Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements
The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 644.e30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Jones, W. Schuyler Krucoff, Mitchell W. Morales, Pablo Wilgus, Rebecca W. Heath, Anne H. Williams, Mary F. Tcheng, James E. Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica Malone, Misti L. Reed, Terrie L. Fukaya, Rie Lookstein, Robert A. Handa, Nobuhiro Aronow, Herbert D. Bertges, Daniel J. Jaff, Michael R. Tsai, Thomas T. Smale, Joshua A. Zaugg, Margo J. Thatcher, Robert J. Cronenwett, Jack L. |
description | The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible.
Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI.
The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI.
Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993992106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521417321298</els_id><sourcerecordid>1993992106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDfSy3nRmqRt0ujVmF-DgSJ6HdL0VDO6duZ0A3-E_9mOzcluvAonPO8D57yEnDMaMcrE1SyarTDilMmIyogl7ID0GVUyFBlVh6RPZcLClLOkR04QZ5QylmbymPS4ijOVcNEn3y_w7rD1X8EIERDnULdBUwbP4N3iA7ypgkndgl91_66pu_EWVs4CBsOX0fPk9vI62BnMnmHxZ3D7hmJrsI2HoDCtCaCCdQxPyVFpKoSz7Tsgb_d3r-PHcPr0MBmPpqGNlWhDy0Wec5VRyxOalzaVAHmcUxkzq4w0IjeiMAVkhVGytLQsY0itKA0XaaZkFg_IcONd-OZzCdjquUMLVWVqaJaomVKxUpxR0aFsg1rfIHoo9cK7ufFfmlG9bkHPdNeCXregqdRdC13mYqtf5nModonfs3fAzQaAbsmVA6_ROqgtFM6DbXXRuH_0PxO-nCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993992106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><description>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible.
Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI.
The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI.
Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29389426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for Vascular Surgery and the Japanese Circulation Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29389426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcheng, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Misti L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Terrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookstein, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronow, Herbert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertges, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaff, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Margo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible.
Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI.
The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI.
Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</description><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDfSy3nRmqRt0ujVmF-DgSJ6HdL0VDO6duZ0A3-E_9mOzcluvAonPO8D57yEnDMaMcrE1SyarTDilMmIyogl7ID0GVUyFBlVh6RPZcLClLOkR04QZ5QylmbymPS4ijOVcNEn3y_w7rD1X8EIERDnULdBUwbP4N3iA7ypgkndgl91_66pu_EWVs4CBsOX0fPk9vI62BnMnmHxZ3D7hmJrsI2HoDCtCaCCdQxPyVFpKoSz7Tsgb_d3r-PHcPr0MBmPpqGNlWhDy0Wec5VRyxOalzaVAHmcUxkzq4w0IjeiMAVkhVGytLQsY0itKA0XaaZkFg_IcONd-OZzCdjquUMLVWVqaJaomVKxUpxR0aFsg1rfIHoo9cK7ufFfmlG9bkHPdNeCXregqdRdC13mYqtf5nModonfs3fAzQaAbsmVA6_ROqgtFM6DbXXRuH_0PxO-nCI</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Jones, W. Schuyler</creator><creator>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creator><creator>Morales, Pablo</creator><creator>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creator><creator>Heath, Anne H.</creator><creator>Williams, Mary F.</creator><creator>Tcheng, James E.</creator><creator>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creator><creator>Malone, Misti L.</creator><creator>Reed, Terrie L.</creator><creator>Fukaya, Rie</creator><creator>Lookstein, Robert A.</creator><creator>Handa, Nobuhiro</creator><creator>Aronow, Herbert D.</creator><creator>Bertges, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Jaff, Michael R.</creator><creator>Tsai, Thomas T.</creator><creator>Smale, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Zaugg, Margo J.</creator><creator>Thatcher, Robert J.</creator><creator>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><author>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcheng, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Misti L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Terrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookstein, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronow, Herbert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertges, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaff, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Margo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, W. Schuyler</au><au>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</au><au>Morales, Pablo</au><au>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</au><au>Heath, Anne H.</au><au>Williams, Mary F.</au><au>Tcheng, James E.</au><au>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</au><au>Malone, Misti L.</au><au>Reed, Terrie L.</au><au>Fukaya, Rie</au><au>Lookstein, Robert A.</au><au>Handa, Nobuhiro</au><au>Aronow, Herbert D.</au><au>Bertges, Daniel J.</au><au>Jaff, Michael R.</au><au>Tsai, Thomas T.</au><au>Smale, Joshua A.</au><au>Zaugg, Margo J.</au><au>Thatcher, Robert J.</au><au>Cronenwett, Jack L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>644.e30</epage><pages>637-644.e30</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible.
Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI.
The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI.
Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29389426</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993992106 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Registry%20Assessment%20of%20Peripheral%20Interventional%20Devices%20(RAPID):%20Registry%20assessment%20of%20peripheral%20interventional%20devices%20core%20data%20elements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Jones,%20W.%20Schuyler&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=644.e30&rft.pages=637-644.e30&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993992106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993992106&rft_id=info:pmid/29389426&rft_els_id=S0741521417321298&rfr_iscdi=true |