Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape

Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2-yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow-release N fertilizer sources and landsca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2009-05, Vol.101 (3), p.607-614
Hauptverfasser: Noellsch, A.J, Motavalli, P.P, Nelson, K.A, Kitchen, N.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 614
container_issue 3
container_start_page 607
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 101
creator Noellsch, A.J
Motavalli, P.P
Nelson, K.A
Kitchen, N.R
description Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2-yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow-release N fertilizer sources and landscape position (summit, sideslope, and low-lying) on crop growth and NRE in corn (Zea mays L.) in a claypan soil. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments at 168 kg N ha-1 consisted of pre-plant applied and incorporated polymer-coated urea (PCU), urea, 50% PCU/50% urea mix by weight, anhydrous ammonia (AA), and a nontreated control. Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low-lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions. Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha-1 over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006. Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low-lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006. Based on the grain yield results in this research and different fertilizer cost and crop prices, gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant-applied AA compared with urea in the low-lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha-1. These results demonstrate that targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2008.0067x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20079286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20079286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490X-8ca3e306cab9277b7e6d3a405994bf51078a12f6bb82cbd0a37c0ce8be7e70e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZfSQtyk99wqCu1NyeyHtNLRiMRtMAk4DeRUMVqPgsxmV92Vm7p_fddxaKGXngYev_eG9xg75XAmuFTn-BC82wiA6gyg1D9fsRlXssihVMVrNgMAkfO6FEfsbYwbAM5rxWfsW-ODy1YUR-8iZZPPGu9-kJsG79Bm6NbZrfVP-YosYQKuhyn4B3LZJYVpsMMvCjFDE3xMJ2ss7kZ02TL5osGRTtibHm2kdy_3mN1dXnxtPufLm8WXZr7MjarhPq8MSpJQGuxqoXWnqVxLVFDUter6goOukIu-7LpKmG4NKLUBQ1VHmjSQlMfs0yF3DP77luLUPg7RkLXoyG9jm3bRtajKBH74B9z4bUhVYytlWYlKFZAgOEDPvQL17RiGRwy7lkO7X7v9u3b7vHayfHzJxVTc9gGdGeIfn-BKy6pQiZsfuKfB0u6_ue18cSXmi9XN9dVe3Gv3KeP9IaNHv3ekP3e3ArgEXkpRFIX8DTOinrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>336828450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Noellsch, A.J ; Motavalli, P.P ; Nelson, K.A ; Kitchen, N.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Noellsch, A.J ; Motavalli, P.P ; Nelson, K.A ; Kitchen, N.R</creatorcontrib><description>Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2-yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow-release N fertilizer sources and landscape position (summit, sideslope, and low-lying) on crop growth and NRE in corn (Zea mays L.) in a claypan soil. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments at 168 kg N ha-1 consisted of pre-plant applied and incorporated polymer-coated urea (PCU), urea, 50% PCU/50% urea mix by weight, anhydrous ammonia (AA), and a nontreated control. Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low-lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions. Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha-1 over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006. Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low-lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006. Based on the grain yield results in this research and different fertilizer cost and crop prices, gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant-applied AA compared with urea in the low-lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha-1. These results demonstrate that targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0067x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; anhydrous ammonia ; Biological and medical sciences ; claypan soils ; corn ; cost analysis ; economic analysis ; fertilizer rates ; field experimentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grain crops ; grain yield ; Nitrogen fertilization ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutrient uptake ; nutrient use efficiency ; polymer-coated urea ; profitability ; slope ; slow-release fertilizers ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; topography ; urea ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2009-05, Vol.101 (3), p.607-614</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490X-8ca3e306cab9277b7e6d3a405994bf51078a12f6bb82cbd0a37c0ce8be7e70e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490X-8ca3e306cab9277b7e6d3a405994bf51078a12f6bb82cbd0a37c0ce8be7e70e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0067x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0067x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21473854$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noellsch, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motavalli, P.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, N.R</creatorcontrib><title>Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2-yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow-release N fertilizer sources and landscape position (summit, sideslope, and low-lying) on crop growth and NRE in corn (Zea mays L.) in a claypan soil. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments at 168 kg N ha-1 consisted of pre-plant applied and incorporated polymer-coated urea (PCU), urea, 50% PCU/50% urea mix by weight, anhydrous ammonia (AA), and a nontreated control. Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low-lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions. Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha-1 over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006. Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low-lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006. Based on the grain yield results in this research and different fertilizer cost and crop prices, gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant-applied AA compared with urea in the low-lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha-1. These results demonstrate that targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>anhydrous ammonia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>claypan soils</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grain crops</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutrient uptake</subject><subject>nutrient use efficiency</subject><subject>polymer-coated urea</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>slope</subject><subject>slow-release fertilizers</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>urea</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZfSQtyk99wqCu1NyeyHtNLRiMRtMAk4DeRUMVqPgsxmV92Vm7p_fddxaKGXngYev_eG9xg75XAmuFTn-BC82wiA6gyg1D9fsRlXssihVMVrNgMAkfO6FEfsbYwbAM5rxWfsW-ODy1YUR-8iZZPPGu9-kJsG79Bm6NbZrfVP-YosYQKuhyn4B3LZJYVpsMMvCjFDE3xMJ2ss7kZ02TL5osGRTtibHm2kdy_3mN1dXnxtPufLm8WXZr7MjarhPq8MSpJQGuxqoXWnqVxLVFDUter6goOukIu-7LpKmG4NKLUBQ1VHmjSQlMfs0yF3DP77luLUPg7RkLXoyG9jm3bRtajKBH74B9z4bUhVYytlWYlKFZAgOEDPvQL17RiGRwy7lkO7X7v9u3b7vHayfHzJxVTc9gGdGeIfn-BKy6pQiZsfuKfB0u6_ue18cSXmi9XN9dVe3Gv3KeP9IaNHv3ekP3e3ArgEXkpRFIX8DTOinrg</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Noellsch, A.J</creator><creator>Motavalli, P.P</creator><creator>Nelson, K.A</creator><creator>Kitchen, N.R</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape</title><author>Noellsch, A.J ; Motavalli, P.P ; Nelson, K.A ; Kitchen, N.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490X-8ca3e306cab9277b7e6d3a405994bf51078a12f6bb82cbd0a37c0ce8be7e70e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>anhydrous ammonia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>claypan soils</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grain crops</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutrient uptake</topic><topic>nutrient use efficiency</topic><topic>polymer-coated urea</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>slope</topic><topic>slow-release fertilizers</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>urea</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noellsch, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motavalli, P.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, N.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noellsch, A.J</au><au>Motavalli, P.P</au><au>Nelson, K.A</au><au>Kitchen, N.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>607-614</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2-yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow-release N fertilizer sources and landscape position (summit, sideslope, and low-lying) on crop growth and NRE in corn (Zea mays L.) in a claypan soil. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments at 168 kg N ha-1 consisted of pre-plant applied and incorporated polymer-coated urea (PCU), urea, 50% PCU/50% urea mix by weight, anhydrous ammonia (AA), and a nontreated control. Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low-lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions. Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha-1 over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006. Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low-lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006. Based on the grain yield results in this research and different fertilizer cost and crop prices, gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant-applied AA compared with urea in the low-lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha-1. These results demonstrate that targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2008.0067x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2009-05, Vol.101 (3), p.607-614
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20079286
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
anhydrous ammonia
Biological and medical sciences
claypan soils
corn
cost analysis
economic analysis
fertilizer rates
field experimentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
grain crops
grain yield
Nitrogen fertilization
nitrogen fertilizers
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
nutrient uptake
nutrient use efficiency
polymer-coated urea
profitability
slope
slow-release fertilizers
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
topography
urea
Zea mays
title Corn Response to Conventional and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A54%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corn%20Response%20to%20Conventional%20and%20Slow-Release%20Nitrogen%20Fertilizers%20across%20a%20Claypan%20Landscape&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Noellsch,%20A.J&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=607-614&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2008.0067x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20079286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=336828450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true