A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review

The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea published the first National Medicines Information (MI) strategy in 2012. For the purpose of implementing the MI strategy into practice by the national MI Network, a comprehensive inventory of MI research in Finland was needed. To systematically review literature o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2018-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1106-1124
Hauptverfasser: Mononen, Niina, Järvinen, Riina, Hämeen-Anttila, Katri, Airaksinen, Marja, Bonhomme, Charlotte, Kleme, Jenni, Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1124
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1106
container_title Research in social and administrative pharmacy
container_volume 14
creator Mononen, Niina
Järvinen, Riina
Hämeen-Anttila, Katri
Airaksinen, Marja
Bonhomme, Charlotte
Kleme, Jenni
Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika
description The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea published the first National Medicines Information (MI) strategy in 2012. For the purpose of implementing the MI strategy into practice by the national MI Network, a comprehensive inventory of MI research in Finland was needed. To systematically review literature on MI research conducted in Finland by analyzing and classifying the studies, and identifying the gaps in MI research. Medline, Scopus and Medic databases were searched for peer-reviewed MI publications by using key word screening criteria. The search and extraction process followed PRISMA Guidelines and covered the period from January 2000 to June 2016. Included studies were content analyzed according to MI practices identified, trends over time in research methodology and theory. Included publications (n = 126) applied a variety of research methods, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 51, 40% of all studies), but more than half of the studies were qualitative (n = 68, 54%). Twelve were intervention studies of which 6 were randomized and had a control group. Studies were categorized into: patient counseling in different settings (n = 45); MI sources and needs of medicine users (n = 25); healthcare professionals' (HCPs) competence in patient counseling and pharmacotherapy (n = 25); MI sources and needs of HCPs (n = 23); MI education and literacy (n = 13); and MI policies and strategies (n = 3). Most of the studies were descriptive, and only 6 studies applied a theory. Regardless of some methodological pitfalls, MI research conducted in Finland since 2000 provides multifaceted understanding of MI practices and their development needs. Research should shift towards larger research lines having a stronger theory base and study designs to deepen the understanding of MI practices and behaviors, and effectiveness of MI in different healthcare settings. Future research should cover also the use of electronic MI sources and services which apply modern information technology to clinical decision making and medication reviews, national MI policy, MI literacy, MI needs of HCPs and consumers. •Altogether 126 studies on medicines information practices in Finland were found.•Patient counseling in different settings was the most studied practice.•Survey was the most used single method, but more than half of all studies were qualitative.•Research should shift towards medicines information literacy and use of electronic sources.•Larger research lines with a stronger theory-ba
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.01.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008885569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551741117309841</els_id><sourcerecordid>2008885569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5d6201d292566b6de53e59bcaf3a988adbfdd7599ddd9ac2a9346f93758c955d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gpKjl12T3U028SKl-EnBi55DNpmlKftlslX6701t9SoMzDC88_E-CF1SklJC-c06DXpYad-mGaEiJTQGPUJTKvMiEZSR41gzRpOyoHSCzkJYE5KXhBanaJLJQuSk4FP0MsedHl3f6QbrYfC9Nis89rgF64zrIGDX1b1vfzTYQwDtzeoWz3HYhhF2fRPbnw6-ztFJrZsAF4c8Q-8P92-Lp2T5-vi8mC8TU9BsTJjl8WObyYxxXnELLAcmK6PrXEshtK1qa0smpbVWapPpaIjXMi-ZMJIxm8_Q9X5v_PZjA2FUrQsGmkZ30G-CyggRQjDGZZSyvdT4PgQPtRq8a7XfKkrUDqNaqwNGtcOoCI1B49zV4cSmiiT-pn65RcHdXgDRaDTvVTAOOhOpeTCjsr3758Q35dSG0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008885569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mononen, Niina ; Järvinen, Riina ; Hämeen-Anttila, Katri ; Airaksinen, Marja ; Bonhomme, Charlotte ; Kleme, Jenni ; Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</creator><creatorcontrib>Mononen, Niina ; Järvinen, Riina ; Hämeen-Anttila, Katri ; Airaksinen, Marja ; Bonhomme, Charlotte ; Kleme, Jenni ; Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</creatorcontrib><description>The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea published the first National Medicines Information (MI) strategy in 2012. For the purpose of implementing the MI strategy into practice by the national MI Network, a comprehensive inventory of MI research in Finland was needed. To systematically review literature on MI research conducted in Finland by analyzing and classifying the studies, and identifying the gaps in MI research. Medline, Scopus and Medic databases were searched for peer-reviewed MI publications by using key word screening criteria. The search and extraction process followed PRISMA Guidelines and covered the period from January 2000 to June 2016. Included studies were content analyzed according to MI practices identified, trends over time in research methodology and theory. Included publications (n = 126) applied a variety of research methods, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 51, 40% of all studies), but more than half of the studies were qualitative (n = 68, 54%). Twelve were intervention studies of which 6 were randomized and had a control group. Studies were categorized into: patient counseling in different settings (n = 45); MI sources and needs of medicine users (n = 25); healthcare professionals' (HCPs) competence in patient counseling and pharmacotherapy (n = 25); MI sources and needs of HCPs (n = 23); MI education and literacy (n = 13); and MI policies and strategies (n = 3). Most of the studies were descriptive, and only 6 studies applied a theory. Regardless of some methodological pitfalls, MI research conducted in Finland since 2000 provides multifaceted understanding of MI practices and their development needs. Research should shift towards larger research lines having a stronger theory base and study designs to deepen the understanding of MI practices and behaviors, and effectiveness of MI in different healthcare settings. Future research should cover also the use of electronic MI sources and services which apply modern information technology to clinical decision making and medication reviews, national MI policy, MI literacy, MI needs of HCPs and consumers. •Altogether 126 studies on medicines information practices in Finland were found.•Patient counseling in different settings was the most studied practice.•Survey was the most used single method, but more than half of all studies were qualitative.•Research should shift towards medicines information literacy and use of electronic sources.•Larger research lines with a stronger theory-base and study designs are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.01.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29483046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Drug Information Services ; Finland ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Personnel - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Medicines education ; Medicines information ; Patient counseling ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research - organization &amp; administration ; Research Design ; Research methodology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2018-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1106-1124</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5d6201d292566b6de53e59bcaf3a988adbfdd7599ddd9ac2a9346f93758c955d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5d6201d292566b6de53e59bcaf3a988adbfdd7599ddd9ac2a9346f93758c955d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741117309841$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29483046$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mononen, Niina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Järvinen, Riina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämeen-Anttila, Katri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Airaksinen, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhomme, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleme, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</creatorcontrib><title>A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review</title><title>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</title><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><description>The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea published the first National Medicines Information (MI) strategy in 2012. For the purpose of implementing the MI strategy into practice by the national MI Network, a comprehensive inventory of MI research in Finland was needed. To systematically review literature on MI research conducted in Finland by analyzing and classifying the studies, and identifying the gaps in MI research. Medline, Scopus and Medic databases were searched for peer-reviewed MI publications by using key word screening criteria. The search and extraction process followed PRISMA Guidelines and covered the period from January 2000 to June 2016. Included studies were content analyzed according to MI practices identified, trends over time in research methodology and theory. Included publications (n = 126) applied a variety of research methods, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 51, 40% of all studies), but more than half of the studies were qualitative (n = 68, 54%). Twelve were intervention studies of which 6 were randomized and had a control group. Studies were categorized into: patient counseling in different settings (n = 45); MI sources and needs of medicine users (n = 25); healthcare professionals' (HCPs) competence in patient counseling and pharmacotherapy (n = 25); MI sources and needs of HCPs (n = 23); MI education and literacy (n = 13); and MI policies and strategies (n = 3). Most of the studies were descriptive, and only 6 studies applied a theory. Regardless of some methodological pitfalls, MI research conducted in Finland since 2000 provides multifaceted understanding of MI practices and their development needs. Research should shift towards larger research lines having a stronger theory base and study designs to deepen the understanding of MI practices and behaviors, and effectiveness of MI in different healthcare settings. Future research should cover also the use of electronic MI sources and services which apply modern information technology to clinical decision making and medication reviews, national MI policy, MI literacy, MI needs of HCPs and consumers. •Altogether 126 studies on medicines information practices in Finland were found.•Patient counseling in different settings was the most studied practice.•Survey was the most used single method, but more than half of all studies were qualitative.•Research should shift towards medicines information literacy and use of electronic sources.•Larger research lines with a stronger theory-base and study designs are needed.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Drug Information Services</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Personnel - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicines education</subject><subject>Medicines information</subject><subject>Patient counseling</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1551-7411</issn><issn>1934-8150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gpKjl12T3U028SKl-EnBi55DNpmlKftlslX6701t9SoMzDC88_E-CF1SklJC-c06DXpYad-mGaEiJTQGPUJTKvMiEZSR41gzRpOyoHSCzkJYE5KXhBanaJLJQuSk4FP0MsedHl3f6QbrYfC9Nis89rgF64zrIGDX1b1vfzTYQwDtzeoWz3HYhhF2fRPbnw6-ztFJrZsAF4c8Q-8P92-Lp2T5-vi8mC8TU9BsTJjl8WObyYxxXnELLAcmK6PrXEshtK1qa0smpbVWapPpaIjXMi-ZMJIxm8_Q9X5v_PZjA2FUrQsGmkZ30G-CyggRQjDGZZSyvdT4PgQPtRq8a7XfKkrUDqNaqwNGtcOoCI1B49zV4cSmiiT-pn65RcHdXgDRaDTvVTAOOhOpeTCjsr3758Q35dSG0Q</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Mononen, Niina</creator><creator>Järvinen, Riina</creator><creator>Hämeen-Anttila, Katri</creator><creator>Airaksinen, Marja</creator><creator>Bonhomme, Charlotte</creator><creator>Kleme, Jenni</creator><creator>Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review</title><author>Mononen, Niina ; Järvinen, Riina ; Hämeen-Anttila, Katri ; Airaksinen, Marja ; Bonhomme, Charlotte ; Kleme, Jenni ; Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5d6201d292566b6de53e59bcaf3a988adbfdd7599ddd9ac2a9346f93758c955d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Drug Information Services</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Personnel - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicines education</topic><topic>Medicines information</topic><topic>Patient counseling</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mononen, Niina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Järvinen, Riina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämeen-Anttila, Katri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Airaksinen, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhomme, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleme, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mononen, Niina</au><au>Järvinen, Riina</au><au>Hämeen-Anttila, Katri</au><au>Airaksinen, Marja</au><au>Bonhomme, Charlotte</au><au>Kleme, Jenni</au><au>Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1106</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1106-1124</pages><issn>1551-7411</issn><eissn>1934-8150</eissn><abstract>The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea published the first National Medicines Information (MI) strategy in 2012. For the purpose of implementing the MI strategy into practice by the national MI Network, a comprehensive inventory of MI research in Finland was needed. To systematically review literature on MI research conducted in Finland by analyzing and classifying the studies, and identifying the gaps in MI research. Medline, Scopus and Medic databases were searched for peer-reviewed MI publications by using key word screening criteria. The search and extraction process followed PRISMA Guidelines and covered the period from January 2000 to June 2016. Included studies were content analyzed according to MI practices identified, trends over time in research methodology and theory. Included publications (n = 126) applied a variety of research methods, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 51, 40% of all studies), but more than half of the studies were qualitative (n = 68, 54%). Twelve were intervention studies of which 6 were randomized and had a control group. Studies were categorized into: patient counseling in different settings (n = 45); MI sources and needs of medicine users (n = 25); healthcare professionals' (HCPs) competence in patient counseling and pharmacotherapy (n = 25); MI sources and needs of HCPs (n = 23); MI education and literacy (n = 13); and MI policies and strategies (n = 3). Most of the studies were descriptive, and only 6 studies applied a theory. Regardless of some methodological pitfalls, MI research conducted in Finland since 2000 provides multifaceted understanding of MI practices and their development needs. Research should shift towards larger research lines having a stronger theory base and study designs to deepen the understanding of MI practices and behaviors, and effectiveness of MI in different healthcare settings. Future research should cover also the use of electronic MI sources and services which apply modern information technology to clinical decision making and medication reviews, national MI policy, MI literacy, MI needs of HCPs and consumers. •Altogether 126 studies on medicines information practices in Finland were found.•Patient counseling in different settings was the most studied practice.•Survey was the most used single method, but more than half of all studies were qualitative.•Research should shift towards medicines information literacy and use of electronic sources.•Larger research lines with a stronger theory-base and study designs are needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29483046</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.01.011</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7411
ispartof Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2018-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1106-1124
issn 1551-7411
1934-8150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008885569
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration
Drug Information Services
Finland
Guidelines as Topic
Health Personnel - organization & administration
Humans
Medicines education
Medicines information
Patient counseling
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research - organization & administration
Research Design
Research methodology
Systematic review
title A national approach to medicines information research: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20national%20approach%20to%20medicines%20information%20research:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy&rft.au=Mononen,%20Niina&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1106&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1106-1124&rft.issn=1551-7411&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.01.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008885569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008885569&rft_id=info:pmid/29483046&rft_els_id=S1551741117309841&rfr_iscdi=true