Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol

The primary objective of this study was to identify the capacity and mechanism of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) adsorption on soil colloids of Alfisol and Ultisol at different pH and ionic strengths. Two kinds of EPS were extracted from Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens by cent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2018-06, Vol.237, p.39-49
Hauptverfasser: Ren, Li-ying, Hong, Zhi-neng, Qian, Wei, Li, Jiu-yu, Xu, Ren-kou
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 49
container_issue
container_start_page 39
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 237
creator Ren, Li-ying
Hong, Zhi-neng
Qian, Wei
Li, Jiu-yu
Xu, Ren-kou
description The primary objective of this study was to identify the capacity and mechanism of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) adsorption on soil colloids of Alfisol and Ultisol at different pH and ionic strengths. Two kinds of EPS were extracted from Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens by centrifugation, and their adsorption on Ultisol and Alfisol was investigated using a batch adsorption experiment and attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). The average diameter of EPS from B. subtilis and P. fluorescens was 1825 and 1288 nm, respectively, and both the EPS were negatively charged. The zeta potentials of the two EPS became more negative with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8 and less negative with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. The maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-C and EPS-N on Alfisol was higher than that on Ultisol, whereas the maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-P on Alfisol was lower than that on Ultisol. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Ultisol and Alfisol decreased with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8. Adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Alfisol significantly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 10 mM, whereas it remained constant, slightly increased, or reduced, when the ionic strength was increased from 10 to 80 mM. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P on Ultisol slightly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. Saturation coverage determined by ATR-FTIR showed that adsorption of whole EPS on Ultisol was higher than that on Alfisol at pH 6 after 60 min. Thus, electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids. [Display omitted] •Ultisol had lower sorption capacity for EPS-C, -N but higher for EPS-P than Alfisol.•Electrostatic force played an important role in EPS adsorption.•Protein and phosphate groups also contributed to EPS adsorption.•ATR-FTIR can be used to examine kinetics of EPS adsorption on soil colloids.•Components of soil colloids affected adsorption of EPS-C, -N and -P. Electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007983717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749117347589</els_id><sourcerecordid>2007983717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-551a1d3b3be5bee42495a008e0f2ff1d6dac2ccdeb5d6d5d64396ea382d6780e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi7_QCRHL91Wkl4vwiBuMOBFzyGdVGOG7s6YpF3-vRlGPXooqqBe1eN9hJwzyBmw6mqd4_S-cUPOgTU5sBzqco8sWFOLrCp4sU8WwKs2q4uWHZHjENYAUAghDskRb4uaMV4tiF6a4PwmWjfREfWrmmwYqespfkavNA7DPChPk8_XiN5qGuYuRDVpDLT3bqTxw9FO6ZiWiqYnL0O0wQ1UTYYuh347n5KDXg0Bz376CXm5u32-echWT_ePN8tVpkXFY1aWTDEjOtFh2SGmCG2pABqEnvc9M5VRmmttsCvTnKoQbYVKNNxUdQMoTsjl7u_Gu7cZQ5SjDdsIakI3B8kB6rYRNauTtNhJtXcheOzlxttR-S_JQG7xyrXc4ZVbvBKYTHjT2cWPw9yNaP6OfnkmwfVOgCnnu0Uvg7aYaBnrUUdpnP3f4RtoUZBB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007983717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ren, Li-ying ; Hong, Zhi-neng ; Qian, Wei ; Li, Jiu-yu ; Xu, Ren-kou</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Li-ying ; Hong, Zhi-neng ; Qian, Wei ; Li, Jiu-yu ; Xu, Ren-kou</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of this study was to identify the capacity and mechanism of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) adsorption on soil colloids of Alfisol and Ultisol at different pH and ionic strengths. Two kinds of EPS were extracted from Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens by centrifugation, and their adsorption on Ultisol and Alfisol was investigated using a batch adsorption experiment and attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). The average diameter of EPS from B. subtilis and P. fluorescens was 1825 and 1288 nm, respectively, and both the EPS were negatively charged. The zeta potentials of the two EPS became more negative with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8 and less negative with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. The maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-C and EPS-N on Alfisol was higher than that on Ultisol, whereas the maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-P on Alfisol was lower than that on Ultisol. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Ultisol and Alfisol decreased with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8. Adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Alfisol significantly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 10 mM, whereas it remained constant, slightly increased, or reduced, when the ionic strength was increased from 10 to 80 mM. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P on Ultisol slightly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. Saturation coverage determined by ATR-FTIR showed that adsorption of whole EPS on Ultisol was higher than that on Alfisol at pH 6 after 60 min. Thus, electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids. [Display omitted] •Ultisol had lower sorption capacity for EPS-C, -N but higher for EPS-P than Alfisol.•Electrostatic force played an important role in EPS adsorption.•Protein and phosphate groups also contributed to EPS adsorption.•ATR-FTIR can be used to examine kinetics of EPS adsorption on soil colloids.•Components of soil colloids affected adsorption of EPS-C, -N and -P. Electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29471126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ATR-FTIR ; Extracellular polymeric substances ; Ionic strength ; Soil colloid</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2018-06, Vol.237, p.39-49</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-551a1d3b3be5bee42495a008e0f2ff1d6dac2ccdeb5d6d5d64396ea382d6780e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-551a1d3b3be5bee42495a008e0f2ff1d6dac2ccdeb5d6d5d64396ea382d6780e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Li-ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhi-neng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiu-yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ren-kou</creatorcontrib><title>Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>The primary objective of this study was to identify the capacity and mechanism of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) adsorption on soil colloids of Alfisol and Ultisol at different pH and ionic strengths. Two kinds of EPS were extracted from Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens by centrifugation, and their adsorption on Ultisol and Alfisol was investigated using a batch adsorption experiment and attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). The average diameter of EPS from B. subtilis and P. fluorescens was 1825 and 1288 nm, respectively, and both the EPS were negatively charged. The zeta potentials of the two EPS became more negative with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8 and less negative with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. The maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-C and EPS-N on Alfisol was higher than that on Ultisol, whereas the maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-P on Alfisol was lower than that on Ultisol. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Ultisol and Alfisol decreased with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8. Adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Alfisol significantly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 10 mM, whereas it remained constant, slightly increased, or reduced, when the ionic strength was increased from 10 to 80 mM. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P on Ultisol slightly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. Saturation coverage determined by ATR-FTIR showed that adsorption of whole EPS on Ultisol was higher than that on Alfisol at pH 6 after 60 min. Thus, electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids. [Display omitted] •Ultisol had lower sorption capacity for EPS-C, -N but higher for EPS-P than Alfisol.•Electrostatic force played an important role in EPS adsorption.•Protein and phosphate groups also contributed to EPS adsorption.•ATR-FTIR can be used to examine kinetics of EPS adsorption on soil colloids.•Components of soil colloids affected adsorption of EPS-C, -N and -P. Electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids.</description><subject>ATR-FTIR</subject><subject>Extracellular polymeric substances</subject><subject>Ionic strength</subject><subject>Soil colloid</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi7_QCRHL91Wkl4vwiBuMOBFzyGdVGOG7s6YpF3-vRlGPXooqqBe1eN9hJwzyBmw6mqd4_S-cUPOgTU5sBzqco8sWFOLrCp4sU8WwKs2q4uWHZHjENYAUAghDskRb4uaMV4tiF6a4PwmWjfREfWrmmwYqespfkavNA7DPChPk8_XiN5qGuYuRDVpDLT3bqTxw9FO6ZiWiqYnL0O0wQ1UTYYuh347n5KDXg0Bz376CXm5u32-echWT_ePN8tVpkXFY1aWTDEjOtFh2SGmCG2pABqEnvc9M5VRmmttsCvTnKoQbYVKNNxUdQMoTsjl7u_Gu7cZQ5SjDdsIakI3B8kB6rYRNauTtNhJtXcheOzlxttR-S_JQG7xyrXc4ZVbvBKYTHjT2cWPw9yNaP6OfnkmwfVOgCnnu0Uvg7aYaBnrUUdpnP3f4RtoUZBB</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Ren, Li-ying</creator><creator>Hong, Zhi-neng</creator><creator>Qian, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Jiu-yu</creator><creator>Xu, Ren-kou</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol</title><author>Ren, Li-ying ; Hong, Zhi-neng ; Qian, Wei ; Li, Jiu-yu ; Xu, Ren-kou</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-551a1d3b3be5bee42495a008e0f2ff1d6dac2ccdeb5d6d5d64396ea382d6780e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>ATR-FTIR</topic><topic>Extracellular polymeric substances</topic><topic>Ionic strength</topic><topic>Soil colloid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Li-ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhi-neng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiu-yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ren-kou</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Li-ying</au><au>Hong, Zhi-neng</au><au>Qian, Wei</au><au>Li, Jiu-yu</au><au>Xu, Ren-kou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>39</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>39-49</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>The primary objective of this study was to identify the capacity and mechanism of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) adsorption on soil colloids of Alfisol and Ultisol at different pH and ionic strengths. Two kinds of EPS were extracted from Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens by centrifugation, and their adsorption on Ultisol and Alfisol was investigated using a batch adsorption experiment and attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). The average diameter of EPS from B. subtilis and P. fluorescens was 1825 and 1288 nm, respectively, and both the EPS were negatively charged. The zeta potentials of the two EPS became more negative with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8 and less negative with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. The maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-C and EPS-N on Alfisol was higher than that on Ultisol, whereas the maximum adsorption capacity of EPS-P on Alfisol was lower than that on Ultisol. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Ultisol and Alfisol decreased with increasing solution pH from 3 to 8. Adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P of both the EPS on Alfisol significantly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 10 mM, whereas it remained constant, slightly increased, or reduced, when the ionic strength was increased from 10 to 80 mM. The adsorption of EPS-C, EPS-N, and EPS-P on Ultisol slightly increased with increasing ionic strength from 0 to 80 mM. Saturation coverage determined by ATR-FTIR showed that adsorption of whole EPS on Ultisol was higher than that on Alfisol at pH 6 after 60 min. Thus, electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids. [Display omitted] •Ultisol had lower sorption capacity for EPS-C, -N but higher for EPS-P than Alfisol.•Electrostatic force played an important role in EPS adsorption.•Protein and phosphate groups also contributed to EPS adsorption.•ATR-FTIR can be used to examine kinetics of EPS adsorption on soil colloids.•Components of soil colloids affected adsorption of EPS-C, -N and -P. Electrostatic force between EPS and soil colloids played an important role in EPS adsorption. Besides, proteins and phosphate groups in EPS also contributed to EPS adsorption on soil colloids.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29471126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.075</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2018-06, Vol.237, p.39-49
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007983717
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects ATR-FTIR
Extracellular polymeric substances
Ionic strength
Soil colloid
title Adsorption mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances from two bacteria on Ultisol and Alfisol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adsorption%20mechanism%20of%20extracellular%20polymeric%20substances%20from%20two%20bacteria%20on%20Ultisol%20and%20Alfisol&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Ren,%20Li-ying&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=39-49&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2007983717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007983717&rft_id=info:pmid/29471126&rft_els_id=S0269749117347589&rfr_iscdi=true