Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity
We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate character...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 533 |
creator | ILMONEN, Jari PAASIVIRTA, Lauri |
description | We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19986655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222709341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpodtNfkBvotDenI4s2ZZ6a0PbFAK5NGcxkuWsglfeauRCjvnn1WYDhV56Gmb43oN5j7G3Ai4EwPCRBAwdNACqaaUxjXrBNqIbZNMJMbxkGwChGy06_Zq9IbqHqjEtbNjjl5DKLnq-R58Xn1cq6AMmjmnkMVHwhSNR2LsZ7wLVE89hxhKXxMvC6ZBjuuM7dLFg4X6HGX0JOVKJnj7xA5a6pScdujWNmHx48h7j75Aplocz9mrCmcL589yy229ff15eNdc3339cfr5uvJJQmtAamDxMwyjdpIQQ2inwoPtWTOC0MsNolNOTls4L2Y-j8kZIN3oYe2hdK7fsw8n3kJdfa6Bi95F8mGdMYVnJCmN033fd_8Gh78wx2y179w94v6w51SesbkWrwBhVIXGCarxEOUy2RrbH_GAF2GN19lSdrdXZY3X2qHn_bIzkcZ5yTS3SX2GvZK-r9x-1yZsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821240994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creator><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><description>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bryophyta ; Crustacea ; Detritus ; Floating plants ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitats ; Indicator species ; Insecta ; Insects ; Macroinvertebrates ; Mosses ; Ordination ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Threatened species ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16436894$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bryophyta</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpodtNfkBvotDenI4s2ZZ6a0PbFAK5NGcxkuWsglfeauRCjvnn1WYDhV56Gmb43oN5j7G3Ai4EwPCRBAwdNACqaaUxjXrBNqIbZNMJMbxkGwChGy06_Zq9IbqHqjEtbNjjl5DKLnq-R58Xn1cq6AMmjmnkMVHwhSNR2LsZ7wLVE89hxhKXxMvC6ZBjuuM7dLFg4X6HGX0JOVKJnj7xA5a6pScdujWNmHx48h7j75Aplocz9mrCmcL589yy229ff15eNdc3339cfr5uvJJQmtAamDxMwyjdpIQQ2inwoPtWTOC0MsNolNOTls4L2Y-j8kZIN3oYe2hdK7fsw8n3kJdfa6Bi95F8mGdMYVnJCmN033fd_8Gh78wx2y179w94v6w51SesbkWrwBhVIXGCarxEOUy2RrbH_GAF2GN19lSdrdXZY3X2qHn_bIzkcZ5yTS3SX2GvZK-r9x-1yZsY</recordid><startdate>200501</startdate><enddate>200501</enddate><creator>ILMONEN, Jari</creator><creator>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200501</creationdate><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><author>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bryophyta</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ILMONEN, Jari</au><au>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2005-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>533</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>99-113</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19986655 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Aquatic plants Biological and medical sciences Bryophyta Crustacea Detritus Floating plants Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitats Indicator species Insecta Insects Macroinvertebrates Mosses Ordination Synecology Taxa Threatened species Water flow |
title | Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benthic%20macrocrustacean%20and%20insect%20assemblages%20in%20relation%20to%20spring%20habitat%20characteristics:%20patterns%20in%20abundance%20and%20diversity&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=ILMONEN,%20Jari&rft.date=2005-01&rft.volume=533&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=99-113&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222709341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821240994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |