Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses
Wastewater disinfection is practiced with the goal of reducing risks of human exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. In most circumstances, the efficacy of a wastewater disinfection process is regulated and monitored based on measurements of the responses of indicator bacteria. However, inactivation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water environment research 2007-01, Vol.79 (1), p.81-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Water environment research |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Blatchley, Ernest R. Gong, Woei-Long Alleman, James E. Rose, Joan B. Huffman, Debra E. Otaki, Masahiro Lisle, John T. |
description | Wastewater disinfection is practiced with the goal of reducing risks of human exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. In most circumstances, the efficacy of a wastewater disinfection process is regulated and monitored based on measurements of the responses of indicator bacteria. However, inactivation of indicator bacteria does not guarantee an acceptable degree of inactivation among other waterborne microorganisms (e.g., microbial pathogens). Undisinfected effluent samples from several municipal wastewater treatment facilities were collected for analysis. Facilities were selected to provide a broad spectrum of effluent quality, particularly as related to nitrogenous compounds. Samples were subjected to bench-scale chlorination and dechlorination and UV irradiation under conditions that allowed compliance with relevant discharge regulations and such that disinfectant exposures could be accurately quantified. Disinfected samples were subjected to a battery of assays to assess the immediate and long-term effects of wastewater disinfection on waterborne bacteria and viruses. In general, (viable) bacterial populations showed an immediate decline as a result of disinfectant exposure; however, incubation of disinfected samples under conditions that were designed to mimic the conditions in a receiving stream resulted in substantial recovery of the total bacterial community. The bacterial groups that are commonly used as indicators do not provide an accurate representation of the response of the bacterial community to disinfectant exposure and subsequent recovery in the environment. UV irradiation and chlorination/dechlorination both accomplished measurable inactivation of indigenous phage; however, the extent of inactivation was fairly modest under the conditions of disinfection used in this study. UV irradiation was consistently more effective as a virucide than chlorination/dechlorination under the conditions of application, based on measurements of virus (phage) diversity and concentration. Taken together, and when considered in conjunction with previously published research, the results of these experiments illustrate several important limitations of common disinfection processes as applied in the treatment of municipal wastewaters. In general, it is not clear that conventional disinfection processes, as commonly implemented, are effective for control of the risks of disease transmission, particularly those associated with viral pathogens. Microbial quality in |
doi_str_mv | 10.2175/106143006x102024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19999877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23805205</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23805205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5601-e49d146bd7c24d31f219b77796847581db728c54b5317e811489db82f2e660b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1L5DAUxYO4-P3ui1IEfet6b5rPR50d3QVBEHV8K2maQoZOq0mL63-_GToo-LIhkEvO79x7OYQcI_ykKPklgkBWAIi_CBQo2yJ7yDnLJS9wO9VJzpNe7JL9GJcASCmwHbKLkmrQku-R-bxpnB1i1jfZwsTBvZvBheyXj75bC77vsnQX69-qD53Lro1NtTeZ6ers2YcxunhIfjSmje5o8x6Qp5v54-x3fnd_-2d2dZdbLgBzx3SNTFS1tJTVBTYUdSWl1EIxyRXWlaTKclal9aVTiEzpulK0oU4IqGhxQC6mvq-hfxtdHMqVj9a1relcP8YSdTpKygSefQOX_Ri6tFtJUYDQKZQEwQTZ0McYXFO-Br8y4aNEKNf5lp_5vkz5Jsvppu9YrVz9ZdgEmoDzDWCiNW0TTGd9_OKU5KipSByfuHffuo__Di4X8wcAhcl3MvmWcejDp48WCjgFXvwDR12YOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216069303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Blatchley, Ernest R. ; Gong, Woei-Long ; Alleman, James E. ; Rose, Joan B. ; Huffman, Debra E. ; Otaki, Masahiro ; Lisle, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blatchley, Ernest R. ; Gong, Woei-Long ; Alleman, James E. ; Rose, Joan B. ; Huffman, Debra E. ; Otaki, Masahiro ; Lisle, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater disinfection is practiced with the goal of reducing risks of human exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. In most circumstances, the efficacy of a wastewater disinfection process is regulated and monitored based on measurements of the responses of indicator bacteria. However, inactivation of indicator bacteria does not guarantee an acceptable degree of inactivation among other waterborne microorganisms (e.g., microbial pathogens). Undisinfected effluent samples from several municipal wastewater treatment facilities were collected for analysis. Facilities were selected to provide a broad spectrum of effluent quality, particularly as related to nitrogenous compounds. Samples were subjected to bench-scale chlorination and dechlorination and UV irradiation under conditions that allowed compliance with relevant discharge regulations and such that disinfectant exposures could be accurately quantified. Disinfected samples were subjected to a battery of assays to assess the immediate and long-term effects of wastewater disinfection on waterborne bacteria and viruses. In general, (viable) bacterial populations showed an immediate decline as a result of disinfectant exposure; however, incubation of disinfected samples under conditions that were designed to mimic the conditions in a receiving stream resulted in substantial recovery of the total bacterial community. The bacterial groups that are commonly used as indicators do not provide an accurate representation of the response of the bacterial community to disinfectant exposure and subsequent recovery in the environment. UV irradiation and chlorination/dechlorination both accomplished measurable inactivation of indigenous phage; however, the extent of inactivation was fairly modest under the conditions of disinfection used in this study. UV irradiation was consistently more effective as a virucide than chlorination/dechlorination under the conditions of application, based on measurements of virus (phage) diversity and concentration. Taken together, and when considered in conjunction with previously published research, the results of these experiments illustrate several important limitations of common disinfection processes as applied in the treatment of municipal wastewaters. In general, it is not clear that conventional disinfection processes, as commonly implemented, are effective for control of the risks of disease transmission, particularly those associated with viral pathogens. Microbial quality in receiving streams may not be substantially improved by the application of these disinfection processes; under some circumstances, an argument can be made that disinfection may actually yield a decrease in effluent and receiving water quality. Decisions regarding the need for effluent disinfection must account for site-specific characteristics, but it is not clear that disinfection of municipal wastewater effluents is necessary or beneficial for all facilities. When direct human contact or ingestion of municipal wastewater effluents is likely, disinfection may be necessary. Under these circumstances, UV irradiation appears to be superior to chlorination in terms of microbial quality and chemistry and toxicology. This advantage is particularly evident in effluents that contain appreciable quantities of ammonia-nitrogen or organic nitrogen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143006x102024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17290975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation</publisher><subject>Antiseptics ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - growth & development ; Bacteria - radiation effects ; Bacteriophages ; Chlorination ; Chlorine ; Chlorine - pharmacology ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; Disinfection ; Disinfection - methods ; Disinfection - standards ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Effluents ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fecal coliforms ; General purification processes ; Irradiation ; Oxygen - metabolism ; Pollution ; RESEARCH PAPERS ; Ultraviolet Rays ; United States ; virus ; Viruses - drug effects ; Viruses - growth & development ; Viruses - radiation effects ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water Microbiology ; Water pollution ; Water Purification - methods ; Water Purification - standards ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2007-01, Vol.79 (1), p.81-92</ispartof><rights>2007 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION (WEF)</rights><rights>2007 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Water Environment Federation Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5601-e49d146bd7c24d31f219b77796847581db728c54b5317e811489db82f2e660b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5601-e49d146bd7c24d31f219b77796847581db728c54b5317e811489db82f2e660b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23805205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23805205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18751926$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blatchley, Ernest R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Woei-Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alleman, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Debra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otaki, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisle, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>Wastewater disinfection is practiced with the goal of reducing risks of human exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. In most circumstances, the efficacy of a wastewater disinfection process is regulated and monitored based on measurements of the responses of indicator bacteria. However, inactivation of indicator bacteria does not guarantee an acceptable degree of inactivation among other waterborne microorganisms (e.g., microbial pathogens). Undisinfected effluent samples from several municipal wastewater treatment facilities were collected for analysis. Facilities were selected to provide a broad spectrum of effluent quality, particularly as related to nitrogenous compounds. Samples were subjected to bench-scale chlorination and dechlorination and UV irradiation under conditions that allowed compliance with relevant discharge regulations and such that disinfectant exposures could be accurately quantified. Disinfected samples were subjected to a battery of assays to assess the immediate and long-term effects of wastewater disinfection on waterborne bacteria and viruses. In general, (viable) bacterial populations showed an immediate decline as a result of disinfectant exposure; however, incubation of disinfected samples under conditions that were designed to mimic the conditions in a receiving stream resulted in substantial recovery of the total bacterial community. The bacterial groups that are commonly used as indicators do not provide an accurate representation of the response of the bacterial community to disinfectant exposure and subsequent recovery in the environment. UV irradiation and chlorination/dechlorination both accomplished measurable inactivation of indigenous phage; however, the extent of inactivation was fairly modest under the conditions of disinfection used in this study. UV irradiation was consistently more effective as a virucide than chlorination/dechlorination under the conditions of application, based on measurements of virus (phage) diversity and concentration. Taken together, and when considered in conjunction with previously published research, the results of these experiments illustrate several important limitations of common disinfection processes as applied in the treatment of municipal wastewaters. In general, it is not clear that conventional disinfection processes, as commonly implemented, are effective for control of the risks of disease transmission, particularly those associated with viral pathogens. Microbial quality in receiving streams may not be substantially improved by the application of these disinfection processes; under some circumstances, an argument can be made that disinfection may actually yield a decrease in effluent and receiving water quality. Decisions regarding the need for effluent disinfection must account for site-specific characteristics, but it is not clear that disinfection of municipal wastewater effluents is necessary or beneficial for all facilities. When direct human contact or ingestion of municipal wastewater effluents is likely, disinfection may be necessary. Under these circumstances, UV irradiation appears to be superior to chlorination in terms of microbial quality and chemistry and toxicology. This advantage is particularly evident in effluents that contain appreciable quantities of ammonia-nitrogen or organic nitrogen.</description><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria - radiation effects</subject><subject>Bacteriophages</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Disinfection - standards</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fecal coliforms</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>virus</subject><subject>Viruses - drug effects</subject><subject>Viruses - growth & development</subject><subject>Viruses - radiation effects</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water Purification - standards</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1L5DAUxYO4-P3ui1IEfet6b5rPR50d3QVBEHV8K2maQoZOq0mL63-_GToo-LIhkEvO79x7OYQcI_ykKPklgkBWAIi_CBQo2yJ7yDnLJS9wO9VJzpNe7JL9GJcASCmwHbKLkmrQku-R-bxpnB1i1jfZwsTBvZvBheyXj75bC77vsnQX69-qD53Lro1NtTeZ6ers2YcxunhIfjSmje5o8x6Qp5v54-x3fnd_-2d2dZdbLgBzx3SNTFS1tJTVBTYUdSWl1EIxyRXWlaTKclal9aVTiEzpulK0oU4IqGhxQC6mvq-hfxtdHMqVj9a1relcP8YSdTpKygSefQOX_Ri6tFtJUYDQKZQEwQTZ0McYXFO-Br8y4aNEKNf5lp_5vkz5Jsvppu9YrVz9ZdgEmoDzDWCiNW0TTGd9_OKU5KipSByfuHffuo__Di4X8wcAhcl3MvmWcejDp48WCjgFXvwDR12YOw</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Blatchley, Ernest R.</creator><creator>Gong, Woei-Long</creator><creator>Alleman, James E.</creator><creator>Rose, Joan B.</creator><creator>Huffman, Debra E.</creator><creator>Otaki, Masahiro</creator><creator>Lisle, John T.</creator><general>Water Environment Federation</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses</title><author>Blatchley, Ernest R. ; Gong, Woei-Long ; Alleman, James E. ; Rose, Joan B. ; Huffman, Debra E. ; Otaki, Masahiro ; Lisle, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5601-e49d146bd7c24d31f219b77796847581db728c54b5317e811489db82f2e660b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria - radiation effects</topic><topic>Bacteriophages</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Disinfection - standards</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fecal coliforms</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>virus</topic><topic>Viruses - drug effects</topic><topic>Viruses - growth & development</topic><topic>Viruses - radiation effects</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water Purification - standards</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blatchley, Ernest R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Woei-Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alleman, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Debra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otaki, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisle, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blatchley, Ernest R.</au><au>Gong, Woei-Long</au><au>Alleman, James E.</au><au>Rose, Joan B.</au><au>Huffman, Debra E.</au><au>Otaki, Masahiro</au><au>Lisle, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>81-92</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>Wastewater disinfection is practiced with the goal of reducing risks of human exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. In most circumstances, the efficacy of a wastewater disinfection process is regulated and monitored based on measurements of the responses of indicator bacteria. However, inactivation of indicator bacteria does not guarantee an acceptable degree of inactivation among other waterborne microorganisms (e.g., microbial pathogens). Undisinfected effluent samples from several municipal wastewater treatment facilities were collected for analysis. Facilities were selected to provide a broad spectrum of effluent quality, particularly as related to nitrogenous compounds. Samples were subjected to bench-scale chlorination and dechlorination and UV irradiation under conditions that allowed compliance with relevant discharge regulations and such that disinfectant exposures could be accurately quantified. Disinfected samples were subjected to a battery of assays to assess the immediate and long-term effects of wastewater disinfection on waterborne bacteria and viruses. In general, (viable) bacterial populations showed an immediate decline as a result of disinfectant exposure; however, incubation of disinfected samples under conditions that were designed to mimic the conditions in a receiving stream resulted in substantial recovery of the total bacterial community. The bacterial groups that are commonly used as indicators do not provide an accurate representation of the response of the bacterial community to disinfectant exposure and subsequent recovery in the environment. UV irradiation and chlorination/dechlorination both accomplished measurable inactivation of indigenous phage; however, the extent of inactivation was fairly modest under the conditions of disinfection used in this study. UV irradiation was consistently more effective as a virucide than chlorination/dechlorination under the conditions of application, based on measurements of virus (phage) diversity and concentration. Taken together, and when considered in conjunction with previously published research, the results of these experiments illustrate several important limitations of common disinfection processes as applied in the treatment of municipal wastewaters. In general, it is not clear that conventional disinfection processes, as commonly implemented, are effective for control of the risks of disease transmission, particularly those associated with viral pathogens. Microbial quality in receiving streams may not be substantially improved by the application of these disinfection processes; under some circumstances, an argument can be made that disinfection may actually yield a decrease in effluent and receiving water quality. Decisions regarding the need for effluent disinfection must account for site-specific characteristics, but it is not clear that disinfection of municipal wastewater effluents is necessary or beneficial for all facilities. When direct human contact or ingestion of municipal wastewater effluents is likely, disinfection may be necessary. Under these circumstances, UV irradiation appears to be superior to chlorination in terms of microbial quality and chemistry and toxicology. This advantage is particularly evident in effluents that contain appreciable quantities of ammonia-nitrogen or organic nitrogen.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>Water Environment Federation</pub><pmid>17290975</pmid><doi>10.2175/106143006x102024</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-4303 |
ispartof | Water environment research, 2007-01, Vol.79 (1), p.81-92 |
issn | 1061-4303 1554-7531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19999877 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR |
subjects | Antiseptics Applied sciences Bacteria Bacteria - drug effects Bacteria - growth & development Bacteria - radiation effects Bacteriophages Chlorination Chlorine Chlorine - pharmacology Disinfectants - pharmacology Disinfection Disinfection - methods Disinfection - standards Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination Effluents Exact sciences and technology Fecal coliforms General purification processes Irradiation Oxygen - metabolism Pollution RESEARCH PAPERS Ultraviolet Rays United States virus Viruses - drug effects Viruses - growth & development Viruses - radiation effects Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water Microbiology Water pollution Water Purification - methods Water Purification - standards Water treatment Water treatment and pollution |
title | Effects of Wastewater Disinfection on Waterborne Bacteria and Viruses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Wastewater%20Disinfection%20on%20Waterborne%20Bacteria%20and%20Viruses&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Blatchley,%20Ernest%20R.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=81-92&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143006x102024&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23805205%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216069303&rft_id=info:pmid/17290975&rft_jstor_id=23805205&rfr_iscdi=true |