The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?

Marine reserves are quickly gaining popularity as a management option for marine conservation, fisheries, and other human uses of the oceans. Despite the popularity of marine reserves as a management tool, few reserves appear to have been created or designed with an understanding of how reserves aff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2003-02, Vol.13 (1), p.S117-S137
1. Verfasser: Halpern, Benjamin S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S137
container_issue 1
container_start_page S117
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 13
creator Halpern, Benjamin S.
description Marine reserves are quickly gaining popularity as a management option for marine conservation, fisheries, and other human uses of the oceans. Despite the popularity of marine reserves as a management tool, few reserves appear to have been created or designed with an understanding of how reserves affect biological factors or how reserves can be designed to meet biological goals more effectively (e.g., attaining sustainable fish populations). This shortcoming occurs in part because the many studies that have examined the impacts of reserves on marine organisms remain isolated examples or anecdotes; the results of these many studies have not yet been synthesized. Here, I review the empirical work and discuss the theoretical literature to assess the impacts of marine reserves on several biological measures (density, biomass, size of organisms, and diversity), paying particular attention to the role reserve size has in determining those impacts. The results of 89 separate studies show that, on average, with the exception of invertebrate biomass and size, values for all four biological measures are significantly higher inside reserves compared to outside (or after reserve establishment vs. before) when evaluated for both the overall communities and by each functional group within these communities (carnivorous fishes, herbivorous fishes, planktivorous fishes/invertebrate eaters, and invertebrates). Surprisingly, results also show that the relative impacts of reserves, such as the proportional differences in density or biomass, are independent of reserve size, suggesting that the effects of marine reserves increase directly rather than proportionally with the size of a reserve. However, equal relative differences in biological measures between small and large reserves nearly always translate into greater absolute differences for larger reserves, and so larger reserves may be necessary to meet the goals set for marine reserves. The quality of the data in the reviewed studies varied greatly. To improve data quality in the future, whenever possible, studies should take measurements before and after the creation of a reserve, replicate sampling, and include a suite of representative species. Despite the variable quality of the data, the results from this review suggest that nearly any marine habitat can benefit from the implementation of a reserve. Success of a marine reserve, however, will always be judged against the expectations for that reserve, and so we must ke
doi_str_mv 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:tiomrd]2.0.co;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19932275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3100002</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3100002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5527-9ab94f578f1cdd3c6ee1017f8fed0cf589adf60b516b35a201719aad9a16494e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkUtOwzAQQCMEEuVzAxZZIVikeOw6iWGBUCmlUquitogFQpabjEWgqYsdQOX0OKRwALwZz-8t3gTBGZA2pIL4yCEiSQwnlBB2SoA9EoDkvCpMafMn2ibtzFzQraAFgomI85Ru-__v1m6w59wL8Y9S2gpGs2cMB-VKZVVodDhStlhiOEGH9gPdeXht_pLwwdjXUC1zX_TZphxOiy_0e1WF9vIg2NFq4fBwE_eD-5verHsbDcf9QfdqGGWc0yQSai46miephizPWRYjAoFEpxpzkmmeCpXrmMw5xHPGFfU9EErlQkHcER1k-8Fxw11Z8_aOrpJl4TJcLNQSzbuTIASjNOF-sN8MZtY4Z1HLlS1KZdcSiKx1ylqMrMXIWqf0OmWtU84G49HkWlJJZHcsqSfNGtJnscD1fzGyd3VXDwCb3oHve-xRg31xlbF_WAY_F2LftEyNGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19932275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Halpern, Benjamin S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Benjamin S.</creatorcontrib><description>Marine reserves are quickly gaining popularity as a management option for marine conservation, fisheries, and other human uses of the oceans. Despite the popularity of marine reserves as a management tool, few reserves appear to have been created or designed with an understanding of how reserves affect biological factors or how reserves can be designed to meet biological goals more effectively (e.g., attaining sustainable fish populations). This shortcoming occurs in part because the many studies that have examined the impacts of reserves on marine organisms remain isolated examples or anecdotes; the results of these many studies have not yet been synthesized. Here, I review the empirical work and discuss the theoretical literature to assess the impacts of marine reserves on several biological measures (density, biomass, size of organisms, and diversity), paying particular attention to the role reserve size has in determining those impacts. The results of 89 separate studies show that, on average, with the exception of invertebrate biomass and size, values for all four biological measures are significantly higher inside reserves compared to outside (or after reserve establishment vs. before) when evaluated for both the overall communities and by each functional group within these communities (carnivorous fishes, herbivorous fishes, planktivorous fishes/invertebrate eaters, and invertebrates). Surprisingly, results also show that the relative impacts of reserves, such as the proportional differences in density or biomass, are independent of reserve size, suggesting that the effects of marine reserves increase directly rather than proportionally with the size of a reserve. However, equal relative differences in biological measures between small and large reserves nearly always translate into greater absolute differences for larger reserves, and so larger reserves may be necessary to meet the goals set for marine reserves. The quality of the data in the reviewed studies varied greatly. To improve data quality in the future, whenever possible, studies should take measurements before and after the creation of a reserve, replicate sampling, and include a suite of representative species. Despite the variable quality of the data, the results from this review suggest that nearly any marine habitat can benefit from the implementation of a reserve. Success of a marine reserve, however, will always be judged against the expectations for that reserve, and so we must keep in mind the goals of a reserve in its design, management, and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:tiomrd]2.0.co;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Coral reefs ; Density ; Fisheries management ; Functional groups ; Invertebrates ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Marine fishes ; marine reserves ; Ocean fisheries ; reserve design ; reserve effect ; reserve size ; Species ; trophic cascades</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2003-02, Vol.13 (1), p.S117-S137</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2003 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5527-9ab94f578f1cdd3c6ee1017f8fed0cf589adf60b516b35a201719aad9a16494e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3100002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3100002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Benjamin S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>Marine reserves are quickly gaining popularity as a management option for marine conservation, fisheries, and other human uses of the oceans. Despite the popularity of marine reserves as a management tool, few reserves appear to have been created or designed with an understanding of how reserves affect biological factors or how reserves can be designed to meet biological goals more effectively (e.g., attaining sustainable fish populations). This shortcoming occurs in part because the many studies that have examined the impacts of reserves on marine organisms remain isolated examples or anecdotes; the results of these many studies have not yet been synthesized. Here, I review the empirical work and discuss the theoretical literature to assess the impacts of marine reserves on several biological measures (density, biomass, size of organisms, and diversity), paying particular attention to the role reserve size has in determining those impacts. The results of 89 separate studies show that, on average, with the exception of invertebrate biomass and size, values for all four biological measures are significantly higher inside reserves compared to outside (or after reserve establishment vs. before) when evaluated for both the overall communities and by each functional group within these communities (carnivorous fishes, herbivorous fishes, planktivorous fishes/invertebrate eaters, and invertebrates). Surprisingly, results also show that the relative impacts of reserves, such as the proportional differences in density or biomass, are independent of reserve size, suggesting that the effects of marine reserves increase directly rather than proportionally with the size of a reserve. However, equal relative differences in biological measures between small and large reserves nearly always translate into greater absolute differences for larger reserves, and so larger reserves may be necessary to meet the goals set for marine reserves. The quality of the data in the reviewed studies varied greatly. To improve data quality in the future, whenever possible, studies should take measurements before and after the creation of a reserve, replicate sampling, and include a suite of representative species. Despite the variable quality of the data, the results from this review suggest that nearly any marine habitat can benefit from the implementation of a reserve. Success of a marine reserve, however, will always be judged against the expectations for that reserve, and so we must keep in mind the goals of a reserve in its design, management, and evaluation.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>marine reserves</subject><subject>Ocean fisheries</subject><subject>reserve design</subject><subject>reserve effect</subject><subject>reserve size</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>trophic cascades</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkUtOwzAQQCMEEuVzAxZZIVikeOw6iWGBUCmlUquitogFQpabjEWgqYsdQOX0OKRwALwZz-8t3gTBGZA2pIL4yCEiSQwnlBB2SoA9EoDkvCpMafMn2ibtzFzQraAFgomI85Ru-__v1m6w59wL8Y9S2gpGs2cMB-VKZVVodDhStlhiOEGH9gPdeXht_pLwwdjXUC1zX_TZphxOiy_0e1WF9vIg2NFq4fBwE_eD-5verHsbDcf9QfdqGGWc0yQSai46miephizPWRYjAoFEpxpzkmmeCpXrmMw5xHPGFfU9EErlQkHcER1k-8Fxw11Z8_aOrpJl4TJcLNQSzbuTIASjNOF-sN8MZtY4Z1HLlS1KZdcSiKx1ylqMrMXIWqf0OmWtU84G49HkWlJJZHcsqSfNGtJnscD1fzGyd3VXDwCb3oHve-xRg31xlbF_WAY_F2LftEyNGA</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Halpern, Benjamin S.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?</title><author>Halpern, Benjamin S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5527-9ab94f578f1cdd3c6ee1017f8fed0cf589adf60b516b35a201719aad9a16494e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>marine reserves</topic><topic>Ocean fisheries</topic><topic>reserve design</topic><topic>reserve effect</topic><topic>reserve size</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>trophic cascades</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Benjamin S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population &amp; Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halpern, Benjamin S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>S117</spage><epage>S137</epage><pages>S117-S137</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Marine reserves are quickly gaining popularity as a management option for marine conservation, fisheries, and other human uses of the oceans. Despite the popularity of marine reserves as a management tool, few reserves appear to have been created or designed with an understanding of how reserves affect biological factors or how reserves can be designed to meet biological goals more effectively (e.g., attaining sustainable fish populations). This shortcoming occurs in part because the many studies that have examined the impacts of reserves on marine organisms remain isolated examples or anecdotes; the results of these many studies have not yet been synthesized. Here, I review the empirical work and discuss the theoretical literature to assess the impacts of marine reserves on several biological measures (density, biomass, size of organisms, and diversity), paying particular attention to the role reserve size has in determining those impacts. The results of 89 separate studies show that, on average, with the exception of invertebrate biomass and size, values for all four biological measures are significantly higher inside reserves compared to outside (or after reserve establishment vs. before) when evaluated for both the overall communities and by each functional group within these communities (carnivorous fishes, herbivorous fishes, planktivorous fishes/invertebrate eaters, and invertebrates). Surprisingly, results also show that the relative impacts of reserves, such as the proportional differences in density or biomass, are independent of reserve size, suggesting that the effects of marine reserves increase directly rather than proportionally with the size of a reserve. However, equal relative differences in biological measures between small and large reserves nearly always translate into greater absolute differences for larger reserves, and so larger reserves may be necessary to meet the goals set for marine reserves. The quality of the data in the reviewed studies varied greatly. To improve data quality in the future, whenever possible, studies should take measurements before and after the creation of a reserve, replicate sampling, and include a suite of representative species. Despite the variable quality of the data, the results from this review suggest that nearly any marine habitat can benefit from the implementation of a reserve. Success of a marine reserve, however, will always be judged against the expectations for that reserve, and so we must keep in mind the goals of a reserve in its design, management, and evaluation.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:tiomrd]2.0.co;2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2003-02, Vol.13 (1), p.S117-S137
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19932275
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Journals
subjects Biomass
Coral reefs
Density
Fisheries management
Functional groups
Invertebrates
Marine
Marine ecology
Marine fishes
marine reserves
Ocean fisheries
reserve design
reserve effect
reserve size
Species
trophic cascades
title The Impact of Marine Reserves: Do Reserves Work and Does Reserve Size Matter?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T16%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Marine%20Reserves:%20Do%20Reserves%20Work%20and%20Does%20Reserve%20Size%20Matter?&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Halpern,%20Benjamin%20S.&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=S117&rft.epage=S137&rft.pages=S117-S137&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013%5B0117:tiomrd%5D2.0.co;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3100002%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19932275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3100002&rfr_iscdi=true