Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience

Sickle cell disease, a complex disorder with known pulmonary complications, has the potential to confound the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that when the choice of imaging is guided by chest radiographic results, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2018-08, Vol.59 (8), p.1255-1259
Hauptverfasser: Tivnan, Patrick, Billett, Henny H, Freeman, Leonard M, Haramati, Linda B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1259
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1255
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 59
creator Tivnan, Patrick
Billett, Henny H
Freeman, Leonard M
Haramati, Linda B
description Sickle cell disease, a complex disorder with known pulmonary complications, has the potential to confound the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that when the choice of imaging is guided by chest radiographic results, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy have comparable diagnostic performance in sickle cell disease. A retrospective cohort of adults with sickle cell disease who were imaged for suspected pulmonary embolism with either CTPA or V/Q, from 2000 to 2016 at our institution, was established. To reduce radiation exposure, our practice recommends V/Q for stable patients with normal chest radiographs. Results of index pulmonary embolism imaging, 90-d follow-up, and results of chest radiography were recorded. Two hundred forty-five adults with sickle cell disease comprised the cohort. The mean age (±SD) was 33 ± 10.5 y, and 58% (141) were men. Index imaging was V/Q in 62.9% ( = 154) and CTPA in 37.1% ( = 91). Chest radiographs, performed in 96.3% ( = 236), were normal in 72.9% ( = 172). Imaging results for pulmonary embolism were negative in 88.2% ( = 216), positive in 4.1% ( = 10), and indeterminate in 7.8% ( = 19) with no difference between V/Q and CTPA ( = 0.63). Reimaging within 90 d occurred in 9.8% ( = 24), 14.7% (20/136) after initial V/Q, and 5% (4/109) after initial CTPA ( = 0.08). Reimaging revealed a pulmonary embolism diagnosis after negative/indeterminate results in 0.7% (1/149) of V/Qs and 1.2% of (1/86) CTPAs ( = 0.69). Over the 17-y study period, 47% (114/245) underwent repeated imaging, and 11% (27/245) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism at least once. In sickle cell disease patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, positive imaging rates were low for any given clinical presentation, but 11% of the cohort was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism over the 17-y study period. CTPA and V/Q performed comparably for pulmonary embolism diagnosis when the choice of imaging was guided by results of chest radiography. Hence, V/Q is a reasonable first choice for sickle cell disease patients with normal chest radiographs.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.117.205641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999679578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1999679578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-681593e45c0b574caf6e98fae3b4305bc6deadc711340441b018adabc04567843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWqs_wI0E3LiZmjuTp7tSqxYFBXXhKmTSOzJ1HjVxQP-9kdqNq7u43zkcPkJOgE1yI9XFqhtaXE4A1CRnQnLYISMQhciElGqXjBhIyIRg4oAcxrhijEmt9T45yA0Hw5UakbtF697q7o1WfaCPQ9P2nQvfdN6WfVPHltYdfar9e4N0hk1Dr-qILuIlnVJQ2Su6QOdfaww1dh6PyF7lmojHf3dMXq7nz7Pb7P7hZjGb3me-UPlnJjUIUyAXnpVCce8qiUZXDouSF0yUXi7RLb0CKDjjHEoG2i1d6RkXUmlejMn5pncd-o8B46dt6-jTPNdhP0QLxiQ7Riid0LN_6KofQpfW2TxpE8pooRIFG8qHPsaAlV2Huk0eLDD7a9puTNsUsRvTKXP61zyUv69tYqu2-AHjaHiC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117579857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tivnan, Patrick ; Billett, Henny H ; Freeman, Leonard M ; Haramati, Linda B</creator><creatorcontrib>Tivnan, Patrick ; Billett, Henny H ; Freeman, Leonard M ; Haramati, Linda B</creatorcontrib><description>Sickle cell disease, a complex disorder with known pulmonary complications, has the potential to confound the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that when the choice of imaging is guided by chest radiographic results, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy have comparable diagnostic performance in sickle cell disease. A retrospective cohort of adults with sickle cell disease who were imaged for suspected pulmonary embolism with either CTPA or V/Q, from 2000 to 2016 at our institution, was established. To reduce radiation exposure, our practice recommends V/Q for stable patients with normal chest radiographs. Results of index pulmonary embolism imaging, 90-d follow-up, and results of chest radiography were recorded. Two hundred forty-five adults with sickle cell disease comprised the cohort. The mean age (±SD) was 33 ± 10.5 y, and 58% (141) were men. Index imaging was V/Q in 62.9% ( = 154) and CTPA in 37.1% ( = 91). Chest radiographs, performed in 96.3% ( = 236), were normal in 72.9% ( = 172). Imaging results for pulmonary embolism were negative in 88.2% ( = 216), positive in 4.1% ( = 10), and indeterminate in 7.8% ( = 19) with no difference between V/Q and CTPA ( = 0.63). Reimaging within 90 d occurred in 9.8% ( = 24), 14.7% (20/136) after initial V/Q, and 5% (4/109) after initial CTPA ( = 0.08). Reimaging revealed a pulmonary embolism diagnosis after negative/indeterminate results in 0.7% (1/149) of V/Qs and 1.2% of (1/86) CTPAs ( = 0.69). Over the 17-y study period, 47% (114/245) underwent repeated imaging, and 11% (27/245) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism at least once. In sickle cell disease patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, positive imaging rates were low for any given clinical presentation, but 11% of the cohort was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism over the 17-y study period. CTPA and V/Q performed comparably for pulmonary embolism diagnosis when the choice of imaging was guided by results of chest radiography. Hence, V/Q is a reasonable first choice for sickle cell disease patients with normal chest radiographs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.205641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29419477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Anemia, Sickle Cell - complications ; Angiography ; Chest ; Complications ; Computed tomography ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Embolism ; Embolisms ; Female ; Humans ; Lung diseases ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Patients ; Perfusion ; Pulmonary Embolism - complications ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology ; Pulmonary embolisms ; Radiation ; Radiation effects ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Scintigraphy ; Sickle cell disease ; Tomography ; Ventilation ; Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2018-08, Vol.59 (8), p.1255-1259</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Aug 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-681593e45c0b574caf6e98fae3b4305bc6deadc711340441b018adabc04567843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-681593e45c0b574caf6e98fae3b4305bc6deadc711340441b018adabc04567843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tivnan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billett, Henny H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Leonard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haramati, Linda B</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Sickle cell disease, a complex disorder with known pulmonary complications, has the potential to confound the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that when the choice of imaging is guided by chest radiographic results, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy have comparable diagnostic performance in sickle cell disease. A retrospective cohort of adults with sickle cell disease who were imaged for suspected pulmonary embolism with either CTPA or V/Q, from 2000 to 2016 at our institution, was established. To reduce radiation exposure, our practice recommends V/Q for stable patients with normal chest radiographs. Results of index pulmonary embolism imaging, 90-d follow-up, and results of chest radiography were recorded. Two hundred forty-five adults with sickle cell disease comprised the cohort. The mean age (±SD) was 33 ± 10.5 y, and 58% (141) were men. Index imaging was V/Q in 62.9% ( = 154) and CTPA in 37.1% ( = 91). Chest radiographs, performed in 96.3% ( = 236), were normal in 72.9% ( = 172). Imaging results for pulmonary embolism were negative in 88.2% ( = 216), positive in 4.1% ( = 10), and indeterminate in 7.8% ( = 19) with no difference between V/Q and CTPA ( = 0.63). Reimaging within 90 d occurred in 9.8% ( = 24), 14.7% (20/136) after initial V/Q, and 5% (4/109) after initial CTPA ( = 0.08). Reimaging revealed a pulmonary embolism diagnosis after negative/indeterminate results in 0.7% (1/149) of V/Qs and 1.2% of (1/86) CTPAs ( = 0.69). Over the 17-y study period, 47% (114/245) underwent repeated imaging, and 11% (27/245) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism at least once. In sickle cell disease patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, positive imaging rates were low for any given clinical presentation, but 11% of the cohort was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism over the 17-y study period. CTPA and V/Q performed comparably for pulmonary embolism diagnosis when the choice of imaging was guided by results of chest radiography. Hence, V/Q is a reasonable first choice for sickle cell disease patients with normal chest radiographs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Anemia, Sickle Cell - complications</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Embolism</subject><subject>Embolisms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pulmonary embolisms</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>Sickle cell disease</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWqs_wI0E3LiZmjuTp7tSqxYFBXXhKmTSOzJ1HjVxQP-9kdqNq7u43zkcPkJOgE1yI9XFqhtaXE4A1CRnQnLYISMQhciElGqXjBhIyIRg4oAcxrhijEmt9T45yA0Hw5UakbtF697q7o1WfaCPQ9P2nQvfdN6WfVPHltYdfar9e4N0hk1Dr-qILuIlnVJQ2Su6QOdfaww1dh6PyF7lmojHf3dMXq7nz7Pb7P7hZjGb3me-UPlnJjUIUyAXnpVCce8qiUZXDouSF0yUXi7RLb0CKDjjHEoG2i1d6RkXUmlejMn5pncd-o8B46dt6-jTPNdhP0QLxiQ7Riid0LN_6KofQpfW2TxpE8pooRIFG8qHPsaAlV2Huk0eLDD7a9puTNsUsRvTKXP61zyUv69tYqu2-AHjaHiC</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Tivnan, Patrick</creator><creator>Billett, Henny H</creator><creator>Freeman, Leonard M</creator><creator>Haramati, Linda B</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience</title><author>Tivnan, Patrick ; Billett, Henny H ; Freeman, Leonard M ; Haramati, Linda B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-681593e45c0b574caf6e98fae3b4305bc6deadc711340441b018adabc04567843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Anemia, Sickle Cell - complications</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Embolism</topic><topic>Embolisms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pulmonary embolisms</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>Sickle cell disease</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tivnan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billett, Henny H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Leonard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haramati, Linda B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tivnan, Patrick</au><au>Billett, Henny H</au><au>Freeman, Leonard M</au><au>Haramati, Linda B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1255</spage><epage>1259</epage><pages>1255-1259</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><abstract>Sickle cell disease, a complex disorder with known pulmonary complications, has the potential to confound the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that when the choice of imaging is guided by chest radiographic results, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy have comparable diagnostic performance in sickle cell disease. A retrospective cohort of adults with sickle cell disease who were imaged for suspected pulmonary embolism with either CTPA or V/Q, from 2000 to 2016 at our institution, was established. To reduce radiation exposure, our practice recommends V/Q for stable patients with normal chest radiographs. Results of index pulmonary embolism imaging, 90-d follow-up, and results of chest radiography were recorded. Two hundred forty-five adults with sickle cell disease comprised the cohort. The mean age (±SD) was 33 ± 10.5 y, and 58% (141) were men. Index imaging was V/Q in 62.9% ( = 154) and CTPA in 37.1% ( = 91). Chest radiographs, performed in 96.3% ( = 236), were normal in 72.9% ( = 172). Imaging results for pulmonary embolism were negative in 88.2% ( = 216), positive in 4.1% ( = 10), and indeterminate in 7.8% ( = 19) with no difference between V/Q and CTPA ( = 0.63). Reimaging within 90 d occurred in 9.8% ( = 24), 14.7% (20/136) after initial V/Q, and 5% (4/109) after initial CTPA ( = 0.08). Reimaging revealed a pulmonary embolism diagnosis after negative/indeterminate results in 0.7% (1/149) of V/Qs and 1.2% of (1/86) CTPAs ( = 0.69). Over the 17-y study period, 47% (114/245) underwent repeated imaging, and 11% (27/245) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism at least once. In sickle cell disease patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, positive imaging rates were low for any given clinical presentation, but 11% of the cohort was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism over the 17-y study period. CTPA and V/Q performed comparably for pulmonary embolism diagnosis when the choice of imaging was guided by results of chest radiography. Hence, V/Q is a reasonable first choice for sickle cell disease patients with normal chest radiographs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>29419477</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.117.205641</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2018-08, Vol.59 (8), p.1255-1259
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999679578
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Adults
Anemia, Sickle Cell - complications
Angiography
Chest
Complications
Computed tomography
Computed Tomography Angiography
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Embolism
Embolisms
Female
Humans
Lung diseases
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Patients
Perfusion
Pulmonary Embolism - complications
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology
Pulmonary embolisms
Radiation
Radiation effects
Radiographs
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Scintigraphy
Sickle cell disease
Tomography
Ventilation
Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio
Ventilators
title Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20for%20Pulmonary%20Embolism%20in%20Sickle%20Cell%20Disease:%20A%2017-Year%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Tivnan,%20Patrick&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1255&rft.epage=1259&rft.pages=1255-1259&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.117.205641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999679578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117579857&rft_id=info:pmid/29419477&rfr_iscdi=true