Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol
Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE. This is a retrospective study from a prosp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Alshelleh, Mohammad Inamdar, Sumant McKinley, Matthew Stewart, Molly Novak, Jeffrey S. Greenberg, Ronald E. Sultan, Keith Devito, Bethany Cheung, Mary Cerulli, Maurice A. Miller, Larry S. Sejpal, Divyesh V. Vegesna, Anil K. Trindade, Arvind J. |
description | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE.
This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL).
A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003).
A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999194063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510718300956</els_id><sourcerecordid>1999194063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbuO1DAUhi0EYoeFB6BBLmkSfJmxY1HBistKK9FAbTn2yayHJA62syhUvAbdPgjVPgpPgsMMlFS-6Pv_o6MPoaeU1JRQ8eJQ7z3UjNCmJrQmnN1DG0qUrISU6j7akAJVO0rkGXqU0oEQ0jBOH6Izpra0PMgG_bwcbYQBxmx6vHjoHQ4ddkuaepO8wQ4y2OzDiP2IX5sYIedf338kDClM12Y_JzwnP-7xTejnAXL0FpckRAyjC4O3MSQbpgV_9fkam9H9uYQ5H6m728HEz2vehmEyEdwJxCkX2ETnv5W_aNYy3PowpeXudoohBxv6x-hBZ_oET07nOfr09s3Hi_fV1Yd3lxevrirLdzxXljgjZesstNu25bKVyjbMGmEUoUpKYSxrBONMbpkVyhjRNcJCATtOG7Xj5-j5sbcM_jJDynrwyULfmxHCnDRVSlG1JYIXlB7RdfEUodNT9GXHRVOiV2n6oIs0vUrThOoirWSenerndgD3L_HXUgFeHgEoS954iDpZD6MF52Oxo13w_6n_DVV3sH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999194063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><description>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE.
This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL).
A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003).
A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29410080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis ; Barrett Esophagus - pathology ; Biopsy ; Databases, Factual ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis ; Precancerous Conditions - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510718300956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamdar, Sumant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devito, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vegesna, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE.
This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL).
A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003).
A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbuO1DAUhi0EYoeFB6BBLmkSfJmxY1HBistKK9FAbTn2yayHJA62syhUvAbdPgjVPgpPgsMMlFS-6Pv_o6MPoaeU1JRQ8eJQ7z3UjNCmJrQmnN1DG0qUrISU6j7akAJVO0rkGXqU0oEQ0jBOH6Izpra0PMgG_bwcbYQBxmx6vHjoHQ4ddkuaepO8wQ4y2OzDiP2IX5sYIedf338kDClM12Y_JzwnP-7xTejnAXL0FpckRAyjC4O3MSQbpgV_9fkam9H9uYQ5H6m728HEz2vehmEyEdwJxCkX2ETnv5W_aNYy3PowpeXudoohBxv6x-hBZ_oET07nOfr09s3Hi_fV1Yd3lxevrirLdzxXljgjZesstNu25bKVyjbMGmEUoUpKYSxrBONMbpkVyhjRNcJCATtOG7Xj5-j5sbcM_jJDynrwyULfmxHCnDRVSlG1JYIXlB7RdfEUodNT9GXHRVOiV2n6oIs0vUrThOoirWSenerndgD3L_HXUgFeHgEoS954iDpZD6MF52Oxo13w_6n_DVV3sH8</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creator><creator>Inamdar, Sumant</creator><creator>McKinley, Matthew</creator><creator>Stewart, Molly</creator><creator>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Sultan, Keith</creator><creator>Devito, Bethany</creator><creator>Cheung, Mary</creator><creator>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creator><creator>Miller, Larry S.</creator><creator>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creator><creator>Vegesna, Anil K.</creator><creator>Trindade, Arvind J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</title><author>Alshelleh, Mohammad ; Inamdar, Sumant ; McKinley, Matthew ; Stewart, Molly ; Novak, Jeffrey S. ; Greenberg, Ronald E. ; Sultan, Keith ; Devito, Bethany ; Cheung, Mary ; Cerulli, Maurice A. ; Miller, Larry S. ; Sejpal, Divyesh V. ; Vegesna, Anil K. ; Trindade, Arvind J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c0da77bdceb4bb37b79c82ca6a9019776ac286232742c69aa6f86ce37bf318953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshelleh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamdar, Sumant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devito, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerulli, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vegesna, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Arvind J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshelleh, Mohammad</au><au>Inamdar, Sumant</au><au>McKinley, Matthew</au><au>Stewart, Molly</au><au>Novak, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Greenberg, Ronald E.</au><au>Sultan, Keith</au><au>Devito, Bethany</au><au>Cheung, Mary</au><au>Cerulli, Maurice A.</au><au>Miller, Larry S.</au><au>Sejpal, Divyesh V.</au><au>Vegesna, Anil K.</au><au>Trindade, Arvind J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is a new wide-field advanced imaging technology for Barrett’s esophagus (BE). No data exist on incremental yield of dysplasia detection. Our aim is to report the incremental yield of dysplasia detection in BE using VLE.
This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from 2011 to 2017 comparing the dysplasia yield of 4 different surveillance strategies in an academic BE tertiary care referral center. The groups were (1) random biopsies (RB), (2) Seattle protocol random biopsies (SP), (3) VLE without laser marking (VLE), and (4) VLE with laser marking (VLEL).
A total of 448 consecutive patients (79 RB, 95 SP, 168 VLE, and 106 VLEL) met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for visible lesions, the total dysplasia yield was 5.7%, 19.6%, 24.8%, and 33.7%, respectively. When compared with just the SP group, the VLEL group had statistically higher rates of overall dysplasia yield (19.6% vs 33.7%, P = .03; odds ratio, 2.1, P = .03). Both the VLEL and VLE groups had statistically significant differences in neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer) detection compared with the SP group (14% vs 1%, P = .001 and 11% vs 1%, P = .003).
A surveillance strategy involving VLEL led to a statistically significant higher yield of dysplasia and neoplasia detection compared with a standard random biopsy protocol. These results support the use of VLEL for surveillance in BE in academic centers.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29410080</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-07, Vol.88 (1), p.35-42 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999194063 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma - pathology Aged Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis Barrett Esophagus - pathology Biopsy Databases, Factual Endoscopy, Digestive System Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Female Humans Male Microscopy, Confocal Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis Precancerous Conditions - pathology Retrospective Studies Tomography, Optical Coherence |
title | Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A41%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incremental%20yield%20of%20dysplasia%20detection%20in%20Barrett%E2%80%99s%20esophagus%20using%20volumetric%20laser%20endomicroscopy%20with%20and%20without%20laser%C2%A0marking%20compared%20with%20a%20standardized%20random%20biopsy%C2%A0protocol&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Alshelleh,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999194063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999194063&rft_id=info:pmid/29410080&rft_els_id=S0016510718300956&rfr_iscdi=true |