Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia
In light of recent changes to federal regulatory requirements placed on the aquaculture industry, aquaculture operators must act proactively to maximize their production to meet demands, compete with new operations, and maintain compliance with effluent standards. As a result, water quality characte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquacultural engineering 2005-10, Vol.33 (4), p.258-270 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 270 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Aquacultural engineering |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Viadero, Roger C. Cunningham, James H. Semmens, Kenneth J. Tierney, Aislinn E. |
description | In light of recent changes to federal regulatory requirements placed on the aquaculture industry, aquaculture operators must act proactively to maximize their production to meet demands, compete with new operations, and maintain compliance with effluent standards. As a result, water quality characterization was conducted at six anonymous facilities using flow-through design, rearing mostly rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that were selected based on various water sources, operation, size, and effluent treatment.
Average concentrations and mass loadings of regulated parameters were within regulatory limits and increased in direct proportion to the mass of fish reared. However, when comparing effluent pollutant concentrations and loads with West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limitations, the potential for increased production existed at each facility. Based on the current West Virginia NPDES limit of 30mg/L for total suspended solids (TSS), each facility could increase production from 147 to 819%. However, with a more stringent TSS limitation of 5mg/L net used in states in the western US, two facilities would have to reduce production from 37 to 44%, while the other sites could increase production from 19 to 170%. Consequently, the opportunity to increase production under any set of regulatory constraints was a function of annual fish production, legal requirements, and the implementation of effective effluent treatment processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19956268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0144860905000300</els_id><sourcerecordid>14766199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-59aeeccc7de37dbff704c7b1eea96d417640fbc6e5fbd5e99faa9bd2ba8f297f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBuAIUYml5ScgfIFbwjhx7PiEUFU-pEocaOnRmjjjrVfZeGsnIP59HXYljnvy5RnPq3mL4i2HigOXH3cVPi1I07aqAdoK6gpAvCg2vFNN2UouXhYb4EKUnQT9qnid0g6y0E27KR5unBsXmmaG08AOMQyLnX2YmN8f0M6JBcfcGP6U82MMy_aRravsMs5LJBYOFHHVifmJPVCa2S8ft37yeFVcOBwTvTm9l8X9l5u762_l7Y-v368_35ZWtHIuW41E1lo1UKOG3jkFwqqeE6GWg-BKCnC9ldS6fmhJa4eo-6HusXO1Vq65LD4c_83Rn5acwOx9sjSOOFFYkuFat7KW3XmopOS6ac5D8U_qDNsjtDGkFMmZQ_R7jH8NB7MWY3bmVIxZizFQm3z2PPf-tACTxdFFnKxP_4cV1LoTPLt3R-cwGNzGbO5_1sAb4NCAalbx6SgoX_i3p2iS9TRZGnwkO5sh-DNZngEYMLJK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14766199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Viadero, Roger C. ; Cunningham, James H. ; Semmens, Kenneth J. ; Tierney, Aislinn E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Viadero, Roger C. ; Cunningham, James H. ; Semmens, Kenneth J. ; Tierney, Aislinn E.</creatorcontrib><description>In light of recent changes to federal regulatory requirements placed on the aquaculture industry, aquaculture operators must act proactively to maximize their production to meet demands, compete with new operations, and maintain compliance with effluent standards. As a result, water quality characterization was conducted at six anonymous facilities using flow-through design, rearing mostly rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that were selected based on various water sources, operation, size, and effluent treatment.
Average concentrations and mass loadings of regulated parameters were within regulatory limits and increased in direct proportion to the mass of fish reared. However, when comparing effluent pollutant concentrations and loads with West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limitations, the potential for increased production existed at each facility. Based on the current West Virginia NPDES limit of 30mg/L for total suspended solids (TSS), each facility could increase production from 147 to 819%. However, with a more stringent TSS limitation of 5mg/L net used in states in the western US, two facilities would have to reduce production from 37 to 44%, while the other sites could increase production from 19 to 170%. Consequently, the opportunity to increase production under any set of regulatory constraints was a function of annual fish production, legal requirements, and the implementation of effective effluent treatment processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AQEND6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Effluent ; effluents ; fish culture ; fish production ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; laws and regulations ; Oncorhynchus ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; pollution control ; Production ; Regulation ; total suspended solids ; Trout ; water pollution ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Aquacultural engineering, 2005-10, Vol.33 (4), p.258-270</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-59aeeccc7de37dbff704c7b1eea96d417640fbc6e5fbd5e99faa9bd2ba8f297f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-59aeeccc7de37dbff704c7b1eea96d417640fbc6e5fbd5e99faa9bd2ba8f297f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17029841$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viadero, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semmens, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Aislinn E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia</title><title>Aquacultural engineering</title><description>In light of recent changes to federal regulatory requirements placed on the aquaculture industry, aquaculture operators must act proactively to maximize their production to meet demands, compete with new operations, and maintain compliance with effluent standards. As a result, water quality characterization was conducted at six anonymous facilities using flow-through design, rearing mostly rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that were selected based on various water sources, operation, size, and effluent treatment.
Average concentrations and mass loadings of regulated parameters were within regulatory limits and increased in direct proportion to the mass of fish reared. However, when comparing effluent pollutant concentrations and loads with West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limitations, the potential for increased production existed at each facility. Based on the current West Virginia NPDES limit of 30mg/L for total suspended solids (TSS), each facility could increase production from 147 to 819%. However, with a more stringent TSS limitation of 5mg/L net used in states in the western US, two facilities would have to reduce production from 37 to 44%, while the other sites could increase production from 19 to 170%. Consequently, the opportunity to increase production under any set of regulatory constraints was a function of annual fish production, legal requirements, and the implementation of effective effluent treatment processes.</description><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Effluent</subject><subject>effluents</subject><subject>fish culture</subject><subject>fish production</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>laws and regulations</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>total suspended solids</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0144-8609</issn><issn>1873-5614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBuAIUYml5ScgfIFbwjhx7PiEUFU-pEocaOnRmjjjrVfZeGsnIP59HXYljnvy5RnPq3mL4i2HigOXH3cVPi1I07aqAdoK6gpAvCg2vFNN2UouXhYb4EKUnQT9qnid0g6y0E27KR5unBsXmmaG08AOMQyLnX2YmN8f0M6JBcfcGP6U82MMy_aRravsMs5LJBYOFHHVifmJPVCa2S8ft37yeFVcOBwTvTm9l8X9l5u762_l7Y-v368_35ZWtHIuW41E1lo1UKOG3jkFwqqeE6GWg-BKCnC9ldS6fmhJa4eo-6HusXO1Vq65LD4c_83Rn5acwOx9sjSOOFFYkuFat7KW3XmopOS6ac5D8U_qDNsjtDGkFMmZQ_R7jH8NB7MWY3bmVIxZizFQm3z2PPf-tACTxdFFnKxP_4cV1LoTPLt3R-cwGNzGbO5_1sAb4NCAalbx6SgoX_i3p2iS9TRZGnwkO5sh-DNZngEYMLJK</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Viadero, Roger C.</creator><creator>Cunningham, James H.</creator><creator>Semmens, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Tierney, Aislinn E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia</title><author>Viadero, Roger C. ; Cunningham, James H. ; Semmens, Kenneth J. ; Tierney, Aislinn E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-59aeeccc7de37dbff704c7b1eea96d417640fbc6e5fbd5e99faa9bd2ba8f297f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Effluent</topic><topic>effluents</topic><topic>fish culture</topic><topic>fish production</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>laws and regulations</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>total suspended solids</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viadero, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semmens, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Aislinn E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquacultural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viadero, Roger C.</au><au>Cunningham, James H.</au><au>Semmens, Kenneth J.</au><au>Tierney, Aislinn E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia</atitle><jtitle>Aquacultural engineering</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>258-270</pages><issn>0144-8609</issn><eissn>1873-5614</eissn><coden>AQEND6</coden><abstract>In light of recent changes to federal regulatory requirements placed on the aquaculture industry, aquaculture operators must act proactively to maximize their production to meet demands, compete with new operations, and maintain compliance with effluent standards. As a result, water quality characterization was conducted at six anonymous facilities using flow-through design, rearing mostly rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that were selected based on various water sources, operation, size, and effluent treatment.
Average concentrations and mass loadings of regulated parameters were within regulatory limits and increased in direct proportion to the mass of fish reared. However, when comparing effluent pollutant concentrations and loads with West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limitations, the potential for increased production existed at each facility. Based on the current West Virginia NPDES limit of 30mg/L for total suspended solids (TSS), each facility could increase production from 147 to 819%. However, with a more stringent TSS limitation of 5mg/L net used in states in the western US, two facilities would have to reduce production from 37 to 44%, while the other sites could increase production from 19 to 170%. Consequently, the opportunity to increase production under any set of regulatory constraints was a function of annual fish production, legal requirements, and the implementation of effective effluent treatment processes.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8609 |
ispartof | Aquacultural engineering, 2005-10, Vol.33 (4), p.258-270 |
issn | 0144-8609 1873-5614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19956268 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal aquaculture Animal productions Biological and medical sciences Effluent effluents fish culture fish production Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects laws and regulations Oncorhynchus Oncorhynchus mykiss pollution control Production Regulation total suspended solids Trout water pollution Water quality |
title | Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operations in West Virginia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effluent%20and%20production%20impacts%20of%20flow-through%20aquaculture%20operations%20in%20West%20Virginia&rft.jtitle=Aquacultural%20engineering&rft.au=Viadero,%20Roger%20C.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=258-270&rft.issn=0144-8609&rft.eissn=1873-5614&rft.coden=AQEND6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14766199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14766199&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0144860905000300&rfr_iscdi=true |