The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland

The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH 4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH 4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable energy 2005-11, Vol.30 (14), p.2111-2127
Hauptverfasser: Murphy, J.D., McCarthy, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2127
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2111
container_title Renewable energy
container_volume 30
creator Murphy, J.D.
McCarthy, K.
description The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH 4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH 4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspectives. Biogas may be produced at a centralised anaerobic digestion (CAD) facility, accepting agricultural slurries plus a portion (typically 20%) of municipal waste such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Alternatively, OFMSW may be the sole feedstock utilised in the dry anaerobic combustion (DRANCO) process. Importation of green electricity to satisfy parasitic electrical demand and the burning of biogas to satisfy thermal demand was found to be more advantageous than using biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant to cover parasitic electrical and thermal demand. The DRANCO process produced more fuel than the CAD process due to the lower thermal demand of the digester. The economics of the DRANCO process were superior to the CAD process due to the greater gate fee (it is assumed that no gate fee is obtained from agricultural slurry) and the greater quantity of biogas available for sale. The DRANCO process leads to greater greenhouse-gas savings than the CAD process due to the displacement of more OFMSW from landfill and more petrol from transport. The options when applied to Ireland could lead to a substitution of 1% of petrol and diesel and to a 12% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from the transport sector.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.renene.2005.02.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19938354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096014810500042X</els_id><sourcerecordid>19938354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2cf2c58913723d05a550e6ecac2ee423e8be2841e7267f65140ae4894c171d213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcPAFbgnrRxLngoQqKJUqcSlny3U24CqNg50g8fe4aiVuaA-7h5nZmSHklkHOgJUPuzxgnybnAEUOPAeQZ2TGVFVnUCp-TmZQl5AxqdgluYpxB8AKVckZWW4-kfphdHvT0SH4ZrKj8z31Ld06_2EibX2gU0SaTkPHYPo4-DDSdsKOup6uAnamb67JRWu6iDenPSfvL8-bxWu2fluuFk_rzEohxozblttC1UxUXDRQmKIALNEayxElF6i2yJVkWPGyasuCSTAoVS0tq1jDmZiT-6Nu8vo1YRz13kWLXfKAfoqa1bVQopAJKI9AG3yMAVs9hBQy_GgG-tCa3ulja_rQmgauU2uJdnfSN9Gark15rYt_3ApEDQIS7vGIwxT222HQ0TrsLTYuoB11493_j34BY-WDbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19938354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Murphy, J.D. ; McCarthy, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murphy, J.D. ; McCarthy, K.</creatorcontrib><description>The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH 4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH 4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspectives. Biogas may be produced at a centralised anaerobic digestion (CAD) facility, accepting agricultural slurries plus a portion (typically 20%) of municipal waste such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Alternatively, OFMSW may be the sole feedstock utilised in the dry anaerobic combustion (DRANCO) process. Importation of green electricity to satisfy parasitic electrical demand and the burning of biogas to satisfy thermal demand was found to be more advantageous than using biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant to cover parasitic electrical and thermal demand. The DRANCO process produced more fuel than the CAD process due to the lower thermal demand of the digester. The economics of the DRANCO process were superior to the CAD process due to the greater gate fee (it is assumed that no gate fee is obtained from agricultural slurry) and the greater quantity of biogas available for sale. The DRANCO process leads to greater greenhouse-gas savings than the CAD process due to the displacement of more OFMSW from landfill and more petrol from transport. The options when applied to Ireland could lead to a substitution of 1% of petrol and diesel and to a 12% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from the transport sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.02.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biofuels ; CH4-enriched biogas ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Greenhouse-gas ; Natural energy ; OFMSW</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2005-11, Vol.30 (14), p.2111-2127</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2cf2c58913723d05a550e6ecac2ee423e8be2841e7267f65140ae4894c171d213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2cf2c58913723d05a550e6ecac2ee423e8be2841e7267f65140ae4894c171d213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014810500042X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17039030$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murphy, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, K.</creatorcontrib><title>The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH 4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH 4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspectives. Biogas may be produced at a centralised anaerobic digestion (CAD) facility, accepting agricultural slurries plus a portion (typically 20%) of municipal waste such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Alternatively, OFMSW may be the sole feedstock utilised in the dry anaerobic combustion (DRANCO) process. Importation of green electricity to satisfy parasitic electrical demand and the burning of biogas to satisfy thermal demand was found to be more advantageous than using biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant to cover parasitic electrical and thermal demand. The DRANCO process produced more fuel than the CAD process due to the lower thermal demand of the digester. The economics of the DRANCO process were superior to the CAD process due to the greater gate fee (it is assumed that no gate fee is obtained from agricultural slurry) and the greater quantity of biogas available for sale. The DRANCO process leads to greater greenhouse-gas savings than the CAD process due to the displacement of more OFMSW from landfill and more petrol from transport. The options when applied to Ireland could lead to a substitution of 1% of petrol and diesel and to a 12% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from the transport sector.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>CH4-enriched biogas</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Greenhouse-gas</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>OFMSW</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcPAFbgnrRxLngoQqKJUqcSlny3U24CqNg50g8fe4aiVuaA-7h5nZmSHklkHOgJUPuzxgnybnAEUOPAeQZ2TGVFVnUCp-TmZQl5AxqdgluYpxB8AKVckZWW4-kfphdHvT0SH4ZrKj8z31Ld06_2EibX2gU0SaTkPHYPo4-DDSdsKOup6uAnamb67JRWu6iDenPSfvL8-bxWu2fluuFk_rzEohxozblttC1UxUXDRQmKIALNEayxElF6i2yJVkWPGyasuCSTAoVS0tq1jDmZiT-6Nu8vo1YRz13kWLXfKAfoqa1bVQopAJKI9AG3yMAVs9hBQy_GgG-tCa3ulja_rQmgauU2uJdnfSN9Gark15rYt_3ApEDQIS7vGIwxT222HQ0TrsLTYuoB11493_j34BY-WDbg</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Murphy, J.D.</creator><creator>McCarthy, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland</title><author>Murphy, J.D. ; McCarthy, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2cf2c58913723d05a550e6ecac2ee423e8be2841e7267f65140ae4894c171d213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>CH4-enriched biogas</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Greenhouse-gas</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>OFMSW</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murphy, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murphy, J.D.</au><au>McCarthy, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2111</spage><epage>2127</epage><pages>2111-2127</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH 4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH 4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspectives. Biogas may be produced at a centralised anaerobic digestion (CAD) facility, accepting agricultural slurries plus a portion (typically 20%) of municipal waste such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Alternatively, OFMSW may be the sole feedstock utilised in the dry anaerobic combustion (DRANCO) process. Importation of green electricity to satisfy parasitic electrical demand and the burning of biogas to satisfy thermal demand was found to be more advantageous than using biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant to cover parasitic electrical and thermal demand. The DRANCO process produced more fuel than the CAD process due to the lower thermal demand of the digester. The economics of the DRANCO process were superior to the CAD process due to the greater gate fee (it is assumed that no gate fee is obtained from agricultural slurry) and the greater quantity of biogas available for sale. The DRANCO process leads to greater greenhouse-gas savings than the CAD process due to the displacement of more OFMSW from landfill and more petrol from transport. The options when applied to Ireland could lead to a substitution of 1% of petrol and diesel and to a 12% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from the transport sector.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2005.02.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1481
ispartof Renewable energy, 2005-11, Vol.30 (14), p.2111-2127
issn 0960-1481
1879-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19938354
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Biofuels
CH4-enriched biogas
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Greenhouse-gas
Natural energy
OFMSW
title The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20optimal%20production%20of%20biogas%20for%20use%20as%20a%20transport%20fuel%20in%20Ireland&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Murphy,%20J.D.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2111&rft.epage=2127&rft.pages=2111-2127&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2005.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19938354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19938354&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S096014810500042X&rfr_iscdi=true