Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements

The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30
Hauptverfasser: Jones, W. Schuyler, Krucoff, Mitchell W., Morales, Pablo, Wilgus, Rebecca W., Heath, Anne H., Williams, Mary F., Tcheng, James E., Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica, Malone, Misti L., Reed, Terrie L., Fukaya, Rie, Lookstein, Robert A., Handa, Nobuhiro, Aronow, Herbert D., Bertges, Daniel J., Jaff, Michael R., Tsai, Thomas T., Smale, Joshua A., Zaugg, Margo J., Thatcher, Robert J., Cronenwett, Jack L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 644.e30
container_issue 2
container_start_page 637
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 67
creator Jones, W. Schuyler
Krucoff, Mitchell W.
Morales, Pablo
Wilgus, Rebecca W.
Heath, Anne H.
Williams, Mary F.
Tcheng, James E.
Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica
Malone, Misti L.
Reed, Terrie L.
Fukaya, Rie
Lookstein, Robert A.
Handa, Nobuhiro
Aronow, Herbert D.
Bertges, Daniel J.
Jaff, Michael R.
Tsai, Thomas T.
Smale, Joshua A.
Zaugg, Margo J.
Thatcher, Robert J.
Cronenwett, Jack L.
description The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993992106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521417321298</els_id><sourcerecordid>1993992106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDfSy3nRmqRt0ujVmF-DgSJ6HdL0VDO6duZ0A3-E_9mOzcluvAonPO8D57yEnDMaMcrE1SyarTDilMmIyogl7ID0GVUyFBlVh6RPZcLClLOkR04QZ5QylmbymPS4ijOVcNEn3y_w7rD1X8EIERDnULdBUwbP4N3iA7ypgkndgl91_66pu_EWVs4CBsOX0fPk9vI62BnMnmHxZ3D7hmJrsI2HoDCtCaCCdQxPyVFpKoSz7Tsgb_d3r-PHcPr0MBmPpqGNlWhDy0Wec5VRyxOalzaVAHmcUxkzq4w0IjeiMAVkhVGytLQsY0itKA0XaaZkFg_IcONd-OZzCdjquUMLVWVqaJaomVKxUpxR0aFsg1rfIHoo9cK7ufFfmlG9bkHPdNeCXregqdRdC13mYqtf5nModonfs3fAzQaAbsmVA6_ROqgtFM6DbXXRuH_0PxO-nCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993992106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><description>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29389426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for Vascular Surgery and the Japanese Circulation Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29389426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcheng, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Misti L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Terrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookstein, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronow, Herbert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertges, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaff, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Margo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</description><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDfSy3nRmqRt0ujVmF-DgSJ6HdL0VDO6duZ0A3-E_9mOzcluvAonPO8D57yEnDMaMcrE1SyarTDilMmIyogl7ID0GVUyFBlVh6RPZcLClLOkR04QZ5QylmbymPS4ijOVcNEn3y_w7rD1X8EIERDnULdBUwbP4N3iA7ypgkndgl91_66pu_EWVs4CBsOX0fPk9vI62BnMnmHxZ3D7hmJrsI2HoDCtCaCCdQxPyVFpKoSz7Tsgb_d3r-PHcPr0MBmPpqGNlWhDy0Wec5VRyxOalzaVAHmcUxkzq4w0IjeiMAVkhVGytLQsY0itKA0XaaZkFg_IcONd-OZzCdjquUMLVWVqaJaomVKxUpxR0aFsg1rfIHoo9cK7ufFfmlG9bkHPdNeCXregqdRdC13mYqtf5nModonfs3fAzQaAbsmVA6_ROqgtFM6DbXXRuH_0PxO-nCI</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Jones, W. Schuyler</creator><creator>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creator><creator>Morales, Pablo</creator><creator>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creator><creator>Heath, Anne H.</creator><creator>Williams, Mary F.</creator><creator>Tcheng, James E.</creator><creator>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creator><creator>Malone, Misti L.</creator><creator>Reed, Terrie L.</creator><creator>Fukaya, Rie</creator><creator>Lookstein, Robert A.</creator><creator>Handa, Nobuhiro</creator><creator>Aronow, Herbert D.</creator><creator>Bertges, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Jaff, Michael R.</creator><creator>Tsai, Thomas T.</creator><creator>Smale, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Zaugg, Margo J.</creator><creator>Thatcher, Robert J.</creator><creator>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</title><author>Jones, W. Schuyler ; Krucoff, Mitchell W. ; Morales, Pablo ; Wilgus, Rebecca W. ; Heath, Anne H. ; Williams, Mary F. ; Tcheng, James E. ; Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica ; Malone, Misti L. ; Reed, Terrie L. ; Fukaya, Rie ; Lookstein, Robert A. ; Handa, Nobuhiro ; Aronow, Herbert D. ; Bertges, Daniel J. ; Jaff, Michael R. ; Tsai, Thomas T. ; Smale, Joshua A. ; Zaugg, Margo J. ; Thatcher, Robert J. ; Cronenwett, Jack L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c26bb2980c240bfc57eeb3b0731c9a7a6ba6dade8da97fc0ff3e5c6fa26589783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. Schuyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcheng, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Misti L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Terrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookstein, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronow, Herbert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertges, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaff, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Margo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, W. Schuyler</au><au>Krucoff, Mitchell W.</au><au>Morales, Pablo</au><au>Wilgus, Rebecca W.</au><au>Heath, Anne H.</au><au>Williams, Mary F.</au><au>Tcheng, James E.</au><au>Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica</au><au>Malone, Misti L.</au><au>Reed, Terrie L.</au><au>Fukaya, Rie</au><au>Lookstein, Robert A.</au><au>Handa, Nobuhiro</au><au>Aronow, Herbert D.</au><au>Bertges, Daniel J.</au><au>Jaff, Michael R.</au><au>Tsai, Thomas T.</au><au>Smale, Joshua A.</au><au>Zaugg, Margo J.</au><au>Thatcher, Robert J.</au><au>Cronenwett, Jack L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>644.e30</epage><pages>637-644.e30</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29389426</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2018-02, Vol.67 (2), p.637-644.e30
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993992106
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Registry%20Assessment%20of%20Peripheral%20Interventional%20Devices%20(RAPID):%20Registry%20assessment%20of%20peripheral%20interventional%20devices%20core%20data%20elements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Jones,%20W.%20Schuyler&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=644.e30&rft.pages=637-644.e30&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993992106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993992106&rft_id=info:pmid/29389426&rft_els_id=S0741521417321298&rfr_iscdi=true