Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria

Bacterial biomass was characterised in supernatants from activated sludge from a nutrient removal plant after settling before and after applying gentle shear ( G∼600 s −1). Free-swimming and floc-associated bacteria were quantified by microscopy and their identity was determined by fluorescence in-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2008-02, Vol.42 (4), p.843-854
Hauptverfasser: Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando, Larsen, Poul, Nielsen, Jeppe Lund, Nielsen, Per Halkjær
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 4
container_start_page 843
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 42
creator Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando
Larsen, Poul
Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
Nielsen, Per Halkjær
description Bacterial biomass was characterised in supernatants from activated sludge from a nutrient removal plant after settling before and after applying gentle shear ( G∼600 s −1). Free-swimming and floc-associated bacteria were quantified by microscopy and their identity was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Total cell numbers in the supernatant after settling ranged within 2–9×10 7 cells/mL. Most cells (60–70%) were associated with microcolonies or small flocs, which made up 5–10% of the total number of particles. The remaining 30–40% of the cells corresponded to free-swimming, single cells. The small flocs in the supernatants (diameter=2.5–35 μm) accounted only for ∼1% of the total number of particles; however, they greatly contributed to the total volume of biomass in suspension (57% and 75%). The shear applied ( G∼600 s −1) induced some floc detachment and higher cell numbers in the supernatants (10–70×10 7 cells/mL). The identity of bacteria in suspension was as diverse as that in the settled sludge; however, bacteria belonging to Planctomycetes, Firmicutes and Deltaproteobacteria were in higher abundance in the sludge supernatants and were enriched in the supernatants due to gentle shear. Potentially active bacteria were quantified based on the ratio of the number of cells fluorescing with the EUBmix gene probe targeting most bacteria to the total number of cells stained with DAPI. Lower ratios of EUBmix to total cells were measured in the supernatants (50%) than in the settled sludge (80%), suggesting that cells in the dispersed fraction of the sludge were potentially less active than those in the average settleable floc. In conclusion, the attachment properties of bacteria in activated sludge were different among groups, rendering floc fractions more susceptible to detachment and suspension depending on their abundance and activity level.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20037561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135407005696</els_id><sourcerecordid>20037561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-18b5a40909b6391d7b922e730f0ec76256851ca308e597f62a285a4e93ea1cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0CQS7kljL8S-4KEVuVDquAAPVsTZ9LNKrsptreo_Po6SgQ3ONmyn_ed0cPYKw4VB16_21e_MAWKlQBoKjAViPoJ23DT2FIoZZ6yDYCSJZdanbPnMe4BQAhpn7Fz3hhjhTIb9nW7w4A-URh-YxqmYzH1RdpRMU5TpPGhwJTQ76gr-hlbgfl2jym_xvHU3VLRLhX4gp31OEZ6uZ4X7Obj1Y_t5_L626cv2w_XpddKpJKbVqMCC7atpeVd01ohqJHQA_mmFro2mnuUYEjbpq8FCpMDZCUh962SF-zt0nsXpp8niskdhuhpHPFI0ym67EQ2uub_BbnKk7ixGVQL6MMUY6De3YXhgOHBcXCzcLd3i_C5vHFgXBaeY6_X_lN7oO5vaDWcgcsVwOhxzBaPfoh_OAFcaGt15t4sXI-Tw9uQmZvv-VcCmNqaeh71fiEoi70fKLjoBzp66oZAPrluGv696yNMPqk5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14851189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando ; Larsen, Poul ; Nielsen, Jeppe Lund ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando ; Larsen, Poul ; Nielsen, Jeppe Lund ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial biomass was characterised in supernatants from activated sludge from a nutrient removal plant after settling before and after applying gentle shear ( G∼600 s −1). Free-swimming and floc-associated bacteria were quantified by microscopy and their identity was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Total cell numbers in the supernatant after settling ranged within 2–9×10 7 cells/mL. Most cells (60–70%) were associated with microcolonies or small flocs, which made up 5–10% of the total number of particles. The remaining 30–40% of the cells corresponded to free-swimming, single cells. The small flocs in the supernatants (diameter=2.5–35 μm) accounted only for ∼1% of the total number of particles; however, they greatly contributed to the total volume of biomass in suspension (57% and 75%). The shear applied ( G∼600 s −1) induced some floc detachment and higher cell numbers in the supernatants (10–70×10 7 cells/mL). The identity of bacteria in suspension was as diverse as that in the settled sludge; however, bacteria belonging to Planctomycetes, Firmicutes and Deltaproteobacteria were in higher abundance in the sludge supernatants and were enriched in the supernatants due to gentle shear. Potentially active bacteria were quantified based on the ratio of the number of cells fluorescing with the EUBmix gene probe targeting most bacteria to the total number of cells stained with DAPI. Lower ratios of EUBmix to total cells were measured in the supernatants (50%) than in the settled sludge (80%), suggesting that cells in the dispersed fraction of the sludge were potentially less active than those in the average settleable floc. In conclusion, the attachment properties of bacteria in activated sludge were different among groups, rendering floc fractions more susceptible to detachment and suspension depending on their abundance and activity level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17889248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Applied sciences ; bacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; bacterial adhesion ; Bacterial cells ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Detachment ; diameter ; Exact sciences and technology ; Firmicutes ; FISH ; Flocculation ; flocs ; free-swimming bacteria ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Nephelometry and Turbidimetry ; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge ; Particle Size ; Planctomycetes ; plate count ; Pollution ; Sewage - microbiology ; sewage sludge ; Shear ; shear stress ; species diversity ; Stress, Mechanical ; Wastes ; wastewater treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2008-02, Vol.42 (4), p.843-854</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-18b5a40909b6391d7b922e730f0ec76256851ca308e597f62a285a4e93ea1cb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20125995$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17889248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jeppe Lund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Bacterial biomass was characterised in supernatants from activated sludge from a nutrient removal plant after settling before and after applying gentle shear ( G∼600 s −1). Free-swimming and floc-associated bacteria were quantified by microscopy and their identity was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Total cell numbers in the supernatant after settling ranged within 2–9×10 7 cells/mL. Most cells (60–70%) were associated with microcolonies or small flocs, which made up 5–10% of the total number of particles. The remaining 30–40% of the cells corresponded to free-swimming, single cells. The small flocs in the supernatants (diameter=2.5–35 μm) accounted only for ∼1% of the total number of particles; however, they greatly contributed to the total volume of biomass in suspension (57% and 75%). The shear applied ( G∼600 s −1) induced some floc detachment and higher cell numbers in the supernatants (10–70×10 7 cells/mL). The identity of bacteria in suspension was as diverse as that in the settled sludge; however, bacteria belonging to Planctomycetes, Firmicutes and Deltaproteobacteria were in higher abundance in the sludge supernatants and were enriched in the supernatants due to gentle shear. Potentially active bacteria were quantified based on the ratio of the number of cells fluorescing with the EUBmix gene probe targeting most bacteria to the total number of cells stained with DAPI. Lower ratios of EUBmix to total cells were measured in the supernatants (50%) than in the settled sludge (80%), suggesting that cells in the dispersed fraction of the sludge were potentially less active than those in the average settleable floc. In conclusion, the attachment properties of bacteria in activated sludge were different among groups, rendering floc fractions more susceptible to detachment and suspension depending on their abundance and activity level.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>bacterial adhesion</subject><subject>Bacterial cells</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Detachment</subject><subject>diameter</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Firmicutes</subject><subject>FISH</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>flocs</subject><subject>free-swimming bacteria</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry</subject><subject>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Planctomycetes</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sewage - microbiology</subject><subject>sewage sludge</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>shear stress</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0CQS7kljL8S-4KEVuVDquAAPVsTZ9LNKrsptreo_Po6SgQ3ONmyn_ed0cPYKw4VB16_21e_MAWKlQBoKjAViPoJ23DT2FIoZZ6yDYCSJZdanbPnMe4BQAhpn7Fz3hhjhTIb9nW7w4A-URh-YxqmYzH1RdpRMU5TpPGhwJTQ76gr-hlbgfl2jym_xvHU3VLRLhX4gp31OEZ6uZ4X7Obj1Y_t5_L626cv2w_XpddKpJKbVqMCC7atpeVd01ohqJHQA_mmFro2mnuUYEjbpq8FCpMDZCUh962SF-zt0nsXpp8niskdhuhpHPFI0ym67EQ2uub_BbnKk7ixGVQL6MMUY6De3YXhgOHBcXCzcLd3i_C5vHFgXBaeY6_X_lN7oO5vaDWcgcsVwOhxzBaPfoh_OAFcaGt15t4sXI-Tw9uQmZvv-VcCmNqaeh71fiEoi70fKLjoBzp66oZAPrluGv696yNMPqk5</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando</creator><creator>Larsen, Poul</creator><creator>Nielsen, Jeppe Lund</creator><creator>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria</title><author>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando ; Larsen, Poul ; Nielsen, Jeppe Lund ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-18b5a40909b6391d7b922e730f0ec76256851ca308e597f62a285a4e93ea1cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>bacterial adhesion</topic><topic>Bacterial cells</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Detachment</topic><topic>diameter</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Firmicutes</topic><topic>FISH</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>flocs</topic><topic>free-swimming bacteria</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry</topic><topic>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Planctomycetes</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sewage - microbiology</topic><topic>sewage sludge</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>shear stress</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jeppe Lund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando</au><au>Larsen, Poul</au><au>Nielsen, Jeppe Lund</au><au>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>843-854</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Bacterial biomass was characterised in supernatants from activated sludge from a nutrient removal plant after settling before and after applying gentle shear ( G∼600 s −1). Free-swimming and floc-associated bacteria were quantified by microscopy and their identity was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Total cell numbers in the supernatant after settling ranged within 2–9×10 7 cells/mL. Most cells (60–70%) were associated with microcolonies or small flocs, which made up 5–10% of the total number of particles. The remaining 30–40% of the cells corresponded to free-swimming, single cells. The small flocs in the supernatants (diameter=2.5–35 μm) accounted only for ∼1% of the total number of particles; however, they greatly contributed to the total volume of biomass in suspension (57% and 75%). The shear applied ( G∼600 s −1) induced some floc detachment and higher cell numbers in the supernatants (10–70×10 7 cells/mL). The identity of bacteria in suspension was as diverse as that in the settled sludge; however, bacteria belonging to Planctomycetes, Firmicutes and Deltaproteobacteria were in higher abundance in the sludge supernatants and were enriched in the supernatants due to gentle shear. Potentially active bacteria were quantified based on the ratio of the number of cells fluorescing with the EUBmix gene probe targeting most bacteria to the total number of cells stained with DAPI. Lower ratios of EUBmix to total cells were measured in the supernatants (50%) than in the settled sludge (80%), suggesting that cells in the dispersed fraction of the sludge were potentially less active than those in the average settleable floc. In conclusion, the attachment properties of bacteria in activated sludge were different among groups, rendering floc fractions more susceptible to detachment and suspension depending on their abundance and activity level.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17889248</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.026</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2008-02, Vol.42 (4), p.843-854
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20037561
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Activated sludge
Applied sciences
bacteria
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
Bacteria - isolation & purification
bacterial adhesion
Bacterial cells
Colony Count, Microbial
Detachment
diameter
Exact sciences and technology
Firmicutes
FISH
Flocculation
flocs
free-swimming bacteria
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Nephelometry and Turbidimetry
Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge
Particle Size
Planctomycetes
plate count
Pollution
Sewage - microbiology
sewage sludge
Shear
shear stress
species diversity
Stress, Mechanical
Wastes
wastewater treatment
Water treatment and pollution
title Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A35%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20the%20loosely%20attached%20fraction%20of%20activated%20sludge%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Morgan-Sagastume,%20Fernando&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=843-854&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20037561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14851189&rft_id=info:pmid/17889248&rft_els_id=S0043135407005696&rfr_iscdi=true