Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species
1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1205 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Jones, Julia P. G. Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. Hockley, Neal Gibbons, James M. Milner-Gulland, E. J. |
description | 1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20033280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20144083</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20144083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAE3bXevNp04UKG8YWi4IjLkGlTTek0YzIP_femziDiyhC4gXzncHKCECaQkrjOmpSwTCQ0y3hKAWQKhMs8_dhCg5-LbTQAoCSRBZBdtBdCAwCFYGyA1NiEue1e8fzN4OdgsKvxTTc3fmnNKmAdNx471-LaeXzvOjt3vsfH3nRVwLb7Fl5rv9z4RP2LbSv8NDOlNeEA7dS6DeZwM_fR8-VoPLxO7h6uboYXd0nJZZEnkxwmtcjzCSGgi5gbeEGpFkaWeVXUWUFENqFGxCmqgssSWAY1rYBkWlaEs310uvadefe-iFnU1IbStK3ujFsEFathjEqI4PEfsHEL38VsijLGOZdCRkiuodK7ELyp1czbqfafioDqa1eN6ttVfbu9t1TftauPKD3Z-OtQ6rb2uitt-NFTEITGR0bufM2tbGs-_-2vbh9H_Snqj9b6JsQv-eVPOAfJ2BfblZy2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233444858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural seasons ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Astacoides ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian modelling ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cambaridae ; Crayfish ; Crustaceans ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecology ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental monitoring ; firewood ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General aspects. Techniques ; Harvest ; Harvesting seasons ; Human ecology ; Human influences ; inter‐disciplinary ; local knowledge ; Methodological Advances ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Modeling ; participatory monitoring ; participatory research ; power ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20144083$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20144083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20512110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</description><subject>Agricultural seasons</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Astacoides</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian modelling</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cambaridae</subject><subject>Crayfish</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>firewood</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting seasons</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>inter‐disciplinary</subject><subject>local knowledge</subject><subject>Methodological Advances</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>participatory monitoring</subject><subject>participatory research</subject><subject>power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAE3bXevNp04UKG8YWi4IjLkGlTTek0YzIP_femziDiyhC4gXzncHKCECaQkrjOmpSwTCQ0y3hKAWQKhMs8_dhCg5-LbTQAoCSRBZBdtBdCAwCFYGyA1NiEue1e8fzN4OdgsKvxTTc3fmnNKmAdNx471-LaeXzvOjt3vsfH3nRVwLb7Fl5rv9z4RP2LbSv8NDOlNeEA7dS6DeZwM_fR8-VoPLxO7h6uboYXd0nJZZEnkxwmtcjzCSGgi5gbeEGpFkaWeVXUWUFENqFGxCmqgssSWAY1rYBkWlaEs310uvadefe-iFnU1IbStK3ujFsEFathjEqI4PEfsHEL38VsijLGOZdCRkiuodK7ELyp1czbqfafioDqa1eN6ttVfbu9t1TftauPKD3Z-OtQ6rb2uitt-NFTEITGR0bufM2tbGs-_-2vbh9H_Snqj9b6JsQv-eVPOAfJ2BfblZy2</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Jones, Julia P. G.</creator><creator>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creator><creator>Hockley, Neal</creator><creator>Gibbons, James M.</creator><creator>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><author>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural seasons</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Astacoides</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian modelling</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cambaridae</topic><topic>Crayfish</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>firewood</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting seasons</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>inter‐disciplinary</topic><topic>local knowledge</topic><topic>Methodological Advances</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>participatory monitoring</topic><topic>participatory research</topic><topic>power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Julia P. G.</au><au>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</au><au>Hockley, Neal</au><au>Gibbons, James M.</au><au>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1205</spage><epage>1212</epage><pages>1205-1212</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20033280 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural seasons Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Astacoides Bayesian analysis Bayesian modelling Biodiversity conservation Biological and medical sciences Cambaridae Crayfish Crustaceans Ecological sustainability Ecology Environmental conservation Environmental monitoring firewood Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects General aspects. Techniques Harvest Harvesting seasons Human ecology Human influences inter‐disciplinary local knowledge Methodological Advances Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) Modeling participatory monitoring participatory research power Studies |
title | Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20Use%20of%20Interviews%20as%20a%20Tool%20for%20Monitoring%20Trends%20in%20the%20Harvesting%20of%20Wild%20Species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Jones,%20Julia%20P.%20G.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1205&rft.epage=1212&rft.pages=1205-1212&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20144083%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233444858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20144083&rfr_iscdi=true |