Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure

The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) er...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2018-03, Vol.121 (6), p.746-750
Hauptverfasser: Eugène, Marc, Urena, Marina, Abtan, Jérémie, Carrasco, José-Luis, Ghodbane, Walid, Nataf, Patrick, Vahanian, Alec, Himbert, Dominique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 750
container_issue 6
container_start_page 746
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 121
creator Eugène, Marc
Urena, Marina
Abtan, Jérémie
Carrasco, José-Luis
Ghodbane, Walid
Nataf, Patrick
Vahanian, Alec
Himbert, Dominique
description The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era. Patients were consecutively included between 2008 and 2016. CS was defined as ≥1 sign of systemic hypoperfusion and need of catecholamines. Refractory pulmonary edema was defined as not controlled by optimal medical treatment. A total of 40 patients, 22 men (55%), aged 79 ± 9 years, were included: 17 with CS (42.5%), 23 with refractory pulmonary edema (57.5%). After PBAV, mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47 ± 16 mm Hg to 32 ± 10 mm Hg (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1994362481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914917319288</els_id><sourcerecordid>2007534567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-55a905a1ea438dc81cdd4d5f0dfaa4c235e14afe22a626c2eb0ab77dd579b61a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhJ4AsceGS4HHiJD6hbdUvqRIV5eNozdoT4SgbL7azUo_8c1ztlgMXTtZIz7zjmaco3gKvgEP7caxwOxoMthIcugqg4k3_rFhB36kSFNTPixXnXJQKGnVSvIpxzCWAbF8WJ0LVqut7sSp-XwwDmeT2NFOMzA_sC0WzELujYJaEM_klsjOcJu9ntvYhOcO-47RfJr-bMKYH5mZ2h8nRnCL74dJPdk97CvQE3yeafXSR4WzZOmcSuyYMiV2im5ZAr4sXA06R3hzf0-Lb5cXX8-vy9vPVzfn6tjS1qlMpJSouEQiburemB2NtY-XA7YDYGFFLggYHEgJb0RpBG46brrNWdmrTAtanxYdD7i74XwvFpLcuGpqmw44alGrqVjQ9ZPT9P-jolzDn32nBeSfrRrZdpuSBMsHHGGjQu-C2GB40cP3oSI_66Eg_OtIAOjvKfe-O6ctmS_Zv15OUDHw6AJTPsXcUdDT5vIasC9mVtt79Z8Qf2VinNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007534567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Eugène, Marc ; Urena, Marina ; Abtan, Jérémie ; Carrasco, José-Luis ; Ghodbane, Walid ; Nataf, Patrick ; Vahanian, Alec ; Himbert, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Eugène, Marc ; Urena, Marina ; Abtan, Jérémie ; Carrasco, José-Luis ; Ghodbane, Walid ; Nataf, Patrick ; Vahanian, Alec ; Himbert, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era. Patients were consecutively included between 2008 and 2016. CS was defined as ≥1 sign of systemic hypoperfusion and need of catecholamines. Refractory pulmonary edema was defined as not controlled by optimal medical treatment. A total of 40 patients, 22 men (55%), aged 79 ± 9 years, were included: 17 with CS (42.5%), 23 with refractory pulmonary edema (57.5%). After PBAV, mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47 ± 16 mm Hg to 32 ± 10 mm Hg (p &lt; 0.001), aortic valve area increased from 0.60 ± 0.18 cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.22 cm2 (p &lt; 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 35 ± 15 to 37 ± 14% (p = 0.02), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 61 ± 15 to 48 ± 12 mm Hg (p = 0.002). There was no procedural death. Early death occurred in 12 patients (30%). After PBAV, 16 of the 28 survivors (57%) were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR; n = 7) or TAVI (n = 9), and 12 (43%) were denied definitive therapy. The 2-year estimated survival rate was 71 ± 17% after SAVR, 36 ± 19% after TAVI, and 8 ± 8% after PBAV alone. In conclusion, rescue PBAV is safe in patients with CS and high-risk aortic stenosis or refractory pulmonary edema and may improve their dismal prognosis when followed by TAVI or SAVR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29397882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aortic stenosis ; Aortic valve ; Balloon treatment ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Catecholamines ; Coronary vessels ; Edema ; Electrocardiography ; Heart ; Heart diseases ; Heart failure ; Heart surgery ; Implantation ; Medical treatment ; Mercury ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Pulmonary arteries ; Pulmonary artery ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Ventilators ; Ventricle</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2018-03, Vol.121 (6), p.746-750</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2017. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-55a905a1ea438dc81cdd4d5f0dfaa4c235e14afe22a626c2eb0ab77dd579b61a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-55a905a1ea438dc81cdd4d5f0dfaa4c235e14afe22a626c2eb0ab77dd579b61a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0336-0058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914917319288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29397882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eugène, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urena, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abtan, Jérémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, José-Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodbane, Walid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nataf, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahanian, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himbert, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era. Patients were consecutively included between 2008 and 2016. CS was defined as ≥1 sign of systemic hypoperfusion and need of catecholamines. Refractory pulmonary edema was defined as not controlled by optimal medical treatment. A total of 40 patients, 22 men (55%), aged 79 ± 9 years, were included: 17 with CS (42.5%), 23 with refractory pulmonary edema (57.5%). After PBAV, mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47 ± 16 mm Hg to 32 ± 10 mm Hg (p &lt; 0.001), aortic valve area increased from 0.60 ± 0.18 cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.22 cm2 (p &lt; 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 35 ± 15 to 37 ± 14% (p = 0.02), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 61 ± 15 to 48 ± 12 mm Hg (p = 0.002). There was no procedural death. Early death occurred in 12 patients (30%). After PBAV, 16 of the 28 survivors (57%) were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR; n = 7) or TAVI (n = 9), and 12 (43%) were denied definitive therapy. The 2-year estimated survival rate was 71 ± 17% after SAVR, 36 ± 19% after TAVI, and 8 ± 8% after PBAV alone. In conclusion, rescue PBAV is safe in patients with CS and high-risk aortic stenosis or refractory pulmonary edema and may improve their dismal prognosis when followed by TAVI or SAVR.</description><subject>Aortic stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic valve</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Catecholamines</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Pulmonary artery</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhJ4AsceGS4HHiJD6hbdUvqRIV5eNozdoT4SgbL7azUo_8c1ztlgMXTtZIz7zjmaco3gKvgEP7caxwOxoMthIcugqg4k3_rFhB36kSFNTPixXnXJQKGnVSvIpxzCWAbF8WJ0LVqut7sSp-XwwDmeT2NFOMzA_sC0WzELujYJaEM_klsjOcJu9ntvYhOcO-47RfJr-bMKYH5mZ2h8nRnCL74dJPdk97CvQE3yeafXSR4WzZOmcSuyYMiV2im5ZAr4sXA06R3hzf0-Lb5cXX8-vy9vPVzfn6tjS1qlMpJSouEQiburemB2NtY-XA7YDYGFFLggYHEgJb0RpBG46brrNWdmrTAtanxYdD7i74XwvFpLcuGpqmw44alGrqVjQ9ZPT9P-jolzDn32nBeSfrRrZdpuSBMsHHGGjQu-C2GB40cP3oSI_66Eg_OtIAOjvKfe-O6ctmS_Zv15OUDHw6AJTPsXcUdDT5vIasC9mVtt79Z8Qf2VinNg</recordid><startdate>20180315</startdate><enddate>20180315</enddate><creator>Eugène, Marc</creator><creator>Urena, Marina</creator><creator>Abtan, Jérémie</creator><creator>Carrasco, José-Luis</creator><creator>Ghodbane, Walid</creator><creator>Nataf, Patrick</creator><creator>Vahanian, Alec</creator><creator>Himbert, Dominique</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-0058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180315</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure</title><author>Eugène, Marc ; Urena, Marina ; Abtan, Jérémie ; Carrasco, José-Luis ; Ghodbane, Walid ; Nataf, Patrick ; Vahanian, Alec ; Himbert, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-55a905a1ea438dc81cdd4d5f0dfaa4c235e14afe22a626c2eb0ab77dd579b61a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aortic stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic valve</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Catecholamines</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Pulmonary artery</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eugène, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urena, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abtan, Jérémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, José-Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodbane, Walid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nataf, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahanian, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himbert, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eugène, Marc</au><au>Urena, Marina</au><au>Abtan, Jérémie</au><au>Carrasco, José-Luis</au><au>Ghodbane, Walid</au><au>Nataf, Patrick</au><au>Vahanian, Alec</au><au>Himbert, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-03-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>746-750</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era. Patients were consecutively included between 2008 and 2016. CS was defined as ≥1 sign of systemic hypoperfusion and need of catecholamines. Refractory pulmonary edema was defined as not controlled by optimal medical treatment. A total of 40 patients, 22 men (55%), aged 79 ± 9 years, were included: 17 with CS (42.5%), 23 with refractory pulmonary edema (57.5%). After PBAV, mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47 ± 16 mm Hg to 32 ± 10 mm Hg (p &lt; 0.001), aortic valve area increased from 0.60 ± 0.18 cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.22 cm2 (p &lt; 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 35 ± 15 to 37 ± 14% (p = 0.02), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 61 ± 15 to 48 ± 12 mm Hg (p = 0.002). There was no procedural death. Early death occurred in 12 patients (30%). After PBAV, 16 of the 28 survivors (57%) were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR; n = 7) or TAVI (n = 9), and 12 (43%) were denied definitive therapy. The 2-year estimated survival rate was 71 ± 17% after SAVR, 36 ± 19% after TAVI, and 8 ± 8% after PBAV alone. In conclusion, rescue PBAV is safe in patients with CS and high-risk aortic stenosis or refractory pulmonary edema and may improve their dismal prognosis when followed by TAVI or SAVR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29397882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.048</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-0058</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2018-03, Vol.121 (6), p.746-750
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1994362481
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aortic stenosis
Aortic valve
Balloon treatment
Blood pressure
Cardiovascular disease
Catecholamines
Coronary vessels
Edema
Electrocardiography
Heart
Heart diseases
Heart failure
Heart surgery
Implantation
Medical treatment
Mercury
Patients
Prognosis
Pulmonary arteries
Pulmonary artery
Stenosis
Surgery
Ventilators
Ventricle
title Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Rescue%20Percutaneous%20Balloon%20Aortic%20Valvuloplasty%20in%20Patients%20With%20Severe%20Aortic%20Stenosis%20and%20Acute%20Heart%20Failure&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Eug%C3%A8ne,%20Marc&rft.date=2018-03-15&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=746-750&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2007534567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007534567&rft_id=info:pmid/29397882&rft_els_id=S0002914917319288&rfr_iscdi=true