Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities

Perception is fundamentally a multisensory experience. The principle of inverse effectiveness (PoIE) states how the multisensory gain is maximal when responses to the unisensory constituents of the stimuli are weak. It is one of the basic principles underlying multisensory processing of spatiotempor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2018-05, Vol.80 (4), p.999-1010
Hauptverfasser: Møller, Cecilie, Højlund, Andreas, Bærentsen, Klaus B., Hansen, Niels Chr, Skewes, Joshua C., Vuust, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1010
container_issue 4
container_start_page 999
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 80
creator Møller, Cecilie
Højlund, Andreas
Bærentsen, Klaus B.
Hansen, Niels Chr
Skewes, Joshua C.
Vuust, Peter
description Perception is fundamentally a multisensory experience. The principle of inverse effectiveness (PoIE) states how the multisensory gain is maximal when responses to the unisensory constituents of the stimuli are weak. It is one of the basic principles underlying multisensory processing of spatiotemporally corresponding crossmodal stimuli that are well established at behavioral as well as neural levels. It is not yet clear, however, how modality-specific stimulus features influence discrimination of subtle changes in a crossmodally corresponding feature belonging to another modality. Here, we tested the hypothesis that reliance on visual cues to pitch discrimination follow the PoIE at the interindividual level (i.e., varies with varying levels of auditory-only pitch discrimination abilities). Using an oddball pitch discrimination task, we measured the effect of varying visually perceived vertical position in participants exhibiting a wide range of pitch discrimination abilities (i.e., musicians and nonmusicians). Visual cues significantly enhanced pitch discrimination as measured by the sensitivity index d’ , and more so in the crossmodally congruent than incongruent condition. The magnitude of gain caused by compatible visual cues was associated with individual pitch discrimination thresholds, as predicted by the PoIE . This was not the case for the magnitude of the congruence effect, which was unrelated to individual pitch discrimination thresholds, indicating that the pitch-height association is robust to variations in auditory skills. Our findings shed light on individual differences in multisensory processing by suggesting that relevant multisensory information that crucially aids some perceivers’ performance may be of less importance to others, depending on their unisensory abilities.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007983856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193969805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-4e1c3b6b02f529dd732c277dbd699fcb2264e192fbeeea45c42b18bf9d0f9e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsZcONmNK95xJ0UX1Bwo-Iu5DVt6jRTkxml_960UysIrvK43zm5uQeAUwQvSZGVVwERimgKUZEiWqK03ANDxChJCSNv-7s9RgNwFMIcwpzkBTwEA8xoQRDFQzB9taETdb1KrNOdMjqZCutCPCVL26pZom1Q3i6sE61t3HUyse7dumkiOm2b9HOjTpa-USaE9f2XbWebYtv4VSKkrW1rTTgGB5WogznZriPwcnf7PH5IJ0_3j-ObSaooytqUGqSIzCXEVYaZ1gXBCheFljpnrFIS4zwiDFfSGCNopiiWqJQV07BihgkyAhe9b2zpozOh5Yv4AVPXwpmmCxxDWLCSlFke0fM_6LzpvIvdcYwYYTkrYRYp1FPKNyF4U_FlHIfwK44gX6fA-xR4TIGvU-Bl1JxtnTu5MHqn-Bl7BHAPhFhyU-N_n_7f9Rt08JR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193969805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Møller, Cecilie ; Højlund, Andreas ; Bærentsen, Klaus B. ; Hansen, Niels Chr ; Skewes, Joshua C. ; Vuust, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Møller, Cecilie ; Højlund, Andreas ; Bærentsen, Klaus B. ; Hansen, Niels Chr ; Skewes, Joshua C. ; Vuust, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Perception is fundamentally a multisensory experience. The principle of inverse effectiveness (PoIE) states how the multisensory gain is maximal when responses to the unisensory constituents of the stimuli are weak. It is one of the basic principles underlying multisensory processing of spatiotemporally corresponding crossmodal stimuli that are well established at behavioral as well as neural levels. It is not yet clear, however, how modality-specific stimulus features influence discrimination of subtle changes in a crossmodally corresponding feature belonging to another modality. Here, we tested the hypothesis that reliance on visual cues to pitch discrimination follow the PoIE at the interindividual level (i.e., varies with varying levels of auditory-only pitch discrimination abilities). Using an oddball pitch discrimination task, we measured the effect of varying visually perceived vertical position in participants exhibiting a wide range of pitch discrimination abilities (i.e., musicians and nonmusicians). Visual cues significantly enhanced pitch discrimination as measured by the sensitivity index d’ , and more so in the crossmodally congruent than incongruent condition. The magnitude of gain caused by compatible visual cues was associated with individual pitch discrimination thresholds, as predicted by the PoIE . This was not the case for the magnitude of the congruence effect, which was unrelated to individual pitch discrimination thresholds, indicating that the pitch-height association is robust to variations in auditory skills. Our findings shed light on individual differences in multisensory processing by suggesting that relevant multisensory information that crucially aids some perceivers’ performance may be of less importance to others, depending on their unisensory abilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29473142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brain research ; Cognition ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Discrimination Learning ; Evidence ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Individuality ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Music ; Musicians &amp; conductors ; Perceptions ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Pitch Discrimination - physiology ; Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Speech ; Stimuli ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2018-05, Vol.80 (4), p.999-1010</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-4e1c3b6b02f529dd732c277dbd699fcb2264e192fbeeea45c42b18bf9d0f9e9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-4e1c3b6b02f529dd732c277dbd699fcb2264e192fbeeea45c42b18bf9d0f9e9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29473142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Møller, Cecilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Højlund, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bærentsen, Klaus B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Niels Chr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skewes, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuust, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Perception is fundamentally a multisensory experience. The principle of inverse effectiveness (PoIE) states how the multisensory gain is maximal when responses to the unisensory constituents of the stimuli are weak. It is one of the basic principles underlying multisensory processing of spatiotemporally corresponding crossmodal stimuli that are well established at behavioral as well as neural levels. It is not yet clear, however, how modality-specific stimulus features influence discrimination of subtle changes in a crossmodally corresponding feature belonging to another modality. Here, we tested the hypothesis that reliance on visual cues to pitch discrimination follow the PoIE at the interindividual level (i.e., varies with varying levels of auditory-only pitch discrimination abilities). Using an oddball pitch discrimination task, we measured the effect of varying visually perceived vertical position in participants exhibiting a wide range of pitch discrimination abilities (i.e., musicians and nonmusicians). Visual cues significantly enhanced pitch discrimination as measured by the sensitivity index d’ , and more so in the crossmodally congruent than incongruent condition. The magnitude of gain caused by compatible visual cues was associated with individual pitch discrimination thresholds, as predicted by the PoIE . This was not the case for the magnitude of the congruence effect, which was unrelated to individual pitch discrimination thresholds, indicating that the pitch-height association is robust to variations in auditory skills. Our findings shed light on individual differences in multisensory processing by suggesting that relevant multisensory information that crucially aids some perceivers’ performance may be of less importance to others, depending on their unisensory abilities.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Musicians &amp; conductors</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsZcONmNK95xJ0UX1Bwo-Iu5DVt6jRTkxml_960UysIrvK43zm5uQeAUwQvSZGVVwERimgKUZEiWqK03ANDxChJCSNv-7s9RgNwFMIcwpzkBTwEA8xoQRDFQzB9taETdb1KrNOdMjqZCutCPCVL26pZom1Q3i6sE61t3HUyse7dumkiOm2b9HOjTpa-USaE9f2XbWebYtv4VSKkrW1rTTgGB5WogznZriPwcnf7PH5IJ0_3j-ObSaooytqUGqSIzCXEVYaZ1gXBCheFljpnrFIS4zwiDFfSGCNopiiWqJQV07BihgkyAhe9b2zpozOh5Yv4AVPXwpmmCxxDWLCSlFke0fM_6LzpvIvdcYwYYTkrYRYp1FPKNyF4U_FlHIfwK44gX6fA-xR4TIGvU-Bl1JxtnTu5MHqn-Bl7BHAPhFhyU-N_n_7f9Rt08JR0</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Møller, Cecilie</creator><creator>Højlund, Andreas</creator><creator>Bærentsen, Klaus B.</creator><creator>Hansen, Niels Chr</creator><creator>Skewes, Joshua C.</creator><creator>Vuust, Peter</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities</title><author>Møller, Cecilie ; Højlund, Andreas ; Bærentsen, Klaus B. ; Hansen, Niels Chr ; Skewes, Joshua C. ; Vuust, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-4e1c3b6b02f529dd732c277dbd699fcb2264e192fbeeea45c42b18bf9d0f9e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Musicians &amp; conductors</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Møller, Cecilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Højlund, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bærentsen, Klaus B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Niels Chr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skewes, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuust, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Møller, Cecilie</au><au>Højlund, Andreas</au><au>Bærentsen, Klaus B.</au><au>Hansen, Niels Chr</au><au>Skewes, Joshua C.</au><au>Vuust, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>999</spage><epage>1010</epage><pages>999-1010</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Perception is fundamentally a multisensory experience. The principle of inverse effectiveness (PoIE) states how the multisensory gain is maximal when responses to the unisensory constituents of the stimuli are weak. It is one of the basic principles underlying multisensory processing of spatiotemporally corresponding crossmodal stimuli that are well established at behavioral as well as neural levels. It is not yet clear, however, how modality-specific stimulus features influence discrimination of subtle changes in a crossmodally corresponding feature belonging to another modality. Here, we tested the hypothesis that reliance on visual cues to pitch discrimination follow the PoIE at the interindividual level (i.e., varies with varying levels of auditory-only pitch discrimination abilities). Using an oddball pitch discrimination task, we measured the effect of varying visually perceived vertical position in participants exhibiting a wide range of pitch discrimination abilities (i.e., musicians and nonmusicians). Visual cues significantly enhanced pitch discrimination as measured by the sensitivity index d’ , and more so in the crossmodally congruent than incongruent condition. The magnitude of gain caused by compatible visual cues was associated with individual pitch discrimination thresholds, as predicted by the PoIE . This was not the case for the magnitude of the congruence effect, which was unrelated to individual pitch discrimination thresholds, indicating that the pitch-height association is robust to variations in auditory skills. Our findings shed light on individual differences in multisensory processing by suggesting that relevant multisensory information that crucially aids some perceivers’ performance may be of less importance to others, depending on their unisensory abilities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29473142</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2018-05, Vol.80 (4), p.999-1010
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007983856
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adult
Auditory Perception
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brain research
Cognition
Cognitive Development
Cognitive Processes
Cognitive Psychology
Cues
Discrimination Learning
Evidence
Experimental psychology
Female
Humans
Individual Differences
Individuality
Listening Comprehension
Male
Music
Musicians & conductors
Perceptions
Photic Stimulation - methods
Pitch Discrimination - physiology
Psychology
Resistance (Psychology)
Semantics
Semiotics
Speech
Stimuli
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visually%20induced%20gains%20in%20pitch%20discrimination:%20Linking%20audio-visual%20processing%20with%20auditory%20abilities&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=M%C3%B8ller,%20Cecilie&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=999&rft.epage=1010&rft.pages=999-1010&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-017-1481-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193969805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193969805&rft_id=info:pmid/29473142&rfr_iscdi=true