40-item Quality of Recovery score.
Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Age, body mass index, laterality, mastectomy type, and lymph node dissection were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in quality of recovery, pain burden as measured by visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, antiemetic use, or length of hospital stay between groups at 24 hours after surgery. Mean global 40-item Quality of Recovery scores were 169 (range, 155 to 182) for the treatment arm and 165 (range, 143 to 179) for the placebo arm (p = 0.36), indicating a high quality of recovery in both groups.
Although intraoperative nerve blocks can be a safe adjunct to a comprehensive postsurgical recovery regimen, the authors' results indicate no effect on overall quality of recovery from tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Therapeutic, I.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>29481391</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000004104</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2018-03, Vol.141 (3), p.590-597 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008889400 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Breast Neoplasms - surgery Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Dexamethasone - administration & dosage Double-Blind Method Epinephrine - administration & dosage Female Humans Injections, Intravenous Intraoperative Care - methods Mammaplasty - methods Mastectomy - methods Middle Aged Nerve Block - methods Prospective Studies Recovery of Function Tissue Expansion - instrumentation Tissue Expansion - methods Tissue Expansion Devices Treatment Failure |
title | Intraoperative Nerve Blocks Fail to Improve Quality of Recovery after Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T07%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Nerve%20Blocks%20Fail%20to%20Improve%20Quality%20of%20Recovery%20after%20Tissue%20Expander%20Breast%20Reconstruction:%20A%20Prospective,%20Double-Blinded,%20Randomized,%20Placebo-Controlled%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Lanier,%20Steven%20T.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=597&rft.pages=590-597&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008889400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008889400&rft_id=info:pmid/29481391&rfr_iscdi=true |