Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment
This article describes an extended collaboration between a development team and an evaluation team working with GenScope, an open-ended exploratory software tool. In some respects, this was a routine evaluation, documenting substantial gains (of roughly 1 SD) in genetics reasoning ability in all but...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American educational research journal 2003, Vol.40 (2), p.495-538 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 538 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 495 |
container_title | American educational research journal |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Hickey, Daniel T. Ann C. H. Kindfield Horwitz, Paul Mary Ann T. Christie |
description | This article describes an extended collaboration between a development team and an evaluation team working with GenScope, an open-ended exploratory software tool. In some respects, this was a routine evaluation, documenting substantial gains (of roughly 1 SD) in genetics reasoning ability in all but 1 of 17 classes, despite challenges presented by school computer-lab settings. Relative to matched comparison classes, larger gains were found in technical biology and general science courses but not in college prep or honors biology courses. In other respects, our effort illustrates the value of new views of assessment, technology, and research. The alignment of a sophisticated research assessment and simple classroom assessments shed light on initial failures, spurring revision. By refining the GenScope activities and extending the classroom assessments, we supported worthwhile whole-class discourse around the shared understanding of the software. A follow-up study in a laptop-equipped classroom yielded the absolute and relative gains (3.1 SD and 1.6 SD) that proponents of such innovations have long promised. In retrospect, the strengths and weakness of the study illustrate the value of newer "design-based" approaches to educational research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3102/00028312040002495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20075140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ782334</ericid><jstor_id>3699396</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_00028312040002495</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3699396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-5492a482bc149693c87154c20b5c0d917ef3841876b765a19feaffd3f8667bbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2P0zAQhi0EEmXhByBxsDhwahaPP-L4uKrKUlSJA8s5cpxJSZXaxR-72n9PoqJFggsnj_w-89iaIeQtsGsBjH9kjPFGAGdyqaRRz8gKjFAVMIDnZLXcVgvwkrxK6cgYcNPAijzsfMZDtHn0B7opMY6uTOW0pjufciwuj8Gv6U1KmNIJfV5T63u6vbdTsUtGR08tvUP3w4cpHB6rb-V8DjFjT2_RYx5donu00S_-rb8fY_CL5zV5Mdgp4Zvf5xX5_ml7t_lc7b_e7jY3-8pJrXOlpOFWNrxzIE1thGs0KOk465RjvQGNg2gkNLrudK0smAHtMPRiaOpad10vrsiHi_ccw8-CKbenMTmcJusxlNRyxrQCyWbw_V_gMZTo578tjJRMGTVDcIFcDClFHNpzHE82PrbA2mUP7T97mHveXXpwnu0Tv_2iGy6EnOPrS5zsAf-8-R--Y8ohPglFbYwwtfgFjySa0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200440595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hickey, Daniel T. ; Ann C. H. Kindfield ; Horwitz, Paul ; Mary Ann T. Christie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Daniel T. ; Ann C. H. Kindfield ; Horwitz, Paul ; Mary Ann T. Christie</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes an extended collaboration between a development team and an evaluation team working with GenScope, an open-ended exploratory software tool. In some respects, this was a routine evaluation, documenting substantial gains (of roughly 1 SD) in genetics reasoning ability in all but 1 of 17 classes, despite challenges presented by school computer-lab settings. Relative to matched comparison classes, larger gains were found in technical biology and general science courses but not in college prep or honors biology courses. In other respects, our effort illustrates the value of new views of assessment, technology, and research. The alignment of a sophisticated research assessment and simple classroom assessments shed light on initial failures, spurring revision. By refining the GenScope activities and extending the classroom assessments, we supported worthwhile whole-class discourse around the shared understanding of the software. A follow-up study in a laptop-equipped classroom yielded the absolute and relative gains (3.1 SD and 1.6 SD) that proponents of such innovations have long promised. In retrospect, the strengths and weakness of the study illustrate the value of newer "design-based" approaches to educational research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/00028312040002495</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AECJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Educational Research Association</publisher><subject>Abstract Reasoning ; Achievement Gains ; Biology ; Classrooms ; Collaboration ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Software ; Computers in education ; Core curriculum ; Curricula ; Educational Environment ; Educational Research ; Educational Technology ; Educational Testing ; Followup Studies ; Genetics ; Genotype & phenotype ; Inheritances ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning ; Reasoning ; Research design ; Research methodology ; Science Curriculum ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Science Teachers ; Skill Development ; Software ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching, Learning, and Human Development ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>American educational research journal, 2003, Vol.40 (2), p.495-538</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Summer 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-5492a482bc149693c87154c20b5c0d917ef3841876b765a19feaffd3f8667bbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-5492a482bc149693c87154c20b5c0d917ef3841876b765a19feaffd3f8667bbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3699396$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3699396$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ782334$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ann C. H. Kindfield</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mary Ann T. Christie</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment</title><title>American educational research journal</title><description>This article describes an extended collaboration between a development team and an evaluation team working with GenScope, an open-ended exploratory software tool. In some respects, this was a routine evaluation, documenting substantial gains (of roughly 1 SD) in genetics reasoning ability in all but 1 of 17 classes, despite challenges presented by school computer-lab settings. Relative to matched comparison classes, larger gains were found in technical biology and general science courses but not in college prep or honors biology courses. In other respects, our effort illustrates the value of new views of assessment, technology, and research. The alignment of a sophisticated research assessment and simple classroom assessments shed light on initial failures, spurring revision. By refining the GenScope activities and extending the classroom assessments, we supported worthwhile whole-class discourse around the shared understanding of the software. A follow-up study in a laptop-equipped classroom yielded the absolute and relative gains (3.1 SD and 1.6 SD) that proponents of such innovations have long promised. In retrospect, the strengths and weakness of the study illustrate the value of newer "design-based" approaches to educational research.</description><subject>Abstract Reasoning</subject><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Computers in education</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Educational Testing</subject><subject>Followup Studies</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Inheritances</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching, Learning, and Human Development</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0002-8312</issn><issn>1935-1011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2P0zAQhi0EEmXhByBxsDhwahaPP-L4uKrKUlSJA8s5cpxJSZXaxR-72n9PoqJFggsnj_w-89iaIeQtsGsBjH9kjPFGAGdyqaRRz8gKjFAVMIDnZLXcVgvwkrxK6cgYcNPAijzsfMZDtHn0B7opMY6uTOW0pjufciwuj8Gv6U1KmNIJfV5T63u6vbdTsUtGR08tvUP3w4cpHB6rb-V8DjFjT2_RYx5donu00S_-rb8fY_CL5zV5Mdgp4Zvf5xX5_ml7t_lc7b_e7jY3-8pJrXOlpOFWNrxzIE1thGs0KOk465RjvQGNg2gkNLrudK0smAHtMPRiaOpad10vrsiHi_ccw8-CKbenMTmcJusxlNRyxrQCyWbw_V_gMZTo578tjJRMGTVDcIFcDClFHNpzHE82PrbA2mUP7T97mHveXXpwnu0Tv_2iGy6EnOPrS5zsAf-8-R--Y8ohPglFbYwwtfgFjySa0A</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Hickey, Daniel T.</creator><creator>Ann C. H. Kindfield</creator><creator>Horwitz, Paul</creator><creator>Mary Ann T. Christie</creator><general>American Educational Research Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment</title><author>Hickey, Daniel T. ; Ann C. H. Kindfield ; Horwitz, Paul ; Mary Ann T. Christie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-5492a482bc149693c87154c20b5c0d917ef3841876b765a19feaffd3f8667bbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Abstract Reasoning</topic><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Computers in education</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Educational Testing</topic><topic>Followup Studies</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Inheritances</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching, Learning, and Human Development</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ann C. H. Kindfield</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mary Ann T. Christie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hickey, Daniel T.</au><au>Ann C. H. Kindfield</au><au>Horwitz, Paul</au><au>Mary Ann T. Christie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ782334</ericid><atitle>Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment</atitle><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>495-538</pages><issn>0002-8312</issn><eissn>1935-1011</eissn><coden>AECJAX</coden><abstract>This article describes an extended collaboration between a development team and an evaluation team working with GenScope, an open-ended exploratory software tool. In some respects, this was a routine evaluation, documenting substantial gains (of roughly 1 SD) in genetics reasoning ability in all but 1 of 17 classes, despite challenges presented by school computer-lab settings. Relative to matched comparison classes, larger gains were found in technical biology and general science courses but not in college prep or honors biology courses. In other respects, our effort illustrates the value of new views of assessment, technology, and research. The alignment of a sophisticated research assessment and simple classroom assessments shed light on initial failures, spurring revision. By refining the GenScope activities and extending the classroom assessments, we supported worthwhile whole-class discourse around the shared understanding of the software. A follow-up study in a laptop-equipped classroom yielded the absolute and relative gains (3.1 SD and 1.6 SD) that proponents of such innovations have long promised. In retrospect, the strengths and weakness of the study illustrate the value of newer "design-based" approaches to educational research.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Educational Research Association</pub><doi>10.3102/00028312040002495</doi><tpages>44</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8312 |
ispartof | American educational research journal, 2003, Vol.40 (2), p.495-538 |
issn | 0002-8312 1935-1011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20075140 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Abstract Reasoning Achievement Gains Biology Classrooms Collaboration Computer Assisted Instruction Computer Software Computers in education Core curriculum Curricula Educational Environment Educational Research Educational Technology Educational Testing Followup Studies Genetics Genotype & phenotype Inheritances Instructional Effectiveness Learning Reasoning Research design Research methodology Science Curriculum Science education Science Instruction Science Teachers Skill Development Software Student Evaluation Students Teaching Teaching Methods Teaching, Learning, and Human Development Thinking Skills |
title | Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Curriculum,%20Instruction,%20Assessment,%20and%20Evaluation%20in%20a%20Technology-Supported%20Genetics%20Learning%20Environment&rft.jtitle=American%20educational%20research%20journal&rft.au=Hickey,%20Daniel%20T.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=495-538&rft.issn=0002-8312&rft.eissn=1935-1011&rft.coden=AECJAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/00028312040002495&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3699396%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200440595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ782334&rft_jstor_id=3699396&rft_sage_id=10.3102_00028312040002495&rfr_iscdi=true |