EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) subtypes among patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial and to determine the impact of PCV subtypes on clinical outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of 61 patients with ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2018-02, Vol.59 (2), p.889-896
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Colin S, Lim, Louis W, Ngo, Wei Kiong, Lim, Tock Han
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 896
container_issue 2
container_start_page 889
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 59
creator Tan, Colin S
Lim, Louis W
Ngo, Wei Kiong
Lim, Tock Han
description The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) subtypes among patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial and to determine the impact of PCV subtypes on clinical outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of 61 patients with macular PCV from the EVEREST study. Indocyanine green (ICGA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) obtained using standardized imaging protocols were graded to classify PCV into three subtypes. Type A PCV had polyps with interconnecting channels, type B had polyps with branching vascular networks, but no significant leakage on FA, and type C had polyps with branching vascular networks and leakage on FA. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proportion of patients with BCVA ≥ 20/40 were compared among the three PCV subtypes. Of the 61 patients, 54 were gradable for PCV subtype. Among these, 8 had type A PCV (14.8%), 27 had type B (50%), and 19 had type C (35.2%). At baseline, BCVA was 67.1 letters for type A, 58.7 for type B, and 43.5 for type C (P < 0.001). At 6 months, BCVA was highest among patients with type A compared with types B and C (80.1 letters versus 67.2 versus 50.4, respectively; P < 0.001). Type A PCV gained 13 letters compared with 8.5 (type B) and 6.9 (type C). BCVA ≥ 20/40 was highest for type A compared with types B and C (100% vs. 51.9% vs. 10.5%; P < 0.001). On performing ANCOVA, PCV subtype and baseline BCVA significantly affected final BCVA. The visual outcome following treatment varies with PCV subtype classification. The distinction in clinical outcomes between the PCV subtypes is observed in the initial months following the start of treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.17-22683
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001911714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001911714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-a3933213361333d622dff067283ab632944b88d96076501e4bd5ee4731a4cf6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1LxDAQhoMofh-9So4erOajTbvepKwfoKysq9eSNlOMpE1NUmH9If5es66Kh2Hm8PAMMy9CR5ScUSryc23f_RnNE8ZEwTfQLs0ylmR5wTf_zTtoz_tXQhiljGyjHTZJeZYVxS76nD5P59PHBZ7DYF3A2QUuje51Iw2ejaGxHXgse4UXDmTooA-R9IPtPWDb4gdrloPVKtLli3Xr6Vn6ZjR2kOFliR_HOiyHKNE9lvh-NEE30QLuFM-j13b6AxQubR-cNQZWi7Q0B2irlcbD4U_fR09X00V5k9zNrm_Ly7uk4ZyFRPJJ7JRzEYsrwZhqWyJyVnBZCx7PTOuiUBNBcpERCmmtMoA051SmTSsU30cna-_g7NsIPlSd9g0YI3uwo68YIXRCaU7TiCZrtHHWewdtNTjdSbesKKlWUVSrKCqaV99RRP74Rz3WHag_-vf3_AsuJYXz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001911714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tan, Colin S ; Lim, Louis W ; Ngo, Wei Kiong ; Lim, Tock Han</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Colin S ; Lim, Louis W ; Ngo, Wei Kiong ; Lim, Tock Han ; EVEREST Study Group ; for the EVEREST Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) subtypes among patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial and to determine the impact of PCV subtypes on clinical outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of 61 patients with macular PCV from the EVEREST study. Indocyanine green (ICGA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) obtained using standardized imaging protocols were graded to classify PCV into three subtypes. Type A PCV had polyps with interconnecting channels, type B had polyps with branching vascular networks, but no significant leakage on FA, and type C had polyps with branching vascular networks and leakage on FA. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proportion of patients with BCVA ≥ 20/40 were compared among the three PCV subtypes. Of the 61 patients, 54 were gradable for PCV subtype. Among these, 8 had type A PCV (14.8%), 27 had type B (50%), and 19 had type C (35.2%). At baseline, BCVA was 67.1 letters for type A, 58.7 for type B, and 43.5 for type C (P &lt; 0.001). At 6 months, BCVA was highest among patients with type A compared with types B and C (80.1 letters versus 67.2 versus 50.4, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Type A PCV gained 13 letters compared with 8.5 (type B) and 6.9 (type C). BCVA ≥ 20/40 was highest for type A compared with types B and C (100% vs. 51.9% vs. 10.5%; P &lt; 0.001). On performing ANCOVA, PCV subtype and baseline BCVA significantly affected final BCVA. The visual outcome following treatment varies with PCV subtype classification. The distinction in clinical outcomes between the PCV subtypes is observed in the initial months following the start of treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-22683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29435588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Choroidal Neovascularization - classification ; Choroidal Neovascularization - drug therapy ; Choroidal Neovascularization - physiopathology ; Coloring Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Humans ; Indocyanine Green - administration &amp; dosage ; Intravitreal Injections ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Photochemotherapy ; Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use ; Polyps - classification ; Polyps - drug therapy ; Polyps - physiopathology ; Porphyrins - therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Ranibizumab - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2018-02, Vol.59 (2), p.889-896</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-a3933213361333d622dff067283ab632944b88d96076501e4bd5ee4731a4cf6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Colin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Louis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Wei Kiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Tock Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVEREST Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EVEREST Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) subtypes among patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial and to determine the impact of PCV subtypes on clinical outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of 61 patients with macular PCV from the EVEREST study. Indocyanine green (ICGA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) obtained using standardized imaging protocols were graded to classify PCV into three subtypes. Type A PCV had polyps with interconnecting channels, type B had polyps with branching vascular networks, but no significant leakage on FA, and type C had polyps with branching vascular networks and leakage on FA. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proportion of patients with BCVA ≥ 20/40 were compared among the three PCV subtypes. Of the 61 patients, 54 were gradable for PCV subtype. Among these, 8 had type A PCV (14.8%), 27 had type B (50%), and 19 had type C (35.2%). At baseline, BCVA was 67.1 letters for type A, 58.7 for type B, and 43.5 for type C (P &lt; 0.001). At 6 months, BCVA was highest among patients with type A compared with types B and C (80.1 letters versus 67.2 versus 50.4, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Type A PCV gained 13 letters compared with 8.5 (type B) and 6.9 (type C). BCVA ≥ 20/40 was highest for type A compared with types B and C (100% vs. 51.9% vs. 10.5%; P &lt; 0.001). On performing ANCOVA, PCV subtype and baseline BCVA significantly affected final BCVA. The visual outcome following treatment varies with PCV subtype classification. The distinction in clinical outcomes between the PCV subtypes is observed in the initial months following the start of treatment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Choroidal Neovascularization - classification</subject><subject>Choroidal Neovascularization - drug therapy</subject><subject>Choroidal Neovascularization - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coloring Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indocyanine Green - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Photochemotherapy</subject><subject>Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Polyps - classification</subject><subject>Polyps - drug therapy</subject><subject>Polyps - physiopathology</subject><subject>Porphyrins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Ranibizumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1LxDAQhoMofh-9So4erOajTbvepKwfoKysq9eSNlOMpE1NUmH9If5es66Kh2Hm8PAMMy9CR5ScUSryc23f_RnNE8ZEwTfQLs0ylmR5wTf_zTtoz_tXQhiljGyjHTZJeZYVxS76nD5P59PHBZ7DYF3A2QUuje51Iw2ejaGxHXgse4UXDmTooA-R9IPtPWDb4gdrloPVKtLli3Xr6Vn6ZjR2kOFliR_HOiyHKNE9lvh-NEE30QLuFM-j13b6AxQubR-cNQZWi7Q0B2irlcbD4U_fR09X00V5k9zNrm_Ly7uk4ZyFRPJJ7JRzEYsrwZhqWyJyVnBZCx7PTOuiUBNBcpERCmmtMoA051SmTSsU30cna-_g7NsIPlSd9g0YI3uwo68YIXRCaU7TiCZrtHHWewdtNTjdSbesKKlWUVSrKCqaV99RRP74Rz3WHag_-vf3_AsuJYXz</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Tan, Colin S</creator><creator>Lim, Louis W</creator><creator>Ngo, Wei Kiong</creator><creator>Lim, Tock Han</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Tan, Colin S ; Lim, Louis W ; Ngo, Wei Kiong ; Lim, Tock Han</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-a3933213361333d622dff067283ab632944b88d96076501e4bd5ee4731a4cf6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Choroidal Neovascularization - classification</topic><topic>Choroidal Neovascularization - drug therapy</topic><topic>Choroidal Neovascularization - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coloring Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indocyanine Green - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Photochemotherapy</topic><topic>Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Polyps - classification</topic><topic>Polyps - drug therapy</topic><topic>Polyps - physiopathology</topic><topic>Porphyrins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Ranibizumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Colin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Louis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Wei Kiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Tock Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVEREST Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EVEREST Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Colin S</au><au>Lim, Louis W</au><au>Ngo, Wei Kiong</au><au>Lim, Tock Han</au><aucorp>EVEREST Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>for the EVEREST Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>889</spage><epage>896</epage><pages>889-896</pages><issn>1552-5783</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) subtypes among patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial and to determine the impact of PCV subtypes on clinical outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of 61 patients with macular PCV from the EVEREST study. Indocyanine green (ICGA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) obtained using standardized imaging protocols were graded to classify PCV into three subtypes. Type A PCV had polyps with interconnecting channels, type B had polyps with branching vascular networks, but no significant leakage on FA, and type C had polyps with branching vascular networks and leakage on FA. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proportion of patients with BCVA ≥ 20/40 were compared among the three PCV subtypes. Of the 61 patients, 54 were gradable for PCV subtype. Among these, 8 had type A PCV (14.8%), 27 had type B (50%), and 19 had type C (35.2%). At baseline, BCVA was 67.1 letters for type A, 58.7 for type B, and 43.5 for type C (P &lt; 0.001). At 6 months, BCVA was highest among patients with type A compared with types B and C (80.1 letters versus 67.2 versus 50.4, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Type A PCV gained 13 letters compared with 8.5 (type B) and 6.9 (type C). BCVA ≥ 20/40 was highest for type A compared with types B and C (100% vs. 51.9% vs. 10.5%; P &lt; 0.001). On performing ANCOVA, PCV subtype and baseline BCVA significantly affected final BCVA. The visual outcome following treatment varies with PCV subtype classification. The distinction in clinical outcomes between the PCV subtypes is observed in the initial months following the start of treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29435588</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.17-22683</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5783
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018-02, Vol.59 (2), p.889-896
issn 1552-5783
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001911714
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Choroidal Neovascularization - classification
Choroidal Neovascularization - drug therapy
Choroidal Neovascularization - physiopathology
Coloring Agents - administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Humans
Indocyanine Green - administration & dosage
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Middle Aged
Photochemotherapy
Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use
Polyps - classification
Polyps - drug therapy
Polyps - physiopathology
Porphyrins - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Ranibizumab - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity - physiology
title EVEREST Report 5: Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subtypes in a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A40%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVEREST%20Report%205:%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20and%20Treatment%20Response%20of%20Polypoidal%20Choroidal%20Vasculopathy%20Subtypes%20in%20a%20Multicenter,%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Tan,%20Colin%20S&rft.aucorp=EVEREST%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=889&rft.epage=896&rft.pages=889-896&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.17-22683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001911714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001911714&rft_id=info:pmid/29435588&rfr_iscdi=true