A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data
•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food policy 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Food policy |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Brzozowski, Matthew Crossley, Thomas F. Winter, Joachim K. |
description | •Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion.
Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000616838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306919217306942</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000616838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWKs_QcjSzYxfksljVlKKVqHgRtchkwekTCdjMhX9905p967u5t4D9yB0T6AmQMTjrg4puTH1NQUia1A1EHqBFkRJVnHB5SVaAANRtaSl1-imlB0AUGhggcQK27QfTY4lDTgFnL01fY_N4LCLJv_iIxv7n9EPLk6H7LEzk7lFV8H0xd-dc4k-X54_1q_V9n3ztl5tK8spTJWUMghqbdsIIQinxLnGhGCkahkLDTdBdUY1HSGMd9wL5VgnJHNeNC3rFGVL9HDijjl9HXyZ9D4W6_veDD4diqbzEUGEYmqu8lPV5lRK9kGPOe7nB5qAPnrSO332pI-eNCg9e5p3T6edn398R591sdEP1rs4u5i0S_Efwh-MOHKm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000616838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><description>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion.
Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-9192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>data collection ; Expenditure ; food policy ; food purchasing ; Measurement error ; Recall bias ; Survey data</subject><ispartof>Food policy, 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919217306942$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><title>Food policy</title><description>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion.
Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</description><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Expenditure</subject><subject>food policy</subject><subject>food purchasing</subject><subject>Measurement error</subject><subject>Recall bias</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWKs_QcjSzYxfksljVlKKVqHgRtchkwekTCdjMhX9905p967u5t4D9yB0T6AmQMTjrg4puTH1NQUia1A1EHqBFkRJVnHB5SVaAANRtaSl1-imlB0AUGhggcQK27QfTY4lDTgFnL01fY_N4LCLJv_iIxv7n9EPLk6H7LEzk7lFV8H0xd-dc4k-X54_1q_V9n3ztl5tK8spTJWUMghqbdsIIQinxLnGhGCkahkLDTdBdUY1HSGMd9wL5VgnJHNeNC3rFGVL9HDijjl9HXyZ9D4W6_veDD4diqbzEUGEYmqu8lPV5lRK9kGPOe7nB5qAPnrSO332pI-eNCg9e5p3T6edn398R591sdEP1rs4u5i0S_Efwh-MOHKm</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Brzozowski, Matthew</creator><creator>Crossley, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Winter, Joachim K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><author>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Expenditure</topic><topic>food policy</topic><topic>food purchasing</topic><topic>Measurement error</topic><topic>Recall bias</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brzozowski, Matthew</au><au>Crossley, Thomas F.</au><au>Winter, Joachim K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</atitle><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>53-61</pages><issn>0306-9192</issn><eissn>1873-5657</eissn><abstract>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion.
Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-9192 |
ispartof | Food policy, 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61 |
issn | 0306-9192 1873-5657 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000616838 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | data collection Expenditure food policy food purchasing Measurement error Recall bias Survey data |
title | A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20recall%20and%20diary%20food%20expenditure%20data&rft.jtitle=Food%20policy&rft.au=Brzozowski,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=53-61&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000616838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000616838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306919217306942&rfr_iscdi=true |