Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol

Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Alshelleh, Mohammad, Inamdar, Sumant, McKinley, Matthew, Stewart, Molly, Novak, Jeffrey S., Greenberg, Ronald E., Sultan, Keith, Devito, Bethany, Cheung, Mary, Cerulli, Maurice A., Miller, Larry S., Sejpal, Divyesh V., Vegesna, Anil K., Trindade, Arvind J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 88
creator Alshelleh, Mohammad
Inamdar, Sumant
McKinley, Matthew
Stewart, Molly
Novak, Jeffrey S.
Greenberg, Ronald E.
Sultan, Keith
Devito, Bethany
Cheung, Mary
Cerulli, Maurice A.
Miller, Larry S.
Sejpal, Divyesh V.
Vegesna, Anil K.
Trindade, Arvind J.
description Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL). A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003). A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999194063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510718300956</els_id><sourcerecordid>1999194063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbuO1DAUhi0EYoeFB6BBLmkSfJmxY1HBistKK9FAbTn2yayHJA62syhUvAbdPgjVPgpPgsMMlFS-6Pv_o6MPoaeU1JRQ8eJQ7z3UjNCmJrQmnN1DG0qUrISU6j7akAJVO0rkGXqU0oEQ0jBOH6Izpra0PMgG_bwcbYQBxmx6vHjoHQ4ddkuaepO8wQ4y2OzDiP2IX5sYIedf338kDClM12Y_JzwnP-7xTejnAXL0FpckRAyjC4O3MSQbpgV_9fkam9H9uYQ5H6m728HEz2vehmEyEdwJxCkX2ETnv5W_aNYy3PowpeXudoohBxv6x-hBZ_oET07nOfr09s3Hi_fV1Yd3lxevrirLdzxXljgjZesstNu25bKVyjbMGmEUoUpKYSxrBONMbpkVyhjRNcJCATtOG7Xj5-j5sbcM_jJDynrwyULfmxHCnDRVSlG1JYIXlB7RdfEUodNT9GXHRVOiV2n6oIs0vUrThOoirWSenerndgD3L_HXUgFeHgEoS954iDpZD6MF52Oxo13w_6n_DVV3sH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999194063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><description>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL). A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003). A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29410080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis ; Barrett Esophagus - pathology ; Biopsy ; Databases, Factual ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis ; Precancerous Conditions - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510718300956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamdar, Sumant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devito, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vegesna, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL). A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003). A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbuO1DAUhi0EYoeFB6BBLmkSfJmxY1HBistKK9FAbTn2yayHJA62syhUvAbdPgjVPgpPgsMMlFS-6Pv_o6MPoaeU1JRQ8eJQ7z3UjNCmJrQmnN1DG0qUrISU6j7akAJVO0rkGXqU0oEQ0jBOH6Izpra0PMgG_bwcbYQBxmx6vHjoHQ4ddkuaepO8wQ4y2OzDiP2IX5sYIedf338kDClM12Y_JzwnP-7xTejnAXL0FpckRAyjC4O3MSQbpgV_9fkam9H9uYQ5H6m728HEz2vehmEyEdwJxCkX2ETnv5W_aNYy3PowpeXudoohBxv6x-hBZ_oET07nOfr09s3Hi_fV1Yd3lxevrirLdzxXljgjZesstNu25bKVyjbMGmEUoUpKYSxrBONMbpkVyhjRNcJCATtOG7Xj5-j5sbcM_jJDynrwyULfmxHCnDRVSlG1JYIXlB7RdfEUodNT9GXHRVOiV2n6oIs0vUrThOoirWSenerndgD3L_HXUgFeHgEoS954iDpZD6MF52Oxo13w_6n_DVV3sH8</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creator><creator>Inamdar, Sumant</creator><creator>McKinley, Matthew</creator><creator>Stewart, Molly</creator><creator>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Sultan, Keith</creator><creator>Devito, Bethany</creator><creator>Cheung, Mary</creator><creator>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creator><creator>Miller, Larry S.</creator><creator>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creator><creator>Vegesna, Anil K.</creator><creator>Trindade, Arvind J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><author>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamdar, Sumant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devito, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vegesna, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshelleh, Mohammad</au><au>Inamdar, Sumant</au><au>McKinley, Matthew</au><au>Stewart, Molly</au><au>Novak, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Greenberg, Ronald E.</au><au>Sultan, Keith</au><au>Devito, Bethany</au><au>Cheung, Mary</au><au>Cerulli, Maurice A.</au><au>Miller, Larry S.</au><au>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</au><au>Vegesna, Anil K.</au><au>Trindade, Arvind J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL). A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003). A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29410080</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999194063
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Aged
Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis
Barrett Esophagus - pathology
Biopsy
Databases, Factual
Endoscopy, Digestive System
Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Humans
Male
Microscopy, Confocal
Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis
Precancerous Conditions - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
title Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A41%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incremental%20yield%20of%20dysplasia%20detection%20in%20Barrett%E2%80%99s%20esophagus%20using%20volumetric%20laser%20endomicroscopy%20with%20and%20without%20laser%C2%A0marking%20compared%20with%20a%20standardized%20random%20biopsy%C2%A0protocol&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Alshelleh,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999194063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999194063&rft_id=info:pmid/29410080&rft_els_id=S0016510718300956&rfr_iscdi=true