Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines
Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of inciden...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastroenterología y hepatología 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 301 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Gastroenterología y hepatología |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Mella, Jose Manuel Gómez, Estanislao Jesús Omodeo, Mariana Manzotti, Matias Roel, Mariela Pereyra, Lisandro Fischer, Carolina Panigadi, Nicolás González, Raquel Luna, Pablo Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo Boerr, Luis Alberto |
description | Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001404797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0210570518300050</els_id><sourcerecordid>2001404797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uFDEQhH0AkRB4BfCRyw5tz493LkhRRAApEkjkbnnsnsWL117cnkj79ni0SQ6cOLVaqqpWf8XYewGNADF83Dc7QyWnX3hsJAjVCNkA9C_YJUgBm15Bf8FeE-0BZN_K8RW7kGMnx75Xl2z-kfHBBIwWeZq5j9Y7jMUEboOP3poQTjxjqKJY-NFEm9EUb7k9USFuCnfe7GIiT3wyhI6nyO2Scw3hu6WG1RikN-zlbALh28d5xe5vP9_ffN3cff_y7eb6bmM7OZTNPIoWzTh1wrYTDNNgFbZzv3XWya7fWjMNzolROWWchAmdEm5GqBsO3YztFftwjj3m9GdBKvrgyWIIJmJaSEsA0UGnRlWl6iy1ORFlnPUx-4PJJy1Ar1z1Xj9z1StXLaSuXKvz3eORZTqge_Y9Qa2C67MA66cPHrMm61fCzme0Rbvk_-PIp38ynvr4jSekfVpyrCC10FQN-uda9dq02LZQ_dD-BdVEqDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001404797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0210-5705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29429557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Elsevier España, S.L.U</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ecoendoscopia ; Endoscopic ultrasound ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Hallazgos incidentales ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasias pancreáticas ; Pancreatic cyst ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology ; Pancreatic neoplasms ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevalence ; Prevalencia ; Quiste pancreático ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterología y hepatología, 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301</ispartof><rights>Elsevier España, S.L.U.</rights><rights>2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodeo, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzotti, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roel, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereyra, Lisandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panigadi, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><title>Gastroenterología y hepatología</title><addtitle>Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ecoendoscopia</subject><subject>Endoscopic ultrasound</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Hallazgos incidentales</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasias pancreáticas</subject><subject>Pancreatic cyst</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic neoplasms</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prevalencia</subject><subject>Quiste pancreático</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0210-5705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uFDEQhH0AkRB4BfCRyw5tz493LkhRRAApEkjkbnnsnsWL117cnkj79ni0SQ6cOLVaqqpWf8XYewGNADF83Dc7QyWnX3hsJAjVCNkA9C_YJUgBm15Bf8FeE-0BZN_K8RW7kGMnx75Xl2z-kfHBBIwWeZq5j9Y7jMUEboOP3poQTjxjqKJY-NFEm9EUb7k9USFuCnfe7GIiT3wyhI6nyO2Scw3hu6WG1RikN-zlbALh28d5xe5vP9_ffN3cff_y7eb6bmM7OZTNPIoWzTh1wrYTDNNgFbZzv3XWya7fWjMNzolROWWchAmdEm5GqBsO3YztFftwjj3m9GdBKvrgyWIIJmJaSEsA0UGnRlWl6iy1ORFlnPUx-4PJJy1Ar1z1Xj9z1StXLaSuXKvz3eORZTqge_Y9Qa2C67MA66cPHrMm61fCzme0Rbvk_-PIp38ynvr4jSekfVpyrCC10FQN-uda9dq02LZQ_dD-BdVEqDI</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Mella, Jose Manuel</creator><creator>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creator><creator>Omodeo, Mariana</creator><creator>Manzotti, Matias</creator><creator>Roel, Mariela</creator><creator>Pereyra, Lisandro</creator><creator>Fischer, Carolina</creator><creator>Panigadi, Nicolás</creator><creator>González, Raquel</creator><creator>Luna, Pablo</creator><creator>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creator><creator>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creator><creator>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creator><general>Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</title><author>Mella, Jose Manuel ; Gómez, Estanislao Jesús ; Omodeo, Mariana ; Manzotti, Matias ; Roel, Mariela ; Pereyra, Lisandro ; Fischer, Carolina ; Panigadi, Nicolás ; González, Raquel ; Luna, Pablo ; Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia ; Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo ; Boerr, Luis Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-f913ea9b41c3b06b6c7e3f58dcd2458cab6dd197d7ad20bed71dfe07ade64fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ecoendoscopia</topic><topic>Endoscopic ultrasound</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Hallazgos incidentales</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasias pancreáticas</topic><topic>Pancreatic cyst</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic neoplasms</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prevalencia</topic><topic>Quiste pancreático</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mella, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodeo, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzotti, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roel, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereyra, Lisandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panigadi, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerr, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterología y hepatología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mella, Jose Manuel</au><au>Gómez, Estanislao Jesús</au><au>Omodeo, Mariana</au><au>Manzotti, Matias</au><au>Roel, Mariela</au><au>Pereyra, Lisandro</au><au>Fischer, Carolina</au><au>Panigadi, Nicolás</au><au>González, Raquel</au><au>Luna, Pablo</au><au>Pedreira, Silvia Cecilia</au><au>Cimmino, Daniel Gustavo</au><au>Boerr, Luis Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterología y hepatología</jtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>293-301</pages><issn>0210-5705</issn><abstract>Abstract Background Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. Aims To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). Methods Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3–6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). Results Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3–11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16–41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5–22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n=5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4–2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1–9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as “AGA- or European-positive” had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. Conclusions In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Elsevier España, S.L.U</pub><pmid>29429557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0210-5705 |
ispartof | Gastroenterología y hepatología, 2018-05, Vol.41 (5), p.293-301 |
issn | 0210-5705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2001404797 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Ecoendoscopia Endoscopic ultrasound Gastroenterology and Hepatology Hallazgos incidentales Humans Incidental Findings Magnetic Resonance Imaging Middle Aged Neoplasias pancreáticas Pancreatic cyst Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging Pancreatic Cyst - epidemiology Pancreatic neoplasms Practice Guidelines as Topic Prevalence Prevalencia Quiste pancreático Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed Young Adult |
title | Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20incidental%20clinically%20relevant%20pancreatic%20cysts%20at%20diagnosis%20based%20on%20current%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterolog%C3%ADa%20y%20hepatolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Mella,%20Jose%20Manuel&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=293-301&rft.issn=0210-5705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001404797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001404797&rft_id=info:pmid/29429557&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0210570518300050&rfr_iscdi=true |