Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial

Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8
Hauptverfasser: Zaki, Mary N., Wing, Deborah A., McNulty, Jennifer A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451.e8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 451.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 218
creator Zaki, Mary N.
Wing, Deborah A.
McNulty, Jennifer A.
description Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007988265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937818301558</els_id><sourcerecordid>2007988265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMuO1DAQRS3EiGlm-AEWyEs2CWUncWzEBrV4tDTSbJi1Ve1Ut9xy7MZOhsfXk6gHlqzqoXtvqQ5jrwXUAoR6d6rxlI61BKFrkDUI8YxtBJi-Ulrp52wDALIyTa-v2ctSTusojXzBrqVp-1a3zYb93KbxjNmXFHk68DLhOVDhj4WXee_mybs5YF6Gac7EfeQuYCl8t9vxtKdC_EcaKfI5DpSPyccjd1QwE8b3HHnGOKTR_6aBuxSnnEJY2il7DLfs6oCh0KunesMePn_6tv1a3d1_2W0_3lWu6dRUNR0MvdBSdQpEpxC0kOgECmg73RpjpHCmbRToBlSL5GQ_dMvGKexMj7q5YW8vueecvs9UJjv64igEjJTmYiVAb_R6YJHKi9TlVEqmgz1nP2L-ZQXYlbg92ZW4XYlbkHYhvpjePOXP-5GGf5a_iBfBh4uAli8fPWVbnKfoaPCZ3GSH5P-X_wfD2pIJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007988265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29474843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Mass Index ; California - epidemiology ; cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section ; class III obesity ; Female ; Humans ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pregnancy ; severely obese ; skin closure ; smoking ; Smoking - adverse effects ; staples ; surgical site infections ; Surgical Stapling ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Suture Techniques ; sutures ; tobacco ; Wound Healing ; wound infection ; wound separation</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937818301558$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29474843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>California - epidemiology</subject><subject>cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>class III obesity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>severely obese</subject><subject>skin closure</subject><subject>smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>staples</subject><subject>surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>sutures</subject><subject>tobacco</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>wound infection</subject><subject>wound separation</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMuO1DAQRS3EiGlm-AEWyEs2CWUncWzEBrV4tDTSbJi1Ve1Ut9xy7MZOhsfXk6gHlqzqoXtvqQ5jrwXUAoR6d6rxlI61BKFrkDUI8YxtBJi-Ulrp52wDALIyTa-v2ctSTusojXzBrqVp-1a3zYb93KbxjNmXFHk68DLhOVDhj4WXee_mybs5YF6Gac7EfeQuYCl8t9vxtKdC_EcaKfI5DpSPyccjd1QwE8b3HHnGOKTR_6aBuxSnnEJY2il7DLfs6oCh0KunesMePn_6tv1a3d1_2W0_3lWu6dRUNR0MvdBSdQpEpxC0kOgECmg73RpjpHCmbRToBlSL5GQ_dMvGKexMj7q5YW8vueecvs9UJjv64igEjJTmYiVAb_R6YJHKi9TlVEqmgz1nP2L-ZQXYlbg92ZW4XYlbkHYhvpjePOXP-5GGf5a_iBfBh4uAli8fPWVbnKfoaPCZ3GSH5P-X_wfD2pIJ</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Zaki, Mary N.</creator><creator>Wing, Deborah A.</creator><creator>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Zaki, Mary N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; McNulty, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-350d71826560156a0812ac1a10458499921c9436083064aec27d5c94c6a597a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>California - epidemiology</topic><topic>cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>class III obesity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>severely obese</topic><topic>skin closure</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>staples</topic><topic>surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>sutures</topic><topic>tobacco</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>wound infection</topic><topic>wound separation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Mary N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaki, Mary N.</au><au>Wing, Deborah A.</au><au>McNulty, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>218</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>451.e1</spage><epage>451.e8</epage><pages>451.e1-451.e8</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29474843</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-6667</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-04, Vol.218 (4), p.451.e1-451.e8
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007988265
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Body Mass Index
California - epidemiology
cesarean delivery
Cesarean Section
class III obesity
Female
Humans
Obesity - epidemiology
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Pregnancy
severely obese
skin closure
smoking
Smoking - adverse effects
staples
surgical site infections
Surgical Stapling
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Suture Techniques
sutures
tobacco
Wound Healing
wound infection
wound separation
title Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20staples%20vs%20subcuticular%20suture%20in%20class%20III%20obese%20women%20undergoing%20cesarean:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Zaki,%20Mary%20N.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=218&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=451.e1&rft.epage=451.e8&rft.pages=451.e1-451.e8&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2007988265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007988265&rft_id=info:pmid/29474843&rft_els_id=S0002937818301558&rfr_iscdi=true