Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines

Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of inciden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastroenterología y hepatología 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301
Hauptverfasser: Mella, Jose Manuel, Gómez, Estanislao Jesús, Omodeo, Mariana, Manzotti, Matias, Roel, Mariela, Pereyra, Lisandro, Fischer, Carolina, Panigadi, Nicolás, González, Raquel, Luna, Pablo, Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia, Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo, Boerr, Luis Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301
container_issue 5
container_start_page 293
container_title Gastroenterología y hepatología
container_volume 41
creator Mella, Jose Manuel
Gómez, Estanislao Jesús
Omodeo, Mariana
Manzotti, Matias
Roel, Mariela
Pereyra, Lisandro
Fischer, Carolina
Panigadi, Nicolás
González, Raquel
Luna, Pablo
Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia
Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo
Boerr, Luis Alberto
description Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001404797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0210570518300050</els_id><sourcerecordid>2001404797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uFDEQhH0AkRB4BfCRyw5tz493LkhRRAApEkjkbnnsnsWL117cnkj79ni0SQ6cOLVaqqpWf8XYewGNADF83Dc7QyWnX3hsJAjVCNkA9C_YJUgBm15Bf8FeE-0BZN_K8RW7kGMnx75Xl2z-kfHBBIwWeZq5j9Y7jMUEboOP3poQTjxjqKJY-NFEm9EUb7k9USFuCnfe7GIiT3wyhI6nyO2Scw3hu6WG1RikN-zlbALh28d5xe5vP9_ffN3cff_y7eb6bmM7OZTNPIoWzTh1wrYTDNNgFbZzv3XWya7fWjMNzolROWWchAmdEm5GqBsO3YztFftwjj3m9GdBKvrgyWIIJmJaSEsA0UGnRlWl6iy1ORFlnPUx-4PJJy1Ar1z1Xj9z1StXLaSuXKvz3eORZTqge_Y9Qa2C67MA66cPHrMm61fCzme0Rbvk_-PIp38ynvr4jSekfVpyrCC10FQN-uda9dq02LZQ_dD-BdVEqDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001404797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0210-5705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29429557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Elsevier España, S.L.U</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ecoendoscopia ; Endoscopic ultrasound ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Hallazgos incidentales ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasias pancreáticas ; Pancreatic cyst ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology ; Pancreatic neoplasms ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevalence ; Prevalencia ; Quiste pancreático ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterología y hepatología, 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301</ispartof><rights>Elsevier España, S.L.U.</rights><rights>2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodeo, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzotti, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roel, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereyra, Lisandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panigadi, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><title>Gastroenterología y hepatología</title><addtitle>Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ecoendoscopia</subject><subject>Endoscopic ultrasound</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Hallazgos incidentales</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasias pancreáticas</subject><subject>Pancreatic cyst</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic neoplasms</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prevalencia</subject><subject>Quiste pancreático</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0210-5705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uFDEQhH0AkRB4BfCRyw5tz493LkhRRAApEkjkbnnsnsWL117cnkj79ni0SQ6cOLVaqqpWf8XYewGNADF83Dc7QyWnX3hsJAjVCNkA9C_YJUgBm15Bf8FeE-0BZN_K8RW7kGMnx75Xl2z-kfHBBIwWeZq5j9Y7jMUEboOP3poQTjxjqKJY-NFEm9EUb7k9USFuCnfe7GIiT3wyhI6nyO2Scw3hu6WG1RikN-zlbALh28d5xe5vP9_ffN3cff_y7eb6bmM7OZTNPIoWzTh1wrYTDNNgFbZzv3XWya7fWjMNzolROWWchAmdEm5GqBsO3YztFftwjj3m9GdBKvrgyWIIJmJaSEsA0UGnRlWl6iy1ORFlnPUx-4PJJy1Ar1z1Xj9z1StXLaSuXKvz3eORZTqge_Y9Qa2C67MA66cPHrMm61fCzme0Rbvk_-PIp38ynvr4jSekfVpyrCC10FQN-uda9dq02LZQ_dD-BdVEqDI</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Mella, Jose Manuel</creator><creator>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creator><creator>Omodeo, Mariana</creator><creator>Manzotti, Matias</creator><creator>Roel, Mariela</creator><creator>Pereyra, Lisandro</creator><creator>Fischer, Carolina</creator><creator>Panigadi, Nicolás</creator><creator>González, Raquel</creator><creator>Luna, Pablo</creator><creator>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creator><creator>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creator><creator>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creator><general>Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><author>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ecoendoscopia</topic><topic>Endoscopic ultrasound</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Hallazgos incidentales</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasias pancreáticas</topic><topic>Pancreatic cyst</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic neoplasms</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prevalencia</topic><topic>Quiste pancreático</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodeo, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzotti, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roel, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereyra, Lisandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panigadi, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterología y hepatología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mella, Jose Manuel</au><au>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</au><au>Omodeo, Mariana</au><au>Manzotti, Matias</au><au>Roel, Mariela</au><au>Pereyra, Lisandro</au><au>Fischer, Carolina</au><au>Panigadi, Nicolás</au><au>González, Raquel</au><au>Luna, Pablo</au><au>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</au><au>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</au><au>Boerr, Luis Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterología y hepatología</jtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>293-301</pages><issn>0210-5705</issn><abstract>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Elsevier España, S.L.U</pub><pmid>29429557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0210-5705
ispartof Gastroenterología y hepatología, 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301
issn 0210-5705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001404797
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ecoendoscopia
Endoscopic ultrasound
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Hallazgos incidentales
Humans
Incidental Findings
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Neoplasias pancreáticas
Pancreatic cyst
Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging
Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology
Pancreatic neoplasms
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prevalence
Prevalencia
Quiste pancreático
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
title Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20incidental%20clinically%20relevant%20pancreatic%20cysts%20at%20diagnosis%20based%20on%20current%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterolog%C3%ADa%20y%20hepatolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Mella,%20Jose%20Manuel&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=293-301&rft.issn=0210-5705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001404797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001404797&rft_id=info:pmid/29429557&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0210570518300050&rfr_iscdi=true