Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators
The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimpl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2007-04, Vol.104 (17), p.7295-7300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 7295 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Rouger, J Lagleyre, S Fraysse, B Deneve, S Deguine, O Barone, P |
description | The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimplantation evolution of word recognition in a large sample of CI users in unisensory (visual or auditory) and bisensory (visuoauditory) conditions. We found that, despite considerable recovery of auditory performance during the first year postimplantation, CI patients maintain a much higher level of word recognition in speechreading conditions compared with normally hearing subjects, even several years after implantation. Consequently, we show that CI users present higher visuoauditory performance when compared with normally hearing subjects with similar auditory stimuli. This better performance is not only due to greater speechreading performance, but, most importantly, also due to a greater capacity to integrate visual input with the distorted speech signal. Our results suggest that these behavioral changes in CI users might be mediated by a reorganization of the cortical network involved in speech recognition that favors a more specific involvement of visual areas. Furthermore, they provide crucial indications to guide the rehabilitation of CI patients by using visually oriented therapeutic strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.0609419104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pnas_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20030859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20030859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-3bccfe8a6f077f8c81a24f610180d395a271dedaee957e466dc373eacf72b56d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA0iDqgc0o5jxx8XpKpqKdJKSEDPlteZ7KZK4sV2VvS_x9GuWOgBTpY8v3l-fjOEvKZwTkGyi-1o4zkI0JxqCvwJWVDQtBRcw1OyAKhkqXjFT8iLGO8BQNcKnpMTKjnwqoIF-Xq96xocHRZpY1PhvNv0aEPZDdvejgmbokHbFlubOhxTLGzAYoUpYSiGqU9dxDH68FB0mV0Hm3yIL8mz1vYRXx3OU3J3c_396rZcfvn0-epyWTpBIZVs5VyLyooWpGyVU9RWvM0lqqBhuraVpA02FlHXErkQjWOSoXWtrFa1aNgp-bjX3U6rARuX_QXbm23oBhsejLed-bsydhuz9jtDVV3n_2eBD3uBzaO228ulme8AaK0rpXc0s-8PjwX_Y8KYzNBFh30OCf0Ujcx5SkXVf8EKgIGqdQbfPQLv_RTGnFhmKJNKKJGhiz3kgo8xYPvbJwUzb4CZN8AcNyB3vPkzlSN_GHkG3h6AufMoxzNiZKXrTJz9mzDt1PcJf6ajWGu9sevQRXP3bbYPeahUCMZ-AXiYzuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201378686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Rouger, J ; Lagleyre, S ; Fraysse, B ; Deneve, S ; Deguine, O ; Barone, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouger, J ; Lagleyre, S ; Fraysse, B ; Deneve, S ; Deguine, O ; Barone, P</creatorcontrib><description>The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimplantation evolution of word recognition in a large sample of CI users in unisensory (visual or auditory) and bisensory (visuoauditory) conditions. We found that, despite considerable recovery of auditory performance during the first year postimplantation, CI patients maintain a much higher level of word recognition in speechreading conditions compared with normally hearing subjects, even several years after implantation. Consequently, we show that CI users present higher visuoauditory performance when compared with normally hearing subjects with similar auditory stimuli. This better performance is not only due to greater speechreading performance, but, most importantly, also due to a greater capacity to integrate visual input with the distorted speech signal. Our results suggest that these behavioral changes in CI users might be mediated by a reorganization of the cortical network involved in speech recognition that favors a more specific involvement of visual areas. Furthermore, they provide crucial indications to guide the rehabilitation of CI patients by using visually oriented therapeutic strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609419104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17404220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Audiometry, Speech ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biological Sciences ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness ; Ears & hearing ; Hearing Impaired Persons ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Lipreading ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Neurons and Cognition ; Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology ; Prostheses ; Speech Discrimination Tests ; Speech therapy ; Visual Perception ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2007-04, Vol.104 (17), p.7295-7300</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Apr 24, 2007</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-3bccfe8a6f077f8c81a24f610180d395a271dedaee957e466dc373eacf72b56d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-3bccfe8a6f077f8c81a24f610180d395a271dedaee957e466dc373eacf72b56d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4174-2580</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/104/17.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1855404/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1855404/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00159289$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouger, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagleyre, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraysse, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deneve, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguine, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, P</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimplantation evolution of word recognition in a large sample of CI users in unisensory (visual or auditory) and bisensory (visuoauditory) conditions. We found that, despite considerable recovery of auditory performance during the first year postimplantation, CI patients maintain a much higher level of word recognition in speechreading conditions compared with normally hearing subjects, even several years after implantation. Consequently, we show that CI users present higher visuoauditory performance when compared with normally hearing subjects with similar auditory stimuli. This better performance is not only due to greater speechreading performance, but, most importantly, also due to a greater capacity to integrate visual input with the distorted speech signal. Our results suggest that these behavioral changes in CI users might be mediated by a reorganization of the cortical network involved in speech recognition that favors a more specific involvement of visual areas. Furthermore, they provide crucial indications to guide the rehabilitation of CI patients by using visually oriented therapeutic strategies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Impaired Persons</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lipreading</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Speech Discrimination Tests</subject><subject>Speech therapy</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA0iDqgc0o5jxx8XpKpqKdJKSEDPlteZ7KZK4sV2VvS_x9GuWOgBTpY8v3l-fjOEvKZwTkGyi-1o4zkI0JxqCvwJWVDQtBRcw1OyAKhkqXjFT8iLGO8BQNcKnpMTKjnwqoIF-Xq96xocHRZpY1PhvNv0aEPZDdvejgmbokHbFlubOhxTLGzAYoUpYSiGqU9dxDH68FB0mV0Hm3yIL8mz1vYRXx3OU3J3c_396rZcfvn0-epyWTpBIZVs5VyLyooWpGyVU9RWvM0lqqBhuraVpA02FlHXErkQjWOSoXWtrFa1aNgp-bjX3U6rARuX_QXbm23oBhsejLed-bsydhuz9jtDVV3n_2eBD3uBzaO228ulme8AaK0rpXc0s-8PjwX_Y8KYzNBFh30OCf0Ujcx5SkXVf8EKgIGqdQbfPQLv_RTGnFhmKJNKKJGhiz3kgo8xYPvbJwUzb4CZN8AcNyB3vPkzlSN_GHkG3h6AufMoxzNiZKXrTJz9mzDt1PcJf6ajWGu9sevQRXP3bbYPeahUCMZ-AXiYzuY</recordid><startdate>20070424</startdate><enddate>20070424</enddate><creator>Rouger, J</creator><creator>Lagleyre, S</creator><creator>Fraysse, B</creator><creator>Deneve, S</creator><creator>Deguine, O</creator><creator>Barone, P</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2580</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20070424</creationdate><title>Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators</title><author>Rouger, J ; Lagleyre, S ; Fraysse, B ; Deneve, S ; Deguine, O ; Barone, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-3bccfe8a6f077f8c81a24f610180d395a271dedaee957e466dc373eacf72b56d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Impaired Persons</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lipreading</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Speech Discrimination Tests</topic><topic>Speech therapy</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouger, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagleyre, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraysse, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deneve, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguine, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouger, J</au><au>Lagleyre, S</au><au>Fraysse, B</au><au>Deneve, S</au><au>Deguine, O</au><au>Barone, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2007-04-24</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>7295</spage><epage>7300</epage><pages>7295-7300</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimplantation evolution of word recognition in a large sample of CI users in unisensory (visual or auditory) and bisensory (visuoauditory) conditions. We found that, despite considerable recovery of auditory performance during the first year postimplantation, CI patients maintain a much higher level of word recognition in speechreading conditions compared with normally hearing subjects, even several years after implantation. Consequently, we show that CI users present higher visuoauditory performance when compared with normally hearing subjects with similar auditory stimuli. This better performance is not only due to greater speechreading performance, but, most importantly, also due to a greater capacity to integrate visual input with the distorted speech signal. Our results suggest that these behavioral changes in CI users might be mediated by a reorganization of the cortical network involved in speech recognition that favors a more specific involvement of visual areas. Furthermore, they provide crucial indications to guide the rehabilitation of CI patients by using visually oriented therapeutic strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>17404220</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0609419104</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2580</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2007-04, Vol.104 (17), p.7295-7300 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20030859 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; JSTOR |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Audiometry, Speech Auditory Perception Auditory Perception - physiology Biological Sciences Cochlear Implants Deafness Ears & hearing Hearing Impaired Persons Humans Life Sciences Lipreading Middle Aged Models, Psychological Neurons and Cognition Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology Prostheses Speech Discrimination Tests Speech therapy Visual Perception Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pnas_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20that%20cochlear-implanted%20deaf%20patients%20are%20better%20multisensory%20integrators&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Rouger,%20J&rft.date=2007-04-24&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=7295&rft.epage=7300&rft.pages=7295-7300&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0609419104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pnas_%3E20030859%3C/proquest_pnas_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201378686&rft_id=info:pmid/17404220&rfr_iscdi=true |