Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck
Objectives Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical anthropology 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 408 |
container_title | American journal of physical anthropology |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Arlegi, Mikel Gómez‐Robles, Aida Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier |
description | Objectives
Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size.
Materials and Methods
Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches.
Results
All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans.
Discussion
Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajpa.23441 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2002481457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002481457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQJC4INRDHrh0fq_KvIjjAOXKdTZOS2MFOhMrT45LCgQPSSrur_TSaHYSOcXSBoyi-lKtGXsSEUryDhjgSLEwYpbtoGPlrKGhCBujAuZVfma99NIgFpYwyPkRXj8Y2hanMslSyCkrdwtLKtjTaz0FbQLA0tqwqOQ5UUdaN1J8A40DqLCi6WupAg3o7RHu5rBwcbfsIvd5cv8zuwvnT7f1sOg8VEQSHIHOeYRCKJyxiEwXeDSU5AchFBCIjEgSVC44zxbnkOGY8zxn2z8SSsmxCRuis122see_AtWldOgXenQbTuTT2_9IE0wn36OkfdGU6q707T1FOKCEEe-q8p5Q1zlnI08aWtbTrFEfpJtt0k236na2HT7aS3aKG7Bf9CdMDuAc-ygrW_0il04fnaS_6BWoGgmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047343331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creator><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size.
Materials and Methods
Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches.
Results
All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans.
Discussion
Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-7691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29446467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; allometry ; Animals ; Anthropology, Physical ; Anthropometry ; Biological Evolution ; Body Size ; cervical vertebrae ; Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology ; Female ; Gorilla gorilla - anatomy & histology ; Gorillas ; hominine ; Humans ; Landmarks ; Male ; Modularity ; Morphology ; Neck - anatomy & histology ; Pan troglodytes - anatomy & histology ; Primates ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5665-9275 ; 0000-0001-7831-3902 ; 0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajpa.23441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajpa.23441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><description>Objectives
Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size.
Materials and Methods
Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches.
Results
All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans.
Discussion
Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>allometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology, Physical</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>cervical vertebrae</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gorilla gorilla - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Gorillas</subject><subject>hominine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Landmarks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neck - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><issn>2692-7691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQJC4INRDHrh0fq_KvIjjAOXKdTZOS2MFOhMrT45LCgQPSSrur_TSaHYSOcXSBoyi-lKtGXsSEUryDhjgSLEwYpbtoGPlrKGhCBujAuZVfma99NIgFpYwyPkRXj8Y2hanMslSyCkrdwtLKtjTaz0FbQLA0tqwqOQ5UUdaN1J8A40DqLCi6WupAg3o7RHu5rBwcbfsIvd5cv8zuwvnT7f1sOg8VEQSHIHOeYRCKJyxiEwXeDSU5AchFBCIjEgSVC44zxbnkOGY8zxn2z8SSsmxCRuis122see_AtWldOgXenQbTuTT2_9IE0wn36OkfdGU6q707T1FOKCEEe-q8p5Q1zlnI08aWtbTrFEfpJtt0k236na2HT7aS3aKG7Bf9CdMDuAc-ygrW_0il04fnaS_6BWoGgmQ</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Arlegi, Mikel</creator><creator>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creator><creator>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-9275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</title><author>Arlegi, Mikel ; Gómez‐Robles, Aida ; Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-eaf7d1e9c786065ce60043f3eef90e9d3ae94ab71dc77a71267ff618642a46d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>allometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology, Physical</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>cervical vertebrae</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gorilla gorilla - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Gorillas</topic><topic>hominine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Landmarks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neck - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arlegi, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arlegi, Mikel</au><au>Gómez‐Robles, Aida</au><au>Gómez‐Olivencia, Asier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>408-416</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><eissn>2692-7691</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Although integration studies are important to understand the evolution of organisms' traits across phylogenies, vertebral integration in primates is still largely unexplored. Here we describe and quantify patterns of morphological integration and modularity in the subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) in extant hominines incorporating the potential influence of size.
Materials and Methods
Three‐dimensional landmarks were digitized on 546 subaxial cervical vertebrae from 141 adult individuals of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Integration and modularity, and the influence of size effects, were quantified using geometric morphometric approaches.
Results
All subaxial cervical vertebrae from the three species show a strong degree of integration. Gorillas show the highest degree of integration; conversely, humans have the lowest degree of integration. Analyses of allometric regression residuals show that size is an important factor promoting integration in gorillas, with lesser influence in chimpanzees and almost no effect in humans.
Discussion
Results point to a likely ancestral pattern of integration in non‐human hominines, whereby the degree of integration decreases from cranial to caudal positions. Humans deviate from this pattern in the cranialmost (C3) and, to a lesser extent, in the caudalmost (C7) vertebrae, which are less integrated. These differences can be tentatively related to the emergence of bipedalism due to the presence of modern human‐like C3 in australopiths, which still preserve a more chimpanzee‐like C7.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29446467</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.23441</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-9275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-2660</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9483 |
ispartof | American journal of physical anthropology, 2018-06, Vol.166 (2), p.408-416 |
issn | 0002-9483 1096-8644 2692-7691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2002481457 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult allometry Animals Anthropology, Physical Anthropometry Biological Evolution Body Size cervical vertebrae Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology Female Gorilla gorilla - anatomy & histology Gorillas hominine Humans Landmarks Male Modularity Morphology Neck - anatomy & histology Pan troglodytes - anatomy & histology Primates Vertebrae |
title | Morphological integration in the gorilla, chimpanzee, and human neck |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A27%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphological%20integration%20in%20the%20gorilla,%20chimpanzee,%20and%20human%20neck&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Arlegi,%20Mikel&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=408-416&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.23441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002481457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047343331&rft_id=info:pmid/29446467&rfr_iscdi=true |