Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathology to compare levels of reporting with recently published minimum standards. A systematic review of the clinical literature from August 2002 to August 2017...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2018-04, Vol.34 (4), p.1366-1375
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Iain R., Robinson, Patrick G., West, Christopher C., Goudie, Ewan B., Yong, Li Y., White, Timothy O., LaPrade, Robert F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1375
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1366
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 34
creator Murray, Iain R.
Robinson, Patrick G.
West, Christopher C.
Goudie, Ewan B.
Yong, Li Y.
White, Timothy O.
LaPrade, Robert F.
description To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathology to compare levels of reporting with recently published minimum standards. A systematic review of the clinical literature from August 2002 to August 2017 was performed. Human clinical studies published in English and involving the administration of BMAC for musculoskeletal applications were included. Studies evaluating non-concentrated preparations of bone marrow aspirate or preparations of laboratory cultured cells were excluded. Studies evaluating the treatment of dental or maxillofacial conditions were excluded. Similarly, in vitro studies, editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews were excluded. Levels of reporting were compared with previously published minimum standards agreed on through an international Delphi consensus process. Of 1,580 studies identified on the initial search, 46 satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Considerable deficiencies in reporting of key variables including the details of BMAC preparation and composition were noted. Studies reported information on only 42% (range, 25%-60%) of the variables included within established minimum reporting standards. No study provided adequate information to enable the precise replication of preparation protocols and accurate characterization of the BMAC formulation delivered. We found that all existing clinical studies in the literature evaluating BMAC for orthopaedic or sports medicine applications are limited by inadequate reporting of both preparation protocols and composition. Deficient reporting of the variables that may critically influence outcomes precludes interpretation, prevents other researchers from reproducing experimental conditions, and makes comparisons across studies difficult. We encourage the adoption of emerging minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating the use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics. Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993994842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806317314822</els_id><sourcerecordid>1993994842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dd6ee20fc6942a06f4cc4e0b74335e488185c3ab2442fb230004e5085404ecf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbBr6QJC6RS8ZKKkFpYW64zoa7SuNgOVf8elxaWzGZG1hmP7kHogpKUEppfL1LlwtzZlBE6SClNCc8PUJ9mLE844_QQ9clAlElBct5DJ94vCCGcF_wY9VjJyyxWH80nsLIumPYDT4NqK-Uqj02LR41pjVZNfO0qAx7ff6mmUz_gnW0Bvyjn7BoP_co4FQCPbKuhDdv5Bg_xdOMDLCOv8QS-DKzP0FGtGg_n-36K3h_u30ZPyfj18Xk0HCea5ywkVZUDMFLrvBRMkbwWWgsgs4HgPANRFLTINFczJgSrZ4zHTAIyUmQidl2X_BRd7f5dOfvZgQ9yabyGplEt2M5LWsbspSgEi6jYodpZ7x3UcuXMUrmNpERuHcuF3DmWW8eSUhkdx7XL_YVutoTqb-lXagRudwDEnDG7k14biHoq40AHWVnz_4Vv7V2PtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993994842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Murray, Iain R. ; Robinson, Patrick G. ; West, Christopher C. ; Goudie, Ewan B. ; Yong, Li Y. ; White, Timothy O. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Iain R. ; Robinson, Patrick G. ; West, Christopher C. ; Goudie, Ewan B. ; Yong, Li Y. ; White, Timothy O. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><description>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathology to compare levels of reporting with recently published minimum standards. A systematic review of the clinical literature from August 2002 to August 2017 was performed. Human clinical studies published in English and involving the administration of BMAC for musculoskeletal applications were included. Studies evaluating non-concentrated preparations of bone marrow aspirate or preparations of laboratory cultured cells were excluded. Studies evaluating the treatment of dental or maxillofacial conditions were excluded. Similarly, in vitro studies, editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews were excluded. Levels of reporting were compared with previously published minimum standards agreed on through an international Delphi consensus process. Of 1,580 studies identified on the initial search, 46 satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Considerable deficiencies in reporting of key variables including the details of BMAC preparation and composition were noted. Studies reported information on only 42% (range, 25%-60%) of the variables included within established minimum reporting standards. No study provided adequate information to enable the precise replication of preparation protocols and accurate characterization of the BMAC formulation delivered. We found that all existing clinical studies in the literature evaluating BMAC for orthopaedic or sports medicine applications are limited by inadequate reporting of both preparation protocols and composition. Deficient reporting of the variables that may critically influence outcomes precludes interpretation, prevents other researchers from reproducing experimental conditions, and makes comparisons across studies difficult. We encourage the adoption of emerging minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating the use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics. Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29395555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Clinical Protocols - standards ; Humans ; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy ; Orthopedic Procedures - standards</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2018-04, Vol.34 (4), p.1366-1375</ispartof><rights>2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dd6ee20fc6942a06f4cc4e0b74335e488185c3ab2442fb230004e5085404ecf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dd6ee20fc6942a06f4cc4e0b74335e488185c3ab2442fb230004e5085404ecf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806317314822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Iain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Ewan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong, Li Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><title>Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathology to compare levels of reporting with recently published minimum standards. A systematic review of the clinical literature from August 2002 to August 2017 was performed. Human clinical studies published in English and involving the administration of BMAC for musculoskeletal applications were included. Studies evaluating non-concentrated preparations of bone marrow aspirate or preparations of laboratory cultured cells were excluded. Studies evaluating the treatment of dental or maxillofacial conditions were excluded. Similarly, in vitro studies, editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews were excluded. Levels of reporting were compared with previously published minimum standards agreed on through an international Delphi consensus process. Of 1,580 studies identified on the initial search, 46 satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Considerable deficiencies in reporting of key variables including the details of BMAC preparation and composition were noted. Studies reported information on only 42% (range, 25%-60%) of the variables included within established minimum reporting standards. No study provided adequate information to enable the precise replication of preparation protocols and accurate characterization of the BMAC formulation delivered. We found that all existing clinical studies in the literature evaluating BMAC for orthopaedic or sports medicine applications are limited by inadequate reporting of both preparation protocols and composition. Deficient reporting of the variables that may critically influence outcomes precludes interpretation, prevents other researchers from reproducing experimental conditions, and makes comparisons across studies difficult. We encourage the adoption of emerging minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating the use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics. Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.</description><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - standards</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbBr6QJC6RS8ZKKkFpYW64zoa7SuNgOVf8elxaWzGZG1hmP7kHogpKUEppfL1LlwtzZlBE6SClNCc8PUJ9mLE844_QQ9clAlElBct5DJ94vCCGcF_wY9VjJyyxWH80nsLIumPYDT4NqK-Uqj02LR41pjVZNfO0qAx7ff6mmUz_gnW0Bvyjn7BoP_co4FQCPbKuhDdv5Bg_xdOMDLCOv8QS-DKzP0FGtGg_n-36K3h_u30ZPyfj18Xk0HCea5ywkVZUDMFLrvBRMkbwWWgsgs4HgPANRFLTINFczJgSrZ4zHTAIyUmQidl2X_BRd7f5dOfvZgQ9yabyGplEt2M5LWsbspSgEi6jYodpZ7x3UcuXMUrmNpERuHcuF3DmWW8eSUhkdx7XL_YVutoTqb-lXagRudwDEnDG7k14biHoq40AHWVnz_4Vv7V2PtQ</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Murray, Iain R.</creator><creator>Robinson, Patrick G.</creator><creator>West, Christopher C.</creator><creator>Goudie, Ewan B.</creator><creator>Yong, Li Y.</creator><creator>White, Timothy O.</creator><creator>LaPrade, Robert F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review</title><author>Murray, Iain R. ; Robinson, Patrick G. ; West, Christopher C. ; Goudie, Ewan B. ; Yong, Li Y. ; White, Timothy O. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dd6ee20fc6942a06f4cc4e0b74335e488185c3ab2442fb230004e5085404ecf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bone Marrow Transplantation</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Iain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Ewan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong, Li Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Iain R.</au><au>Robinson, Patrick G.</au><au>West, Christopher C.</au><au>Goudie, Ewan B.</au><au>Yong, Li Y.</au><au>White, Timothy O.</au><au>LaPrade, Robert F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1366</spage><epage>1375</epage><pages>1366-1375</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathology to compare levels of reporting with recently published minimum standards. A systematic review of the clinical literature from August 2002 to August 2017 was performed. Human clinical studies published in English and involving the administration of BMAC for musculoskeletal applications were included. Studies evaluating non-concentrated preparations of bone marrow aspirate or preparations of laboratory cultured cells were excluded. Studies evaluating the treatment of dental or maxillofacial conditions were excluded. Similarly, in vitro studies, editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews were excluded. Levels of reporting were compared with previously published minimum standards agreed on through an international Delphi consensus process. Of 1,580 studies identified on the initial search, 46 satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Considerable deficiencies in reporting of key variables including the details of BMAC preparation and composition were noted. Studies reported information on only 42% (range, 25%-60%) of the variables included within established minimum reporting standards. No study provided adequate information to enable the precise replication of preparation protocols and accurate characterization of the BMAC formulation delivered. We found that all existing clinical studies in the literature evaluating BMAC for orthopaedic or sports medicine applications are limited by inadequate reporting of both preparation protocols and composition. Deficient reporting of the variables that may critically influence outcomes precludes interpretation, prevents other researchers from reproducing experimental conditions, and makes comparisons across studies difficult. We encourage the adoption of emerging minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating the use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics. Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29395555</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.036</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2018-04, Vol.34 (4), p.1366-1375
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993994842
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bone Marrow Transplantation
Clinical Protocols - standards
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy
Orthopedic Procedures - standards
title Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies Evaluating Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reporting%20Standards%20in%20Clinical%20Studies%20Evaluating%20Bone%20Marrow%20Aspirate%20Concentrate:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Murray,%20Iain%20R.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1366&rft.epage=1375&rft.pages=1366-1375&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993994842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993994842&rft_id=info:pmid/29395555&rft_els_id=S0749806317314822&rfr_iscdi=true