Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity

We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate character...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113
Hauptverfasser: ILMONEN, Jari, PAASIVIRTA, Lauri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 99
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 533
creator ILMONEN, Jari
PAASIVIRTA, Lauri
description We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19986655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222709341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpodtNfkBvotDenI4s2ZZ6a0PbFAK5NGcxkuWsglfeauRCjvnn1WYDhV56Gmb43oN5j7G3Ai4EwPCRBAwdNACqaaUxjXrBNqIbZNMJMbxkGwChGy06_Zq9IbqHqjEtbNjjl5DKLnq-R58Xn1cq6AMmjmnkMVHwhSNR2LsZ7wLVE89hxhKXxMvC6ZBjuuM7dLFg4X6HGX0JOVKJnj7xA5a6pScdujWNmHx48h7j75Aplocz9mrCmcL589yy229ff15eNdc3339cfr5uvJJQmtAamDxMwyjdpIQQ2inwoPtWTOC0MsNolNOTls4L2Y-j8kZIN3oYe2hdK7fsw8n3kJdfa6Bi95F8mGdMYVnJCmN033fd_8Gh78wx2y179w94v6w51SesbkWrwBhVIXGCarxEOUy2RrbH_GAF2GN19lSdrdXZY3X2qHn_bIzkcZ5yTS3SX2GvZK-r9x-1yZsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821240994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creator><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><description>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bryophyta ; Crustacea ; Detritus ; Floating plants ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitats ; Indicator species ; Insecta ; Insects ; Macroinvertebrates ; Mosses ; Ordination ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Threatened species ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16436894$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bryophyta</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpodtNfkBvotDenI4s2ZZ6a0PbFAK5NGcxkuWsglfeauRCjvnn1WYDhV56Gmb43oN5j7G3Ai4EwPCRBAwdNACqaaUxjXrBNqIbZNMJMbxkGwChGy06_Zq9IbqHqjEtbNjjl5DKLnq-R58Xn1cq6AMmjmnkMVHwhSNR2LsZ7wLVE89hxhKXxMvC6ZBjuuM7dLFg4X6HGX0JOVKJnj7xA5a6pScdujWNmHx48h7j75Aplocz9mrCmcL589yy229ff15eNdc3339cfr5uvJJQmtAamDxMwyjdpIQQ2inwoPtWTOC0MsNolNOTls4L2Y-j8kZIN3oYe2hdK7fsw8n3kJdfa6Bi95F8mGdMYVnJCmN033fd_8Gh78wx2y179w94v6w51SesbkWrwBhVIXGCarxEOUy2RrbH_GAF2GN19lSdrdXZY3X2qHn_bIzkcZ5yTS3SX2GvZK-r9x-1yZsY</recordid><startdate>200501</startdate><enddate>200501</enddate><creator>ILMONEN, Jari</creator><creator>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200501</creationdate><title>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</title><author>ILMONEN, Jari ; PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e290fc0f7d3bf41118b40c08621f0b8497d94b8f83bc136dd4c913bdc0d602b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bryophyta</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ILMONEN, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ILMONEN, Jari</au><au>PAASIVIRTA, Lauri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2005-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>533</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>99-113</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>We studied variation in benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics in six springs located in a single groundwater area in south-west Finland. We defined five habitat types in the studied springs according to water flow and benthic substrate characteristicsminerogenic brooks, organogenic brooks, helocrenes, floating moss carpets and limnocrene pools. Most studied invertebrate orders, as well as individual taxa, showed differences in relative abundances between the habitat types, but the most common taxa occurred in all springs and habitat types. The studied macroinvertebrates were most abundant in the moss carpet sites and least abundant in the pool sites, but the difference was not statistically significant. We did not observe significant differences in mean taxonomic richness per sample between habitat classes. The observed taxonomic richness in pooled samples of habitat classes was highest in moss carpet habitat and lowest in pool habitat, and the rarefied richness estimate was lowest in pool habitat. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages varied more between habitat types than between individual springs. In an Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, spring brook sites were separated from the moss carpet and pool sites, whereas helocrene sites were widely scattered among sites in other habitat classes. The strongest ecological gradients were related to water flow and the presence of minerogenic substrate, separating lentic and lotic habitats. Abundances of moss and coarse detritus accounted for most of the within-class variation. We identified several indicator species for minerogenic and organogenic brooks and for moss carpet and pool habitats, but none for the helocrenes. We found several occurrences of two crenobiont insect species considered threatened in Finland. We suggest that combined studies on macroinvertebrate and bryophyte assemblages would be a powerful approach in assessing the biodiversity of springs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2005-01, Vol.533 (1-3), p.99-113
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19986655
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aquatic plants
Biological and medical sciences
Bryophyta
Crustacea
Detritus
Floating plants
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitats
Indicator species
Insecta
Insects
Macroinvertebrates
Mosses
Ordination
Synecology
Taxa
Threatened species
Water flow
title Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristics: patterns in abundance and diversity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benthic%20macrocrustacean%20and%20insect%20assemblages%20in%20relation%20to%20spring%20habitat%20characteristics:%20patterns%20in%20abundance%20and%20diversity&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=ILMONEN,%20Jari&rft.date=2005-01&rft.volume=533&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=99-113&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-004-2399-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222709341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821240994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true