HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration

Accurate identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) places a substantial burden on emergency physicians (EPs). Bayesian nomogram for risk stratification in low- to intermediate-risk cardiovascular patients has not been investigated previously. The objective of this stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.147-155
Hauptverfasser: Farook, Naureen, Cochon, L., Bode, A.D., Langer, B.P., Baez, A.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 2
container_start_page 147
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 54
creator Farook, Naureen
Cochon, L.
Bode, A.D.
Langer, B.P.
Baez, A.A.
description Accurate identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) places a substantial burden on emergency physicians (EPs). Bayesian nomogram for risk stratification in low- to intermediate-risk cardiovascular patients has not been investigated previously. The objective of this study was to develop a comparative diagnostic model using Bayesian statistics for exercise treadmill test (ETT) and stress echocardiogram (ECHO) to calculate post-test diagnostic risk of MACE using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) risk score as predictor of pretest probability. Stratification was made by applying HEART scores for the prediction of MACE. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using pooled sensitivity and specificity of ETT and ECHO from the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association systematic review. Post-test probabilities were obtained after inserting HEART score and LR into Bayesian nomogram. Analysis of variance was used to assess statistical association. Positive LR (LR+) for ETT was 4.56 and negative LR (LR–) was 0.27; for ECHO, LR+ 5.65 and LR– 0.15. Bayesian statistical modeling post-test probabilities for LR+ and low HEART risk yielded a post-test probability for ETT of 7.75% and 9.09% for ECHO; intermediate risk gave 47.62% and 52.63%, respectively. For LR–, low HEART risk post-test probability for ETT was 0.46% and for ECHO 0.26%; intermediate risk probabilities were 4.48% and 2.49%, respectively. LR– was statistically significant in ruling out MACE with ECHO (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001409828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736467917310569</els_id><sourcerecordid>2001409828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-50928bbec1e00da2d6b26842981602946c6711e31cd1c88747430373f5466633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4C8hHLi1-pI7DiVLKQ0JCgt4tx9mCqyYutoPUE3-drUrPnCyNZ3Z3PkIuORtxxtX1crSEFmILzUgwXqI4YoIfkIGQYzEcM1EdkgErpRoWqqxOyGlKS4ZGpvkxORFVITQbiwH5eZpN3ub03YUI1HYNfc8RUqJzSJnOcMMHdG5D72FtY26hy_TObiB526HmfPKhw_An3nJD3yD1q5zoIoaW5k-gE9dnoFOLo--9_ehCyt7RaVitbB2izRg-J0cLu0pw8feekfnDbD59Gr68Pj5PJy9DJ5XOWKgSuq7BcWCssaJRtVC6EJXmCrsWyqmSc5DcNdxpXRZlIZks5WJcKKWkPCNXu7HrGL567GZanxzgIR2EPhmBbApWaaHRqnZWF0NKERZmHX1r48ZwZrbszdLs2Zst-62O7DF4-bejr7d_-9geNhpudwbAot8eoknOI15ofASXTRP8fzt-AcvRl9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001409828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Farook, Naureen ; Cochon, L. ; Bode, A.D. ; Langer, B.P. ; Baez, A.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farook, Naureen ; Cochon, L. ; Bode, A.D. ; Langer, B.P. ; Baez, A.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) places a substantial burden on emergency physicians (EPs). Bayesian nomogram for risk stratification in low- to intermediate-risk cardiovascular patients has not been investigated previously. The objective of this study was to develop a comparative diagnostic model using Bayesian statistics for exercise treadmill test (ETT) and stress echocardiogram (ECHO) to calculate post-test diagnostic risk of MACE using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) risk score as predictor of pretest probability. Stratification was made by applying HEART scores for the prediction of MACE. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using pooled sensitivity and specificity of ETT and ECHO from the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association systematic review. Post-test probabilities were obtained after inserting HEART score and LR into Bayesian nomogram. Analysis of variance was used to assess statistical association. Positive LR (LR+) for ETT was 4.56 and negative LR (LR–) was 0.27; for ECHO, LR+ 5.65 and LR– 0.15. Bayesian statistical modeling post-test probabilities for LR+ and low HEART risk yielded a post-test probability for ETT of 7.75% and 9.09% for ECHO; intermediate risk gave 47.62% and 52.63%, respectively. For LR–, low HEART risk post-test probability for ETT was 0.46% and for ECHO 0.26%; intermediate risk probabilities were 4.48% and 2.49%, respectively. LR– was statistically significant in ruling out MACE with ECHO (p &lt; 0.001), but no significant differences were seen for LR+ (p = 0.64). This Bayesian analysis demonstrated slight superiority of stress ECHO over ETT in low- and intermediate-risk patients in ruling out MACE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29428052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ECHO ; exercise stress test ; HEART score ; MACE</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.147-155</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-50928bbec1e00da2d6b26842981602946c6711e31cd1c88747430373f5466633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-50928bbec1e00da2d6b26842981602946c6711e31cd1c88747430373f5466633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29428052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farook, Naureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochon, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baez, A.A.</creatorcontrib><title>HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Accurate identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) places a substantial burden on emergency physicians (EPs). Bayesian nomogram for risk stratification in low- to intermediate-risk cardiovascular patients has not been investigated previously. The objective of this study was to develop a comparative diagnostic model using Bayesian statistics for exercise treadmill test (ETT) and stress echocardiogram (ECHO) to calculate post-test diagnostic risk of MACE using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) risk score as predictor of pretest probability. Stratification was made by applying HEART scores for the prediction of MACE. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using pooled sensitivity and specificity of ETT and ECHO from the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association systematic review. Post-test probabilities were obtained after inserting HEART score and LR into Bayesian nomogram. Analysis of variance was used to assess statistical association. Positive LR (LR+) for ETT was 4.56 and negative LR (LR–) was 0.27; for ECHO, LR+ 5.65 and LR– 0.15. Bayesian statistical modeling post-test probabilities for LR+ and low HEART risk yielded a post-test probability for ETT of 7.75% and 9.09% for ECHO; intermediate risk gave 47.62% and 52.63%, respectively. For LR–, low HEART risk post-test probability for ETT was 0.46% and for ECHO 0.26%; intermediate risk probabilities were 4.48% and 2.49%, respectively. LR– was statistically significant in ruling out MACE with ECHO (p &lt; 0.001), but no significant differences were seen for LR+ (p = 0.64). This Bayesian analysis demonstrated slight superiority of stress ECHO over ETT in low- and intermediate-risk patients in ruling out MACE.</description><subject>ECHO</subject><subject>exercise stress test</subject><subject>HEART score</subject><subject>MACE</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4C8hHLi1-pI7DiVLKQ0JCgt4tx9mCqyYutoPUE3-drUrPnCyNZ3Z3PkIuORtxxtX1crSEFmILzUgwXqI4YoIfkIGQYzEcM1EdkgErpRoWqqxOyGlKS4ZGpvkxORFVITQbiwH5eZpN3ub03YUI1HYNfc8RUqJzSJnOcMMHdG5D72FtY26hy_TObiB526HmfPKhw_An3nJD3yD1q5zoIoaW5k-gE9dnoFOLo--9_ehCyt7RaVitbB2izRg-J0cLu0pw8feekfnDbD59Gr68Pj5PJy9DJ5XOWKgSuq7BcWCssaJRtVC6EJXmCrsWyqmSc5DcNdxpXRZlIZks5WJcKKWkPCNXu7HrGL567GZanxzgIR2EPhmBbApWaaHRqnZWF0NKERZmHX1r48ZwZrbszdLs2Zst-62O7DF4-bejr7d_-9geNhpudwbAot8eoknOI15ofASXTRP8fzt-AcvRl9g</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Farook, Naureen</creator><creator>Cochon, L.</creator><creator>Bode, A.D.</creator><creator>Langer, B.P.</creator><creator>Baez, A.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration</title><author>Farook, Naureen ; Cochon, L. ; Bode, A.D. ; Langer, B.P. ; Baez, A.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-50928bbec1e00da2d6b26842981602946c6711e31cd1c88747430373f5466633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>ECHO</topic><topic>exercise stress test</topic><topic>HEART score</topic><topic>MACE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farook, Naureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochon, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baez, A.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farook, Naureen</au><au>Cochon, L.</au><au>Bode, A.D.</au><au>Langer, B.P.</au><au>Baez, A.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>147-155</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Accurate identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) places a substantial burden on emergency physicians (EPs). Bayesian nomogram for risk stratification in low- to intermediate-risk cardiovascular patients has not been investigated previously. The objective of this study was to develop a comparative diagnostic model using Bayesian statistics for exercise treadmill test (ETT) and stress echocardiogram (ECHO) to calculate post-test diagnostic risk of MACE using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) risk score as predictor of pretest probability. Stratification was made by applying HEART scores for the prediction of MACE. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using pooled sensitivity and specificity of ETT and ECHO from the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association systematic review. Post-test probabilities were obtained after inserting HEART score and LR into Bayesian nomogram. Analysis of variance was used to assess statistical association. Positive LR (LR+) for ETT was 4.56 and negative LR (LR–) was 0.27; for ECHO, LR+ 5.65 and LR– 0.15. Bayesian statistical modeling post-test probabilities for LR+ and low HEART risk yielded a post-test probability for ETT of 7.75% and 9.09% for ECHO; intermediate risk gave 47.62% and 52.63%, respectively. For LR–, low HEART risk post-test probability for ETT was 0.46% and for ECHO 0.26%; intermediate risk probabilities were 4.48% and 2.49%, respectively. LR– was statistically significant in ruling out MACE with ECHO (p &lt; 0.001), but no significant differences were seen for LR+ (p = 0.64). This Bayesian analysis demonstrated slight superiority of stress ECHO over ETT in low- and intermediate-risk patients in ruling out MACE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29428052</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.021</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.147-155
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001409828
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects ECHO
exercise stress test
HEART score
MACE
title HEART Score and Stress Test Emergency Department Bayesian Decision Scheme: Results from the Acute Care Diagnostic Collaboration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A57%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HEART%20Score%20and%20Stress%20Test%20Emergency%20Department%20Bayesian%20Decision%20Scheme:%20Results%20from%20the%20Acute%20Care%20Diagnostic%20Collaboration&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Farook,%20Naureen&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=147-155&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001409828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001409828&rft_id=info:pmid/29428052&rft_els_id=S0736467917310569&rfr_iscdi=true