Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres

Summary This study was designed to standardize dust collection in recently built operating theatres equipped with a continuous monitoring system. The objectives were to establish the relationship between microbiological and dust contamination, and then to compare those parameters with the main indic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2007-08, Vol.66 (4), p.320-326
Hauptverfasser: Scaltriti, S, Cencetti, S, Rovesti, S, Marchesi, I, Bargellini, A, Borella, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 4
container_start_page 320
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 66
creator Scaltriti, S
Cencetti, S
Rovesti, S
Marchesi, I
Bargellini, A
Borella, P
description Summary This study was designed to standardize dust collection in recently built operating theatres equipped with a continuous monitoring system. The objectives were to establish the relationship between microbiological and dust contamination, and then to compare those parameters with the main indicators of surgical activity in order to better define risk factors affecting air quality. The air quality during 23 surgical operations was studied in three conventionally ventilated operating theatres. Microbiological air counts were taken using both passive and active sampling methods. Air dust particles, ≥0.5 and ≥5 μm in size, were measured using a light-scattering particle analyser. The overall dust load was mainly (98%) composed of fine particulate matter, most probably due to its longer suspension time before settlement. These particles positively correlated with operation length, but not with surgical technique, suggesting that fine particles may be a good tracer of operation complexity. In contrast, the surgical technique was the main predictor for the concentration of particles ≥5 μm, with a higher risk from general conventional surgery compared with scope surgery. The frequency of door-opening, taken as an index of staff and visitor movement, was the main negative predictor of over-threshold values of both fine and larger dust particles but, conversely, was a positive predictor of raised bacterial counts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20041464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670107001843</els_id><sourcerecordid>20041464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11614e385bc89a2b34cfd4d8b2a761942acb73131c88593fdd9fc9ad70d080e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozps_X8CFZKO7dm6apmlAhGHQcWBAUGcd0iR10mmTZ5IK8-1NfQ8GXLhKOJxzcvO7CL0hUBMg3eVUTw_O1w0Ar4HVQMQLtCOMNlUjqHiJdkVhVceBnKDTlCYAKDp7jU4I7xgTnO7Q_TeXHvGodA4x4TFEvFcxO73OKlusvMGL0zEMTs1YB5_V4rzKLngcRqxcxK7c9jYWzf_E-cGqHG06R69GNSd7cTzP0P3nTz-uv1R3X29ur6_uKt1yyBUhHWkt7dmge6GagbZ6NK3ph0bxjoi2UXrglFCi-54JOhojRi2U4WCgB8voGXp_6N3H8Gu1KcvFJW3nWXkb1iQLmpa0XVuMzcFY_pJStKPcR7eo-CQJyA2mnOQGc0twCUwWdCX09ti-Dos1z5EjvWJ4dzSopNU8RuW1S88-AcDo36IPB58tLH47G2XSznptjYtWZ2mC-_8cH_-J69l5V158tE82TWGNvlCWRKZGgvy-rX3bOnAA0reU_gF31Kf6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20041464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Scaltriti, S ; Cencetti, S ; Rovesti, S ; Marchesi, I ; Bargellini, A ; Borella, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Scaltriti, S ; Cencetti, S ; Rovesti, S ; Marchesi, I ; Bargellini, A ; Borella, P</creatorcontrib><description>Summary This study was designed to standardize dust collection in recently built operating theatres equipped with a continuous monitoring system. The objectives were to establish the relationship between microbiological and dust contamination, and then to compare those parameters with the main indicators of surgical activity in order to better define risk factors affecting air quality. The air quality during 23 surgical operations was studied in three conventionally ventilated operating theatres. Microbiological air counts were taken using both passive and active sampling methods. Air dust particles, ≥0.5 and ≥5 μm in size, were measured using a light-scattering particle analyser. The overall dust load was mainly (98%) composed of fine particulate matter, most probably due to its longer suspension time before settlement. These particles positively correlated with operation length, but not with surgical technique, suggesting that fine particles may be a good tracer of operation complexity. In contrast, the surgical technique was the main predictor for the concentration of particles ≥5 μm, with a higher risk from general conventional surgery compared with scope surgery. The frequency of door-opening, taken as an index of staff and visitor movement, was the main negative predictor of over-threshold values of both fine and larger dust particles but, conversely, was a positive predictor of raised bacterial counts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17655973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - etiology ; Dust - analysis ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microbial contamination ; Operating Rooms ; Operating theatre ; Particle contamination ; Particulate Matter - analysis ; Risk Factors ; Surgical Procedures, Operative - adverse effects ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2007-08, Vol.66 (4), p.320-326</ispartof><rights>The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2007 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11614e385bc89a2b34cfd4d8b2a761942acb73131c88593fdd9fc9ad70d080e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11614e385bc89a2b34cfd4d8b2a761942acb73131c88593fdd9fc9ad70d080e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670107001843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19005319$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17655973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scaltriti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cencetti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovesti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargellini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borella, P</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Summary This study was designed to standardize dust collection in recently built operating theatres equipped with a continuous monitoring system. The objectives were to establish the relationship between microbiological and dust contamination, and then to compare those parameters with the main indicators of surgical activity in order to better define risk factors affecting air quality. The air quality during 23 surgical operations was studied in three conventionally ventilated operating theatres. Microbiological air counts were taken using both passive and active sampling methods. Air dust particles, ≥0.5 and ≥5 μm in size, were measured using a light-scattering particle analyser. The overall dust load was mainly (98%) composed of fine particulate matter, most probably due to its longer suspension time before settlement. These particles positively correlated with operation length, but not with surgical technique, suggesting that fine particles may be a good tracer of operation complexity. In contrast, the surgical technique was the main predictor for the concentration of particles ≥5 μm, with a higher risk from general conventional surgery compared with scope surgery. The frequency of door-opening, taken as an index of staff and visitor movement, was the main negative predictor of over-threshold values of both fine and larger dust particles but, conversely, was a positive predictor of raised bacterial counts.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Dust - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial contamination</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Operating theatre</subject><subject>Particle contamination</subject><subject>Particulate Matter - analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozps_X8CFZKO7dm6apmlAhGHQcWBAUGcd0iR10mmTZ5IK8-1NfQ8GXLhKOJxzcvO7CL0hUBMg3eVUTw_O1w0Ar4HVQMQLtCOMNlUjqHiJdkVhVceBnKDTlCYAKDp7jU4I7xgTnO7Q_TeXHvGodA4x4TFEvFcxO73OKlusvMGL0zEMTs1YB5_V4rzKLngcRqxcxK7c9jYWzf_E-cGqHG06R69GNSd7cTzP0P3nTz-uv1R3X29ur6_uKt1yyBUhHWkt7dmge6GagbZ6NK3ph0bxjoi2UXrglFCi-54JOhojRi2U4WCgB8voGXp_6N3H8Gu1KcvFJW3nWXkb1iQLmpa0XVuMzcFY_pJStKPcR7eo-CQJyA2mnOQGc0twCUwWdCX09ti-Dos1z5EjvWJ4dzSopNU8RuW1S88-AcDo36IPB58tLH47G2XSznptjYtWZ2mC-_8cH_-J69l5V158tE82TWGNvlCWRKZGgvy-rX3bOnAA0reU_gF31Kf6</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Scaltriti, S</creator><creator>Cencetti, S</creator><creator>Rovesti, S</creator><creator>Marchesi, I</creator><creator>Bargellini, A</creator><creator>Borella, P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres</title><author>Scaltriti, S ; Cencetti, S ; Rovesti, S ; Marchesi, I ; Bargellini, A ; Borella, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11614e385bc89a2b34cfd4d8b2a761942acb73131c88593fdd9fc9ad70d080e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Dust - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial contamination</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Operating theatre</topic><topic>Particle contamination</topic><topic>Particulate Matter - analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scaltriti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cencetti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovesti, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargellini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borella, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scaltriti, S</au><au>Cencetti, S</au><au>Rovesti, S</au><au>Marchesi, I</au><au>Bargellini, A</au><au>Borella, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>320-326</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Summary This study was designed to standardize dust collection in recently built operating theatres equipped with a continuous monitoring system. The objectives were to establish the relationship between microbiological and dust contamination, and then to compare those parameters with the main indicators of surgical activity in order to better define risk factors affecting air quality. The air quality during 23 surgical operations was studied in three conventionally ventilated operating theatres. Microbiological air counts were taken using both passive and active sampling methods. Air dust particles, ≥0.5 and ≥5 μm in size, were measured using a light-scattering particle analyser. The overall dust load was mainly (98%) composed of fine particulate matter, most probably due to its longer suspension time before settlement. These particles positively correlated with operation length, but not with surgical technique, suggesting that fine particles may be a good tracer of operation complexity. In contrast, the surgical technique was the main predictor for the concentration of particles ≥5 μm, with a higher risk from general conventional surgery compared with scope surgery. The frequency of door-opening, taken as an index of staff and visitor movement, was the main negative predictor of over-threshold values of both fine and larger dust particles but, conversely, was a positive predictor of raised bacterial counts.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17655973</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2007-08, Vol.66 (4), p.320-326
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20041464
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air quality
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Cross Infection - etiology
Dust - analysis
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Epidemiological Monitoring
Epidemiology. Vaccinations
General aspects
Humans
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Microbial contamination
Operating Rooms
Operating theatre
Particle contamination
Particulate Matter - analysis
Risk Factors
Surgical Procedures, Operative - adverse effects
Time Factors
title Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A57%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20for%20particulate%20and%20microbial%20contamination%20of%20air%20in%20operating%20theatres&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Scaltriti,%20S&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=320-326&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20041464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20041464&rft_id=info:pmid/17655973&rft_els_id=S0195670107001843&rfr_iscdi=true