Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California

Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) occurs throughout the U.S. from California to Maryland. It is considered an invasive plant in some parts of this range but not others. To test the hypothesis that plants from different regions have similar growth characteristics, we grew plants from stem cuttings collect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of aquatic plant management 2008-01, Vol.46, p.89-96
Hauptverfasser: Spencer, D F, Stocker, R K, Liow, P-S, Whitehand, L C, Ksander, G G, Fox, A M, Everitt, J H, Quinn, L D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue
container_start_page 89
container_title Journal of aquatic plant management
container_volume 46
creator Spencer, D F
Stocker, R K
Liow, P-S
Whitehand, L C
Ksander, G G
Fox, A M
Everitt, J H
Quinn, L D
description Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) occurs throughout the U.S. from California to Maryland. It is considered an invasive plant in some parts of this range but not others. To test the hypothesis that plants from different regions have similar growth characteristics, we grew plants from stem cuttings collected at two sites in Florida, one site in Texas, and two sites in California in a common garden experiment in Davis, California. Pants were grown outdoors in topsoil or a 90:10 sand:topsoil mix, in large plastic containers. All plants survived winter conditions in Davis, California, during 2004, when the minimum air temperature was -3.3 C. Stem width, number of stems per plant, number of leaves per stem, total leaf area per plant, and RGR sub(NSTEMS) did not differ among the provenances studied. Variegated plants had somewhat greater stem angles, indicating that the stems were more prostrate early in the growing season. Differences in stem height, number of in ternodes per stem, and mean internode distance were consistent with those expected from the inclusion of variegated plants in this study. Plant dry weight differed depending on plant origin and substrate type. Variegated plants weighed less regardless of the substrate. With the exception of a variegated form, plants from disparate geographic locations grew equally well under similar conditions, and no differences in growth characteristics were found that would suggest different invasive potential and impact on resident species.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19997400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19997400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p186t-daf0288f52840da73bcc186b22e1adb5c1b8e9313b71b4983bdd3d3d567008c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjE9LwzAcQHNQcE6_Q06isEr-tGlyHMV1QkGQ6XX80iQYaZOatLqP70B5h3d48C7QitBSFEIwfoWuc_4kpFKKiRV6b-I4QYLZf1vcpvgzf-DocOshzPjVWoPvt2kJJmITA5xw9_iAXYoj3g0xeQMbfLAnyBsMweAGBu9iCh5u0KWDIdvbf6_R2-7p0OyL7qV9brZdMVEp5sKAI0xKVzFZEgM1131_DpoxS8HoqqdaWsUp1zXVpZJcG8PPVKImRPaKr9Hd33dK8WuxeT6OPvd2GCDYuOQjVUrVJSH8FyvFTEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19997400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Spencer, D F ; Stocker, R K ; Liow, P-S ; Whitehand, L C ; Ksander, G G ; Fox, A M ; Everitt, J H ; Quinn, L D</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, D F ; Stocker, R K ; Liow, P-S ; Whitehand, L C ; Ksander, G G ; Fox, A M ; Everitt, J H ; Quinn, L D</creatorcontrib><description>Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) occurs throughout the U.S. from California to Maryland. It is considered an invasive plant in some parts of this range but not others. To test the hypothesis that plants from different regions have similar growth characteristics, we grew plants from stem cuttings collected at two sites in Florida, one site in Texas, and two sites in California in a common garden experiment in Davis, California. Pants were grown outdoors in topsoil or a 90:10 sand:topsoil mix, in large plastic containers. All plants survived winter conditions in Davis, California, during 2004, when the minimum air temperature was -3.3 C. Stem width, number of stems per plant, number of leaves per stem, total leaf area per plant, and RGR sub(NSTEMS) did not differ among the provenances studied. Variegated plants had somewhat greater stem angles, indicating that the stems were more prostrate early in the growing season. Differences in stem height, number of in ternodes per stem, and mean internode distance were consistent with those expected from the inclusion of variegated plants in this study. Plant dry weight differed depending on plant origin and substrate type. Variegated plants weighed less regardless of the substrate. With the exception of a variegated form, plants from disparate geographic locations grew equally well under similar conditions, and no differences in growth characteristics were found that would suggest different invasive potential and impact on resident species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6623</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Arundo donax</subject><ispartof>Journal of aquatic plant management, 2008-01, Vol.46, p.89-96</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liow, P-S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehand, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ksander, G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everitt, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, L D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California</title><title>Journal of aquatic plant management</title><description>Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) occurs throughout the U.S. from California to Maryland. It is considered an invasive plant in some parts of this range but not others. To test the hypothesis that plants from different regions have similar growth characteristics, we grew plants from stem cuttings collected at two sites in Florida, one site in Texas, and two sites in California in a common garden experiment in Davis, California. Pants were grown outdoors in topsoil or a 90:10 sand:topsoil mix, in large plastic containers. All plants survived winter conditions in Davis, California, during 2004, when the minimum air temperature was -3.3 C. Stem width, number of stems per plant, number of leaves per stem, total leaf area per plant, and RGR sub(NSTEMS) did not differ among the provenances studied. Variegated plants had somewhat greater stem angles, indicating that the stems were more prostrate early in the growing season. Differences in stem height, number of in ternodes per stem, and mean internode distance were consistent with those expected from the inclusion of variegated plants in this study. Plant dry weight differed depending on plant origin and substrate type. Variegated plants weighed less regardless of the substrate. With the exception of a variegated form, plants from disparate geographic locations grew equally well under similar conditions, and no differences in growth characteristics were found that would suggest different invasive potential and impact on resident species.</description><subject>Arundo donax</subject><issn>0146-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjE9LwzAcQHNQcE6_Q06isEr-tGlyHMV1QkGQ6XX80iQYaZOatLqP70B5h3d48C7QitBSFEIwfoWuc_4kpFKKiRV6b-I4QYLZf1vcpvgzf-DocOshzPjVWoPvt2kJJmITA5xw9_iAXYoj3g0xeQMbfLAnyBsMweAGBu9iCh5u0KWDIdvbf6_R2-7p0OyL7qV9brZdMVEp5sKAI0xKVzFZEgM1131_DpoxS8HoqqdaWsUp1zXVpZJcG8PPVKImRPaKr9Hd33dK8WuxeT6OPvd2GCDYuOQjVUrVJSH8FyvFTEs</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Spencer, D F</creator><creator>Stocker, R K</creator><creator>Liow, P-S</creator><creator>Whitehand, L C</creator><creator>Ksander, G G</creator><creator>Fox, A M</creator><creator>Everitt, J H</creator><creator>Quinn, L D</creator><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California</title><author>Spencer, D F ; Stocker, R K ; Liow, P-S ; Whitehand, L C ; Ksander, G G ; Fox, A M ; Everitt, J H ; Quinn, L D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p186t-daf0288f52840da73bcc186b22e1adb5c1b8e9313b71b4983bdd3d3d567008c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arundo donax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liow, P-S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehand, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ksander, G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everitt, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, L D</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, D F</au><au>Stocker, R K</au><au>Liow, P-S</au><au>Whitehand, L C</au><au>Ksander, G G</au><au>Fox, A M</au><au>Everitt, J H</au><au>Quinn, L D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>89</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>89-96</pages><issn>0146-6623</issn><abstract>Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) occurs throughout the U.S. from California to Maryland. It is considered an invasive plant in some parts of this range but not others. To test the hypothesis that plants from different regions have similar growth characteristics, we grew plants from stem cuttings collected at two sites in Florida, one site in Texas, and two sites in California in a common garden experiment in Davis, California. Pants were grown outdoors in topsoil or a 90:10 sand:topsoil mix, in large plastic containers. All plants survived winter conditions in Davis, California, during 2004, when the minimum air temperature was -3.3 C. Stem width, number of stems per plant, number of leaves per stem, total leaf area per plant, and RGR sub(NSTEMS) did not differ among the provenances studied. Variegated plants had somewhat greater stem angles, indicating that the stems were more prostrate early in the growing season. Differences in stem height, number of in ternodes per stem, and mean internode distance were consistent with those expected from the inclusion of variegated plants in this study. Plant dry weight differed depending on plant origin and substrate type. Variegated plants weighed less regardless of the substrate. With the exception of a variegated form, plants from disparate geographic locations grew equally well under similar conditions, and no differences in growth characteristics were found that would suggest different invasive potential and impact on resident species.</abstract><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6623
ispartof Journal of aquatic plant management, 2008-01, Vol.46, p.89-96
issn 0146-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19997400
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Arundo donax
title Comparative Growth of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) from Florida, Texas, and California
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A13%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Growth%20of%20Giant%20Reed%20(Arundo%20donax%20L.)%20from%20Florida,%20Texas,%20and%20California&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aquatic%20plant%20management&rft.au=Spencer,%20D%20F&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=89-96&rft.issn=0146-6623&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E19997400%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19997400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true