DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity

The consumption of red meat has been linked to an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. One of the major hypotheses states that heme iron (present in red meat) stimulates the formation of genotoxic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) and lipid peroxidation products (LPOs). By means of DNA adductomics, chem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and chemical toxicology 2018-05, Vol.115, p.73-87
Hauptverfasser: Hemeryck, Lieselot Y., Rombouts, Caroline, De Paepe, Ellen, Vanhaecke, Lynn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue
container_start_page 73
container_title Food and chemical toxicology
container_volume 115
creator Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.
Rombouts, Caroline
De Paepe, Ellen
Vanhaecke, Lynn
description The consumption of red meat has been linked to an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. One of the major hypotheses states that heme iron (present in red meat) stimulates the formation of genotoxic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) and lipid peroxidation products (LPOs). By means of DNA adductomics, chemically induced DNA adduct formation can be mapped in relation to e.g. dietary exposures. In this study, this state-of-the-art methodology was used to investigate alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct formation in in vitro red vs. white meat digests. In doing so, 90 alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct types could be (tentatively) identified. Overall, 12 NOC- and/or LPO-related DNA adduct types, i.e. dimethyl-T (or ethyl-T), hydroxymethyl-T, tetramethyl-T, methylguanine (MeG), guanidinohydantoin, hydroxybutyl-C, hydroxymethylhydantoin, malondialdehyde-x3-C, O6-carboxymethylguanine, hydroxyethyl-T, carboxyethyl-T and 3,N4-etheno-C were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers. The retrieval of these DNA adduct markers is in support of the heme, NOC and LPO hypotheses, suggesting that DNA adduct formation may indeed contribute to red meat related CRC risk. [Display omitted] •Beef and chicken meat underwent separate in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion.•Genotoxic effects were assessed by means of UHPLC-HRMS DNA adductomics.•The individual gut microbiome steers the gastro-intestinal formation of DNA adducts.•12 DNA adduct types were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007115180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691518300978</els_id><sourcerecordid>2007115180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f608d6b0425207aefaa34ed455be6e2d7b08ba429059fd64bd51bfbb832e30213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtvFDEUhS0EIpvAD6BBLmlmcm2PPbOiihLykCJooEOy_LhevJoZL2PvQv49Xm2gpLrNd47u-Qh5x6BlwNTltg2utBzY0AJvQfAXZMWGXjRKSPaSrID3Q6PWTJ6R85y3ANCzXr0mZ3zdyYEpsSLfbz5fUeP93hW6W1KIY5w3NAUaZ3qIZUnUpTHN0dEJTaE-bjCXTEuik9nRBT095Jb--hELnogNzqmk39HF8vSGvApmzPj2-V6Qb7efvl7fN49f7h6urx4bJ6QoTVAweGWh45JDbzAYIzr0nZQWFXLfWxis6fga5Dp41VkvmQ3WDoKjAM7EBflw6q0Lfu7rg3qK2eE4mhnTPmt-HM4kG6Ci7IS6JeW8YNC7JU5medIM9FGq3uoqVR-lauC6Sq2Z98_1ezuh_5f4a7ECH08A1pGHiIvOLuLs0McFa5lP8T_1fwBDgIdu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007115180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. ; Rombouts, Caroline ; De Paepe, Ellen ; Vanhaecke, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. ; Rombouts, Caroline ; De Paepe, Ellen ; Vanhaecke, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>The consumption of red meat has been linked to an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. One of the major hypotheses states that heme iron (present in red meat) stimulates the formation of genotoxic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) and lipid peroxidation products (LPOs). By means of DNA adductomics, chemically induced DNA adduct formation can be mapped in relation to e.g. dietary exposures. In this study, this state-of-the-art methodology was used to investigate alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct formation in in vitro red vs. white meat digests. In doing so, 90 alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct types could be (tentatively) identified. Overall, 12 NOC- and/or LPO-related DNA adduct types, i.e. dimethyl-T (or ethyl-T), hydroxymethyl-T, tetramethyl-T, methylguanine (MeG), guanidinohydantoin, hydroxybutyl-C, hydroxymethylhydantoin, malondialdehyde-x3-C, O6-carboxymethylguanine, hydroxyethyl-T, carboxyethyl-T and 3,N4-etheno-C were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers. The retrieval of these DNA adduct markers is in support of the heme, NOC and LPO hypotheses, suggesting that DNA adduct formation may indeed contribute to red meat related CRC risk. [Display omitted] •Beef and chicken meat underwent separate in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion.•Genotoxic effects were assessed by means of UHPLC-HRMS DNA adductomics.•The individual gut microbiome steers the gastro-intestinal formation of DNA adducts.•12 DNA adduct types were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29458163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer risk ; DNA adductome mapping ; Heme ; Red meat</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2018-05, Vol.115, p.73-87</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f608d6b0425207aefaa34ed455be6e2d7b08ba429059fd64bd51bfbb832e30213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f608d6b0425207aefaa34ed455be6e2d7b08ba429059fd64bd51bfbb832e30213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2451-3375</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombouts, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paepe, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecke, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>The consumption of red meat has been linked to an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. One of the major hypotheses states that heme iron (present in red meat) stimulates the formation of genotoxic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) and lipid peroxidation products (LPOs). By means of DNA adductomics, chemically induced DNA adduct formation can be mapped in relation to e.g. dietary exposures. In this study, this state-of-the-art methodology was used to investigate alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct formation in in vitro red vs. white meat digests. In doing so, 90 alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct types could be (tentatively) identified. Overall, 12 NOC- and/or LPO-related DNA adduct types, i.e. dimethyl-T (or ethyl-T), hydroxymethyl-T, tetramethyl-T, methylguanine (MeG), guanidinohydantoin, hydroxybutyl-C, hydroxymethylhydantoin, malondialdehyde-x3-C, O6-carboxymethylguanine, hydroxyethyl-T, carboxyethyl-T and 3,N4-etheno-C were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers. The retrieval of these DNA adduct markers is in support of the heme, NOC and LPO hypotheses, suggesting that DNA adduct formation may indeed contribute to red meat related CRC risk. [Display omitted] •Beef and chicken meat underwent separate in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion.•Genotoxic effects were assessed by means of UHPLC-HRMS DNA adductomics.•The individual gut microbiome steers the gastro-intestinal formation of DNA adducts.•12 DNA adduct types were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers.</description><subject>Cancer risk</subject><subject>DNA adductome mapping</subject><subject>Heme</subject><subject>Red meat</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtvFDEUhS0EIpvAD6BBLmlmcm2PPbOiihLykCJooEOy_LhevJoZL2PvQv49Xm2gpLrNd47u-Qh5x6BlwNTltg2utBzY0AJvQfAXZMWGXjRKSPaSrID3Q6PWTJ6R85y3ANCzXr0mZ3zdyYEpsSLfbz5fUeP93hW6W1KIY5w3NAUaZ3qIZUnUpTHN0dEJTaE-bjCXTEuik9nRBT095Jb--hELnogNzqmk39HF8vSGvApmzPj2-V6Qb7efvl7fN49f7h6urx4bJ6QoTVAweGWh45JDbzAYIzr0nZQWFXLfWxis6fga5Dp41VkvmQ3WDoKjAM7EBflw6q0Lfu7rg3qK2eE4mhnTPmt-HM4kG6Ci7IS6JeW8YNC7JU5medIM9FGq3uoqVR-lauC6Sq2Z98_1ezuh_5f4a7ECH08A1pGHiIvOLuLs0McFa5lP8T_1fwBDgIdu</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.</creator><creator>Rombouts, Caroline</creator><creator>De Paepe, Ellen</creator><creator>Vanhaecke, Lynn</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2451-3375</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity</title><author>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. ; Rombouts, Caroline ; De Paepe, Ellen ; Vanhaecke, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f608d6b0425207aefaa34ed455be6e2d7b08ba429059fd64bd51bfbb832e30213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cancer risk</topic><topic>DNA adductome mapping</topic><topic>Heme</topic><topic>Red meat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombouts, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paepe, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecke, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.</au><au>Rombouts, Caroline</au><au>De Paepe, Ellen</au><au>Vanhaecke, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>115</volume><spage>73</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>73-87</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><abstract>The consumption of red meat has been linked to an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. One of the major hypotheses states that heme iron (present in red meat) stimulates the formation of genotoxic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) and lipid peroxidation products (LPOs). By means of DNA adductomics, chemically induced DNA adduct formation can be mapped in relation to e.g. dietary exposures. In this study, this state-of-the-art methodology was used to investigate alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct formation in in vitro red vs. white meat digests. In doing so, 90 alkylation and (lipid per)oxidation induced DNA adduct types could be (tentatively) identified. Overall, 12 NOC- and/or LPO-related DNA adduct types, i.e. dimethyl-T (or ethyl-T), hydroxymethyl-T, tetramethyl-T, methylguanine (MeG), guanidinohydantoin, hydroxybutyl-C, hydroxymethylhydantoin, malondialdehyde-x3-C, O6-carboxymethylguanine, hydroxyethyl-T, carboxyethyl-T and 3,N4-etheno-C were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers. The retrieval of these DNA adduct markers is in support of the heme, NOC and LPO hypotheses, suggesting that DNA adduct formation may indeed contribute to red meat related CRC risk. [Display omitted] •Beef and chicken meat underwent separate in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion.•Genotoxic effects were assessed by means of UHPLC-HRMS DNA adductomics.•The individual gut microbiome steers the gastro-intestinal formation of DNA adducts.•12 DNA adduct types were singled out as potential heme-rich meat digestion markers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29458163</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.032</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2451-3375</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6915
ispartof Food and chemical toxicology, 2018-05, Vol.115, p.73-87
issn 0278-6915
1873-6351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2007115180
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cancer risk
DNA adductome mapping
Heme
Red meat
title DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20adduct%20profiling%20of%20in%20vitro%20colonic%20meat%20digests%20to%20map%20red%20vs.%20white%20meat%20genotoxicity&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Hemeryck,%20Lieselot%20Y.&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=115&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=73-87&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2007115180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007115180&rft_id=info:pmid/29458163&rft_els_id=S0278691518300978&rfr_iscdi=true