Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia
Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional change...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1101-1109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1101 |
container_title | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, Yong-Shin Joo, Jindeok Choi, Jin-Woo Jeong, Hong-Soo Chung, Si-Wook |
description | Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional changes. A total of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized into desflurane or propofol groups. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at seven time points: before induction (baseline), after endotracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, after the first Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after reverse Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after the second Trendelenburg and right tilt position and before endotracheal extubation. Trendelenburg positioning raised IOP in both groups. In the desflurane group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 6.27 and 8.48 mmHg higher than baseline IOP in left and right eye, respectively; IOP at the second Trendelenburg position was 7 and 9.44 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively. In the propofol group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 2.04 and 4.04 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eyes, respectively. It was 3.04 and 4.87 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively, at the second Trendelenburg position. In the desflurane group, 56.52% patients exhibited high IOP (≥ 25 mmHg) compared with 13.04% in the propofol group at the second Trendelenburg position in the right eyes (
P
= 0.005). There was a positive correlation between IOP and peak inspiratory pressure (
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2004375292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002883959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-60b15e95bb75c2f9c87088fe7438e0c74a55d169abc8bef16e185b6a135f73923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd2K1TAUhYsozo8-gDcS8MaLqSZN06TeyaCjMOCNehvSdPdMhvSkZjfC8RF9KnfnjAqCkJAfvrX2Zq-qeib4K8G5fo2CG61rLgxt0dXqQXUqlJZ104n2Id2l0bWQXJ9UZ4i3nPPeSPG4Omn6VmnRi9Pq51eXg1tD2rOwrTW75Et0mS0ZEEsG5l1BGNlwYBkWWMMavgNbEoZN5SLzN26_A2RjyWG_Y9EtLif0aQme-RRTBr8SRl47yIc3zJF1woV-yeiCZbcf0xx-wHhBODWQYqRyuJbxQB8zuW22pFnSlCIjnI2AUyykBHoCrjeAwT2pHk0uIjy9P8-rL-_ffb78UF9_uvp4-fa69m3D17rjg1DQq2HQyjdT743mxkygW2mAe906pUbR9W7wZoBJdCCMGjonpJq07Bt5Xr08-lJL3wpVt3NADzFSK6mgbThvpVbNHfriH_Q2lUxDu6MaY2SveqLEkfI0F8ww2SWH2eWDFdxuQdtj0JaCtlvQVpHm-b1zGWYY_yh-J0tAcwRw2eYH-W_p_7v-Amriub0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002883959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Seo, Kwon Hui ; Kim, Yong-Shin ; Joo, Jindeok ; Choi, Jin-Woo ; Jeong, Hong-Soo ; Chung, Si-Wook</creator><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kwon Hui ; Kim, Yong-Shin ; Joo, Jindeok ; Choi, Jin-Woo ; Jeong, Hong-Soo ; Chung, Si-Wook</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional changes. A total of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized into desflurane or propofol groups. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at seven time points: before induction (baseline), after endotracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, after the first Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after reverse Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after the second Trendelenburg and right tilt position and before endotracheal extubation. Trendelenburg positioning raised IOP in both groups. In the desflurane group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 6.27 and 8.48 mmHg higher than baseline IOP in left and right eye, respectively; IOP at the second Trendelenburg position was 7 and 9.44 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively. In the propofol group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 2.04 and 4.04 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eyes, respectively. It was 3.04 and 4.87 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively, at the second Trendelenburg position. In the desflurane group, 56.52% patients exhibited high IOP (≥ 25 mmHg) compared with 13.04% in the propofol group at the second Trendelenburg position in the right eyes (
P
= 0.005). There was a positive correlation between IOP and peak inspiratory pressure (
P
< 0.001). Propofol anesthesia mitigated wide variations in IOP caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29457191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Colorectal surgery ; Critical Care Medicine ; Health Sciences ; Intensive ; Intraocular pressure ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research ; Patients ; Randomization ; Statistics for Life Sciences ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1101-1109</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-60b15e95bb75c2f9c87088fe7438e0c74a55d169abc8bef16e185b6a135f73923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-60b15e95bb75c2f9c87088fe7438e0c74a55d169abc8bef16e185b6a135f73923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4397-9207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kwon Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jindeok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hong-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Si-Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional changes. A total of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized into desflurane or propofol groups. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at seven time points: before induction (baseline), after endotracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, after the first Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after reverse Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after the second Trendelenburg and right tilt position and before endotracheal extubation. Trendelenburg positioning raised IOP in both groups. In the desflurane group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 6.27 and 8.48 mmHg higher than baseline IOP in left and right eye, respectively; IOP at the second Trendelenburg position was 7 and 9.44 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively. In the propofol group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 2.04 and 4.04 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eyes, respectively. It was 3.04 and 4.87 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively, at the second Trendelenburg position. In the desflurane group, 56.52% patients exhibited high IOP (≥ 25 mmHg) compared with 13.04% in the propofol group at the second Trendelenburg position in the right eyes (
P
= 0.005). There was a positive correlation between IOP and peak inspiratory pressure (
P
< 0.001). Propofol anesthesia mitigated wide variations in IOP caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Health Sciences</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd2K1TAUhYsozo8-gDcS8MaLqSZN06TeyaCjMOCNehvSdPdMhvSkZjfC8RF9KnfnjAqCkJAfvrX2Zq-qeib4K8G5fo2CG61rLgxt0dXqQXUqlJZ104n2Id2l0bWQXJ9UZ4i3nPPeSPG4Omn6VmnRi9Pq51eXg1tD2rOwrTW75Et0mS0ZEEsG5l1BGNlwYBkWWMMavgNbEoZN5SLzN26_A2RjyWG_Y9EtLif0aQme-RRTBr8SRl47yIc3zJF1woV-yeiCZbcf0xx-wHhBODWQYqRyuJbxQB8zuW22pFnSlCIjnI2AUyykBHoCrjeAwT2pHk0uIjy9P8-rL-_ffb78UF9_uvp4-fa69m3D17rjg1DQq2HQyjdT743mxkygW2mAe906pUbR9W7wZoBJdCCMGjonpJq07Bt5Xr08-lJL3wpVt3NADzFSK6mgbThvpVbNHfriH_Q2lUxDu6MaY2SveqLEkfI0F8ww2SWH2eWDFdxuQdtj0JaCtlvQVpHm-b1zGWYY_yh-J0tAcwRw2eYH-W_p_7v-Amriub0</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Seo, Kwon Hui</creator><creator>Kim, Yong-Shin</creator><creator>Joo, Jindeok</creator><creator>Choi, Jin-Woo</creator><creator>Jeong, Hong-Soo</creator><creator>Chung, Si-Wook</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-9207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia</title><author>Seo, Kwon Hui ; Kim, Yong-Shin ; Joo, Jindeok ; Choi, Jin-Woo ; Jeong, Hong-Soo ; Chung, Si-Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-60b15e95bb75c2f9c87088fe7438e0c74a55d169abc8bef16e185b6a135f73923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Health Sciences</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Statistics for Life Sciences</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kwon Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jindeok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hong-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Si-Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seo, Kwon Hui</au><au>Kim, Yong-Shin</au><au>Joo, Jindeok</au><au>Choi, Jin-Woo</au><au>Jeong, Hong-Soo</au><au>Chung, Si-Wook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Monit Comput</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1101</spage><epage>1109</epage><pages>1101-1109</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional changes. A total of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized into desflurane or propofol groups. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at seven time points: before induction (baseline), after endotracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, after the first Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after reverse Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after the second Trendelenburg and right tilt position and before endotracheal extubation. Trendelenburg positioning raised IOP in both groups. In the desflurane group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 6.27 and 8.48 mmHg higher than baseline IOP in left and right eye, respectively; IOP at the second Trendelenburg position was 7 and 9.44 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively. In the propofol group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 2.04 and 4.04 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eyes, respectively. It was 3.04 and 4.87 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively, at the second Trendelenburg position. In the desflurane group, 56.52% patients exhibited high IOP (≥ 25 mmHg) compared with 13.04% in the propofol group at the second Trendelenburg position in the right eyes (
P
= 0.005). There was a positive correlation between IOP and peak inspiratory pressure (
P
< 0.001). Propofol anesthesia mitigated wide variations in IOP caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>29457191</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-9207</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-1307 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1101-1109 |
issn | 1387-1307 1573-2614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2004375292 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesiology Colorectal surgery Critical Care Medicine Health Sciences Intensive Intraocular pressure Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Patients Randomization Statistics for Life Sciences Surgery |
title | Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20intraocular%20pressure%20caused%20by%20repetitive%20positional%20changes%20during%20laparoscopic%20colorectal%20surgery:%20a%20prospective,%20randomized,%20controlled%20study%20comparing%20propofol%20and%20desflurane%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=Seo,%20Kwon%20Hui&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1101&rft.epage=1109&rft.pages=1101-1109&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-018-0116-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002883959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002883959&rft_id=info:pmid/29457191&rfr_iscdi=true |