Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck

Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physical anthropology 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416
Hauptverfasser: Arlegi, Mikel, Gómez‐Robles, Aida, Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 416
container_issue 2
container_start_page 408
container_title American journal of physical anthropology
container_volume 166
creator Arlegi, Mikel
Gómez‐Robles, Aida
Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier
description Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size. Materials and Methods Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches. Results All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans. Discussion Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajpa.23441
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2002481457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002481457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQJC4INRDHrh0fq_KvIjjAOXKdTZOS2MFOhMrT45LCgQPSSrur_TSaHYSOcXSBoyi-lKtGXsSEUryDhjgSLEwYpbtoGPlrKGhCBujAuZVfma99NIgFpYwyPkRXj8Y2hanMslSyCkrdwtLKtjTaz0FbQLA0tqwqOQ5UUdaN1J8A40DqLCi6WupAg3o7RHu5rBwcbfsIvd5cv8zuwvnT7f1sOg8VEQSHIHOeYRCKJyxiEwXeDSU5AchFBCIjEgSVC44zxbnkOGY8zxn2z8SSsmxCRuis122see_AtWldOgXenQbTuTT2_9IE0wn36OkfdGU6q707T1FOKCEEe-q8p5Q1zlnI08aWtbTrFEfpJtt0k236na2HT7aS3aKG7Bf9CdMDuAc-ygrW_0il04fnaS_6BWoGgmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047343331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creator><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size. Materials and Methods Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches. Results All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans. Discussion Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-7691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29446467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; allometry ; Animals ; Anthropology, Physical ; Anthropometry ; Biological Evolution ; Body Size ; cervical vertebrae ; Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Gorilla gorilla - anatomy &amp; histology ; Gorillas ; hominine ; Humans ; Landmarks ; Male ; Modularity ; Morphology ; Neck - anatomy &amp; histology ; Pan troglodytes - anatomy &amp; histology ; Primates ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5665-9275 ; 0000-0001-7831-3902 ; 0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajpa.23441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajpa.23441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><description>Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size. Materials and Methods Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches. Results All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans. Discussion Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>allometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology, Physical</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>cervical vertebrae</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gorilla gorilla - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Gorillas</subject><subject>hominine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Landmarks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><issn>2692-7691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQJC4INRDHrh0fq_KvIjjAOXKdTZOS2MFOhMrT45LCgQPSSrur_TSaHYSOcXSBoyi-lKtGXsSEUryDhjgSLEwYpbtoGPlrKGhCBujAuZVfma99NIgFpYwyPkRXj8Y2hanMslSyCkrdwtLKtjTaz0FbQLA0tqwqOQ5UUdaN1J8A40DqLCi6WupAg3o7RHu5rBwcbfsIvd5cv8zuwvnT7f1sOg8VEQSHIHOeYRCKJyxiEwXeDSU5AchFBCIjEgSVC44zxbnkOGY8zxn2z8SSsmxCRuis122see_AtWldOgXenQbTuTT2_9IE0wn36OkfdGU6q707T1FOKCEEe-q8p5Q1zlnI08aWtbTrFEfpJtt0k236na2HT7aS3aKG7Bf9CdMDuAc-ygrW_0il04fnaS_6BWoGgmQ</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Arlegi, Mikel</creator><creator>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creator><creator>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-9275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><author>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>allometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology, Physical</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>cervical vertebrae</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gorilla gorilla - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Gorillas</topic><topic>hominine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Landmarks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arlegi, Mikel</au><au>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</au><au>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>408-416</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><eissn>2692-7691</eissn><abstract>Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size. Materials and Methods Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches. Results All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans. Discussion Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29446467</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.23441</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-9275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9483
ispartof American journal of physical anthropology, 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416
issn 0002-9483
1096-8644
2692-7691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2002481457
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
allometry
Animals
Anthropology, Physical
Anthropometry
Biological Evolution
Body Size
cervical vertebrae
Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology
Female
Gorilla gorilla - anatomy & histology
Gorillas
hominine
Humans
Landmarks
Male
Modularity
Morphology
Neck - anatomy & histology
Pan troglodytes - anatomy & histology
Primates
Vertebrae
title Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A27%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphological%20integration%20in%20the%20gorilla,%20chimpanzee,%20and%20human%20neck&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Arlegi,%20Mikel&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=408-416&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.23441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002481457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047343331&rft_id=info:pmid/29446467&rfr_iscdi=true