Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species

1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Julia P. G., Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M., Hockley, Neal, Gibbons, James M., Milner-Gulland, E. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1212
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1205
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 45
creator Jones, Julia P. G.
Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.
Hockley, Neal
Gibbons, James M.
Milner-Gulland, E. J.
description 1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20033280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20144083</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20144083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAE3bXevNp04UKG8YWi4IjLkGlTTek0YzIP_femziDiyhC4gXzncHKCECaQkrjOmpSwTCQ0y3hKAWQKhMs8_dhCg5-LbTQAoCSRBZBdtBdCAwCFYGyA1NiEue1e8fzN4OdgsKvxTTc3fmnNKmAdNx471-LaeXzvOjt3vsfH3nRVwLb7Fl5rv9z4RP2LbSv8NDOlNeEA7dS6DeZwM_fR8-VoPLxO7h6uboYXd0nJZZEnkxwmtcjzCSGgi5gbeEGpFkaWeVXUWUFENqFGxCmqgssSWAY1rYBkWlaEs310uvadefe-iFnU1IbStK3ujFsEFathjEqI4PEfsHEL38VsijLGOZdCRkiuodK7ELyp1czbqfafioDqa1eN6ttVfbu9t1TftauPKD3Z-OtQ6rb2uitt-NFTEITGR0bufM2tbGs-_-2vbh9H_Snqj9b6JsQv-eVPOAfJ2BfblZy2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233444858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural seasons ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Astacoides ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian modelling ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cambaridae ; Crayfish ; Crustaceans ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecology ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental monitoring ; firewood ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General aspects. Techniques ; Harvest ; Harvesting seasons ; Human ecology ; Human influences ; inter‐disciplinary ; local knowledge ; Methodological Advances ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Modeling ; participatory monitoring ; participatory research ; power ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20144083$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20144083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20512110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</description><subject>Agricultural seasons</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Astacoides</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian modelling</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cambaridae</subject><subject>Crayfish</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>firewood</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting seasons</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>inter‐disciplinary</subject><subject>local knowledge</subject><subject>Methodological Advances</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>participatory monitoring</subject><subject>participatory research</subject><subject>power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAE3bXevNp04UKG8YWi4IjLkGlTTek0YzIP_femziDiyhC4gXzncHKCECaQkrjOmpSwTCQ0y3hKAWQKhMs8_dhCg5-LbTQAoCSRBZBdtBdCAwCFYGyA1NiEue1e8fzN4OdgsKvxTTc3fmnNKmAdNx471-LaeXzvOjt3vsfH3nRVwLb7Fl5rv9z4RP2LbSv8NDOlNeEA7dS6DeZwM_fR8-VoPLxO7h6uboYXd0nJZZEnkxwmtcjzCSGgi5gbeEGpFkaWeVXUWUFENqFGxCmqgssSWAY1rYBkWlaEs310uvadefe-iFnU1IbStK3ujFsEFathjEqI4PEfsHEL38VsijLGOZdCRkiuodK7ELyp1czbqfafioDqa1eN6ttVfbu9t1TftauPKD3Z-OtQ6rb2uitt-NFTEITGR0bufM2tbGs-_-2vbh9H_Snqj9b6JsQv-eVPOAfJ2BfblZy2</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Jones, Julia P. G.</creator><creator>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creator><creator>Hockley, Neal</creator><creator>Gibbons, James M.</creator><creator>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</title><author>Jones, Julia P. G. ; Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M. ; Hockley, Neal ; Gibbons, James M. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-b70bf577b110a936504922a5e8c7d9f69156b2e59155d948c0360f2d016a8d143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural seasons</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Astacoides</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian modelling</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cambaridae</topic><topic>Crayfish</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>firewood</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting seasons</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>inter‐disciplinary</topic><topic>local knowledge</topic><topic>Methodological Advances</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>participatory monitoring</topic><topic>participatory research</topic><topic>power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Julia P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Julia P. G.</au><au>Andriamarovololona, Mijasoa M.</au><au>Hockley, Neal</au><au>Gibbons, James M.</au><au>Milner-Gulland, E. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1205</spage><epage>1212</epage><pages>1205-1212</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Many aspects of human behaviour impact on ecological systems. Ecologists therefore need information on changes in these behaviours and are increasingly using methods more familiar to social scientists. 2. Understanding patterns of wildlife harvesting is important for assessing the sustainability of harvests. Interviews are commonly used in which informants are asked to summarize their activities over a period of time. However, few studies have investigated the reliability of such data, the usefulness of interviews for monitoring trends, and how their information content can be maximized. 3. We carried out rapid assessment interviews with villagers in Madagascar about the quantity, timing and spatial patterns of crayfish Astacoides granulimanus and firewood collection. We compared the results with information from daily interviews with the same informants. We used mixed models to investigate how accurately people reported their activities in the rapid assessment interviews, and estimated the probability of detecting a change in harvesting from two such interviews using a Bayesian approach. 4. The interviews provided reliable information on quantities, effort, and the spatial pattern of harvesting. Simulations suggested the interviews would detect changes in catches and harvesting effort with reasonable power; for example, a 20% change in the amount of time spent crayfish harvesting could be detected with 90% power. Power is higher when the same informants are questioned in repeat interviews. 5. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists are increasingly using social techniques and it is vital that they are subject to rigorous testing to ensure robustness in trend detection. This study suggests that interviews can be used to monitor changes in harvesting patterns by resource users, but whether the power is adequate will depend on the needs of the study. To maximize the power of interviews, informants should be interviewed independently and the same informants interviewed in subsequent years.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-08, Vol.45 (4), p.1205-1212
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20033280
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural seasons
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Astacoides
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian modelling
Biodiversity conservation
Biological and medical sciences
Cambaridae
Crayfish
Crustaceans
Ecological sustainability
Ecology
Environmental conservation
Environmental monitoring
firewood
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
General aspects. Techniques
Harvest
Harvesting seasons
Human ecology
Human influences
inter‐disciplinary
local knowledge
Methodological Advances
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Modeling
participatory monitoring
participatory research
power
Studies
title Testing the Use of Interviews as a Tool for Monitoring Trends in the Harvesting of Wild Species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20Use%20of%20Interviews%20as%20a%20Tool%20for%20Monitoring%20Trends%20in%20the%20Harvesting%20of%20Wild%20Species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Jones,%20Julia%20P.%20G.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1205&rft.epage=1212&rft.pages=1205-1212&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20144083%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233444858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20144083&rfr_iscdi=true