Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)

Streambank retreat is a complex cyclical process involving subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, seepage erosion, and geotechnical failures and is driven by several soil properties that themselves are temporally and spatially variable. Therefore, it can be extremely challenging to predict and model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2017-01, Vol.42 (1 p.191-213), p.191-213
Hauptverfasser: Klavon, Kate, Fox, Garey, Guertault, Lucie, Langendoen, Eddy, Enlow, Holly, Miller, Ron, Khanal, Anish
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 1 p.191-213
container_start_page 191
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 42
creator Klavon, Kate
Fox, Garey
Guertault, Lucie
Langendoen, Eddy
Enlow, Holly
Miller, Ron
Khanal, Anish
description Streambank retreat is a complex cyclical process involving subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, seepage erosion, and geotechnical failures and is driven by several soil properties that themselves are temporally and spatially variable. Therefore, it can be extremely challenging to predict and model the erosion and consequent retreat of streambanks. However, modeling streambank retreat has many important applications, including the design and assessment of mitigation strategies for stream revitalization and stabilization. In order to highlight the current complexities of modeling streambank retreat and to suggest future research areas, this paper reviewed one of the most comprehensive streambank retreat models available, the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM), which has recently been integrated with several popular hydrodynamic and sediment transport models including the Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The objectives of this paper were to: (i) comprehensively review studies that have utilized BSTEM and report their findings, (ii) address the limitations of the model so that it can be applied appropriately in its current form, and (iii) suggest directions of research that will help make the model a more useful tool in future applications. The paper includes an extensive overview of peer reviewed studies to guide future users of BSTEM. The review demonstrated that the model needs further testing and evaluation outside of the central United States. Also, further development is needed in terms of accounting for spatial and temporal variability in geotechnical and fluvial erodibility parameters, incorporating subaerial processes, and accounting for the influence of riparian vegetation on streambank pore-water pressure dynamics, applied shear stress, and erodibility parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.4073
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000562662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2000562662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_20005626623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjr1Ow0AQhK8AifAj8QhbhsLJnh2cmBJkRENF-mgdb5JLznfh9owEb8LbcoQUtKl2NTvfzCp1q3GkEfMxy340wWlxpgYaqzKrZsX0Ql2KbBG1nsyqgfquP8j2FI1bA8E--CWLZA0Jt9D5li2sfIBeGIwDiYGpa8jt0kqNseYrkd4BufZ4hMASfTjID4kRs95EgeSJG4b_aPw8YNEzcPDyG_NXOHx8m9evd9fqfEVW-OY4r9TwuZ4_vWTpyfc-tSw6I0u2lhz7XhY5It6XeVnmxQnWH9qpYRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000562662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Klavon, Kate ; Fox, Garey ; Guertault, Lucie ; Langendoen, Eddy ; Enlow, Holly ; Miller, Ron ; Khanal, Anish</creator><creatorcontrib>Klavon, Kate ; Fox, Garey ; Guertault, Lucie ; Langendoen, Eddy ; Enlow, Holly ; Miller, Ron ; Khanal, Anish</creatorcontrib><description>Streambank retreat is a complex cyclical process involving subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, seepage erosion, and geotechnical failures and is driven by several soil properties that themselves are temporally and spatially variable. Therefore, it can be extremely challenging to predict and model the erosion and consequent retreat of streambanks. However, modeling streambank retreat has many important applications, including the design and assessment of mitigation strategies for stream revitalization and stabilization. In order to highlight the current complexities of modeling streambank retreat and to suggest future research areas, this paper reviewed one of the most comprehensive streambank retreat models available, the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM), which has recently been integrated with several popular hydrodynamic and sediment transport models including the Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The objectives of this paper were to: (i) comprehensively review studies that have utilized BSTEM and report their findings, (ii) address the limitations of the model so that it can be applied appropriately in its current form, and (iii) suggest directions of research that will help make the model a more useful tool in future applications. The paper includes an extensive overview of peer reviewed studies to guide future users of BSTEM. The review demonstrated that the model needs further testing and evaluation outside of the central United States. Also, further development is needed in terms of accounting for spatial and temporal variability in geotechnical and fluvial erodibility parameters, incorporating subaerial processes, and accounting for the influence of riparian vegetation on streambank pore-water pressure dynamics, applied shear stress, and erodibility parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4073</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>engineering ; erodibility ; hydrodynamics ; land restoration ; landforms ; Midwestern United States ; model validation ; riparian areas ; rivers ; sediment transport ; seepage ; shear stress ; soil erosion ; soil erosion models ; streambank stability ; streams ; temporal variation ; vegetation</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2017-01, Vol.42 (1 p.191-213), p.191-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klavon, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Garey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guertault, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langendoen, Eddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enlow, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, Anish</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>Streambank retreat is a complex cyclical process involving subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, seepage erosion, and geotechnical failures and is driven by several soil properties that themselves are temporally and spatially variable. Therefore, it can be extremely challenging to predict and model the erosion and consequent retreat of streambanks. However, modeling streambank retreat has many important applications, including the design and assessment of mitigation strategies for stream revitalization and stabilization. In order to highlight the current complexities of modeling streambank retreat and to suggest future research areas, this paper reviewed one of the most comprehensive streambank retreat models available, the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM), which has recently been integrated with several popular hydrodynamic and sediment transport models including the Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The objectives of this paper were to: (i) comprehensively review studies that have utilized BSTEM and report their findings, (ii) address the limitations of the model so that it can be applied appropriately in its current form, and (iii) suggest directions of research that will help make the model a more useful tool in future applications. The paper includes an extensive overview of peer reviewed studies to guide future users of BSTEM. The review demonstrated that the model needs further testing and evaluation outside of the central United States. Also, further development is needed in terms of accounting for spatial and temporal variability in geotechnical and fluvial erodibility parameters, incorporating subaerial processes, and accounting for the influence of riparian vegetation on streambank pore-water pressure dynamics, applied shear stress, and erodibility parameters.</description><subject>engineering</subject><subject>erodibility</subject><subject>hydrodynamics</subject><subject>land restoration</subject><subject>landforms</subject><subject>Midwestern United States</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>riparian areas</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>sediment transport</subject><subject>seepage</subject><subject>shear stress</subject><subject>soil erosion</subject><subject>soil erosion models</subject><subject>streambank stability</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjr1Ow0AQhK8AifAj8QhbhsLJnh2cmBJkRENF-mgdb5JLznfh9owEb8LbcoQUtKl2NTvfzCp1q3GkEfMxy340wWlxpgYaqzKrZsX0Ql2KbBG1nsyqgfquP8j2FI1bA8E--CWLZA0Jt9D5li2sfIBeGIwDiYGpa8jt0kqNseYrkd4BufZ4hMASfTjID4kRs95EgeSJG4b_aPw8YNEzcPDyG_NXOHx8m9evd9fqfEVW-OY4r9TwuZ4_vWTpyfc-tSw6I0u2lhz7XhY5It6XeVnmxQnWH9qpYRw</recordid><startdate>20170111</startdate><enddate>20170111</enddate><creator>Klavon, Kate</creator><creator>Fox, Garey</creator><creator>Guertault, Lucie</creator><creator>Langendoen, Eddy</creator><creator>Enlow, Holly</creator><creator>Miller, Ron</creator><creator>Khanal, Anish</creator><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170111</creationdate><title>Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)</title><author>Klavon, Kate ; Fox, Garey ; Guertault, Lucie ; Langendoen, Eddy ; Enlow, Holly ; Miller, Ron ; Khanal, Anish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_20005626623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>engineering</topic><topic>erodibility</topic><topic>hydrodynamics</topic><topic>land restoration</topic><topic>landforms</topic><topic>Midwestern United States</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>riparian areas</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>sediment transport</topic><topic>seepage</topic><topic>shear stress</topic><topic>soil erosion</topic><topic>soil erosion models</topic><topic>streambank stability</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klavon, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Garey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guertault, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langendoen, Eddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enlow, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, Anish</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klavon, Kate</au><au>Fox, Garey</au><au>Guertault, Lucie</au><au>Langendoen, Eddy</au><au>Enlow, Holly</au><au>Miller, Ron</au><au>Khanal, Anish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2017-01-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1 p.191-213</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>191-213</pages><issn>1096-9837</issn><abstract>Streambank retreat is a complex cyclical process involving subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, seepage erosion, and geotechnical failures and is driven by several soil properties that themselves are temporally and spatially variable. Therefore, it can be extremely challenging to predict and model the erosion and consequent retreat of streambanks. However, modeling streambank retreat has many important applications, including the design and assessment of mitigation strategies for stream revitalization and stabilization. In order to highlight the current complexities of modeling streambank retreat and to suggest future research areas, this paper reviewed one of the most comprehensive streambank retreat models available, the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM), which has recently been integrated with several popular hydrodynamic and sediment transport models including the Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The objectives of this paper were to: (i) comprehensively review studies that have utilized BSTEM and report their findings, (ii) address the limitations of the model so that it can be applied appropriately in its current form, and (iii) suggest directions of research that will help make the model a more useful tool in future applications. The paper includes an extensive overview of peer reviewed studies to guide future users of BSTEM. The review demonstrated that the model needs further testing and evaluation outside of the central United States. Also, further development is needed in terms of accounting for spatial and temporal variability in geotechnical and fluvial erodibility parameters, incorporating subaerial processes, and accounting for the influence of riparian vegetation on streambank pore-water pressure dynamics, applied shear stress, and erodibility parameters.</abstract><doi>10.1002/esp.4073</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-9837
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2017-01, Vol.42 (1 p.191-213), p.191-213
issn 1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000562662
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects engineering
erodibility
hydrodynamics
land restoration
landforms
Midwestern United States
model validation
riparian areas
rivers
sediment transport
seepage
shear stress
soil erosion
soil erosion models
streambank stability
streams
temporal variation
vegetation
title Evaluating a process-based model for use in streambank stabilization and stream restoration: insights on the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A09%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20a%20process-based%20model%20for%20use%20in%20streambank%20stabilization%20and%20stream%20restoration:%20insights%20on%20the%20bank%20stability%20and%20toe%20erosion%20model%20(BSTEM)&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Klavon,%20Kate&rft.date=2017-01-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1%20p.191-213&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=191-213&rft.issn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2000562662%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000562662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true