Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)

A method was validated for estimating fluopyram and tebuconazole in onion on LC-MS/MS using dispersive QuEChERS. Three sprays of a combination fungicide fluopyram + tebuconazole (Luna experience, 400 SC) were applied @ 75 + 75 and 150 + 150 g a.i. ha −1 at an interval of 10 days on onion using Knaps...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2016-10, Vol.23 (20), p.20871-20881
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Badal V., Chawla, Suchi, Gor, Hetal, Upadhyay, Payal, Parmar, Kaushik D., Patel, Anil R., Shah, Paresh G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20881
container_issue 20
container_start_page 20871
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 23
creator Patel, Badal V.
Chawla, Suchi
Gor, Hetal
Upadhyay, Payal
Parmar, Kaushik D.
Patel, Anil R.
Shah, Paresh G.
description A method was validated for estimating fluopyram and tebuconazole in onion on LC-MS/MS using dispersive QuEChERS. Three sprays of a combination fungicide fluopyram + tebuconazole (Luna experience, 400 SC) were applied @ 75 + 75 and 150 + 150 g a.i. ha −1 at an interval of 10 days on onion using Knapsack sprayer. First spray was made at bulb setting stage. Spring onion samples were drawn at 0 (1 h), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 days and matured onion bulb at harvest (52 days) after the last spray. Soil samples were also drawn at harvest. Foliar application of the combination product resulted in 1.14 and 2.86 mg kg −1 fluopyram residues on spring onion at standard and double dose, respectively, one hour after the last application. The levels of fluopyram residues gradually declined and recorded 0.25 and 0.58 mg kg −1 on 20th day of application with half-lives of 8.8 and 9.1 days at standard and double dose, respectively. For tebuconazole, the corresponding residues observed after 1 h (0 day) of application were 0.92 and 2.29 mg kg −1 . The levels declined gradually to 0.12 and 0.33 mg kg −1 on 20th days with half-life of 6.7 to 7.7 days at standard and double dose, respectively. Here, we are proposing a pre-harvest interval of 7 day for fluopyram and tebuconazole in spring onion when applied at 75 + 75 g a.i. ha −1 (400 SC). Risk assessment was done by calculating hazard quotient and by comparing theoretical maximum residue intake (TMRI) with maximum permissible intake (MPI). In all the cases, results of the study showed that HQ (Hazard Quotient) ≤1 and TMDI 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000438778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2000438778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4768-1d4f7c0ce707fd57145b0d49f7bae9a0a964dbe45a87f6228c88ddfd5235d56a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cuKFDEUBuAgitOOPoAbCbjpQco5SZ1KUsuh8QYDgpd1SCWnpMaqpE26FuPTm6ZHEUF0kyzy5U8OP2NPBbwUAPqyCNF2qgGhGt22ojH32EYogY3Gvr_PNtAjNqJFPGOPSrkBkNBL_ZCdSY0GJYgNcx-oTGElHsjPUyTuYuB5Kl-5K4VKWSgeeBr5OK9pf5vdwl_wAw2rT9F9TzPxLQJ83F3wKV6myFOc6rq9mudpXbinvbt4zB6Mbi705G4_Z59fv_q0e9tcv3_zbnd13XjUyjQi4Kg9eNKgx9Bpgd0AAftRD456B65XGAbCzhk9KimNNyaEKmXbhU659pxtT7n7nL6tVA52mYqneXaR0lqsBABsjdbmn1QYVCha0PI_qFS6WiUqff4HvUlrjnXmqhQYA3WoqsRJ-ZxKyTTafZ4Wl2-tAHts1Z5atbVVe2zVHv_77C55HRYKv278rLECeQKlHsUvlH97-q-pPwAPZ6mv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860880714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Patel, Badal V. ; Chawla, Suchi ; Gor, Hetal ; Upadhyay, Payal ; Parmar, Kaushik D. ; Patel, Anil R. ; Shah, Paresh G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Badal V. ; Chawla, Suchi ; Gor, Hetal ; Upadhyay, Payal ; Parmar, Kaushik D. ; Patel, Anil R. ; Shah, Paresh G.</creatorcontrib><description>A method was validated for estimating fluopyram and tebuconazole in onion on LC-MS/MS using dispersive QuEChERS. Three sprays of a combination fungicide fluopyram + tebuconazole (Luna experience, 400 SC) were applied @ 75 + 75 and 150 + 150 g a.i. ha −1 at an interval of 10 days on onion using Knapsack sprayer. First spray was made at bulb setting stage. Spring onion samples were drawn at 0 (1 h), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 days and matured onion bulb at harvest (52 days) after the last spray. Soil samples were also drawn at harvest. Foliar application of the combination product resulted in 1.14 and 2.86 mg kg −1 fluopyram residues on spring onion at standard and double dose, respectively, one hour after the last application. The levels of fluopyram residues gradually declined and recorded 0.25 and 0.58 mg kg −1 on 20th day of application with half-lives of 8.8 and 9.1 days at standard and double dose, respectively. For tebuconazole, the corresponding residues observed after 1 h (0 day) of application were 0.92 and 2.29 mg kg −1 . The levels declined gradually to 0.12 and 0.33 mg kg −1 on 20th days with half-life of 6.7 to 7.7 days at standard and double dose, respectively. Here, we are proposing a pre-harvest interval of 7 day for fluopyram and tebuconazole in spring onion when applied at 75 + 75 g a.i. ha −1 (400 SC). Risk assessment was done by calculating hazard quotient and by comparing theoretical maximum residue intake (TMRI) with maximum permissible intake (MPI). In all the cases, results of the study showed that HQ (Hazard Quotient) ≤1 and TMDI &lt; MPI. Hence, the use of this combination product can be recommended with pre harvest interval of 7 days. The data can be used in establishing MRLs (maximum residue limits) for spring onion after considering multilocation trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27484201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Allium cepa ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Benzamides - analysis ; Chromatography ; Crop diseases ; Crop residues ; Crops ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental science ; fluopyram ; foliar application ; Fungicides ; green onions ; Half-Life ; Harvest ; maximum permissible intake ; Onions ; Onions - chemistry ; Pathogens ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticides ; Pyridines - analysis ; Reference materials ; Research Article ; Residues ; Risk Assessment ; Seeds ; soil ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Solvents ; sprayers ; Sprays ; Studies ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; tebuconazole ; Triazoles - analysis ; Vegetables ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016-10, Vol.23 (20), p.20871-20881</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4768-1d4f7c0ce707fd57145b0d49f7bae9a0a964dbe45a87f6228c88ddfd5235d56a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4768-1d4f7c0ce707fd57145b0d49f7bae9a0a964dbe45a87f6228c88ddfd5235d56a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Badal V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Suchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gor, Hetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhyay, Payal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Kaushik D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Anil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Paresh G.</creatorcontrib><title>Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>A method was validated for estimating fluopyram and tebuconazole in onion on LC-MS/MS using dispersive QuEChERS. Three sprays of a combination fungicide fluopyram + tebuconazole (Luna experience, 400 SC) were applied @ 75 + 75 and 150 + 150 g a.i. ha −1 at an interval of 10 days on onion using Knapsack sprayer. First spray was made at bulb setting stage. Spring onion samples were drawn at 0 (1 h), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 days and matured onion bulb at harvest (52 days) after the last spray. Soil samples were also drawn at harvest. Foliar application of the combination product resulted in 1.14 and 2.86 mg kg −1 fluopyram residues on spring onion at standard and double dose, respectively, one hour after the last application. The levels of fluopyram residues gradually declined and recorded 0.25 and 0.58 mg kg −1 on 20th day of application with half-lives of 8.8 and 9.1 days at standard and double dose, respectively. For tebuconazole, the corresponding residues observed after 1 h (0 day) of application were 0.92 and 2.29 mg kg −1 . The levels declined gradually to 0.12 and 0.33 mg kg −1 on 20th days with half-life of 6.7 to 7.7 days at standard and double dose, respectively. Here, we are proposing a pre-harvest interval of 7 day for fluopyram and tebuconazole in spring onion when applied at 75 + 75 g a.i. ha −1 (400 SC). Risk assessment was done by calculating hazard quotient and by comparing theoretical maximum residue intake (TMRI) with maximum permissible intake (MPI). In all the cases, results of the study showed that HQ (Hazard Quotient) ≤1 and TMDI &lt; MPI. Hence, the use of this combination product can be recommended with pre harvest interval of 7 days. The data can be used in establishing MRLs (maximum residue limits) for spring onion after considering multilocation trials.</description><subject>Allium cepa</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Benzamides - analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>fluopyram</subject><subject>foliar application</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>green onions</subject><subject>Half-Life</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>maximum permissible intake</subject><subject>Onions</subject><subject>Onions - chemistry</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pyridines - analysis</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>sprayers</subject><subject>Sprays</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>tebuconazole</subject><subject>Triazoles - analysis</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cuKFDEUBuAgitOOPoAbCbjpQco5SZ1KUsuh8QYDgpd1SCWnpMaqpE26FuPTm6ZHEUF0kyzy5U8OP2NPBbwUAPqyCNF2qgGhGt22ojH32EYogY3Gvr_PNtAjNqJFPGOPSrkBkNBL_ZCdSY0GJYgNcx-oTGElHsjPUyTuYuB5Kl-5K4VKWSgeeBr5OK9pf5vdwl_wAw2rT9F9TzPxLQJ83F3wKV6myFOc6rq9mudpXbinvbt4zB6Mbi705G4_Z59fv_q0e9tcv3_zbnd13XjUyjQi4Kg9eNKgx9Bpgd0AAftRD456B65XGAbCzhk9KimNNyaEKmXbhU659pxtT7n7nL6tVA52mYqneXaR0lqsBABsjdbmn1QYVCha0PI_qFS6WiUqff4HvUlrjnXmqhQYA3WoqsRJ-ZxKyTTafZ4Wl2-tAHts1Z5atbVVe2zVHv_77C55HRYKv278rLECeQKlHsUvlH97-q-pPwAPZ6mv</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Patel, Badal V.</creator><creator>Chawla, Suchi</creator><creator>Gor, Hetal</creator><creator>Upadhyay, Payal</creator><creator>Parmar, Kaushik D.</creator><creator>Patel, Anil R.</creator><creator>Shah, Paresh G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)</title><author>Patel, Badal V. ; Chawla, Suchi ; Gor, Hetal ; Upadhyay, Payal ; Parmar, Kaushik D. ; Patel, Anil R. ; Shah, Paresh G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4768-1d4f7c0ce707fd57145b0d49f7bae9a0a964dbe45a87f6228c88ddfd5235d56a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allium cepa</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Benzamides - analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>fluopyram</topic><topic>foliar application</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>green onions</topic><topic>Half-Life</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>maximum permissible intake</topic><topic>Onions</topic><topic>Onions - chemistry</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pyridines - analysis</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>sprayers</topic><topic>Sprays</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>tebuconazole</topic><topic>Triazoles - analysis</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Badal V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Suchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gor, Hetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhyay, Payal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Kaushik D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Anil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Paresh G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Badal V.</au><au>Chawla, Suchi</au><au>Gor, Hetal</au><au>Upadhyay, Payal</au><au>Parmar, Kaushik D.</au><au>Patel, Anil R.</au><au>Shah, Paresh G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>20871</spage><epage>20881</epage><pages>20871-20881</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>A method was validated for estimating fluopyram and tebuconazole in onion on LC-MS/MS using dispersive QuEChERS. Three sprays of a combination fungicide fluopyram + tebuconazole (Luna experience, 400 SC) were applied @ 75 + 75 and 150 + 150 g a.i. ha −1 at an interval of 10 days on onion using Knapsack sprayer. First spray was made at bulb setting stage. Spring onion samples were drawn at 0 (1 h), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 days and matured onion bulb at harvest (52 days) after the last spray. Soil samples were also drawn at harvest. Foliar application of the combination product resulted in 1.14 and 2.86 mg kg −1 fluopyram residues on spring onion at standard and double dose, respectively, one hour after the last application. The levels of fluopyram residues gradually declined and recorded 0.25 and 0.58 mg kg −1 on 20th day of application with half-lives of 8.8 and 9.1 days at standard and double dose, respectively. For tebuconazole, the corresponding residues observed after 1 h (0 day) of application were 0.92 and 2.29 mg kg −1 . The levels declined gradually to 0.12 and 0.33 mg kg −1 on 20th days with half-life of 6.7 to 7.7 days at standard and double dose, respectively. Here, we are proposing a pre-harvest interval of 7 day for fluopyram and tebuconazole in spring onion when applied at 75 + 75 g a.i. ha −1 (400 SC). Risk assessment was done by calculating hazard quotient and by comparing theoretical maximum residue intake (TMRI) with maximum permissible intake (MPI). In all the cases, results of the study showed that HQ (Hazard Quotient) ≤1 and TMDI &lt; MPI. Hence, the use of this combination product can be recommended with pre harvest interval of 7 days. The data can be used in establishing MRLs (maximum residue limits) for spring onion after considering multilocation trials.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27484201</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1344
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016-10, Vol.23 (20), p.20871-20881
issn 0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000438778
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Allium cepa
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Benzamides - analysis
Chromatography
Crop diseases
Crop residues
Crops
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental monitoring
Environmental science
fluopyram
foliar application
Fungicides
green onions
Half-Life
Harvest
maximum permissible intake
Onions
Onions - chemistry
Pathogens
Pesticide Residues - analysis
Pesticides
Pyridines - analysis
Reference materials
Research Article
Residues
Risk Assessment
Seeds
soil
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Solvents
sprayers
Sprays
Studies
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
tebuconazole
Triazoles - analysis
Vegetables
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram + tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residue%20decline%20and%20risk%20assessment%20of%20fluopyram%20+%20tebuconazole%20(400SC)%20in/on%20onion%20(Allium%20cepa)&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Patel,%20Badal%20V.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=20871&rft.epage=20881&rft.pages=20871-20881&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-016-7331-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000438778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860880714&rft_id=info:pmid/27484201&rfr_iscdi=true