Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation

By using 6 years of Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) turtle by-catch data collected from the middle Mississippi River, we investigated smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtle abundance collected from 5 physical habitats: main channel border, wing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chelonian conservation and biology 2006-12, Vol.5 (2), p.225-231
Hauptverfasser: Barko, V A, Briggler, J T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Chelonian conservation and biology
container_volume 5
creator Barko, V A
Briggler, J T
description By using 6 years of Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) turtle by-catch data collected from the middle Mississippi River, we investigated smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtle abundance collected from 5 physical habitats: main channel border, wing dikes, tributary, open side channel, and closed side channel. Females comprised 62% and males 38% of the total catch of smooth softshell turtles. For spiny softshell turtles, females comprised 67% and males 33% of the total catch. We observed skewed reproductive age structure and sex ratios among and within both species. Smooth and spiny softshell turtle captures were dominated by reproductive individuals (62% and 87%, respectively). Smooth softshell turtles were most abundant in open side channels and main channel borders, whereas spiny softshell turtles were most abundant in tributaries and closed side channels. Smooth softshell abundance was greatest in deep waters with faster water velocity, whereas spiny softshell abundance was greatest in waters with higher visibility (e.g., Secchi transparency) and slower water velocity.
doi_str_mv 10.1043/1071-8443(2006)5[225:MSSAMA]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19969428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19969428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_199694283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk9Lw0AQxfegYP3zHeYkLaRxs0lrUk-hVOohKKY3kbImG7Kyya47uwW_oR_LNIgnD8LAmzfzg_cICSIaRjSJbyJ6G83TJImnjNLlbPHC2GJVlGVe5K8spOH68Y6dkMkvdkbOEd8pTVIaswn5KmSteF9D2WntWih147AVSsE0N1zpXkDnnaz4DEbKyP7zLwiHh2yEHbidt04JBNmDawUMAbU6CuJxjJHwLA_CrmDL36TjDnJEXUnupO4xgCdtvBoNlM76ynkrgjH8oTNqaDJy0GgL62ER9jBeLslpwxWKqx-9INf3m916OzdWf3iBbt9JrIbOvBfa4z7KsmWWsDT-N_gNjI53-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19969428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Barko, V A ; Briggler, J T</creator><creatorcontrib>Barko, V A ; Briggler, J T</creatorcontrib><description>By using 6 years of Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) turtle by-catch data collected from the middle Mississippi River, we investigated smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtle abundance collected from 5 physical habitats: main channel border, wing dikes, tributary, open side channel, and closed side channel. Females comprised 62% and males 38% of the total catch of smooth softshell turtles. For spiny softshell turtles, females comprised 67% and males 33% of the total catch. We observed skewed reproductive age structure and sex ratios among and within both species. Smooth and spiny softshell turtle captures were dominated by reproductive individuals (62% and 87%, respectively). Smooth softshell turtles were most abundant in open side channels and main channel borders, whereas spiny softshell turtles were most abundant in tributaries and closed side channels. Smooth softshell abundance was greatest in deep waters with faster water velocity, whereas spiny softshell abundance was greatest in waters with higher visibility (e.g., Secchi transparency) and slower water velocity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-8443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/1071-8443(2006)5[225:MSSAMA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Apalone mutica ; Apalone spinifera ; Freshwater</subject><ispartof>Chelonian conservation and biology, 2006-12, Vol.5 (2), p.225-231</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barko, V A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggler, J T</creatorcontrib><title>Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation</title><title>Chelonian conservation and biology</title><description>By using 6 years of Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) turtle by-catch data collected from the middle Mississippi River, we investigated smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtle abundance collected from 5 physical habitats: main channel border, wing dikes, tributary, open side channel, and closed side channel. Females comprised 62% and males 38% of the total catch of smooth softshell turtles. For spiny softshell turtles, females comprised 67% and males 33% of the total catch. We observed skewed reproductive age structure and sex ratios among and within both species. Smooth and spiny softshell turtle captures were dominated by reproductive individuals (62% and 87%, respectively). Smooth softshell turtles were most abundant in open side channels and main channel borders, whereas spiny softshell turtles were most abundant in tributaries and closed side channels. Smooth softshell abundance was greatest in deep waters with faster water velocity, whereas spiny softshell abundance was greatest in waters with higher visibility (e.g., Secchi transparency) and slower water velocity.</description><subject>Apalone mutica</subject><subject>Apalone spinifera</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><issn>1071-8443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjk9Lw0AQxfegYP3zHeYkLaRxs0lrUk-hVOohKKY3kbImG7Kyya47uwW_oR_LNIgnD8LAmzfzg_cICSIaRjSJbyJ6G83TJImnjNLlbPHC2GJVlGVe5K8spOH68Y6dkMkvdkbOEd8pTVIaswn5KmSteF9D2WntWih147AVSsE0N1zpXkDnnaz4DEbKyP7zLwiHh2yEHbidt04JBNmDawUMAbU6CuJxjJHwLA_CrmDL36TjDnJEXUnupO4xgCdtvBoNlM76ynkrgjH8oTNqaDJy0GgL62ER9jBeLslpwxWKqx-9INf3m916OzdWf3iBbt9JrIbOvBfa4z7KsmWWsDT-N_gNjI53-Q</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Barko, V A</creator><creator>Briggler, J T</creator><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation</title><author>Barko, V A ; Briggler, J T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_199694283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Apalone mutica</topic><topic>Apalone spinifera</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barko, V A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggler, J T</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Chelonian conservation and biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barko, V A</au><au>Briggler, J T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation</atitle><jtitle>Chelonian conservation and biology</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>225-231</pages><issn>1071-8443</issn><abstract>By using 6 years of Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) turtle by-catch data collected from the middle Mississippi River, we investigated smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtle abundance collected from 5 physical habitats: main channel border, wing dikes, tributary, open side channel, and closed side channel. Females comprised 62% and males 38% of the total catch of smooth softshell turtles. For spiny softshell turtles, females comprised 67% and males 33% of the total catch. We observed skewed reproductive age structure and sex ratios among and within both species. Smooth and spiny softshell turtle captures were dominated by reproductive individuals (62% and 87%, respectively). Smooth softshell turtles were most abundant in open side channels and main channel borders, whereas spiny softshell turtles were most abundant in tributaries and closed side channels. Smooth softshell abundance was greatest in deep waters with faster water velocity, whereas spiny softshell abundance was greatest in waters with higher visibility (e.g., Secchi transparency) and slower water velocity.</abstract><doi>10.1043/1071-8443(2006)5[225:MSSAMA]2.0.CO;2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-8443
ispartof Chelonian conservation and biology, 2006-12, Vol.5 (2), p.225-231
issn 1071-8443
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19969428
source BioOne Complete
subjects Apalone mutica
Apalone spinifera
Freshwater
title Midland Smooth Softshell (Apalone mutica) and Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) Turtles in the Middle Mississippi River: Habitat Associations, Population Structure, and Implications for Conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A41%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midland%20Smooth%20Softshell%20(Apalone%20mutica)%20and%20Spiny%20Softshell%20(Apalone%20spinifera)%20Turtles%20in%20the%20Middle%20Mississippi%20River:%20Habitat%20Associations,%20Population%20Structure,%20and%20Implications%20for%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=Chelonian%20conservation%20and%20biology&rft.au=Barko,%20V%20A&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=225-231&rft.issn=1071-8443&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/1071-8443(2006)5%5B225:MSSAMA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E19969428%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19969428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true