Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene
This study was initiated to make comparative evaluation of five proposed urinary markers of occupational exposure to toluene, i.e., benzyl alcohol, benzylmercapturic acid, omicron-cresol, hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene. In practice, six plants in Japan were surveyed, and 122 Japanese worke...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International archives of occupational and environmental health 2007-10, Vol.81 (1), p.81-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | International archives of occupational and environmental health |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | UKAI, Hirohiko KAWAI, Toshio INOUE, Osamu MAEJIMA, Yuki FUKUI, Yoshinari OHASHI, Fumiko OKAMOTO, Satoru TAKADA, Shiro SAKURAI, Haruhiko IKEDA, Masayuki |
description | This study was initiated to make comparative evaluation of five proposed urinary markers of occupational exposure to toluene, i.e., benzyl alcohol, benzylmercapturic acid, omicron-cresol, hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene.
In practice, six plants in Japan were surveyed, and 122 Japanese workers (mostly printers; all men) together with 12 occupationally nonexposed control subjects (to be called controls; all men) agreed to participate in the study. Surveys were conducted in the second half of working weeks. Time-weighted average exposure (about 8 h) to toluene and other solvents were monitored by diffusive sampling. End-of-shift urine samples were collected and analyzed for the five markers by the methods previously described; simultaneous determination of omicron-cresol was possible by the method originally developed for benzyl alcohol analysis.
The toluene concentration in the six plants was such that the grand geometric mean (GM) for the 122 cases was 10.4 ppm with the maximum of 121 ppm. Other solvents coexposed included ethyl acetate (26 ppm as GM), methyl ethyl ketone (26 ppm), butyl acetate (1 ppm) and xylenes (1 ppm). By simple regression analysis, hippuric acid correlated most closely with toluene in air (r = 0.85 for non-corrected observed values) followed by un-metabolized toluene (r = 0.83) and o-cresol (r = 0.81). In a plant where toluene in air was low (i.e., 2 ppm as GM), however, un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine showed better correlation with air-borne toluene (r = 0.79 and 0.61, respectively) than hippuric acid (r = 0.12) or o-cresol (r = 0.17). Benzyl alcohol tended to increase only when toluene exposure was intense. Correction for creatinine concentration or specific gravity of urine did not improve the correlation in any case. Multiple regression analysis showed that solvents other than toluene did not affect the levels of omicron-cresol, hippuric acid or un-metabolized toluene. Levels of benzylmercapturic acid and un-metabolized toluene were below the limits of detection [limit of detections (LODs); 0.2 and 2 microg/l, respectively] in the urine from the control subjects.
In over-all evaluation, hippuric acid, followed by un-metabolized toluene and omicron-cresol, is the marker of choice for occupational toluene exposure. When toluene exposure level is low (e.g., 2 ppm), un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine may be better indicators. Detection of un-metabolized toluene or benzylmerca |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00420-007-0193-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19988747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19988747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1c7ecbfb96e67e73e6d7d12cd5f0e8a397accf33a4fd0b7d7f1e3a84b5ce0cb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFFLwzAQx4Mobk4_gC9SBH2rXpq0aR5lqBMGvuhzSNMLdLZLTdah397UFQTh4P7H_e64-xNySeGOAoj7AMAzSKNMgUqWwhGZU86ylGa8OCZzYDx2KaMzchbCBoCKQrBTMos5Z3lRzslq6bpee71r9pjgXrdDlG6bOJtUjeu0_0AfxsoZM_S_Pd0m-NW7MHhMdi5GO-AWz8mJ1W3AiykvyPvT49tyla5fn1-WD-vU8JztUmoEmspWssBCoGBY1KKmmalzC1hqJoU2xjKmua2hErWwFJkueZUbBFMJtiC3h729d58Dhp3qmmCwbfUW3RAUlbIsBR_B63_gxg0-Xh9UQRmDMs9lhOgBMt6F4NGq3jfx629FQY0eq4PHapSjxwrizNW0eKg6rP8mJlMjcDMBOhjdWq-3pgl_nJRc5FyyH-32hY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613308559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>UKAI, Hirohiko ; KAWAI, Toshio ; INOUE, Osamu ; MAEJIMA, Yuki ; FUKUI, Yoshinari ; OHASHI, Fumiko ; OKAMOTO, Satoru ; TAKADA, Shiro ; SAKURAI, Haruhiko ; IKEDA, Masayuki</creator><creatorcontrib>UKAI, Hirohiko ; KAWAI, Toshio ; INOUE, Osamu ; MAEJIMA, Yuki ; FUKUI, Yoshinari ; OHASHI, Fumiko ; OKAMOTO, Satoru ; TAKADA, Shiro ; SAKURAI, Haruhiko ; IKEDA, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><description>This study was initiated to make comparative evaluation of five proposed urinary markers of occupational exposure to toluene, i.e., benzyl alcohol, benzylmercapturic acid, omicron-cresol, hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene.
In practice, six plants in Japan were surveyed, and 122 Japanese workers (mostly printers; all men) together with 12 occupationally nonexposed control subjects (to be called controls; all men) agreed to participate in the study. Surveys were conducted in the second half of working weeks. Time-weighted average exposure (about 8 h) to toluene and other solvents were monitored by diffusive sampling. End-of-shift urine samples were collected and analyzed for the five markers by the methods previously described; simultaneous determination of omicron-cresol was possible by the method originally developed for benzyl alcohol analysis.
The toluene concentration in the six plants was such that the grand geometric mean (GM) for the 122 cases was 10.4 ppm with the maximum of 121 ppm. Other solvents coexposed included ethyl acetate (26 ppm as GM), methyl ethyl ketone (26 ppm), butyl acetate (1 ppm) and xylenes (1 ppm). By simple regression analysis, hippuric acid correlated most closely with toluene in air (r = 0.85 for non-corrected observed values) followed by un-metabolized toluene (r = 0.83) and o-cresol (r = 0.81). In a plant where toluene in air was low (i.e., 2 ppm as GM), however, un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine showed better correlation with air-borne toluene (r = 0.79 and 0.61, respectively) than hippuric acid (r = 0.12) or o-cresol (r = 0.17). Benzyl alcohol tended to increase only when toluene exposure was intense. Correction for creatinine concentration or specific gravity of urine did not improve the correlation in any case. Multiple regression analysis showed that solvents other than toluene did not affect the levels of omicron-cresol, hippuric acid or un-metabolized toluene. Levels of benzylmercapturic acid and un-metabolized toluene were below the limits of detection [limit of detections (LODs); 0.2 and 2 microg/l, respectively] in the urine from the control subjects.
In over-all evaluation, hippuric acid, followed by un-metabolized toluene and omicron-cresol, is the marker of choice for occupational toluene exposure. When toluene exposure level is low (e.g., 2 ppm), un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine may be better indicators. Detection of un-metabolized toluene or benzylmercapturic acid in urine at the levels in excess of the LODs may be taken as a positive evidence of toluene exposure, because their levels in urine from the controls are below the LODs. The value of benzyl alcohol as an exposure marker should be limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00420-007-0193-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17653568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAEHDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alcohols ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - urine ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Exposure ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Industry ; Japan ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Regression analysis ; Solvents ; Specific gravity ; Studies ; Toluene ; Toluene - urine ; Toxicology ; Urine</subject><ispartof>International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2007-10, Vol.81 (1), p.81-93</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1c7ecbfb96e67e73e6d7d12cd5f0e8a397accf33a4fd0b7d7f1e3a84b5ce0cb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1c7ecbfb96e67e73e6d7d12cd5f0e8a397accf33a4fd0b7d7f1e3a84b5ce0cb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19947549$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17653568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>UKAI, Hirohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAI, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INOUE, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAEJIMA, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUKUI, Yoshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHASHI, Fumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKADA, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKURAI, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IKEDA, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene</title><title>International archives of occupational and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><description>This study was initiated to make comparative evaluation of five proposed urinary markers of occupational exposure to toluene, i.e., benzyl alcohol, benzylmercapturic acid, omicron-cresol, hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene.
In practice, six plants in Japan were surveyed, and 122 Japanese workers (mostly printers; all men) together with 12 occupationally nonexposed control subjects (to be called controls; all men) agreed to participate in the study. Surveys were conducted in the second half of working weeks. Time-weighted average exposure (about 8 h) to toluene and other solvents were monitored by diffusive sampling. End-of-shift urine samples were collected and analyzed for the five markers by the methods previously described; simultaneous determination of omicron-cresol was possible by the method originally developed for benzyl alcohol analysis.
The toluene concentration in the six plants was such that the grand geometric mean (GM) for the 122 cases was 10.4 ppm with the maximum of 121 ppm. Other solvents coexposed included ethyl acetate (26 ppm as GM), methyl ethyl ketone (26 ppm), butyl acetate (1 ppm) and xylenes (1 ppm). By simple regression analysis, hippuric acid correlated most closely with toluene in air (r = 0.85 for non-corrected observed values) followed by un-metabolized toluene (r = 0.83) and o-cresol (r = 0.81). In a plant where toluene in air was low (i.e., 2 ppm as GM), however, un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine showed better correlation with air-borne toluene (r = 0.79 and 0.61, respectively) than hippuric acid (r = 0.12) or o-cresol (r = 0.17). Benzyl alcohol tended to increase only when toluene exposure was intense. Correction for creatinine concentration or specific gravity of urine did not improve the correlation in any case. Multiple regression analysis showed that solvents other than toluene did not affect the levels of omicron-cresol, hippuric acid or un-metabolized toluene. Levels of benzylmercapturic acid and un-metabolized toluene were below the limits of detection [limit of detections (LODs); 0.2 and 2 microg/l, respectively] in the urine from the control subjects.
In over-all evaluation, hippuric acid, followed by un-metabolized toluene and omicron-cresol, is the marker of choice for occupational toluene exposure. When toluene exposure level is low (e.g., 2 ppm), un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine may be better indicators. Detection of un-metabolized toluene or benzylmercapturic acid in urine at the levels in excess of the LODs may be taken as a positive evidence of toluene exposure, because their levels in urine from the controls are below the LODs. The value of benzyl alcohol as an exposure marker should be limited.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - urine</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Specific gravity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toluene</subject><subject>Toluene - urine</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0340-0131</issn><issn>1432-1246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkFFLwzAQx4Mobk4_gC9SBH2rXpq0aR5lqBMGvuhzSNMLdLZLTdah397UFQTh4P7H_e64-xNySeGOAoj7AMAzSKNMgUqWwhGZU86ylGa8OCZzYDx2KaMzchbCBoCKQrBTMos5Z3lRzslq6bpee71r9pjgXrdDlG6bOJtUjeu0_0AfxsoZM_S_Pd0m-NW7MHhMdi5GO-AWz8mJ1W3AiykvyPvT49tyla5fn1-WD-vU8JztUmoEmspWssBCoGBY1KKmmalzC1hqJoU2xjKmua2hErWwFJkueZUbBFMJtiC3h729d58Dhp3qmmCwbfUW3RAUlbIsBR_B63_gxg0-Xh9UQRmDMs9lhOgBMt6F4NGq3jfx629FQY0eq4PHapSjxwrizNW0eKg6rP8mJlMjcDMBOhjdWq-3pgl_nJRc5FyyH-32hY0</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>UKAI, Hirohiko</creator><creator>KAWAI, Toshio</creator><creator>INOUE, Osamu</creator><creator>MAEJIMA, Yuki</creator><creator>FUKUI, Yoshinari</creator><creator>OHASHI, Fumiko</creator><creator>OKAMOTO, Satoru</creator><creator>TAKADA, Shiro</creator><creator>SAKURAI, Haruhiko</creator><creator>IKEDA, Masayuki</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene</title><author>UKAI, Hirohiko ; KAWAI, Toshio ; INOUE, Osamu ; MAEJIMA, Yuki ; FUKUI, Yoshinari ; OHASHI, Fumiko ; OKAMOTO, Satoru ; TAKADA, Shiro ; SAKURAI, Haruhiko ; IKEDA, Masayuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1c7ecbfb96e67e73e6d7d12cd5f0e8a397accf33a4fd0b7d7f1e3a84b5ce0cb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - urine</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Specific gravity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toluene</topic><topic>Toluene - urine</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UKAI, Hirohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAI, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INOUE, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAEJIMA, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUKUI, Yoshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHASHI, Fumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKADA, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKURAI, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IKEDA, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UKAI, Hirohiko</au><au>KAWAI, Toshio</au><au>INOUE, Osamu</au><au>MAEJIMA, Yuki</au><au>FUKUI, Yoshinari</au><au>OHASHI, Fumiko</au><au>OKAMOTO, Satoru</au><au>TAKADA, Shiro</au><au>SAKURAI, Haruhiko</au><au>IKEDA, Masayuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene</atitle><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>81-93</pages><issn>0340-0131</issn><eissn>1432-1246</eissn><coden>IAEHDW</coden><abstract>This study was initiated to make comparative evaluation of five proposed urinary markers of occupational exposure to toluene, i.e., benzyl alcohol, benzylmercapturic acid, omicron-cresol, hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene.
In practice, six plants in Japan were surveyed, and 122 Japanese workers (mostly printers; all men) together with 12 occupationally nonexposed control subjects (to be called controls; all men) agreed to participate in the study. Surveys were conducted in the second half of working weeks. Time-weighted average exposure (about 8 h) to toluene and other solvents were monitored by diffusive sampling. End-of-shift urine samples were collected and analyzed for the five markers by the methods previously described; simultaneous determination of omicron-cresol was possible by the method originally developed for benzyl alcohol analysis.
The toluene concentration in the six plants was such that the grand geometric mean (GM) for the 122 cases was 10.4 ppm with the maximum of 121 ppm. Other solvents coexposed included ethyl acetate (26 ppm as GM), methyl ethyl ketone (26 ppm), butyl acetate (1 ppm) and xylenes (1 ppm). By simple regression analysis, hippuric acid correlated most closely with toluene in air (r = 0.85 for non-corrected observed values) followed by un-metabolized toluene (r = 0.83) and o-cresol (r = 0.81). In a plant where toluene in air was low (i.e., 2 ppm as GM), however, un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine showed better correlation with air-borne toluene (r = 0.79 and 0.61, respectively) than hippuric acid (r = 0.12) or o-cresol (r = 0.17). Benzyl alcohol tended to increase only when toluene exposure was intense. Correction for creatinine concentration or specific gravity of urine did not improve the correlation in any case. Multiple regression analysis showed that solvents other than toluene did not affect the levels of omicron-cresol, hippuric acid or un-metabolized toluene. Levels of benzylmercapturic acid and un-metabolized toluene were below the limits of detection [limit of detections (LODs); 0.2 and 2 microg/l, respectively] in the urine from the control subjects.
In over-all evaluation, hippuric acid, followed by un-metabolized toluene and omicron-cresol, is the marker of choice for occupational toluene exposure. When toluene exposure level is low (e.g., 2 ppm), un-metabolized toluene and benzylmercapturic acid in urine may be better indicators. Detection of un-metabolized toluene or benzylmercapturic acid in urine at the levels in excess of the LODs may be taken as a positive evidence of toluene exposure, because their levels in urine from the controls are below the LODs. The value of benzyl alcohol as an exposure marker should be limited.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>17653568</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00420-007-0193-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-0131 |
ispartof | International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2007-10, Vol.81 (1), p.81-93 |
issn | 0340-0131 1432-1246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19988747 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Alcohols Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers - urine Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases Exposure Health risk assessment Humans Industry Japan Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Occupational Exposure - analysis Regression analysis Solvents Specific gravity Studies Toluene Toluene - urine Toxicology Urine |
title | Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A14%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20biomarkers%20of%20occupational%20exposure%20to%20toluene&rft.jtitle=International%20archives%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=UKAI,%20Hirohiko&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=81-93&rft.issn=0340-0131&rft.eissn=1432-1246&rft.coden=IAEHDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00420-007-0193-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19988747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613308559&rft_id=info:pmid/17653568&rfr_iscdi=true |