Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses
Prevention of microbial cross-contamination during postharvest handling is an important step to minimize microbial food safety hazards. Dump tanks and flume systems are widely used in states like Florida to transfer/wash tomatoes, and are one of the most critical points where cross-contamination may...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Food control 2017-03, Vol.73 (Part B p.511-517), p.511-517 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 517 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Part B p.511-517 |
| container_start_page | 511 |
| container_title | Food control |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Schneider, K.R. De, J. Li, Y. Sreedharan, A. Goodrich Schneider, R. Danyluk, M.D. Pahl, D.M. Walsh, C.S. Todd-Searle, J. Schaffner, D.W. Kline, W. Buchanan, R.L. |
| description | Prevention of microbial cross-contamination during postharvest handling is an important step to minimize microbial food safety hazards. Dump tanks and flume systems are widely used in states like Florida to transfer/wash tomatoes, and are one of the most critical points where cross-contamination may occur. Some processors in states such as New Jersey, New York and California utilize dry dump systems, with or without overhead spray bars, to process tomatoes, while others states such as Maryland field-pack tomatoes. This study was conducted in 2013 and 2014, from five growing regions in Florida and New Jersey each and from four growing regions in Maryland. A total of 1600 and 1597 composite samples were analyzed for aerobic plate count (APC), and total coliforms (TC) and generic E. coli (EC), respectively, from both pre- and post-processed tomatoes. Seventeen samples for APC and 72 for TC had counts outside the countable range and failed to provide any valid result, and were not included in the final data sets. The least square mean (LSM) value of APC for all samples (both pre- and post-processed) was 6.8 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1583), whereas the LSM for TC counts was 4.9 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1438). Ninety out of 1528 (5.9%) and 1498 out of 1597 (93.8%) samples had TC and EC counts below the detection limit of 1.3 log10 CFU/tomato, respectively. APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.048 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000126557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956713516304881</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000126557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-93695feaec677891a1c893592d91817bb46aba5453d9c7d387e2664785266b583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF5CPHEiwk_h1A1WUhwpc4Gw59gZc0rjYKYh_j6Fw5jS70s5o9kPomJKSEsrPlmUXgrNhGMsq7yWRJWnkDppQKepC0ErtoglRjOe5ZvvoIKUlIVQQSiaov_M2htabHsO76Tdm9GHAocPrCAU2g8PrkMZiHYOFlMDhMazMGCDhLoYVnvchemdO8T184FuICT5_THcmfvY_bmNf_fD8EjYJ0iHa60yf4OhXp-hpfvk4uy4WD1c3s4tFYRtej4WquWIdGLBcCKmooVaqmqnKKSqpaNuGm9awhtVOWeFqKaDivBGSZWmZrKfoZJuba79tII165ZOFPjeCXERXJP9fccZEPuXb00whpQidXke_yu01Jfobr17qP7z6G68mUme82Xi-NUJ-5N1D1Ml6GCw4H8GO2gX_X8QX52yHug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000126557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schneider, K.R. ; De, J. ; Li, Y. ; Sreedharan, A. ; Goodrich Schneider, R. ; Danyluk, M.D. ; Pahl, D.M. ; Walsh, C.S. ; Todd-Searle, J. ; Schaffner, D.W. ; Kline, W. ; Buchanan, R.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, K.R. ; De, J. ; Li, Y. ; Sreedharan, A. ; Goodrich Schneider, R. ; Danyluk, M.D. ; Pahl, D.M. ; Walsh, C.S. ; Todd-Searle, J. ; Schaffner, D.W. ; Kline, W. ; Buchanan, R.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Prevention of microbial cross-contamination during postharvest handling is an important step to minimize microbial food safety hazards. Dump tanks and flume systems are widely used in states like Florida to transfer/wash tomatoes, and are one of the most critical points where cross-contamination may occur. Some processors in states such as New Jersey, New York and California utilize dry dump systems, with or without overhead spray bars, to process tomatoes, while others states such as Maryland field-pack tomatoes. This study was conducted in 2013 and 2014, from five growing regions in Florida and New Jersey each and from four growing regions in Maryland. A total of 1600 and 1597 composite samples were analyzed for aerobic plate count (APC), and total coliforms (TC) and generic E. coli (EC), respectively, from both pre- and post-processed tomatoes. Seventeen samples for APC and 72 for TC had counts outside the countable range and failed to provide any valid result, and were not included in the final data sets. The least square mean (LSM) value of APC for all samples (both pre- and post-processed) was 6.8 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1583), whereas the LSM for TC counts was 4.9 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1438). Ninety out of 1528 (5.9%) and 1498 out of 1597 (93.8%) samples had TC and EC counts below the detection limit of 1.3 log10 CFU/tomato, respectively. APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than those in the pre-processed samples. There was no significant difference (p = 0.1011) in the occurrence of generic EC pre- and post-process. There were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) APC and TC on samples collected in 2014 than 2013, while the EC levels showed no significant differences between years. TC counts varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by different growing seasons, with highest counts in summer, over a two-year period, while APC varied significantly (p < 0.0001) in summer and fall vs. winter and spring. APC and TC counts were positively correlated. Tomatoes from FL had significantly lower APC and TC (p < 0.0001) than those from NJ and MD. Despite the potential for increasing microbial contamination resulting from improperly maintained water systems, many packinghouses will continue using existing washing practices to prevent cross-contamination.
•Evaluation of post-harvest processing of tomatoes were carried out in NJ, MD and FL.•APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower.•No significant difference for E. coli was observed between pre and post-process.•APC and TC counts were positively correlated; no correlation was seen for E. coli.•Postharvest washing can increase cross-contamination if not properly practiced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>autumn ; California ; coliform bacteria ; correlation ; cross contamination ; data collection ; detection limit ; Dump tank ; Escherichia coli ; Florida ; Flume ; food safety ; growing season ; Maryland ; microbial contamination ; New Jersey ; New York ; packing houses ; Packinghouse ; plate count ; postharvest treatment ; Processing ; spring ; summer ; tanks ; Tomato ; tomatoes ; washing ; winter</subject><ispartof>Food control, 2017-03, Vol.73 (Part B p.511-517), p.511-517</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-93695feaec677891a1c893592d91817bb46aba5453d9c7d387e2664785266b583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-93695feaec677891a1c893592d91817bb46aba5453d9c7d387e2664785266b583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713516304881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreedharan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich Schneider, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyluk, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahl, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Searle, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffner, D.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, R.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses</title><title>Food control</title><description>Prevention of microbial cross-contamination during postharvest handling is an important step to minimize microbial food safety hazards. Dump tanks and flume systems are widely used in states like Florida to transfer/wash tomatoes, and are one of the most critical points where cross-contamination may occur. Some processors in states such as New Jersey, New York and California utilize dry dump systems, with or without overhead spray bars, to process tomatoes, while others states such as Maryland field-pack tomatoes. This study was conducted in 2013 and 2014, from five growing regions in Florida and New Jersey each and from four growing regions in Maryland. A total of 1600 and 1597 composite samples were analyzed for aerobic plate count (APC), and total coliforms (TC) and generic E. coli (EC), respectively, from both pre- and post-processed tomatoes. Seventeen samples for APC and 72 for TC had counts outside the countable range and failed to provide any valid result, and were not included in the final data sets. The least square mean (LSM) value of APC for all samples (both pre- and post-processed) was 6.8 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1583), whereas the LSM for TC counts was 4.9 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1438). Ninety out of 1528 (5.9%) and 1498 out of 1597 (93.8%) samples had TC and EC counts below the detection limit of 1.3 log10 CFU/tomato, respectively. APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than those in the pre-processed samples. There was no significant difference (p = 0.1011) in the occurrence of generic EC pre- and post-process. There were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) APC and TC on samples collected in 2014 than 2013, while the EC levels showed no significant differences between years. TC counts varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by different growing seasons, with highest counts in summer, over a two-year period, while APC varied significantly (p < 0.0001) in summer and fall vs. winter and spring. APC and TC counts were positively correlated. Tomatoes from FL had significantly lower APC and TC (p < 0.0001) than those from NJ and MD. Despite the potential for increasing microbial contamination resulting from improperly maintained water systems, many packinghouses will continue using existing washing practices to prevent cross-contamination.
•Evaluation of post-harvest processing of tomatoes were carried out in NJ, MD and FL.•APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower.•No significant difference for E. coli was observed between pre and post-process.•APC and TC counts were positively correlated; no correlation was seen for E. coli.•Postharvest washing can increase cross-contamination if not properly practiced.</description><subject>autumn</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>cross contamination</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>detection limit</subject><subject>Dump tank</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Flume</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>growing season</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>microbial contamination</subject><subject>New Jersey</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>packing houses</subject><subject>Packinghouse</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>postharvest treatment</subject><subject>Processing</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>tanks</subject><subject>Tomato</subject><subject>tomatoes</subject><subject>washing</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0956-7135</issn><issn>1873-7129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF5CPHEiwk_h1A1WUhwpc4Gw59gZc0rjYKYh_j6Fw5jS70s5o9kPomJKSEsrPlmUXgrNhGMsq7yWRJWnkDppQKepC0ErtoglRjOe5ZvvoIKUlIVQQSiaov_M2htabHsO76Tdm9GHAocPrCAU2g8PrkMZiHYOFlMDhMazMGCDhLoYVnvchemdO8T184FuICT5_THcmfvY_bmNf_fD8EjYJ0iHa60yf4OhXp-hpfvk4uy4WD1c3s4tFYRtej4WquWIdGLBcCKmooVaqmqnKKSqpaNuGm9awhtVOWeFqKaDivBGSZWmZrKfoZJuba79tII165ZOFPjeCXERXJP9fccZEPuXb00whpQidXke_yu01Jfobr17qP7z6G68mUme82Xi-NUJ-5N1D1Ml6GCw4H8GO2gX_X8QX52yHug</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Schneider, K.R.</creator><creator>De, J.</creator><creator>Li, Y.</creator><creator>Sreedharan, A.</creator><creator>Goodrich Schneider, R.</creator><creator>Danyluk, M.D.</creator><creator>Pahl, D.M.</creator><creator>Walsh, C.S.</creator><creator>Todd-Searle, J.</creator><creator>Schaffner, D.W.</creator><creator>Kline, W.</creator><creator>Buchanan, R.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses</title><author>Schneider, K.R. ; De, J. ; Li, Y. ; Sreedharan, A. ; Goodrich Schneider, R. ; Danyluk, M.D. ; Pahl, D.M. ; Walsh, C.S. ; Todd-Searle, J. ; Schaffner, D.W. ; Kline, W. ; Buchanan, R.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-93695feaec677891a1c893592d91817bb46aba5453d9c7d387e2664785266b583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>autumn</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>cross contamination</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>detection limit</topic><topic>Dump tank</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Flume</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>growing season</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>microbial contamination</topic><topic>New Jersey</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>packing houses</topic><topic>Packinghouse</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>postharvest treatment</topic><topic>Processing</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>tanks</topic><topic>Tomato</topic><topic>tomatoes</topic><topic>washing</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreedharan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich Schneider, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyluk, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahl, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Searle, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffner, D.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, R.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, K.R.</au><au>De, J.</au><au>Li, Y.</au><au>Sreedharan, A.</au><au>Goodrich Schneider, R.</au><au>Danyluk, M.D.</au><au>Pahl, D.M.</au><au>Walsh, C.S.</au><au>Todd-Searle, J.</au><au>Schaffner, D.W.</au><au>Kline, W.</au><au>Buchanan, R.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses</atitle><jtitle>Food control</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Part B p.511-517</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>511-517</pages><issn>0956-7135</issn><eissn>1873-7129</eissn><abstract>Prevention of microbial cross-contamination during postharvest handling is an important step to minimize microbial food safety hazards. Dump tanks and flume systems are widely used in states like Florida to transfer/wash tomatoes, and are one of the most critical points where cross-contamination may occur. Some processors in states such as New Jersey, New York and California utilize dry dump systems, with or without overhead spray bars, to process tomatoes, while others states such as Maryland field-pack tomatoes. This study was conducted in 2013 and 2014, from five growing regions in Florida and New Jersey each and from four growing regions in Maryland. A total of 1600 and 1597 composite samples were analyzed for aerobic plate count (APC), and total coliforms (TC) and generic E. coli (EC), respectively, from both pre- and post-processed tomatoes. Seventeen samples for APC and 72 for TC had counts outside the countable range and failed to provide any valid result, and were not included in the final data sets. The least square mean (LSM) value of APC for all samples (both pre- and post-processed) was 6.8 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1583), whereas the LSM for TC counts was 4.9 log10 CFU/tomato (n = 1438). Ninety out of 1528 (5.9%) and 1498 out of 1597 (93.8%) samples had TC and EC counts below the detection limit of 1.3 log10 CFU/tomato, respectively. APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than those in the pre-processed samples. There was no significant difference (p = 0.1011) in the occurrence of generic EC pre- and post-process. There were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) APC and TC on samples collected in 2014 than 2013, while the EC levels showed no significant differences between years. TC counts varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by different growing seasons, with highest counts in summer, over a two-year period, while APC varied significantly (p < 0.0001) in summer and fall vs. winter and spring. APC and TC counts were positively correlated. Tomatoes from FL had significantly lower APC and TC (p < 0.0001) than those from NJ and MD. Despite the potential for increasing microbial contamination resulting from improperly maintained water systems, many packinghouses will continue using existing washing practices to prevent cross-contamination.
•Evaluation of post-harvest processing of tomatoes were carried out in NJ, MD and FL.•APC and TC counts in post-processed samples were significantly lower.•No significant difference for E. coli was observed between pre and post-process.•APC and TC counts were positively correlated; no correlation was seen for E. coli.•Postharvest washing can increase cross-contamination if not properly practiced.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.048</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-7135 |
| ispartof | Food control, 2017-03, Vol.73 (Part B p.511-517), p.511-517 |
| issn | 0956-7135 1873-7129 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2000126557 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | autumn California coliform bacteria correlation cross contamination data collection detection limit Dump tank Escherichia coli Florida Flume food safety growing season Maryland microbial contamination New Jersey New York packing houses Packinghouse plate count postharvest treatment Processing spring summer tanks Tomato tomatoes washing winter |
| title | Microbial evaluation of pre- and post-processed tomatoes from Florida, New Jersey and Maryland packinghouses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A36%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20evaluation%20of%20pre-%20and%20post-processed%20tomatoes%20from%20Florida,%20New%20Jersey%20and%20Maryland%20packinghouses&rft.jtitle=Food%20control&rft.au=Schneider,%20K.R.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Part%20B%20p.511-517&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=511-517&rft.issn=0956-7135&rft.eissn=1873-7129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000126557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000126557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0956713516304881&rfr_iscdi=true |