A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data

•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food policy 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61
Hauptverfasser: Brzozowski, Matthew, Crossley, Thomas F., Winter, Joachim K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue
container_start_page 53
container_title Food policy
container_volume 72
creator Brzozowski, Matthew
Crossley, Thomas F.
Winter, Joachim K.
description •Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion. Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000616838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306919217306942</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000616838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWKs_QcjSzYxfksljVlKKVqHgRtchkwekTCdjMhX9905p967u5t4D9yB0T6AmQMTjrg4puTH1NQUia1A1EHqBFkRJVnHB5SVaAANRtaSl1-imlB0AUGhggcQK27QfTY4lDTgFnL01fY_N4LCLJv_iIxv7n9EPLk6H7LEzk7lFV8H0xd-dc4k-X54_1q_V9n3ztl5tK8spTJWUMghqbdsIIQinxLnGhGCkahkLDTdBdUY1HSGMd9wL5VgnJHNeNC3rFGVL9HDijjl9HXyZ9D4W6_veDD4diqbzEUGEYmqu8lPV5lRK9kGPOe7nB5qAPnrSO332pI-eNCg9e5p3T6edn398R591sdEP1rs4u5i0S_Efwh-MOHKm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000616838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><description>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion. Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-9192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>data collection ; Expenditure ; food policy ; food purchasing ; Measurement error ; Recall bias ; Survey data</subject><ispartof>Food policy, 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919217306942$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><title>Food policy</title><description>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion. Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</description><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Expenditure</subject><subject>food policy</subject><subject>food purchasing</subject><subject>Measurement error</subject><subject>Recall bias</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWKs_QcjSzYxfksljVlKKVqHgRtchkwekTCdjMhX9905p967u5t4D9yB0T6AmQMTjrg4puTH1NQUia1A1EHqBFkRJVnHB5SVaAANRtaSl1-imlB0AUGhggcQK27QfTY4lDTgFnL01fY_N4LCLJv_iIxv7n9EPLk6H7LEzk7lFV8H0xd-dc4k-X54_1q_V9n3ztl5tK8spTJWUMghqbdsIIQinxLnGhGCkahkLDTdBdUY1HSGMd9wL5VgnJHNeNC3rFGVL9HDijjl9HXyZ9D4W6_veDD4diqbzEUGEYmqu8lPV5lRK9kGPOe7nB5qAPnrSO332pI-eNCg9e5p3T6edn398R591sdEP1rs4u5i0S_Efwh-MOHKm</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Brzozowski, Matthew</creator><creator>Crossley, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Winter, Joachim K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</title><author>Brzozowski, Matthew ; Crossley, Thomas F. ; Winter, Joachim K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-777f62cc946661521dd4affa78933f45af8ba84b1135b5e68d3b673de6493b823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Expenditure</topic><topic>food policy</topic><topic>food purchasing</topic><topic>Measurement error</topic><topic>Recall bias</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Joachim K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brzozowski, Matthew</au><au>Crossley, Thomas F.</au><au>Winter, Joachim K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data</atitle><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>53-61</pages><issn>0306-9192</issn><eissn>1873-5657</eissn><abstract>•Recall and diary food expenditure data, collected on the same sample, are compared.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure data is substantial.•Measurement error in recall food expenditure is negatively correlated with the true values.•Diary records are imperfect and affected by infrequency and diary exhaustion. Recall food expenditure data, which is the basis of a great deal of empirical work, is believed to suffer from considerable measurement error. Diary records are believed to be more accurate. We study an unusual data set that collects recall and diary data from the same households and so allows a direct comparison of the two methods of data collection. The diary data imply measurement errors in recall food expenditure data that are substantial, and which do not have the properties of classical measurement error. However, we also present evidence that the diary measures are themselves imperfect.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-9192
ispartof Food policy, 2017-10, Vol.72, p.53-61
issn 0306-9192
1873-5657
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000616838
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects data collection
Expenditure
food policy
food purchasing
Measurement error
Recall bias
Survey data
title A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20recall%20and%20diary%20food%20expenditure%20data&rft.jtitle=Food%20policy&rft.au=Brzozowski,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=53-61&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000616838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000616838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306919217306942&rfr_iscdi=true