Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 451.e8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 451.e1 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 218 |
creator | Zaki, Mary N. Wing, Deborah A. McNulty, Jennifer A. |
description | Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores.
A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups.
In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007988265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937818301558</els_id><sourcerecordid>2007988265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMuO1DAQRS3EiGlm-AEWyEs2CWUncWzEBrV4tDTSbJi1Ve1Ut9xy7MZOhsfXk6gHlqzqoXtvqQ5jrwXUAoR6d6rxlI61BKFrkDUI8YxtBJi-Ulrp52wDALIyTa-v2ctSTusojXzBrqVp-1a3zYb93KbxjNmXFHk68DLhOVDhj4WXee_mybs5YF6Gac7EfeQuYCl8t9vxtKdC_EcaKfI5DpSPyccjd1QwE8b3HHnGOKTR_6aBuxSnnEJY2il7DLfs6oCh0KunesMePn_6tv1a3d1_2W0_3lWu6dRUNR0MvdBSdQpEpxC0kOgECmg73RpjpHCmbRToBlSL5GQ_dMvGKexMj7q5YW8vueecvs9UJjv64igEjJTmYiVAb_R6YJHKi9TlVEqmgz1nP2L-ZQXYlbg92ZW4XYlbkHYhvpjePOXP-5GGf5a_iBfBh4uAli8fPWVbnKfoaPCZ3GSH5P-X_wfD2pIJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007988265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores.
A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups.
In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29474843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Mass Index ; California - epidemiology ; cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section ; class III obesity ; Female ; Humans ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pregnancy ; severely obese ; skin closure ; smoking ; Smoking - adverse effects ; staples ; surgical site infections ; Surgical Stapling ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Suture Techniques ; sutures ; tobacco ; Wound Healing ; wound infection ; wound separation</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937818301558$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29474843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores.
A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups.
In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>California - epidemiology</subject><subject>cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>class III obesity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>severely obese</subject><subject>skin closure</subject><subject>smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>staples</subject><subject>surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>sutures</subject><subject>tobacco</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>wound infection</subject><subject>wound separation</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMuO1DAQRS3EiGlm-AEWyEs2CWUncWzEBrV4tDTSbJi1Ve1Ut9xy7MZOhsfXk6gHlqzqoXtvqQ5jrwXUAoR6d6rxlI61BKFrkDUI8YxtBJi-Ulrp52wDALIyTa-v2ctSTusojXzBrqVp-1a3zYb93KbxjNmXFHk68DLhOVDhj4WXee_mybs5YF6Gac7EfeQuYCl8t9vxtKdC_EcaKfI5DpSPyccjd1QwE8b3HHnGOKTR_6aBuxSnnEJY2il7DLfs6oCh0KunesMePn_6tv1a3d1_2W0_3lWu6dRUNR0MvdBSdQpEpxC0kOgECmg73RpjpHCmbRToBlSL5GQ_dMvGKexMj7q5YW8vueecvs9UJjv64igEjJTmYiVAb_R6YJHKi9TlVEqmgz1nP2L-ZQXYlbg92ZW4XYlbkHYhvpjePOXP-5GGf5a_iBfBh4uAli8fPWVbnKfoaPCZ3GSH5P-X_wfD2pIJ</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Zaki, Mary N.</creator><creator>Wing, Deborah A.</creator><creator>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>California - epidemiology</topic><topic>cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>class III obesity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>severely obese</topic><topic>skin closure</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>staples</topic><topic>surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>sutures</topic><topic>tobacco</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>wound infection</topic><topic>wound separation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaki, Mary N.</au><au>Wing, Deborah A.</au><au>McNulty, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>218</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>451.e1</spage><epage>451.e8</epage><pages>451.e1-451.e8</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores.
A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups.
In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29474843</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007988265 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Body Mass Index California - epidemiology cesarean delivery Cesarean Section class III obesity Female Humans Obesity - epidemiology Pain Measurement Patient Satisfaction Pregnancy severely obese skin closure smoking Smoking - adverse effects staples surgical site infections Surgical Stapling Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Suture Techniques sutures tobacco Wound Healing wound infection wound separation |
title | Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20staples%20vs%20subcuticular%20suture%20in%20class%20III%20obese%20women%20undergoing%20cesarean:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Zaki,%20Mary%20N.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=218&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=451.e1&rft.epage=451.e8&rft.pages=451.e1-451.e8&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2007988265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007988265&rft_id=info:pmid/29474843&rft_els_id=S0002937818301558&rfr_iscdi=true |